論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available
論文名稱 Title |
擬人化你「藥」嗎?
探討調節焦點與健康控制信念對保健產品擬人化之願付價格的影響 Anthropomorphism Reduces Efficacy?How Regulatory Focus and Health Locus of Control Affect Willingness to Pay For Anthropomorphized Healthcare Products |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
161 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2017-08-11 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2018-02-06 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
知覺效能、健康控制信念、擬人化、調節焦點、願付價格、保健產品 perceived efficacy, regulatory focus, willingness to pay (WTP), healthcare product, anthropomorphism, health locus of control (HLOC) |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5988 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5988 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
擬人化被廣泛得使用在行銷上,例如產品設計與廣告設計上。本研究以說服知識模型為基礎,探討擬人化保健產品如何影響消費者對於產品的願付價格。另外,也提出調節焦點與健康控制信念為本研究的兩個干擾變數。 本研究使用實驗設計法來進行本研究三個實驗,實驗一為單因子的實驗設計,探討擬人化和非擬人化相比,如何影響消費者對保健產品的願付價格,並且進一步檢驗知覺效能為此背後行為的影響機制。實驗二探討調節焦點是否會干擾對於擬人化保健產品的願付價格,並且排除擬人化表情因素對實驗結果的影響。實驗三探討訊息調節焦點框架和個人健康控制信念如何同時影響擬人化與產品願付價格之間的關係。 實驗結果指出,比起無擬人化的保健產,擬人化的保健產品會引發人們有較低的願付價格,而這背後可能原因乃是因為擬人化產品會降低知覺效能而使願付價格下降。以上情境也會出現於當人在預防焦點觸發下,但若人在促進焦點觸發下,擬人化的保健產品則會使人產生更高的願付價格。對於擁有內控健康控制信念的人而言,面對促進焦點的訊息框架時,擬人化比起無擬人化的保健產品會使人有較高的願付價格,但面對預防焦點的訊息框架時,則無此差異。對於擁有外控健康控制信念的人而言,面對預防焦點的訊息框架時,無擬人化比起擬人化的保健產品會使人有較高的願付價格,但面對促進焦點的訊息框架時,則無差異。 |
Abstract |
Anthropomorphism has been widely used in markrting including product design and advertising presentation. Drawing from the persuasion knowledge model, we examin how anthropomorphism in healthcare products affects consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the products. Furthermore, regulatory focus and health locus of control (HLOC) are proposed as two moderators. In this reseach, three experiments were conducted. In Study 1, we examined how an anthropomorphic health product affected WTP. We further explored perceived efficacy as the underlying mechanism behind the anthropomorphism effects. In Study 2, we attempted to examine how regulatory focus affected WTP and ruled out the effects of anthropomorphic expression. In Study 3, we examined the moderating effects of regulatory focus and HLOC simultaneously. The results indicate that compared with a non-anthropomorphic health product, an anthropomorphic one reduces people’s WTP. Anthropomorphization reduces perceived efficacy with the product use. There is an interaction between anthropomorphism and regulatory focus. When people are primed with prevention focus, an anthropomorphic healthcare product leads to lower WTP than a non-anthropomorphic one. When people are primed with promotion focus, opposite results are found. Most importantly, there is a three-way interaction among anthropomorphism, regulatory focus and HLOC. For health internals, an anthropomorphic healthcare product presented in a promotion-focused message leads to higher WTP than does the non-anthropomorphic product with the same message. No such differences on WTP when a prevention-focused message is used. For health externals, a non-anthropomorphic healthcare product presented in a prevention-focused message leads to higher WTP than the anthropomorphic product presented in prevention-focused message. No such differences are found when a promotion-focused message is used. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目錄 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究背景 1 第三節 研究動機 4 第四節 研究目的 6 第五節 研究架構與研究流程 7 第貳章 文獻探討 9 第一節 前言 9 第二節 擬人化 9 第三節 知覺效能 24 第四節 說服知識模型 25 第五節 調節焦點 28 第六節 健康控制信念 36 第七節 小結 40 第參章 研究設計與方法 41 第一節 前言 41 第二節 研究假設與架構 41 第三節 實驗設計建立 47 第四節 小結 48 第肆章 實驗一設計與分析 49 第一節 前言 49 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 49 第三節 研究設計 52 第四節 實驗一結果分析 53 第五節 小結 59 第伍章 實驗二設計與分析 60 第一節 前言 60 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 60 第三節 研究設計 63 第四節 實驗二結果分析 64 第五節 小結 69 第陸章 實驗三設計與分析 70 第一節 前言 70 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 70 第三節 研究設計 73 第四節 實驗三結果分析 74 第五節 小結 80 第柒章 結論與建議 83 第一節 前言 83 第二節 研究結果討論 83 第三節 研究貢獻 86 第四節 研究限制 89 第五節 未來研究與建議 90 第六節 小結 92 參考文獻 93 附錄一:實驗一問卷 101 附錄二:實驗二問卷 107 附錄三:實驗三問卷 125 |
參考文獻 References |
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356. Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49. Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 15-19. Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468-479. Ahn, H. K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224-229. Artz, N., & Tybout, A. M. (1999). The moderating impact of quantitative information on the relationship between source credibility and persuasion: A persuasion knowledge model interpretation. Marketing Letters, 10(1), 51-63. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525-530. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing research, 43(1), 1-10. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71-81. Bennett, B. L., Goldstein, C. M., Gathright, E. C., Hughes, J. W. & Latner, J. D. (2017). Internal health locus of control predicts willingness to track health behaviors online and with smartphone applications. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1-6. Bhutada, N. S., Rollins, B. L., & Perri III, M. (2017). Impact of animated spokes-characters in print direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: An Elaboration Likelihood Model approach. Health Communication, 32(4), 391-400. Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 498-510. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from" feeling right." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388-404. Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2005). Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 1-14. Chang, C. T. (2007). Health‐care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing, 24(2), 143-169. Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J., & Karageorghis, C. (2002). The cognitive processes by which perceived locus of causality predicts participation in physical activity. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(6), 685-699. Chen, F. (2014). A motivational account of product anthropomorphism: Effects on product perceptions and consumer states (Doctoral dissertation). Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. Chernev, A. (2004). Goal–attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 141-150. Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89-98. Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Mantel, S. P. (2010). Consumer response to drug risk information: The role of positive affect. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 31-44. Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2011). Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121-130. Delbeare, M. (2011). Personification in advertising: Using a visual metaphor to trigger anthropomorphism. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121-130. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. Elliott, C. D. (2009). Healthy food looks serious: How children interpret packaged food products. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 359-380. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143-155. Esperat, C., Feng, D., Zhang, Y., & Owen, D. (2007). Health behaviors of low-income pregnant minority women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 284-300. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522-527. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. Guarnera, S., & Williams, R. L. (1987). Optimism and locus of control for health and affiliation among elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42(6), 594-595. Guthrie, S. E. (1993) Faces in the Clouds. A New Theory of Religion, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (2001). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy. Boston: Irwin/McGraw Hill. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23. Hur, J. D., Koo, M., & Hofmann, W. (2015). When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 340-358. Kees, J., Burton, S., & Tangari, A. H. (2010). The impact of regulatory focus, temporal orientation, and fit on consumer responses to health-related advertising. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 19-34. Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 109-114. Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107. Kim, S., Lee, J., Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S. H. (2016). Effects of prominent in-game advertising in mobile media: Cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes and the moderating role of persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 14(3), 203-225. Knox, S., & Walker, D. (2003). Empirical developments in the measurement of involvement, brand loyalty and their relationship in grocery markets. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(4), 271-286. Kong, Y., & Shen, F. (2011). Impact of locus of control on health message effectiveness. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(4), 354-371. Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It's got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 132-146. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218. Lin, H. F., & Shen, F. (2012). Regulatory focus and attribute framing: Evidence of compatibility effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 169-188. Liu, H. H. (2011). Impact of regulatory focus on ambiguity aversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 412-430. Loue, S., Cooper, M., Traore, F., & Fiedler, J. (2004). Locus of control and HIV risk among a sample of Mexican and Puerto Rican women. Journal of Immigrant Health, 6(4), 155-165. May, F., & Monga, A. (2013). When time has a will of its own, the powerless don't have the will to wait: Anthropomorphism of time can decrease patience. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 924-942. McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7-20. Micu, C. C., & Chowdhury, T. G. (2010). The effect of ageing and time horizon perspective on consumers’ response to promotion versus prevention focus advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 621-642. Micu, C. C., & Chowdhury, T. G. (2010). The effect of message's regulatory focus and product type on persuasion. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(2), 181-190. Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health‐related behavior: A meta‐analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 106-143. Moore, J. J., & Rodgers, S. L. (2005). An examination of advertising credibility and skepticism in five different media using the persuasion knowledge model. In American Academy of Advertising. Conference. Proceedings (p. 10). American Academy of Advertising. Morales, A. C. (2005). Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806-812. Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which" intenders" actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405. Nenkov, G. Y., & Scott, M. L. (2014). “So cute I could eat it up”: priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 326-341. Olsen, S. O. (2003). Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption: the mediating role of attitude, health involvement and convenience. Food Quality and Preference, 14(3), 199-209. Ozcakir, A., Dogan, F. O., Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2014). Health locus of control, health related behaviors and demographic factors: A study in a Turkish Population. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, 4(21), 3867-3869. Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1994). How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos can affect product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 190-204. Pham, M. T., & Avnet, T. (2004). Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 503-518. Psouni, S., Chasandra, M., & Theodorakis, Y. (2016). Exercise and healthy eating intentions and behaviors among normal weight and overweight/obese adults. Psychology, 7(4), 598-611. Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77-91. Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. (2009). Pushing the envelope of brand and personality: Antecedents and moderators of anthropomorphized brands. in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 36, eds. Ann L. McGill and Sharon Shavitt, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 413-420. Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. F. (2013). When humanizing brands goes wrong: The detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 81-100. Rahinel, R., & Nelson, N. M. (2016). When brand logos describe the environment: design instability and the utility of safety-oriented products. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 478-496. Ramanathan, S., & Dhar, S. K. (2010). The effect of sales promotions on the size and composition of the shopping basket: Regulatory compatibility from framing and temporal restrictions. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 542-552. Ricœur, P. (1977). The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93-114. Romero, M., & Craig, A. W. (2017). Costly curves: How human-like shapes can increase spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 80-98. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1-28. Samper, A., & Schwartz, J. A. (2012). Price inferences for sacred versus secular goods: Changing the price of medicine influences perceived health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1343-1358. Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383-393. Sundar, A., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2014). Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 138-151. Tam, K. P. (2015). Are anthropomorphic persuasive appeals effective? The role of the recipient's motivations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 187-200. Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514-521. Tanner Jr, J. F., Hunt, J. B., & Eppright, D. R. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 36-45. Touré-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or what to believe: Trust and the differential persuasiveness of human and anthropomorphized messengers. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94-110. Wallston, B. S., Wallston, K. A., Kaplan, G. D., & Maides, S. A. (1976). Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 580-585. Wallston, K.A. & Wallston, B.S. (1982). Who is responsible for your health: The construct of health locus of control. Social Psychology of Health and Illness. 65-95 Wan, W. E., Chen, P. R., & Jin, L. (2017). Judging a book by its cover? The effect of anthropomorphism on product attribute processing and consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1008-1030. Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. Wei, M. L., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J. (2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 34-44. Weiner, B. (1985). (1985b). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. Williams, L. A., Masser, B., & Sun, J. (2015). Revisiting the effect of anthropomorphizing a social cause campaign. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1-16. Williams-Piehota, P., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2004). Matching health messages to health locus of control beliefs for promoting mammography utilization. Psychology & Health, 19(4), 407-423. Xie, G. X., Boush, D., & Boerstler, C. (2007). Consumer response to marketplace deception: Implication of the persuasion knowledge model. in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimonsand Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 406-410. Zhao, G., & Pechmann, C. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents' response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 671-687. Zhou, R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers and investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:永不公開 not available 校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.225.254.81 論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開 Your IP address is 18.225.254.81 This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |