論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
心理賦權、內在動機與創新行為之關係:以員工體驗為調節變項 A Study of the Relationships among Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation and Innovation Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Employee Experience |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
73 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2022-06-16 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2022-07-01 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
創新行為、內在動機、心理賦權、員工體驗、個人與組織契合度 Innovation Behavior, Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Empowerment, Employee Experience, Person-organization Fit |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 330 次,被下載 70 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 330 times, has been downloaded 70 times. |
中文摘要 |
創新是組織成功與存續的關鍵,故一直以來實務界與學術界皆持續地關注與探究創新相關之議題。過去許多不同研究針對創新行為之各層次前置因素進行探討,而本研究認為組織創新之基礎源自於員工個人行為,故欲聚焦於個體層次之前置因素,欲驗證心理賦權、內在動機與創新行為之間的關係,並延伸探討員工體驗之調節效果。換言之,組織及管理者是否能透過提高心理賦權、內在動機與員工體驗驅動員工展現創新行為是本研究欲探討之問題。 本研究主要研究對象以企業在職員工為主,以便利抽樣方式發放問卷予不同產業別、職位與教育程度等之填答者,最終回收共計376份問卷,研究結果發現: 一、 內在動機與創新行為呈正向關係。 二、 心理賦權與內在動機呈正向關係。 三、 內在動機中介心理賦權與創新行為的關係。 四、 員工體驗對於心理賦權與內在動機間之正向關係具部分調節效果。 五、 員工體驗對於內在動機與創新行為間之正向關係具部分調節效果。 最後,據本研究結果提出實務管理意涵及未來研究建議。 |
Abstract |
Innovation is the key to the success and survival of an organization. Both academic and practice fields have been exploring and paying close attention to innovation-related issues. Many different studies have discussed the pre-factors of innovation behavior at various levels, but this study believes that the basis of organizational innovation originates from the individual behavior of employees. Therefore, this study would focus on the pre-factors at the individual level, verify the relationships among psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation and innovation behavior, and discuss the moderating effect of employee experience. In other words, this study intends to explore whether organizations and managers can drive employees’ innovation behaviors by improving psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and employee experience. The data were mainly collected from employees of enterprises. The questionnaires were distributed to respondents of different industries, job positions, and education levels by means of convenience sampling. A total of 376 questionnaires were collected. Results of this study revealed that: (1) intrinsic motivation had a significant positive correlation with innovation behavior; (2) psychological empowerment had a significant positive correlation with intrinsic motivation; (3) intrinsic motivation played a mediating role on the relationship between psychological empowerment and innovation behavior; (4) employee experience had a certain degree of moderating effect on the relationship between psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation; and (5) employee experience had a certain degree moderating effect on the relationship between intrinsic motivation and innovation behavior. According to the results, this study provided practical management implications and future research suggestions. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 創新行為 6 一、定義 6 第二節 內在動機 7 一、定義 7 二、內在動機與創新行為之關係 8 第三節 心理賦權 9 一、定義 9 二、心理賦權與內在動機之關係 11 三、心理賦權、內在動機與創新行為之關係 12 第四節 員工體驗 12 一、定義 12 二、心理賦權、內在動機、創新行為與員工體驗之關係 14 第三章 研究方法 17 第一節 研究架構與假設 17 第二節 研究樣本 18 第三節 研究工具 19 第四節 共同方法變異之檢驗與事前預防 24 第五節 控制變項 27 第六節 資料處理與分析 28 第四章 研究結果 30 第一節 各變項之現況分析 30 第二節 人口資料對於各變項之差異分析 31 第三節 各變項之相關分析 33 第四節 中介模型:心理賦權、內在動機與創新行為之結構方程模式 35 第五節 調節效果:心理賦權、內在動機、創新行為與員工體驗之結構方程模式 38 第六節 員工體驗強弱分配之結構方程模式 40 第五章 結論與建議 44 第一節 結論與討論 44 第二節 管理意涵 46 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 48 參考文獻 50 一、中文部分 50 二、英文部分 51 附錄 59 |
參考文獻 References |
一、中文部分 王思舜(2013)。心理賦權、組織公民行為與職涯高原關係之研究。國立臺北大 學企業管理學系碩士論文。臺北。 吳靜吉、郭俊賢、王文中、劉鶴龍、陳淑惠與李慧賢(1996)。創新行為量表之 編制與修訂。未出版。 易琇樺(2020)。主管領導風格、員工幸福感及其組織承諾與創新行為關係之研 究。國立臺北商業大學國際商務系碩士論文。臺北。 涂君暐(2005)。內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究-以第八屆 創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。桃園。 徐國耕(2019)。情緒領導行為如何影響創新行為?跨層次之中介與調節的影響 效果。國立清華大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士論文。新竹。 張旭嵐(2003)。心理賦權、知覺組織支持對幸福感及創新行為之影響─以預期 形象為調節變項。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文。臺北。 張瑞芸(2019)。員工體驗與工作敬業心關係之研究-以關係型心理契約為中介 變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理學系碩士論文。桃園。 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質;影 響、測試和補救。管理學報,23,77-98。 二、英文部分 Abd-El-Salam, E. M., Shawky, A. Y., El-Nahas, T., & Nawar, Y. S. (2013). The relationship among job satisfaction, motivation, leadership, communication, and psychological empowerment: An Egyptian case study. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 78(2), 33. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Bledow, R., Hülsheger, U., & Rosing, K. (2018). Innovation and creativity in organizations. In D. S. OnesN. Anderson, & H. K. Sinangil The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 161-186). Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297-1333. Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Center for Creative Leadership. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357. Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human resource management review, 3(3), 185-201. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167. Amabile, T.M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B.A. & Tighe, E.M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of management, 25(3), 231-292. Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 43(2), 207-242. Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 805. Bell, N. E., & Staw, B. M. (1989). 11 People as sculptors versus sculpture: the roles of personality and personal control. Handbook of career theory, 232. Bersin, J., Solow, M., & Wakefield, N. (2016). Design thinking: Crafting the employee experience. Deloitte Insights. Blau, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1982). Empowering nets of participation. Administrative science quarterly, 363-379. Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bowen, D., & Lawler, E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when? Sloan Management Review, 33: 31-39. Brief, A.P. & Nord, W.R. (1990). Meaning of Occupational Work. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models (Vol. 154). Sage. Carbone, L. P., & Haeckel, S. H. (1994). Engineering customer experiences. Marketing management, 3(3), 8-19. Cardozo, R., McLaughlin, K., Harmon, B., Reynolds, P., & Miller, B. (1993). Product—Market choices and growth of new businesses. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of The Product Development & Management Association, 10(4), 331-340. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In The stream of consciousness (pp. 335-358). Springer, Boston, MA. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. Dery, K., & Sebastian, I. M. (2017). Building business value with employee experience. MIT Sloan CISR Research Briefing, 17(6), 3. Fan, H. L., Chang, P. F., Albanese, D., Wu, J. J., Yu, M. J., & Chuang, H. J. (2016). Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 49-59. Gagné, M., Senecal, C. B., & Koestner, R. (1997). Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 27(14), 1222-1240. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 513. Giebels, E., de Reuver, R. S., Rispens, S., & Ufkes, E. G. (2016). The critical roles of task conflict and job autonomy in the relationship between proactive personalities and innovative employee behavior. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 52(3), 320-341. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), 472-485. Hackman, J. R., Hackman, R. J., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign (Vol. 2779). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90. He, H.T., (2011). Effectiveness of Knowledge Sharing: An Individual-Organization Oriented Perspective. Studies in Science of Science, vol. 03. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. Jani, H., & Balyan, R. K. (2016). Impact of employee perceive HR practices on employee engagement. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 5(9), 258-261. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of management journal, 47(3), 368-384. Jain, R., Aagja, J., & Bagdare, S. (2017). Customer experience–a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 169-211. Grenwich, CT: JAI. Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, D. E. (1990). Work Motivation: Theory and Practice. American Psychologist, 45(2), 144. Kaufman, B. E. (2007). The development of HRM in historical and international perspective. In The Oxford handbook of human resource management. Kizilos, P. (1990). Crazy about empowerment. Training, 27(12). Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 4. Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of personality, 52(3), 233-248. Lee, M., & Koh, J. (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 684-695. Lesser, E., Mertens, J., Barrientos, M. P., & Singer, M. (2016). Designing employee experience: How a unifying approach can enhance engagement and productivity. IBM Institute for Business Value. Li, V., Mitchell, R., & Boyle, B. (2016). The divergent effects of transformational leadership on individual and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 41(1), 66-97. Li, Y., Wei, F., Ren, S., & Di, Y. (2015). Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Mainiero, L. A. (1986). Coping with powerlessness: The relationship of gender and job dependency to empowerment-strategy usage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 633-653. Matzler, K., Abfalter, D. E., Mooradian, T. A., & Bailom, F. (2013). Corporate culture as an antecedent of successful exploration and exploitation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), 1350025. Maylett, T. and Wride, M. (2017), The Employee Experience: How to Attract Talent, Retain Top Performers, and Drive Results, John Wiley & Sons. Meister, J.C. and Mulcahy, K.J. (2016), The Future Workplace Experience: 10 Rules for Mastering Disruption in Recruiting and Engaging Employees. McGraw Hill Professional. Mishra, A. K., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998). Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Academy of management Review, 23(3), 567-588. Morgan, J. (2017). The employee experience advantage: How to win the war for talent by giving employees the workspaces they want, the tools they need, and a culture they can celebrate. John Wiley & Sons. Neilsen, E. H. 1986. Empowerment strategies: Balancing authority and reposibility. In S. Srivastva & Associates (Eds.), Executive power: 78-110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, July. Plaskoff, J. (2017). Employee experience: the new human resource management approach. Strategic HR Review. Purc, E., & Laguna, M. (2019). Personal values and innovative behavior of employees. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 865. Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational dynamics, 26(2), 37-49. Razmus, W., & Laguna, M. (2018). Dimensions of entrepreneurial success: A multilevel study on stakeholders of micro-enterprises. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 791. Reissner, S., & Pagan, V. (2013). Generating employee engagement in a public– private partnership: Management communication activities and employee experiences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2741-2759. Woodworth, R. S. (1918). Dynamic psychology. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33(1), 327-336. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 96(5), 981. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 33-53. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human relations, 39(11), 1005-1016. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of management journal, 39(2), 483-504. Sun, L. Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The leadership quarterly, 23(1), 55-65. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681. Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta- analysis. Personality and social psychology review, 1(2), 170-182. Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of retailing, 85(1), 31-41. Wang, J., Yang, J., & Xue, Y. (2017). Subjective well-being, knowledge sharing and individual innovation behavior: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Wilkinson, A. (1998). Empowerment: theory and practice. Personnel review. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297. Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., & De Jong, J. P. (2014). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534. Yohn, D. L. (2016). Design your employee experience as thoughtfully as you design your customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 6. Yu, X., & Meng, X. (2021). Intrinsic Motivation, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Behavior of Knowledge-Based Employees in the Industrial New Generation. CONVERTER, 75-87. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53(2), 323-342. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of management journal, 53(1), 107-128. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |