論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
基金流量與報酬引發之風險移轉效果對未來績效的影響 The Risk Shifting Effect on Future Performance Driven By Mutual Fund Flows and Returns |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
54 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2022-06-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2022-06-27 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
共同基金、基金流量、基金績效、風險移轉、績效持續性 Mutual fund, Fund flow, Fund performance, Risk shifting, Performance Persistence |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 278 次,被下載 32 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 278 times, has been downloaded 32 times. |
中文摘要 |
共同基金由於投資類型多樣化、投資門檻低且投資便利性高的原因,深受台灣國內投資人的喜愛,共同基金的總資產規模也日益上升。過去有關國內共同基金的研究多在驗證基金流量與績效之間的交互關係,抑或是基金績效的持續性。 本文以2010年至2021年間國內股票型共同基金作為樣本,首先利用T檢定觀察基金前期流量與績效是否為影響後續淨流量與風險變化的因素,由前期流量高且績效佳的基金將增加未來的風險承擔之結果,顯示國內的基金經理人可能具有過度自信。隨後進一步將基金的淨流量拆分為高、中、低三個部分,利用分段線性迴歸、Fama-Macbech迴歸實證,旨在探討基金前期的流量與績效如何影響基金未來的風險水平以及基金經理人的風險移轉決策,並且驗證其風險移轉後對於基金績效持續性的影響。 實證結果發現,基金經理人在經歷高流量與高績效後所引發的過度自信會導致基金未來的風險上升,為了拆解風險上升的來源,本文加入三個風險移轉機制來分析,發現基金週轉率以及基金貝他值的上升,會造成未來績效下降,並且對於基金的績效持續性也有負向的影響。 |
Abstract |
Mutual funds are welcomed by investors in Taiwan. The total assets under management of mutual funds are also increasing day by day, due to the diversification of investment types, low investment threshold and high convenience. This study using a sample of domestic open-end equity fund in Taiwan from 2010 to 2021, and with the method of piecewise regression and Fama-Macbech regression. Aims to investigates how the fund’s past flow and performance affect the future fund’s risk level amd managers’ risk shifting decisions. Also the subsequent impact on the fund’s performance persistence is concerned. The empirical results show that the overconfidence of fund managers caused by experiencing high flow and good performance will lead to an increase in the fund’s future risk. In order to disassemble the source of the rising risk, this study adds three risk shifting mechanisms. Finds that the increase of fund turnover rate and fund’s beta will lead to a decline in future performance, and also have a negative impact on the persistence of fund performance. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vi 第一章、緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與預期效益 2 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章、文獻回顧 5 第一節 共同基金績效與流量之間的關聯性 5 第二節 基金績效持續性之研究 6 第三節 基金經理人之過度自信行為與風險移轉機制 8 第四節 研究假說 11 第三章、資料與研究方法 12 第一節 資料來源與樣本期間 12 第二節 基金流量、績效與風險衡量方式 13 第三節 風險移轉機制的衡量方式 14 第四節 敘述統計與資料分析 15 第五節 模型設計與研究方法 19 第四章、實證結果與分析 26 第一節 以T檢定觀察基金分組差異顯著性 26 第二節 基金前期流量與績效對未來風險變動關係 28 第三節 基金前期流量、績效與風險移轉機制間的關係 31 第四節 基金風險移轉後對未來績效之關係 34 第五節 基金績效持續性之檢驗 40 第五章、結論與建議 42 第一節 結論 42 第二節 後續研究建議 44 參考文獻 46 |
參考文獻 References |
王南喻、王南憲(2006)。開放式股票型基金績效與流量關係之研究─台灣地區境 內基金市場實證。企業管理學報,69,73-96。 池祥萱、林煜恩與周賓凰(2007)。基金績效持續與聰明錢效果:台灣實證。管理 學報,24(3),307-330。 邱顯比、林清珮(1999)。共同基金分類與基金績效持續性之研究。財務金融學刊 ,7(2),63-88。 傅英芬、劉海清(2016)。基金經理人績效持續性與過度自信。Journal of Data Analysis,11(1),45-70。 劉永欽、陳香如與李翊萱(2012),國內共同基金淨值與未來績效及其持續性之關 係。台灣管理學刊,12(2),179-203。 Andreu, L., Sarto, J. L., and Serrano, M. (2019). Risk shifting consequences depending on manager characteristics. International Review of Economics and Finance 62, 131-152. Brown, K. C., Harlow, W. V. and Starks, L. T. (1996). Of tournaments and temptations: an analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance 51, 85-110. Busse, J. A., Tong, L., Tong, Q. and Zhang, Z. (2019). Trading regularity and fund Performance. The Review of Financial Studies 32, 374-422. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance 52, 57-82. Chevalier, J. A., and Ellison, G. D. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy 105, 1167-1200. Coval, J., and Stafford, E. (2007). Asset fire sales (and purchases) in equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics 86, 479-512. Dubofsky, D. A. (2010). Mutual fund portfolio trading and investor flow. Journal of Banking and Finance 34, 802-812. Edelen, R. M. (1999). Investor flows and the assessed performance of open-end fund Managers. Journal of Financial Economics 53, 439-466. Edelen, R. M., Ince, O. S. and Kadlec, G. B. (2016). Institutional investors and stock return anomalies. Journal of Financial Economics 119, 472-488. Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47, 427-465. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman. (1992). The persistence of mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance 47, 1977-1984. Ha, Y., and Ko, K. (2017). Why do fund managers increase risk?. Journal of Banking and Finance 78, 108-116. Huang, J., Sialm, C. and Zhang, H. (2011). Risk shifting and mutual fund performance. The Review of Financial Studies 24, 2575–2616. Huang, J., Wei, K. D. and Yan, H. (2007). Participation costs and the sensitivity of fund flows to past performance. The Journal of Finance 62, 1273-1311. Huij, Joop, and Marno Verbeek. (2007). Cross-sectional learning and short-run persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 973-997. Jiang, G. J., and Yuksel, H. Z. (2017). What drives the ‘smart-money’ effect? Evidence from investors’ money flow to mutual fund classes. Journal of Empirical Finance 40, 39-58. Jin, X. J., Shen, Y. F., Yu, B., and Qian, M.F. (2021). Flow-driven risk shifting of high-performing funds. Accounting and Finance 62, 71-100. Karceski, J. (2002). Returns-chasing behavior, mutual funds, and beta’s death. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37, 559-594. O’Connell, P. G. J., and Teo, M. (2009). Institutional investors, past performance, and dynamic loss aversion. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44, 155-188. Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review 89, 1279-1298. Puetz, A., and Ruenzi, S. (2011). Overconfidence among professional investors: evidence from mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 38, 684-712. Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992). Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Review 33, 7-17. Sapp, T., and Tiwari, A. (2004). Does stock return momentum explain the ‘smart money’effect? The Journal of Finance 59, 2605-2622. Shu, P.G., Yeh, Y.H. and Yamada, T. (2002). The Behavior of Taiwan Mutual Fund Investors-Performance and Fund Flows. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 10, 583- 600 Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows, The Journal of Finance 53, 1589-1622. Woerheide, W. (1982). Investor Response to Suggested Criteria for Selection of Mutual Funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 17, 129-137. Yan, X., and Zhang, Z. (2009). Institutional investors and equity returns: are short- term institutions better informed? The Review of Financial Studies 22, 893-924. Zheng, L. (1999). Is money smart? A study of mutual fund investors’ fund selection ability. The Journal of Finance 54, 901-933. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |