論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
市場進入競爭與內生性平行輸入政策選擇 Market-Entry Competition and Endogenous Policy Choice Relevant to Parallel Imports |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
64 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2013-07-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2013-07-24 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
貿易政策、品質偏好、雙佔、垂直差異、平行輸入 Trade Policy, Qualitative Preference, Duopoly, Vertical Differentiation, Parallel Imports |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5927 次,被下載 917 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5927 times, has been downloaded 917 times. |
中文摘要 |
在雙佔廠商生產垂直差異產品的南北貿易模型中,我們分析平行輸入政策對廠商價格競爭的影響,並探討國家間平行輸入政策的互動關係。本文的分析得到:(1)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度小時,北國政府一定會允許平行輸入,南國政府對於平行輸入的態度則是無關緊要,其市場均衡結果對於北國政府而言是最佳的結果。(2)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度中等時,兩國政府必定採取同樣的平行輸入政策,兩國可能同時允許或禁止平行輸入,並且產生兩個市場均衡結果,其中北國偏好兩國同時允許平行輸入,而南國則是偏好兩國同時禁止平行輸入。(3)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度大時,兩國政府同時採取禁止平行輸入的政策,其市場均衡結果對於南國政府而言是最佳的結果。 |
Abstract |
Based on the vertically differentiated duopoly in a North-South trade model we analyze the impact of parallel imports on price competition and the interaction of national parallel policies. We conclude that (1) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is sufficiently small, the North will permit parallel imports and the South`s attitude toward parallel policy is irrelevant which leads to the North`s most preferred outcome. (2) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is relatively intermediate, the North and the South will both permit or prohibit parallel imports. The former is preferred by the North and the latter is preferred by the South. (3) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is sufficiently large, the North and the South will both prohibit parallel imports which is the South`s most preferred outcome. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目 錄 論文審定書………………………………………………………………………………i 謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………...ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iv 第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………………….1 第二章 基本模型………………………………………………………………….........6 第三章 市場競爭均衡………………………………………………………………….8 第四章 兩個國家都不實施平行輸入政策下的市場均衡…………………………...17 第五章 至少有一個國家實施平行輸入政策時的市場均衡………………………...21 第一節 北方國家實施平行輸入政策,南方國家不實施平行輸入政策……….21 第二節 北方國家不實施平行輸入政策,南方國家實施平行輸入政策……….25 第三節 北方國家實施平行輸入政策,南方國家實施平行輸入政策………….27 第六章 廠商研究與消費者剩餘……………………………………………………...31 第一節 廠商研究………………………………………………………………...31 第二節 消費者剩餘……………………………………………………………...32 第七章 社會福利極大化下的最適平行輸入政策…………………………………...38 第一節 當λ= 1…………………………………………………………………..38 第二節 當λ= 0…………………………………………………………………..43 第三節 當λ= 1/2………………………………………………………………..43 第八章 模型探討……………………………………………………………………...49 第九章 結論…………………………………………………………………………...50 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….................53 附錄……………………………………………………………………….....................55 |
參考文獻 References |
參考文獻 Andaluz, J. (2000), “On protection and vertical product differentiation”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 77-97. Biadgleng, E.T. (2009), “TRIPS post-grant flexibilities”, Presentation at the UNCTAD workshop on flexibilities in international intellectual property rules and local production of pharmaceuticals for the southern central and west African region 7-9 December 2009, Cape Town, South Africa. Cosac, T. (2003), “Vertical restraints and parallel imports with differentiated products”, Mimeo. Crampes, C. and Hollander, A. (1995), “Duopoly and quality standard”, European Economics Review, 39, 71-82. Cremer, H. and Thisse, J. F. (1994), “Commodity taxation in differentiated oligopoly”, International Economic Review, 35, 613-633. Danzon, P. and Epstein, A. (2008), “Effects of regulation on drug launch and pricing in Interdependent markets”, NBER Working Paper No.14041. Ecchia G. and Lambertini, L. (1997), “Minimum quality standards and collusion”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 45, 101-113. Fajgelbaum, P. D., Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2009), “Income Distribution, product quality, and international trade”, NBER Working Paper No. 15329. Foellmi, R., Hepenstrick, C. and Zweimuller, J. (2010), “Non-homothetic preferences, parallel imports and the extensive margin of international trade”, Discussion Paper No.7939. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). Ganslandt, M. and Maskus K. E. (2004), “Parallel imports and the pricing of pharmaceutical products: evidence from the European Union”, Journal of Health Economics, 23, 1035-1057. Ganslandt, M. and Maskus K. E. (2007), “Intellectual property rights, parallel imports and strategic behavior”, Working Paper Series 704, Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Goldberg, P. K. (2010), “Intellectual property rights protection in developing countries: the case of pharmaceuticals”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 326-353. Knox, D. and Richardson, M. (2002), “Trade policy and parallel imports”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 133-151. Kyle, M. K. (2007), “Strategic responses to parallel trade”, NBER Working Paper No.12968. Lanjouw, J. O. (2005), “Patents, price controls and access to new drugs: how policy affects global market entry”, NBER Working Paper No.11321. Malueg, D. A. and Schwartz, M. (1994), “Parallel imports, demand dispersion, and International price discrimination”, Journal of International Economics, 37, 167-195. Maskus, K. E. (2000), “Parallel imports”, World Economy, 23, 1269-1284. Maskus, K. E. and Chen, Y. (2002), “Parallel imports in a model of vertical distribution: theory, evidence, and policy”, Pacific Economic Review, 7, 319- 334. Maxwell, J. W. (1998), “Minimum quality standards as a barrier to innovation”, Economics Letters, 58, 355-360. Richardson, M. (2002), “An elementary proposition concerning parallel imports”, Journal of International Economics, 56, 233-245. Roy, S. and Saggi K. (2012), “Equilibrium parallel import policies and international market structure”, Journal of International Economics, 87, 262-276. Valletti, T. M. and Szymanski, S. (2006), “Parallel trade, international exhaustion and Intellectual property rights: a welfare analysis”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 54, 499-526. Wauthy, X. (1996), “Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 345-353. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |