Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0424122-092646 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0424122-092646
論文名稱
Title
非鐵金屬公司投入ESG之研究
Engagement in ESG by Non-Ferrous Companies: a Case
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
54
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-12-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-05-24
關鍵字
Keywords
永續投資、非鐵金屬、利害關係人、礦業及冶煉、企業社會責任
ESG, non-ferrous metal, stakeholder, mining and smelting, Corporate Social Responsibility
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 153 次,被下載 294
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 153 times, has been downloaded 294 times.
中文摘要
聯合國2005年報告《Who Cares Wins》中,首見由環境、社會、公司治理等三項指標所構成永續投資(ESG)一詞,報告指出ESG三項指標納入企業運營的評量標準,除了促進企業永續經營之外,也能替社會、環境與經濟帶來正面效益,並讓公司有效實現企業社會責任。

本研究以資源基礎理論及利害關係人為基礎,結合Sher Zaman Khan, Qing Yang, Abdul Waheed (2018)所提出的無形資源能力因素與Lokuwaduge及Heenetigala探討ESG揭露動機,整理五項構面、共25個問項之問卷,探討「智財資本」、「財務能力」、「社會責任」、「營運彈性」及「品質追蹤溯源」構面與「公司績效」構面之關係,以研究非鐵金屬公司投入ESG對於公司績效的影響要素。問卷自民國110年9月27日起以線上電子問卷SurveyCake經電子郵件進行發放,截至110年10月11日共計回收53份,有效問卷共計53份,有效問卷率達100%。

研究結果顯示:「品質追蹤溯源」構面對「公司績效」有顯著正向影響,但其餘構面及人口統計變數並無顯著影響,爰建議加強產品服務及公司流程之品質,以提高公司績效並永續發展。
Abstract
ESG, consisting of Environmental, Social and Governance, was first seen in the report “Who Cares Wins” published by United Nations in 2005. In addition to achieving corporate sustainability ESG not only benefits society, environment and economy but fulfills Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).

This thesis is based on resource-based view (RBV) and stakeholder theory, taking into account intangible resources/capability by Sher Zaman Khan et la. (2018) and ESG disclosure motives by Lokuwaduge and Heenetigala (2016). Five dimensions and twenty-five questions are designed to explore the correlation between company performance and intellectual capital, financial capability, social responsibility, operation flexibility and quality assurance tracking. The online survey was conducted from 27 Sep to 11 Oct 2021 in Surveycake website via email notice. Fifty-three copies of sample were collected and all verified valid.

The conclusion shows there is statistically significant difference between company performance and quality assurance tracking. It is recommended companies shall enhance the quality of product/service and internal process to boost sustainability.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書................................................................................................................................................ i
誌 謝........................................................................................................................................................... ii
摘 要........................................................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract...................................................................................................................................................... iv
目錄............................................................................................................................................................ v
圖次............................................................................................................................................................ vi
表次............................................................................................................................................................ vii
第一章 緒論............................................................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機........................................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的...................................................................................................................................... 2
第三節 研究流程...................................................................................................................................... 2
第四節 研究範圍與限制.......................................................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻探討..................................................................................................................................... 4
第一節 企業社會責任(CSR)與ESG.......................................................................................................... 4
第二節 ESG與無形資源/能力................................................................................................................... 4
第三節 ESG績效與ESG揭露..................................................................................................................... 5
第三章 研究設計...................................................................................................................................... 7
第一節 研究模式....................................................................................................................................... 7
第二節 操作型定義及衡量方法............................................................................................................... 8
第四章 資料分析與討論........................................................................................................................... 11
第一節 人口統計資料與敘述統計........................................................................................................... 11
第二節 信度分析與因素分析................................................................................................................... 17
第三節 效度分析....................................................................................................................................... 19
第四節 研究構面之相關分析................................................................................................................... 25
第五節 公司績效之構面預測分析........................................................................................................... 28
第六節 人口統計變數............................................................................................................................... 32
第五章 結論與建議................................................................................................................................... 39
第一節 研究結論....................................................................................................................................... 39
第二節 管理意涵....................................................................................................................................... 39
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議........................................................................................................... 40
參考文獻.................................................................................................................................................... 41
附錄 研究問卷........................................................................................................................................... 43

參考文獻 References
邱皓政,2010,量化研究與統計分析: SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析(第五版),臺北市: 五南

林雅慧,2020,ESG浪潮下資產管理業者的經營策略,國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班財務金融組碩士論文

郭芷因,2021,環境、社會與公司治理(ESG)與公司績效之關聯性: Covid-19期間ESG的價值,南臺科技大學會計資訊研究所碩士學位論文

蔡秉庭、王茂昌,2019,企業社會責任與企業價值之相互關聯性: 兼論無形資產的影響,會計與公司治理第十四卷第二期2019年12月63-82頁

黃薇錦,2021,環境、社會、治理作為與財務績效,國立臺北大學會計系碩士論文

李虹欣,2021,探討研發支出、HHI(專利集中程度)與ESG成效排名對公司績效之影響-以美國半導體產業為例,國立臺北大學企業管理學系博士論文

Sher Zaman Khan, Qing Yang and Abdul Waheed, (2018), “Investment in tangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, pp.285-295

Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge and Kumudini Heenetigala, (2016), “Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study”, Business Strategy and the Environment, pp.438-450

Gunnar Friede, Timo Busch and Alexander Bassen, (2015), ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 200 empirical studies, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Vol.5, No.4, 210-233

Eduardo Duque-Grisales and Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, (2019), Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack, Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, vol. 168, issue 2, No 7, 315-334
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code