領導理論於當今商業組織的分析中逐漸成為位居重要的研究領域，在過去傳統的領導理論中常見的是以「單層面」的行為導向來針對領導特色進行分類，像是權威式領導、民主是領導、放任式領導等。其後寶德勒衍伸出「權變領導」的概念，將單層面導向深化成「雙層面」的情境面向來關注領導特色。隨著研究的深化與發展，現代領導理論結合多元的層面，進入多面向的綜合研究型態，過去幾年中常聽到的「悖論理論」即是多面向的領導整合研究，然而近期延伸出其他的理論稱為「元(meta)悖論理論」之研究。 此研究即是要透過「元悖論理論」來分析領導者在導入「榮譽典章制度」(code of honor) 時應扮演的角色。在過去商業發展中，詐欺與不道德的商業案 件興起，導致高校系統逐漸思考誠信的培育，「榮譽典章制度」就是從校園中 開始興起，希望能培訓學生從重視校園文化到出社會後能創造有道德的商業文 化而發展出的理論基礎(Sally Sledge & Pam Pringle,2010)
整體而言，本研究的主要研究目的在於探討導入榮譽典章制度的優點、領 導者應該採用何種領導風格以及公司或組織應該如何做好準備，本文中運用質化分析的方法，搜集了七個個案的訪談內容，內容主要圍繞在導入前的組織背景、導入前後的領導人風格、導入前後的組織氛圍以及導入後的績效改變，期望透過七個個案的對比，發現導入榮譽典章制度前應有的準備、領導者扮演的關鍵角色以及導入榮譽典章制度的優點。

Leadership theory has gradually become an important research field in current business. In the behavioral orientation of one-sided analysis commonly seen in leadership in the past, such as transactional leadership, democracy leadership, and Laissez-faire leadership, etc. Later, Fiedler developed the concept of contingency leadership, converting concept of single-level orientation into a "two-level" situational orientation to focus on leadership characteristics. With the similarities, modern leadership theory combined with other multiple theories, like “paradoxical theory", which has been born in the past few years. But in the article here, we will discuss on the topic of “meta-paradoxical leadership theory”, which integrated all leadership theory in one to analyze the leader’s role when constructing the honor code for corporation.
The research is to analyze the role that leaders should play when introducing the "honor code " through " meta-paradoxical leadership". Since the emergence of immortal business activities previously, the college system increasingly thinks about how to improve honesty in the school organization. The purpose is to cultivate the moral and honor thought in their mind. Also, business nowadays would take the “honor code” as reference for cultivation of integrity, and to stimulate the motivation and cohesion in their organization.
Overall, the main research objectives of this study are as follows: The advantages of introducing the honor code system, what leadership style should a leader adopt and how a company or organization should prepare during the time constructing the honor code? This research will focus on empirical analysis, extracting important content from the interview content, and summarize the conclusions. In the current business environment, companies compete fiercely with each other, therefore creating a good corporate or organizational culture will be the key factor for success.

論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vii
表 次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 2
第三節 研究流程說明 4
第四節 研究範圍及可能研究限制 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 榮譽典章 7
第二節 組織變革 9
第三節 組織氛圍 11
第四節 領導理論 13
第五節 元悖論領導 17
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究方法 21
第二節 訪談對象與訪談大綱 22
第三節 研究預期成果 24
第四章 研究成果 25
第一節 榮譽典章導入前 25
第二節 榮譽典章導入 26
第三節 榮譽典章導入成果 31
第五章 研究成果與建議 35
第一節 研究成果 35
第二節 未來研究建議 36
第三節 管理意涵 36
參考文獻 37
一、中文 37
二、英文 38
附錄一 41
附錄二 44
附錄三 47
附錄四 50
附錄五 53
附錄六 57
附錄七 61

一、中文
1.尹衍樑, & 司徒達賢. (1989). 組織變革策略對組織承諾之影響研究-以潤泰工業股份有限公司電腦化為例. 管理評論, 8, 57-72.
2.方志民(2005)。管理學：整合觀點與創新思維。台北市:前程企管管理
3.邱從益. (2005). 組織氣氛與學校經營. 學校行政, (36), 71-86.
4.金維才, & 夏琍. (2004). 美國弗吉尼亞大學 “榮譽制度” 及其啟示. 安徽師範大學學報: 人文社會科學版, 32(5), 603-606.
5.林鉦棽, 高月慈, & 賴鳳儀. (2010). 轉化領導, 交易領導與部屬組織公民行為之關聯性分析: 探討政治技能的調節角色. 組織與管理, 3(2), 129-164.
6.胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例。台北:巨流。
7.洪春吉, & 趙皖屏. (2009). 轉換型領導, 交易型領導與組織創新之關係─ 以半導體業, 石化業, 紡織業實證比較研究.
8.涂政源（2003），主管領導風格、情緒能力與員工對上司承諾關係之研究，國立中正大學企管研究所碩士論文。
9.高瑞新. (2006). 領導行為, 組織氣氛與服務品質關係之研究-以高雄港務警察局為例. 人力資源管理學報, 6(3), 95-117.
10.黃昆輝（民78）:教育行政學。台北：東華
11.張秀琴(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系。
12.黃宗顯等人（2008）.學校領導：新理論與實踐. 台北市：五南
13.莫大華. (2008). 軍人基本信念調整與軍人價值觀教育. 國防大學: 復興崗學報,(91).
14.許士軍. (2009). 企業組織變革新趨勢. 研考雙月刊, 33(3), 14-21.
15.溫子欣. (2006). 領導特質論視角的再審視. 學校行政, (42), 108-120.
16.蔡培村, & 武文瑛. (2004). 領導學: 理論, 實務與研究. 高雄市: 儷文文化.
17.鄭嘉麟. (2007). 領導風格與領導效能之研究 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).
18.簡君倫, 鄭淑勻, & 洪雪華. (2012). 以跨個案方法探索觀光餐旅業之公共關係認知與實踐. 真理觀光學報, (10), 1-22.
19.譚樂, 蒿坡, 楊曉, & 宋合義. (2020). 悖論式領導: 研究述評與展望. 外國經濟與管理, 42(4), 63-79.
20.蘇玫夙（2005）。基隆市托兒所所長領導風格、托兒所組織氣氛與托育服務品質之相關研究。中國文化大學青少年兒童福利研究所。

二、英文
Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J. & Sivasubramaniam, N.(2003), “Context and leadership: an examination of the nice-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire,” The Leadership Quarterl, 14, 261-295.
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Tse, B. (2000). Transformational leadership as management of emotion: A conceptual review.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Blau, G. J., & Boal, K. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. Academy of management review, 12(2), 288-300.
Brown, D. J. & Keeping L. M.(2005), “Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect,” The Leadership Quarter, 16, 245-272.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership, 1978. New Yorker: Harper & Row.
Desler,G.(1980).Organizationtheory:Integratingstructureandbehavior.Englewod
Clif, NJ: Prentice-Hal.
FIEDLERF,.E. (1967).A theory of leadership effectiveness. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gephart Jr, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of management journal, 47(4), 454-462.
Ghazal, S., Arshad, A., & Kamran, F. (2016). Personality and Transformational Leadership: A Review. IBA Business Review, 11(2).
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (2004). Papers on the Science of Administration. Routledge.
Halpin, A. W. (1966). Theory and research in administration. Macmillan.
Hellriegel, D., & Slocum Jr, J. W. (1994). Management. Philipines.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1982). Leadership style: Attitudes and behaviors.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General systems theory: Applications for organization and management. Academy of management journal, 15(4), 447-465.
Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A.(2001), Organizational behavior, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Leavitt, H. J. (1964). Applied organization change in industry: structural, technical and human approaches.
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127-149.
Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate.
May, K. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1993). Academic dishonesty: The honor system and students' attitudes. Journal of college student development.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211-234.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Onyeri, I. N. (1989). An analytical study of the relationship between leadership styles of principals and organizational climate within selected elementary schools.
Pearce, C. L., Wassenaar, C. L., Berson, Y., & Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2019). Toward a。theory of meta-paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 31-41.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
Pritchard, R. D., & Karasick, B. W. (1973). The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational behavior and human performance, 9(1), 126-146.
Smith, P. A.(1997).The University of Alabama doctoral dissertation.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 46-56.
Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business ethics, 78(4), 601-609.
Tagiuri, R. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. Organizational climate: Exploration of a concept, 9-32.
Tyler, T. R., & De Cremer, D. (2005). Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 529-545.
Yukl, G. A., & Becker, W. S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566.