Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0614121-150039 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0614121-150039
論文名稱
Title
高收益債券因子增值策略基金
High Yield Bond Factor Enhanced Index Fund
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
62
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-06-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2021-07-14
關鍵字
Keywords
Barra 風險模型、高收益債券因子、量化追蹤指數、指數增值基金、多因子模型
Barra risk model, High-yield bond factor, Index tracking, Enhanced fund, Multi factor model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 253 次,被下載 36
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 253 times, has been downloaded 36 times.
中文摘要
在過去很長的一段時間,由於投資債券需要有較大的資本,因此交易對象主要為機構法人與大戶,隨著債券市場蓬勃的發展,市場上逐漸產生關於債券的投資商品,一般的大眾也有越來越多投資債券的機會,如債券基金、債券ETF等。
為了因應新冠疫情帶來的衝擊,聯準會祭出一連串貨幣政策,使市場維持低利率的環境。此外,疫苗出世後市場趨於穩定、利差逐漸收斂,在股市狂熱不斷創高之際,投資人可適度在投資組合中納入高收益債券資產,除了定期領取較高利息外更有望賺取價差。
本研究透過Barra建構風險模型,將市場風險做良好的歸因,且依據純因子模型觀察因子表現,發現Momentum、Value為具有穩定獲利的因子,再透過分層抽樣選取指數中的成分債用以追蹤標竿指數,將追蹤誤差穩定控制在0.9%左右,最後藉由從風險模型發現的風格因子將我們的追蹤投組做增強,將追蹤誤差控制在4%以內且平均Information約為1.2。
Abstract
Institutions, legal persons, and large investors have been mainly used as transaction objects of bonds for a long time due to the significant capital required for bond investments. With the rapid development of the bond market, many bond investment products emerged on the market. The general public also gained increasing investment opportunities in bonds, such as bond funds and bond ETFs.
To cope with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve has launched a series of monetary policies to maintain a low-interest-rate environment in the market. Furthermore, after the release of COVID-19 vaccines, the market stabilized, and interest spreads gradually narrowed. When the stock market frenzy continues to hit highs, investors can moderately include high-yield bond assets in their investment portfolios. In addition to regularly receiving increased interest rates, they are expected to earn spreads.
This study uses the Barra risk factor analysis to construct a risk model to attribute market risks and observe the performance of factors based on a pure factor model. Findings show that momentum and value are stable factors. Constituents in the index are selected through stratified sampling to track the benchmark, and tracking error is stably controlled at approximately 0.9%. Finally, our tracking portfolio is enhanced by the style factor found in the risk model. The tracking error is controlled within 4%, and the average information ratio is approximately 1.2.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Content iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background 1
1.2. Motivation for Research 2
1.3. Research Purpose 3
2. Literature Review 5
2.1. Modern Portfolio 5
2.2. Factor of Fixed-Income 6
2.3. Multi Factor Model 7
2.4. Track and Enhanced Index 8
3. Data and Methodology 10
3.1. Data Description 10
3.2. Multi-factor Model Construction 13
3.2.1. Missing Value Process 13
3.2.2. Eliminating Outliers 14
3.2.3. Standardizing Descriptor 15
3.2.4. Compressing Outliers 15
3.2.5. Calculation of Factor Definition 16
3.2.6. Multi-model Factor: Return 20
3.2.7. Common Factor Risk 23
3.2.8. Modeling Covariance Matrices 24
3.2.9. Bias Test 25
3.3. Index Tracking 27
3.4. Index Enhancing 29
4. Empirical Results 31
4.1. Multi Factor Model Result 31
4.1.1. Factor Result 31
4.1.2. Explanatory Power of the Model 35
4.1.3. Empirical Result of Factor Risk 36
4.2. Tracking Index Result 37
4.3. Enhanced Portfolio 39
5. Conclusions and Suggestions 47
5.1. Conclusions 47
5.2. Suggestions 48
Reference 51
參考文獻 References
1. Barth, F., Scholz, H., & Stegmeier, M. (2017). Momentum in the European Corporate Bond Market:
2. The Role of Bond-Specific Returns. The Journal of Fixed Income, 27(3), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2018.27.3.054
3. Bertrand, P. (2010). Another Look at Portfolio Optimization under Tracking-Error Constraints. Financial Analysts Journal, 66(3), 78-90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27809196
4. Bharath, S. T., & Shumway, T. (2008). Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339-1369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40056852
5. Blitz, D., Falkenstein, E., & Vliet, P. v. (2014). Explanations for the Volatility Effect: An Overview Based on the CAPM Assumptions. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(3), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2014.40.3.061
6. Briner, B. G., Smith, R. C., & Ward, P. (2009). The Barra Europe Equity Model (EUE3). (MSCI Barra).
7. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329556
8. Cheyette, O. (2002). The Barra U.S. Fixed Income Risk Model. (Barra, Inc.).
9. Connor, G. (1995). The Three Types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(3), 42-46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4479845
10. Correia, M. M., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, A. I. (2011). Value Investing in Credit Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1800212
11. Derwall, J., Huij, J., & de Zwart, G. J. (2009). The Short-Term Corporate Bond Anomaly. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1101070
12. Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:81:y:1973:i:3:p:607-36
13. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5
14. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
15. Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. (2010). Betting Against Beta. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16601
16. Grinold, R. C., & Kahn, R. N. (1995). Active Portfolio Management: Quantitative Theory and Applications.
17. Henke, H., Kaufmann, H., Messow, P., & Fang-Klingler, J. (2020). Factor Investing in Credit. The Journal of Index Investing, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.1.085
18. Hill, J. M., & Naviwala, H. (1999). Synthetic and Enhanced Index Strategies Using Futures on U.S. Indexes. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(5), 61. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1999.319697
19. Houweling, P., & van Zundert, J. (2014). Factor Investing in the Corporate Bond Market. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2516322
20. Ilmanen, A., Byrne, R., Gunasekera, H., & Minikin, R. (2004). Which Risks Have Been Best Rewarded? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.319930
21. Israel, R., Kang, J., & Richardson, S. A. (2015). Investing with Style in Corporate Bonds. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576784
22. Jensen, M. C., Black, F., & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.
23. Jorion, P. (2003). Portfolio Optimization with Tracking-Error Constraints. Financial Analysts Journal, 59(5), 70-82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4480513
24. Jostova, G., Nikolova, S., Philipov, A., & Stahel, C. W. (2013). Momentum in Corporate Bond Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(7), 1649-1693. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23470056
25. Khang, K., & Dolly King, T.-H. (2004). Return reversals in the bond market: Evidence and causes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(3), 569-593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(03)00035-9
26. Koijen, R. S. J., Moskowitz, T. J., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrugt, E. B. (2018). Carry. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(2), 197-225. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:127:y:2018:i:2:p:197-225
27. L’Hoir, M., & Boulhabel, M. (2010). A Bond-Picking Model for Corporate Bond Allocation. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2010.36.3.131
28. Lintner, J. (1965). Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains From Diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977249
29. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection*. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
30. Menchero, J., & Morozov, A. (2015). Improving Risk Forecasts Through Cross-Sectional Observations. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 41(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2015.41.3.084
31. Merton, R. C. (1974). On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978814
32. Miller, T., & Meckel, T. S. (1999). Beating Index Funds With Derivatives. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(5), 75. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1999.319708
33. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098
34. Pospisil, L., & Zhang, J. (2010). Momentum and Reversal Effects in Corporate Bond Prices and Credit Cycles. The Journal of Fixed Income, 20, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2010.20.2.101
35. Ross, S. (1976). The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13, 341-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6
36. Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19, 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
37. Titman, S., & Jegadeesh, N. (1995). Short-Horizon Return Reversals and the Bid-Ask Spread. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 4, 116-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1995.1006
38. van Binsbergen, J. H., & Koijen, R. S. J. (2015). The Term Structure of Returns: Facts and Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597481
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code