Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0318122-232453 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0318122-232453
論文名稱
Title
時尚與「擬」的距離: 以虛擬網紅作為時尚產業奢侈品代言人的廣告效果初探
The distance between fashion and virtual: A preliminary study on the advertising effect of using Computer-Generated Imagery as the spokesperson of fashion products.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
187
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-03-18
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-04-18
關鍵字
Keywords
虛擬網紅、擬真性、擬社會互動、奢侈品廣告、廣告獨特性
Virtual influencer, Verisimilitude, Parasocial interaction theory, Fashion advertise, Uniqueness of advertise Posts
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 586 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 586 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
網際網路的興起,改變了過去品牌企業與消費者溝通的管道,從傳統媒體的報章雜誌,轉向今日的新型態社群媒體平台。而網紅經濟的崛起,帶動了虛擬網紅的誕生。虛擬網紅是一種由電腦生成技術創建而成的機器人。他們擁有類似現實人類逼真的外型,與獨特的個人特色,善於參與公共事務並於社群平台替弱勢發聲,這樣似人又非人的型態成功的吸引Z世代的年輕族群與其互動。看準了虛擬網紅所帶動的商機,品牌企業陸陸續續與其合作,並於社群媒體Instagram上進行商品的廣告代言,而又以時尚產業為大宗。但過去關於虛擬網紅的研究甚少,而時尚產業透過虛擬網紅作為商品代言人的廣告效果仍尚待釐清。

本研究欲探索在社群媒體Instagram上虛擬網紅的類型,即擬真程度的高低如何觸發消費者在社群媒體上與其的擬社會互動行為,而廣告內容獨特性的呈現方式,是否會強化人們在線上與其互動的意圖。亦透過擬社會互動的過程探究人們對於虛擬網紅作為品牌廣告代言人的廣告效果。本研究採用實驗研究法進行,結果顯示虛擬網紅擬人化的程度越高,消費者會更願意在社群媒體上互動與留言,並提高品牌合作的廣告效果。而廣告內容的獨特性並非強化消費者與虛擬網紅互動的關鍵,原因可能與人們在接收廣告的注意力有關。本研究藉由虛擬網紅作為廣告代言人,不僅為目前為數不多的虛擬網紅相關研究奠定新的視角,更提供了多元的理論貢獻及相關實務建議。
Abstract
The rise of the internet has changed the way how brands communicate with consumers from traditional communication channels to social medial platforms. As such, the internet celebrity economy has risen and sprung up virtual celebrities. The virtual influencers are created by the technology of Computer-generated imagery (CGI), and they have a human-like appearance with a personalized personality. They participate in public affairs and are willing to express their opinions on social media. According to these characteristics, they have successfully attracted young people across generations. As a result, the fashion brand seizes the business opportunity to collaborate with influencers on social media, and generates advertising benefits for their products. In the past, there are not many relevant studies on virtual influencers as advertising spokespersons, and advertising effects still need to be clarified.

This study explores three subjects, which are (1) the relationship between how real and virtual influencers is and the interactions with consumers, (2) whether the uniqueness of advertising content has become the key to influencing the interaction between virtual influencers and consumers, (3) the outcome of advertisement by having virtual influencers as ambassadors. Through an experimental method, this study shows that the higher the degree of verisimilitude of virtual influencers, the more willing consumers are to interact and leave messages on social media and improve the advertising effect of brand cooperation. The uniqueness of advertising content is not the key to enhancing consumers' interaction with virtual influencers, and the reason may be related to people's attention when receiving advertisements. This study provides not only a new perspective for the study of virtual influencers but also multiple theoretical contributions and relevant practical suggestions by discussing the situation of brands advertisement with types of virtual influencer.


目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書................................................................................................................................................i
中文摘要....................................................................................................................................................ii
英文摘要...................................................................................................................................................iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題 14
第三節 研究目的 14
第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 虛擬網紅 15
一、 網紅概念的起源 15
二、 虛擬代言人 16
三、 虛擬網紅 20
四、 擬真程度與人機互動 23
五、 虛擬網紅相關研究與應用 24
六、 小結 25
第二節 奢侈品 27
一、 產品類型 27
二、 奢侈品定義 27
三、 奢侈品消費動機與自我概念 28
第三節 知覺廣告的獨特性 29
一、 獨特性的消費需求 29
二、 獨特性理論 29
三、 廣告內容的獨特性 30
四、 小結 31
第四節 社會比較與相似吸引理論 31
一、 社會比較理論 31
二、 相似吸引力理論 32
三、 小結 32
第五節 擬社會互動 33
一、 擬社會互動定義 33
二、 擬社會互動之相關研究 33
三、 小結 35
第六節 廣告效果 36
一、 廣告效果 36
二、 廣告與品牌態度 36
三、 購買意願 37
四、 小結 37
第三章 假說推論與研究方法 38
第一節 研究架構 38
第二節 假說推論 38
一、 虛擬網紅代言人的擬真程度對於消費者擬社會互動的影響效果 38
二、 消費者與虛擬網紅代言人的擬社會互動過程對於廣告效果之影響 41
三、 廣告貼文獨特性作為虛擬網紅與擬社會互動的調節效果 43
第三節 研究方法 45
一、 樣本、實驗設計與程序 46
二、 實驗刺激物與前測 47
三、 正式實驗 57
第四節 研究變數衡量 58
一、 操弄性檢驗 58
二、 控制變數 59
三、 中介變數 60
四、 調節變數 61
五、 應變數 62
第五節、資料分析方法 64
第四章 資料分析 65
第一節 樣本資料結構分析 65
第二節 正式問卷信度 69
第三節 操弄性檢驗 70
第四節 假說驗證 71
第五章 結論與討論 80
第一節 研究發現與建議 80
第二節 理論與實務貢獻 82
一、理論貢獻 82
二、實務貢獻 83
第三節 研究限制 84
第四節 未來研究方向 85
參考文獻 87
一、 中文文獻 87
二、 英文文獻 88
附錄 111
附錄一、前測一虛擬網紅擬真程度問卷 111
附錄二、前測二時尚品牌態度問卷 123
附錄三、前測三廣告貼文獨特性問卷 135
附錄四、正式問卷、網紅代言人態度問卷A(高擬真、高廣告貼文獨特性) 140
附錄五、正式問卷、網紅代言人態度問卷B(高擬真、低廣告貼文獨特性) 149
附錄六、正式問卷、網紅代言人態度問卷C(低擬真、高廣告貼文獨特性) 158
附錄七、正式問卷、網紅代言人態度問卷D(低擬真、低廣告貼文獨特性) 167

參考文獻 References
Apiel Lin & Ray Lee(2019年5月)。時尚界最火紅虛擬KOL Lil Miquela:擁有百萬IG追蹤者的她,甚至不是「人類」?BAZAAR。取自:http:// harpersbazaar.com/tw/fashion/news/g22645792/virtual-influencer-lil-miquela/
Apiel Lin & Isabel Greenberg(2018年9月4日)Balmain公佈最新代言臉孔—卻沒半個真實「人類」!這代表著什麼意義?BAZAAR。取自:https://www.harpersbazaar.com/tw/fashion/news/g22860002/balmain/
KATHERINE HO(2020年5月)。除了爆紅日本虛擬模特兒 Imma 之外,還有你要認識的時尚虛擬網紅 Noonoouri | 獨家訪問。VOGUE。取自:https://www.voguehk.com/zh/article/fashion/avatar-influencer-noonoouri-joerg-zuber-the-fabricant-kerry-murphy-interview/
Leetea(2019年1月)。 讓人看不出來是虛擬:日本時潮女孩 imma 的真實面貌!LDOPE。取自:https://ldope.com/news/fashion/apparel/imma-gram/
吳晨(2020年2月20日)。平台創新?搞壟斷?從 Facebook 併購 IG 說起。虎嗅網。取自:https://www.stockfeel.com.tw/%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0-%E5%A3%9F%E6%96%B7-facebook-ig/
林克威(2021年1月6日)。【林克威電商專欄】什麼是UGC?讓使用者為品牌製造新話題。INSIDE。取自:https://www.inside.com.tw/article/22167-ugc-content-marketing
范慧如(2020年11月19日)。【影響力行銷系列】Lesson 6:虛擬網紅的未來進行式。凱絡媒體週報。取自:https://twncarat.wordpress.com/2020/11/19/%E3%80%90%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E5%8A%9B%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E3%80%91lesson-6%EF%BC%9A%E8%99%9B%E6%93%AC%E7%B6%B2%E7%B4%85%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86%E9%80%B2%E8%A1%8C%E5%BC%8F/
愛范兒(2019年1月)。虛實整合?Instagram新網紅其實是位真人與電腦繪圖結合的模特兒。3C新報,取自:http://ccc.technews.tw/2019/01/22/victural-model-imma/
端小二(2021年4月6日)。由虛擬網紅向年輕人宣揚防疫信息,會否更有效更有說服力?端傳媒。取自:https://theinitium.com/roundtable/20200406-roundtable-international-virtual-influencer/
余玳均(2019)。圖文觀看意象之語意評價研究-圖片與文字關聯性。國立台南大學數位學習科技學系碩士論文,台南市。
Ahmad, I. (2018). The influencer marketing revolution. Social Media Today. Retrieved from: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/the-influencer-marketing-revolution-infographic/517146/
Clasen, A. (2019, July 18). Why instagram is so important to Millennials. Iconosquare, Retrieved from:
https://blog.iconosquare.com/instagram-important-millennials/
Ben(2019, Jan 18).Virtural Model imma Is Going Viral On Instagram and Twitter. grape. Retrieved from :
https://grapee.jp/en/108683.
Bia, B. (2018, 27 Feb.). Prada enlists computer-generated influencer to promote Fall 18 show. Retrieved from: https://thecurrentdaily.com/2018/02/27/prada-enlists-computer-generated-influencer-ss18-show/
Bloglovin (2016).We asked, they answered: How micro-influencers really want to work with brands. Retrieved from: https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/influencers-instagram-is-the-most-engaging-platform-report/
Brand Finance (2021, Apr.). The annual report on the most valuable and strongest apparel brands. Retrieved from: https://brandfinance.com/press-releases/nike-does-it-again-claiming-title-of-worlds-most-valuable-apparel-brand-for-7th-consecutive-year
Brooke Auxier & Monica Anderson (2021, April 7). Social Media Use in 2021. PEW RESEARCH CENTER. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
Carrie (2020, 31 Jan). These Computer-Generated Influencers Are Pretty Incredible. Retrieved from: https://www.2oceansvibe.com/2020/01/31/subthese-computer-generated-influencers-are-pretty-incredible/
Christopher, T. (2020, 12 Apr.). 5 Notable Virtual Influencer + Brand Partnership. Retrieved from: https://virtualhumans.org/article/5-notable-virtual-influencer-brand-partnerships
Greg, M. (2019, 10 Apr.). KFC’s Newest Colonel Is a Creepy CGI Parody of an Instagram Influencer. Retrieved from: https://www.eater.com/2019/4/10/18304550/kfc-colonel-instagram-influencer
Hall, J. (2015). Build authentic audience experiences through influencer marketing. Forbes, December, 17 Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnhall/2015/12/17/build-authentic-audience-experiences-through-influencer-marketing/?sh=5fc295914ff2
Hall, K. (2016). The importance of authenticity in influencer marketing. Sprout Content. Retrieved from: https://www.business2community.com/marketing/importance-authenticity-influencer-marketing-01696695
Ida, A. M. (2020, 29 Oct.) Virtual influencer: chi sono e perché sono da tenere d’occhio. Retrieved from: http://www.beunsocial.it/virtual-influencer-chi-sono-e-perche-sono-da-tenere-d-occhio/
Kemp, S. (2021a, July 21). Digital 2021: Global Overview Report.DataReportal Retrieved from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-july-global-statshot.
Kemp, S. (2021b, February 11). Digital 2021: Taiwan. Retrieved from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-taiwan
Mertens, L. (2017, 12 October). Hoe vergroot u uw online succes met influencer
marketing? Retrieved from:
https://www.lincelot.com/blog/marketingtips/influencer-marketing/
Natalie, C. (2018, 17 Dec.). ‘The level of stupidity is embarrassing’: Dior is branded ‘absurd’ after using CGI influencer Noonoouri as a model in its latest beauty campaign on Instagram. Retrieved from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6504611/Dior-make-mocked-using-CGI-influencer-Noonoouri-social-media-beauty-campaign.html
Natalie, G. (2018, 01 Mar.). Why This Insta-Famous "Model" Is Sparking Outrage. Retrieved from: https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/03/192224/shudu-gram-black-fake-supermodel-fenty-beauty

Nick Baklanov (2019). The Top Instagram Virtual Influencers in 2019 Retrieved from: https://hypeauditor.com/blog/the-top-instagram-virtual-influencers-in-2019/
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 818-918.
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411-454.
Aliag, K. D. (2019). A comparative analysis of CGI Instagram influencer,@ lilmiquela, and human Instagram influencer,@ _emmachamberlain. Media and Communication Studies (master). Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society, Konungariket Sverige.
Al‐Natour, S., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2008). The effects of process and outcome similarity on users' evaluations of decision aids. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 175-211.
Alperstein, N. M. (1991). Imaginary social relationships with celebrities appearing in television commercials. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35(1), 43-58.
Arioli, M., Crespi, C., & Canessa, N. (2018). Social cognition through the lens of cognitive and clinical neuroscience. BioMed Research International, 2018. 4283427. Doi: 10.1155/2018/4283427.
Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694
Atkin, C., & Block, M. (1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research. 23 (February/March), 57-61.
Aydin, G., & Karamehmet, B. (2017). A comparative study on attitudes towards SMS advertising and mobile application advertising. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(5), 514-536.
Babin, B. J., Hardesty, D. M., & Suter, T. A. (2003). Color and shopping intentions: The intervening effect of price fairness and perceived affect. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 541-551.
Bane, C. M., Cornish, M., Erspamer, N., & Kampman, L. (2010). Self-disclosure through weblogs and perceptions of online and “real-life” friendships among female bloggers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 131-139.
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71-81.
Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Integrating marketing communications: New findings, new lessons, and new ideas. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 122-145.
Bavelas, J.B., & Chovil, N. (2006). Nonverbal and verbal communica-tion: Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use inface-to-face dialogue. In V. Manusov, & M.L. Patterson (Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication(pp. 97–115).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bendixen, M. T. (1993). Advertising effects and effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 27(10), 19-32.
Bendoni, W., & Danielian, F. (2019, July). The future of influencer marketing in the digital age of virtual influencers. In 2019 Global Fashion Management Conference at Paris (pp. 604-607).
Berry, C. J. (1994). The idea of luxury: A conceptual and historical investigation. London, Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Berscheid, E., & Hatfield, E. (1969). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Bertrandias, L., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Some psychological motivations for fashion opinion leadership and fashion opinion seeking. Journal of fashion marketing and management,10(1), 25-40.
Bevan-Dye, A. L. (2013). Black Generation Y students’ attitudes towards Web advertising value. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 155-164. Doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n2p155.
Bockting, W. O. (1999). From construction to context: Gender through the eyes of the transgendered. Siecus Report, 28(1), 3-7.
Brooks, G., & Piskorski, M. (2018). The Trusted Influencer: How They Do It and How Brands Can Benefit. ACR North American Advances.
Brown, D., & Hayes, N. (2008). Influencer marketing. Routledge. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715. Doi: 10.1037/h0044721
Callcott, Margaret F. (1993), "The Spokes-Character in Advertis- ing: An Historical Survey and Framework for Future Research," doctoral dissertation, College of Communication, University of Taxas.
Callcott, M. F., & Lee, W. N. (1995). Establishing the spokes-character in academic inquiry: historical overview and framework for definition. ACR North American Advances, 22, 144–151.
Cardello, A. V., Pineau, B., Paisley, A. G., Roigard, C. M., Chheang, S. L., Guo, L. F., ... & Jaeger, S. R. (2016). Cognitive and emotional differentiators for beer: An exploratory study focusing on “uniqueness”. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 23-38.
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2017). Antecedents of consumer intention to follow and recommend an Instagram account. Online Information Review. Online Information Review, 41(7), 1046-1063. doi: 10.1108/OIR-09-2016-2
013
Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and networked friendship. Springer. Doi: 10.1057/9781137314444
Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. P. (2008). Social comparison, imitation of celebrity models and materialism among Chinese youth. International Journal of Advertising, 27(5), 799-826.
Chow, C. M., Ruhl, H., & Buhrmester, D. (2013). The mediating role of interpersonal competence between adolescents' empathy and friendship quality: A dyadic approach. Journal of Adolescence, 36(1), 191-200.
Claiborne, C. B., & Sirgy, M. J. (2015). Self-image congruence as a model of consumer attitude formation and behavior: A conceptual review and guide for future research. In Proceedings of the 1990 academy of marketing science (AMS) annual conference (pp. 1-7). Springer, Cham.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic medicine. 38(5), 300–314. Doi: 10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
Colliander, J., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media: Weighing publicity effectiveness of blogs versus online magazines. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 313-320.
Colliander, J., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media: Weighing publicity effectiveness of blogs versus online magazines. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 313-320.
Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H., & Pan, B. (2009). Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach. MIS quarterly, 33(3),539-566.
Darner, A., & Arvidsson, N. (2019). Virtual influencers: Anonymous celebrities on social media. Jökoping University School of Engineering. Informatics Bachelor Paper.
Delisle, M. P., & Parmentier, M. A. (2016). Navigating person-branding in the fashion blogosphere. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(3), 211-224.
Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self‐discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self‐esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 261-280.
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition?. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441-447.
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44.
Dotz, W., & Morton, J. (1996). What a character!: 20th century American advertising icons. San Francisco, Chronicle Books Llc.
Dryer, D. C. (1999). Getting personal with computers: how to design personalities for agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(3), 273-295
Ducoffe, R. H. (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 17(1), 1-18
Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Moller, A. C., Friedman, R., & Meinhardt, J. (2007). Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 154.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 177-188.
Franke, N., & Schreier, M. (2008). Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93-107.
Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.
French Jr, J. R. (1956). A formal theory of social power. Psychological Review, 63(3), 181-194. Doi: 10.1037/h0046123.
Fromkin, H. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1980), “The Search for Unique-ness and Valuation of Scarcity,” in Social Exchange: Advances in Theoryand Research, K. J. Gergen, ed., New York: Plenum Press, 57–75
Garretson, J. A., & Niedrich, R. W. (2004). Spokes-characters: Creating character trust and positive brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 25-36.
Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (2016). Teen attitudes toward luxury fashion brands from a social identity perspective: A cross-cultural study of French and US teenagers. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5785-5792.
Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2008). An analysis of factors affecting fashion opinion leadership and fashion opinion seeking. Journal of fashion marketing and management, 12(3), 308-322. Doi: 10.1108/13612020810889272.
Gong, W., & Li, X. (2017). Engaging fans on microblog: the synthetic influence of parasocial interaction and source characteristics on celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(7), 720-732.
Grant, A. E., Guthrie, K. K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1991). Television shopping: A media system dependency perspective. Communication Research, 18(6), 773-798.
Graves, Laura and Gary Powell. 1995. “The Effect of Sex Similarity on Recruiters’ Evaluations of Actual Appli-cants: A Test of the Similarity-Attraction Paradigm.” Personnel Psychology, 48:85–98.
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619-619.
Hair, N., Clark, M., & Shapiro, M. (2010). Toward a classification system of relational activity in consumer electronic communities: the moderators’ tale. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 9(1), 54-65.
Han, J., Jun, M., & Kim, M. (2019). Impact of online community engagement on community loyalty and social well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(1), 1-8.
Han, S. L., & Kim, K. (2020). Role of consumption values in the luxury brand experience: Moderating effects of category and the generation gap. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102249. Doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser. 2020. 102249Get.
Hartmann, T., Stuke, D., & Daschmann, G. (2008). Positive parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sport spectators. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(1), 24-34.
Hayes, J. L., King, K. W., & Ramirez Jr, A. (2016). Brands, friends, & viral advertising: A social exchange perspective on the ad referral processes. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 31-45.
Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2016). From celebrity to influencer. A companion to celebrity, London, England, Willey, 194-212.
Heine, K. (2012). The concept of luxury brands. Luxury Brand Management, 1(2), 193-208.
Hirschman, E, C. (1980), “Attributes and Layers of Mean-ing,” in Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 7, Jerry C. Olsen,ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research,101–118.
Holbrook, M.B. (1980), “Some preliminary notes on research in consumer esthetics”, in Olson, J.C. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U.S.), 7(1), 104–108.
Holbrook, M. B. (1986). Emotion in the consumption experience: toward a new model of the human consumer. The role of affect in consumer behavior: Emerging Theories and Applications, 6(23), 17-52.
Holbrook, M. B., & Moore, W. L. (1981). Feature interactions in consumer judgments of verbal versus pictorial presentations. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(1), 103-113.
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
Hoy, M. G., & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 28-45.
Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594-606.
Hubble, C. (2018). Miquela Sousa and the rise of fake influencers. Eureka Street, 28(13), 20-22.
Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155-173.
Jerslev, A. (2016). Media times| in the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19.
Kapferer, J. N. (2012). Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth. Business Horizons, 55(5), 453-462.
Kaushik, T., & Baliyan, R. (2017). A STUDY ON IMPACT OF CELEBRITY AND NON-CELEBRITY ENDORSED FMCG ADVERTISEMENT THROUGH ONLINE ADVERTISING ON THE CONSUMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR. Global Management Review, 11(1).
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer
memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 97-105.
Kim, D., Hyun, H., & Park, J. (2020). The effect of interior color on customers’ aesthetic perception, emotion, and behavior in the luxury service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102252. Doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020. 102252.
Kim, M. S., & Kim, H. M. (2017). The effect of online fan community attributes on the loyalty and cooperation of fan community members: The moderating role of connect hours. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 232-243.
Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020a). How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106419.
Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020b). The Influence of Authenticity of Online Reviews on Trust Formation among Travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 59(5), 763-776.
Korgaonkar, P. & Wolin, L. (2002). Web usage, advertising, and shopping: Relationship patterns. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(2), 191-204.
Kowalczyk, C.M. & Pounders, K.R. (2016),“Transforming celebrities through social media: the role ofauthenticity and emotional attachment”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(4), 345-356.
Krämer, N.C.,Rosenthal-Vonder Pütten, A.M., &Hoffmann, L.(2015). Social effects of virtualand robot companions. InS.S. Sundar(Ed.),The handbook of the psychology ofcommunication technology(pp. 137–159). Chicester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Doi:10.1002/9781118426456.
Kumar, A., Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. K. (2009). Indian consumers' purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 521-527.
Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134-148.
Labrecque, L. I., Markos, E., & Milne, G. R. (2011). Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 37-50.
Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59-62.
Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753-5760
Lemay Jr, E. P., Clark, M. S., & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 339-353.
Li, M., & Mao, J. (2015). Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user's perception of virtual health advisory services. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 229-243.
Lichtlé, M. C. (2007). The effect of an advertisement’s colour on emotions evoked by attitude towards the ad: The moderating role of the optimal stimulation level. International Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 37-62.
Lim, C. M., & Kim, Y. K. (2011). Older consumers' TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 763-780.
Liu-Thompkins, Y., Maslowska, E., Ren, Y., & Kim, H. (2020). Creating, metavoicing, and propagating: A road map for understanding user roles in computational advertising. Journal of Advertising, 49(4), 394-410.
Lochbuehler, K., Mercincavage, M., Tang, K. Z., Tomlin, C. D., Cappella, J. N., & Strasser, A. A. (2018). Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels. Tobacco Control, 27(3), 266-271.
Lueck, J. A. (2015). Friend-zone with benefits: The parasocial advertising of Kim Kardashian. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(2), 91-109.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143.
MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of marketing, 53(2), 48-65.
Maman Larraufie, A. F., & Kourdoughli, A. (2014). The e-semiotics of luxury. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 5(3), 197-208.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954.
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R. T. (1985). Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 729.
McCoy, S., Everard, A., Polak, P., & Galletta, D. F. (2007). The effects of online Advertising. Communications of The ACM, 50(3), 84-88.
Mendola, M. A. (2014). Blogging in the fashion industry: A descriptive study of the use of the two-step flow communications theory by professional and citizen bloggers to become opinion leaders.
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 318-332.
Morgan, Hal (1986). Symbols of America, New York: Penguin Books.
Mori, M., (1970), “The Uncanny Valley”, Energy, 7, 33–35
Moustakas, E., Lamba, N., Mahmoud, D., & Ranganathan, C. (2020, June). Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Mrad, M., Majdalani, J., Cui, C. C., & El Khansa, Z. (2020). Brand addiction in the contexts of luxury and fast-fashion brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102089.
Mull, I. R., & Lee, S. E. (2014). “PIN” pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 192-200
Nambisan, P., & Watt, J. H. (2011). Managing customer experiences in online product communities. Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 889-895.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103
Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11(11), 575.
Nowak, K. L., & Fox, J. (2018). Avatars and computer-mediated communication: a review of the definitions, uses, and effects of digital representations. Review of Communication Research, 6, 30-53.
Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153-178
Nunnally, J.C., (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Patzer, G. L. (1983). Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 229-241
Pentina, I., Guilloux, V., & Micu, A. C. (2018). Exploring social media engagement behaviors in the context of luxury brands. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 55-69.
Putrevu, S. (2008). Consumer responses toward sexual and nonsexual appeals: The influence of involvement, need for cognition (NFC), and gender. Journal of advertising, 37(2), 57-70.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412-424.
Pratt, J. A., Hauser, K., Ugray, Z., & Patterson, O. (2007). Looking at human–computer interface design: Effects of ethnicity in computer agents. Interacting with Computers, 19(4), 512-523
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145-182.
Quach, S., & Thaichon, P. (2017). From connoisseur luxury to mass luxury: Value co-creation and co-destruction in the online environment. Journal of Business Research, 81, 163-172.
Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 99-113.
Reed, A. (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self‐concept–based consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 19(3), 235-266.
Rosenthal, B., & Brito, E. P. (2017). How virtual brand community traces may increase fan engagement in brand pages. Business Horizons, 60(3), 375-384.
Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
Salomon, D. (2013). Moving on from Facebook: Using Instagram to connect with undergraduates and engage in teaching and learning. College & Research Libraries News, 74(8), 408-412.
Sauers, J. (2019, 23 april). Life after fiction: the future of lil miquela. Geraadpleegd via https://www.culturedmag.com/lil-miquela/
Schmid, H., & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 252-269.
Scott, D. M. (2015). The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Senft, T. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks (Vol. 4). New York : Peter Lang.
Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Dennis, A., & Riemer, K. (2019, January). Crossing the Uncanny Valley? Understanding Affinity, Trustworthiness, and Preference for More Realistic Virtual Humans in Immersive Environments. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Shehu, E., Bijmolt, T. H., & Clement, M. (2016). Effects of likeability dynamics on consumers' intention to share online video advertisements. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 35, 27-43.
Shin, D. H. (2016). Do users experience real sociability through social TV? Analyzing parasocial behavior in relation to social TV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 140-159.
Shin, J., & Lee, S. (2020, January). Intimacy Between Actual Users and Virtual Agents: Interaction through" likes" and" comments". In 2020 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Shin, M., Kim, S. J., & Biocca, F. (2019). The uncanny valley: No need for any further judgments when an avatar looks eerie. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 100-109.
Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13(3), 195-206.
Sirgy, M. J., & Su, C. (2000). Destination image, self-congruity, and travel behavior: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 340-352.
Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J. O., Chon, K. S., Claiborne, C. B., ... & Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 229-241.
Smith, M. L., Cottrell, G. W., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16(3), 184-189.
Snyder, C. R. (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: a consumer catch-22 carousel?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9-24.
Sohn, J. W., & Kim, J. K. (2020). Factors that influence purchase intentions in social commerce. Technology in Society, 63, 101365. Doi: 0.1016/ j.techsoc.2020.1013
65
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53,101742. Doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011.
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 99-113.
Suchman, L., & Stacey, J. (2012). Animation and Automation–The Liveliness and Labours of Bodies and Machines. Body & Society,18(1), 1-46.
Sun, T. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33(2), 194-217.
Thakur, R., Angriawan, A., & Summey, J. H. (2016). Technological opinion leadership: The role of personal innovativeness, gadget love, and technological innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2764-2773.
Thomson, M. (2006). Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 104-119.
Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.
Till, B. D., & Shimp, T. A. (1998). Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67-82.
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Source credibility and attitude certainty: A metacognitive analysis of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 427-442
Trautschold, M., Mazo, G., Learning, M. M. S., & Karch, M. (2011). Droids Made Simple: For the Droid, Droid X, Droid 2, and Droid 2 Global. California:Apress.
Tsai, S. P. (2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: An international investigation. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 427-452.
Tsang, A. S., & Zhou, N. (2005). Newsgroup participants as opinion leaders and seekers in online and offline communication environments. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1186-1193.
Tsang, M. M., Ho, S. C., & Liang, T. P. (2004). Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 65-78.
Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: what do we really know ?. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26-43
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site ?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
Van Landschoot, M, & Ingelaere, R(2019-2020) VIRTUAL INFLUENCERS IN MARKETING APPLICATIES.
Van Norel, N. D., Kommers, P. A., Van Hoof, J. J., & Verhoeven, J. W. (2014). Damaged corporate reputation: Can celebrity Tweets repair it ?. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 308-315.
Vandebosch, H., & Smits, T. (2012). Endorsing children’s appetite for healthy foods: Celebrity versus non-celebrity spokes-characters, Communications, 37(4) , 371-391. Doi: 10.1515/commun-2012-0021.
Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(1), 1-15.
Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484-506.
Von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S. H. (2010). “It doesn’t matter what you are!” explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior,26(6), 1641-1650. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012.
Voorveld, H. A., Van Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38-54.
Vugt, H. C. V., Bailenson, J. N., Hoorn, J. F., & Konijn, E. A. (2008). Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 17(2), 1-27.
Waltemate, T., Gall, D., Roth, D., Botsch, M., & Latoschik, M. E. (2018). The impact of avatar personalization and immersion on virtual body ownership, presence, and emotional response. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1643-1652.
Wee, C. S., Ariff, M. S. B. M., Zakuan, N., Tajudin, M. N. M., Ismail, K., & Ishak, N. (2014). Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(2), 378-397.
Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2007). Measuring consumers' luxury value perception: a cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(7), 1-21.
Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2009). Value‐based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 625-651.
Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 15-19.
Wu, L., Ju, I., & Dodoo, N. A. (2016). Understanding the impact of matchup between country-of-origin facets and country stereotypes on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Global Marketing, 29(4), 203-217.
Yaakop, A., Anuar, M. M., & Omar, K. (2013). Like it or not: Issue of credibility in Facebook advertising. Asian Social Science, 9(3), 154-163. Doi: 10.5539/ass.v9
n3p154.
Yoo, S. Y. (2018). Fashion social influencer and interaction effects with product attributes. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul.
Yuan, L., & Dennis, A. (2017). Interacting like humans? Understanding the effect of anthropomorphism on consumer’s willingness to pay in online auctions. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System January 6, Hawaii, US, 12–20. Doi: 10.24251/hicss.2017.066
Zhang, B., & Kim, J. H. (2013). Luxury fashion consumption in China: Factors affecting attitude and purchase intent. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 68-79.
Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(3), 347-360.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-04-18
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-04-18

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.117.75.53
現在時間是 2024-11-21
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-04-18

Your IP address is 18.117.75.53
The current date is 2024-11-21
This thesis will be available to you on 2025-04-18.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2025-04-18

QR Code