Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0117121-154230 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0117121-154230
論文名稱
Title
以社會交換理論觀點探討工作塑造與人際合作之關聯性
Exploring the relationship between job crafting and interpersonal cooperation: The social exchange perspective
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
55
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-01-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2021-02-17
關鍵字
Keywords
人際公民行為、人際合作、社會交換理論、人際衝突、工作塑造、主動拖延
Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior, Social Exchange Theory, Interpersonal Cooperation, Active Procrastination, Interpersonal Conflict, Job Crafting
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 231 次,被下載 1
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 231 times, has been downloaded 1 times.
中文摘要
本研究以社會交換理論觀點探討員工的工作塑造、人際衝突與人際合作三者的關係。參考過去的研究,工作塑造都是以個體研究為主,只有 Tims, Bakker, and Derks (2015)有探討有關工作塑造者的行為對於同事的影響,本研究將循序漸進按照 Tims 的大方向更深入討論當工作塑造者與同事產生人際衝突時,其工作行為(人際公民行為、主動拖延)會否影響與同事的人際合作。因此本研究有三大研究目的︰
(1)探討個體工作塑造的降低阻礙性的工作需求和知覺與同事人際衝突的關係、(2)釐清個體工作塑造的降低阻礙性的工作需求,是否會透過增加與同事的人際衝突中介,進而降低和同事人際合作、(3)了解工作塑造者的工作行為是否會調節人際衝突,與同事的人際合作之間的關聯性。本研究以問卷方式收集了 132 位在職人士的受試者數據,並進一步進行驗證性因素分析、相關分析與其主要研究發現的迴
歸分析。研究結果顯示工作塑造與人際衝突有正向關聯性、人際衝突有中介工作塑造和人際合作的關係、人際公民行為正向調節人際衝突與人際合作的關聯性、主動拖延行為正向調節人際衝突與人際合作的關聯性。
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between employees' job crafting, interpersonal conflict, and interpersonal cooperation from social exchange theory. Referring to previous job craftings studies, which mainly focused on individual research, only Tims et al. (2015) discussed the impact of job crafting on coworker behavior. This study will follow Tims's research, explore when a job crafter has interpersonal conflicts with a coworker, and their work behaviors affect interpersonal cooperation welling with the coworker. In this study, there are three aims: (1) Exploring the relationship between individuals decreasing hindering job demands and perceptions of interpersonal conflict toward a coworker. (2) Clarifying whether the decreasing hindering job demands will reduce coworker's interpersonal cooperation by increasing interpersonal conflict intermediary. (3) Understanding whether job crafter work behaviors will mediate the relationship between interpersonal conflicts and interpersonal cooperation of coworkers. Data were collected among 132 valid full-time employees and perform further with confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis of the research findings. The results showed that: decreasing hindering job demands were positively related to interpersonal conflict, interpersonal conflict had intermediary the relationship between job crafting and interpersonal cooperation, interpersonal citizenship behavior had positively adjusted to interpersonal conflict and interpersonal cooperation, active procrastination had positively adjusted to interpersonal conflict and interpersonal cooperation.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ....................................................................................................................... i
誌謝 .................................................................................................................................. ii
中文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract............................................................................................................................ iv
第壹章 緒論 .....................................................................................................................1
第貳章 文獻回顧 .............................................................................................................4
第一節 工作塑造 ........................................................................................................ 4
第二節 工作塑造與人際衝突的關聯性 .................................................................... 7
第三節 人際衝突與人際合作的關聯性 .................................................................... 9
第四節 社會交換理論 .............................................................................................. 10
第五節 人際公民行為的調節效果 .......................................................................... 12
第六節 主動拖延的調節效果 .................................................................................. 14
第參章 研究方法 ...........................................................................................................17
第一節 研究對象與研究程序 .................................................................................. 17
第二節 測量工具 ...................................................................................................... 18
第肆章 研究結果 ...........................................................................................................25
第一節 驗證性因素分析 .......................................................................................... 25
第二節 相關分析 ...................................................................................................... 25
第三節 主要研究發現分析 ...................................................................................... 28
第伍章 研究結論與管理意涵 .......................................................................................33
第一節 研究結論與結果討論 .................................................................................. 33
第二節 管理意涵 ...................................................................................................... 35
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 .......................................................................... 36
參考文獻 .........................................................................................................................39
附錄 .................................................................................................................................44

圖 1 本研究之研究架構圖 ........................................................................................... 16
圖 4-1 人際公民行為與人際衝突的交互作用圖 ........................................................ 29
圖 4-2 主動拖延與人際衝突的交互作用圖 ................................................................ 31

表 3-1 有效樣本之背景統計表 .................................................................................... 18
表 4-1 因素模式之驗證性因素分析結果 .................................................................... 25
表 4-2 各變項相關矩陣分析表 .................................................................................... 27
表 4-3 工作塑造、人際衝突、人際合作之中介分析 ................................................ 28
表 4-4 工作塑造、人際衝突、人際合作、人際公民行為之迴歸分析 .................... 30
表 4-5 工作塑造、人際衝突、人際合作、主動拖延之迴歸分析 ............................ 32
參考文獻 References
Ayoko, O. B. (2016). Workplace conflict and willingness to cooperate. International Journal of Conflict Management.
Ayoko, O. B., & J. Härtel, C. E. (2003). The role of space as both a conflict trigger and a conflict control mechanism in culturally heterogeneous workgroups. Applied Psychology, 52(3), 383-412.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of occupational health psychology, 10(2), 170.
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3).
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, J., Maurice N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Social exchange theory. Retrieved September, 3(2007), 62.
Blunt, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (1998). Volitional action and inaction in the lives of undergraduate students: State orientation, procrastination and proneness to boredom. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(6), 837-846.
Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497-513.
Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. J Appl Psychol, 91(1), 70-82. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.70
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65.
Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V. (2009). Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. J Soc Psychol, 149(2), 195-211. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.2.195-212
Chu, A. H., & Choi, J. N. (2005). Rethinking procrastination: positive effects of "active" procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. J Soc Psychol, 145(3), 245-264. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.3.245-264
Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: the science of well-being: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834.
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., & Kessler, S. R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 199-220.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
Frone, M. R. (2000). Interpersonal conflict at work and psychological outcomes: testing a model among young workers. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(2), 246.
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2007). Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting. University of Pittsburgh,
Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands-resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 85-101.
Harriott, J., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Prevalence of procrastination among samples of adults. Psychological reports, 78(2), 611-616.
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Shaw, J. D. (2007). The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 278.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative science quarterly, 256-282.
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465-495.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
Keenan, A., & Newton, T. (1985). Stressful events, stressors and psychological strains in young professional engineers. Journal of organizational behavior, 6(2), 151-156.
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations: Cambridge University Press.
Lauring, J., Andersen, P. H., Storgaard, M., & Kragh, H. (2017). Low-intensity conflict in multinational corporations. Multinational Business Review.
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1995). Structural power and emotional processes in negotiation: A social exchange approach.
Lee, D., Stajkovic, A. D., & Cho, B. (2011). Interpersonal Trust and Emotion as Antecedents of Cooperation: Evidence From Korea. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1603-1631.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 67-84.
Lyons, P. (2008). The crafting of jobs and individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1-2), 25-36.
Mao, H.-Y., Chen, C.-Y., & Hsieh, T.-H. (2009). The relationship between bureaucracy and workplace friendship. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(2), 255-266.
Milgram, N. A., Gehrman, T., & Keinan, G. (1992). Procrastination and emotional upset: A typological model. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(12), 1307-1313.
Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1-17.
Moorman, R. H. (1993). The influence of cognitive and affective based job satisfaction measures on the relationship between satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. Human relations, 46(6), 759-776.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 777-796.
Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B., & van den Heuvel, M. (2017). Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning‐making and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 129-152.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112-138.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(7), 893-917.
Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255-267. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.255
Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J., & Ashford, S. J. (1995). Intra-and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 7-23.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of management, 39(3), 684-708.
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of occupational health psychology, 3(4), 356.
Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological science, 8(6), 454-458.
Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2). doi:10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of occupational health psychology, 18(2), 230.
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Examining Job Crafting from an Interpersonal Perspective: Is Employee Job Crafting Related to the Well-Being of Colleagues? Applied Psychology, 64(4), 727-753. doi:10.1111/apps.12043
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
Zohar, A. H., Shimone, L. P., & Hen, M. (2019). Active and passive procrastination in terms of temperament and character. PeerJ, 7, e6988.
彭台光, 高月慈, & 林鉦棽. (2006). 管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質, 影響, 測試和補救. 管理學報, 23(1), 77-98.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code