Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0605122-221551 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0605122-221551
論文名稱
Title
董監事持股與股票質押對企業創新的影響
The influence of directors' shareholding and stock pledges on corporate innovation.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
59
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-05-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-07-05
關鍵字
Keywords
企業創新、企業經營績效、董監事持股、董監事質押、經理人持股
Corporate innovation, Corporate performance, Directors’ shareholding, Stock pledge, Managers’ shareholding
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 308 次,被下載 55
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 308 times, has been downloaded 55 times.
中文摘要
本文以2001年至2020年台灣上市、上櫃企業為研究樣本,以專利總數作為創新之衡量變數,探討董監事持股與股權質押對企業創新活動的影響,以及企業創新對公司績效的影響;此外,本文亦延伸探討經理人持股是否對於企業創新活動造成影響。實證結果如下:其一,董監事持股比率對於企業創新活動存在負向關係;其二,董監事質押比率對於企業創新活動存在負向影響,推論其原因為董監事畏懼股價崩跌而出現的風險趨避行為;其三,企業創新活動對於企業長期公司績效帶來正向影響;最後,經理人持股比率對於企業創新存在顯著正向關係,顯示出在台灣市場當中,經理人持股能夠降低代理問題,使經理人投入創新以獲得長期價值成長,避免短視近利的決策。
Abstract
This study takes listed companies in Taiwan from 2001 to 2020 as research samples and uses the total number of patents as a proxy variable to measure innovation. We mainly examine the influence of directors’ and supervisors' shareholding and stock pledges on corporate innovation and the impact of corporate innovation on company performance. In addition, this paper extends to explore whether managers' shareholding impacts corporate innovation activities. The empirical results are as follows: First, there is a negative relationship between the shareholding ratio of directors and supervisors and corporate innovation activities. Second, the stock pledge ratio of directors and supervisors has a negative influence on corporate innovation, and it is inferred that directors and supervisors are fear of stock price collapse and tend to behave risk-averse. Third, corporate innovation positively impacts long-term corporate performance. Finally, managers’ shareholding ratio has a significant positive relationship with corporate innovation, showing that in the Taiwan market, manager shareholding may reduce agency problems, which makes managers invest in long-term activities such as innovation, and avoid short-sighted decisions.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
圖次 vi
表次 vii
第一章、緒論 1
第二章、文獻探討 3
第一節、董監事持股對於創新活動的影響 3
第二節、股票質押對創新活動的影響 3
第三節、創新活動是否能替企業提升附加價值 4
第四節、假說建立 4
第三章、資料與樣本 6
第一節、主要研究變數(自變數與應變數) 6
第二節、控制變數 7
第三節、固定效果 8
第四章、研究方法與設計 8
第五章、敘述統計與實證結果 11
第一節、敘述統計 11
第二節、多元迴歸分析結果 20
第六章、將研究發展費用視為企業創新之替代變數 30
第一節、研究發展費用 30
第二節、多元迴歸分析結果 30
第七章、延伸議題:經理人持股對於企業創新活動的影響 39
第一節、經理人持股 39
第二節、相關文獻回顧與假說建立 39
第三節、實證結果 40
第八章、結論與建議 47
參考文獻 49
參考文獻 References
尹賢瑜、童心達與陳沛雨,2014,經理人與董監事之持股對公司績效的影響-以台灣電子產業為例,真理財經學報,第26期,23-52.
江楚翔,2014,景氣變動對研究發展、專利及權利金與企業績效之關係,屏東科技大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
李常青、李宇坤與李茂良,2018,控股股東股權質押與企業創新投入,金融研究,第457期,143-157。
汪青萍、沈佩儒,2011,董事會特性對創新績效與市場評價之影響-台灣電子業之實證,全球商業經營管理學報,第6期,41-52。
許瑜庭,2020,員工對待如何影響創新與經營績效,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
陳安琳、高蘭芬、陳怡凱與陳烷鈺,2013,董監事股權質押與公司治理之研究,中山管理評論,第21卷,第2期,299-337。
黃劭彥、林有志、林琦珍與施志成,2008,智慧資本、智慧資本附加價值與企業績效之整合分析,台灣管理學刊,第8卷,第1期,27-46。
黃奕豪,2007,創新決策系統與公司附加價值之關聯性實證研究,淡江大學會計學系碩士班論文。
黃政仁、闕伶倫,2014,企業創新能力與國際化程度對創新績效及企業績效之影響: 以台灣電子資訊業為例. 會計評論,第59期,107-147。
詹立宇、林惠玲,2013,產業地理與市場集中度之相關性:台灣製造業之分析,經濟研究 (Taipei Economic Inquiry),第49卷,第2期,167-205。
Chang, X., Fu, K., Low, A., & Zhang, W. (2015). Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. Journal of financial economics, 115(1), 168-188.
Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434-2473.
Chemmanur, T. J., & Tian, X. (2018). Do antitakeover provisions spur corporate innovation? A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(3), 1163-1194.
Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Evans, K. P. (2016). Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 61-79.
Chen, W. (2020). Analyzing the Potential Risks and Corporate Governance of Enterprises from the Equity Pledge of Listed Companies, Arizona State University.
Chen, Y., & Hu, S.-Y. (2001). The controlling shareholder's personal stock loan and firm performance.
Cho, S. (1992). Agency costs, management stockholding, and research and development expenditures. Seoul Journal of Economics, 5.
Chou, R. K., Wang, Y.-C., & Jimmy Yang, J. (2021). Share pledging, payout policy, and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Empirical Finance, 61, 18-33.
Clausen, S., & Hirth, S. (2016). Measuring the value of intangibles. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 110-127.
Connolly, R. A., & Hirschey, M. (2005). Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin's q. R&d Management, 35(2), 217-223.
Damodaran, A. (1999). Research and development expenses: Implications for profitability measurement and valuation.
Dou, Y., Masulis, R. W., & Zein, J. (2019). Shareholder wealth consequences of insider pledging of company stock as collateral for personal loans. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(12), 4810-4854.
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., & Sharma, Z. (2011). Incentives and innovation: Evidence from CEO compensation contracts. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper(17).
Hashimoto, A., & Haneda, S. (2008). Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1829-1836.
Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(3), 305-327.
Hsu, P.-H., Lee, H.-H., Liu, A. Z., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Corporate innovation, default risk, and bond pricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 329-344.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Lee, T. S., & Yeh, Y. H. (2004). Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan. In (Vol. 12, pp. 378-388): Wiley Online Library.
Li, M., Liu, C., & Scott, T. (2019). Share pledges and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 55, 192-205.
Ottoo, R. E. (2018). Valuation of corporate innovation and the pricing of risk in the biopharmaceutical industry: The case of Gilead. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30(2), 92-107.
Pang, C., & Wang, Y. (2020). Stock pledge, risk of losing control and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60.
Tian, X. (2011). The causes and consequences of venture capital stage financing. Journal of financial economics, 101(1), 132-159.
Wang, E. C. (2007). R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(2), 345-360.
Xu, R., Chang, J., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2019). Research on the influence of equity pledge on stock price crash risk: based on financial shock of 2015 stock market crisis. Economic and Political Studies, 7(4), 480-505.
Zhang, W. (2015). R&D investment and distress risk. Journal of Empirical Finance, 32, 94-114.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code