Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0631122-161222 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0631122-161222
論文名稱
Title
探討每日時間框架下透過知覺機會成本對廣告態度和行爲意願的影響機制:以心智模擬與活動類型為干擾變數
The Impact of Daily Time Frame on Attitude Toward Advertising and Behavioral Intention mediated by opportunity cost: Mental Simulation and Activity Type as the Moderator Variable
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
210
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-06-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-07-31
關鍵字
Keywords
每日時間框架、機會成本、活動類型、心智模擬、廣告態度、行爲意願
Daily Time Frame, Opportunity Cost, Activity Type, Mental Simulation, Attitude toward Advertising, Behavioral Intention
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 221 次,被下載 30
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 221 times, has been downloaded 30 times.
中文摘要
時間就是金錢,對於現今忙碌的人們來説時間更是不可多得的資源。在每日充斥著各種任務或是活動當中,如何爭分奪秒地將時間有效利用,更是大家一直在追求和學習。在現實生活上不難看到像是以教導消費者如何在每天有效利用時間為目的的廣告,可見行銷人員早已懂得利用以教導消費者運用每一天其中一段時間來進行某些活動的手法。因此本研究著重在於探討每日時間框架的機制下,如何透過消費者所知覺到的機會成本進而影響廣告態度與行爲意願,並以活動類型與心智模擬為干擾變數。
本研究將透過三個實驗來檢驗六個假説。首先實驗一為2(每日時間框架:短vs.長)x 2(活動類型:動態vs.靜態)之雙因子組間設計,共招募212位受測者。實驗二為2(每日時間框架:短vs.長)x 2(活動類型:動態vs.靜態)x 2(心智模擬:過程模擬vs.結果模擬)之三因子組間實驗設計,共招募431位受測者。最後實驗三再次驗證2(每日時間框架:短 vs.長)x 2(活動類型:動態 vs.靜態)x 2(心智模擬:過程模擬 vs.結果模擬)之三因子組間實驗設計,共招募 364 位受測者,分別透過四種與八種情境去瞭解消費者在面對不同的時間框架是否引起不同程度的知覺機會成本,並影響廣告態度與行爲意願。研究結果發現,在短的每日時間框架下會有較低的知覺機會成本。且知覺機會成本越低則廣告態度與行爲意願則提高。再者,本研究也發現在短的每日時間框架時,以結果模擬搭配靜態活動會有較低的知覺機會成本。透過本研究結果能豐富每日時間框架的理論與機制。
Abstract
“Time is money”. It is a valuable resource for us. How to use time effectively is what everyone has been pursuing and learning. It is not difficult to see advertisements by the purpose of teaching consumers how to use their time effectively everyday. It can be seen that marketers have already known how to teach consumers to use a certain period of each day to carry out activities. Therefore, this study focuses on exploring the mechanism of daily time frame, how consumers’ perceived opportunity cost affects attitudes toward advertising and behavioral intentions, activity type and mental simulation as moderator variable. Study 1 conducts a 2 (daily time frame: short vs. long) x 2 (activity type: dynamic vs. static) between-subject factorial design; Study 2 conducts a (daily time frame: short vs. long) x 2 (activity type: dynamic vs. static) x 2 (mental simulation: process vs. outcome) between-subject factorial design; Study 3 conducts a (daily time frame: short vs. long) x 2 (activity type: dynamic vs. static) x 2 (mental simulation: process vs. outcome) between-subject factorial design. The result showed that short daily time frame has a lower perceived opportunity cost. The a lower perceived opportunity cost leads, a higher attitude toward advertising and behavioral intention. Furthermore, this study finds that the fit of short daily time frames, static activities and outcome simulation copy would lead a lower perceived opportunity cost. Hope the results of this study can enrich the theory of daily time frame.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ⅰ
誌謝 ⅱ
摘要 ⅲ
ABSTRACT ⅳ
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 6
第三節 研究問題 8
第四節 研究目的 9
第貳章 文獻回顧 10
第一節 時間的本質 10
第二節 時間與活動類型 19
第三節 心智模擬 21
第四節 機會成本 25
第五節 廣告態度 27
第六節 行爲意願 28
第參章 研究架構與研究假説 29
第一節 研究架構圖 29
第二節 假説推論 29
第肆章 研究方法 36
第一節 實驗一 36
第二節 實驗二 45
第三節 實驗三 50
第伍章 研究結果 56
第一節 實驗一分析結果 56
第二節 實驗二分析結果 66
第三節 實驗三分析結果 80
第陸章 結論與建議 94
第一節 主要研究發現與討論 94
第二節 理論意涵 98
第三節 實務貢獻 99
第四節 研究限制 100
參考資料 101
附錄 109
參考文獻 References
裴雪蓮 (2011)。論機會成本理念對企業發展的意義。商場先到話,653, 199。
劉宜芬. (2012)。廣告對產品線外溢效果之影響: 廣告策略,品牌聯想與屬性呈現之角色。29(6),539-557。
衛生福利部國民健康署(2018)。全民身體活動指引(7-8頁)。臺北市:衛生福利部國民健康署。
鄭芬蘭. (2000)。態度。載於國家教育研究院。取自: https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1313123/
顧萱萱 (2003)。新產品預告訊息與消費者延宕滿足意願。中山管理評論,11(3), 463-488。
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure sciences, 13(3), 185-204.
Ajzen, I., & Manstead, A. S. (2007). Changing health-related behaviours: An approach based on the theory of planned behaviour. In The scope of social psychology (pp. 55-76). Psychology Press.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes: a handbook of social psychology. Worcester, 2.
Amit, R., Muller, E., & Cockburn, I. (1995). Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of business venturing, 10(2), 95-106.
Ardani, W., Rahyuda, K., Giantari, I. G. A. K., & Sukaatmadja, I. P. G. (2019). Customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions in tourism: A literature review. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM), 4(3), 84-93.
Armitage, C. J., & Reidy, J. G. (2008). Use of mental simulations to change theory of planned behaviour variables. British journal of health psychology, 13(3), 513-524.
Barmola, K. C., & Srivastava, S. (2010). Role of Consumer Behaviour in Present Marketing Management Scenario. Productivity, 51(3), 268.
Baumeister, R. F., & Masicampo, E. (2010). Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal–culture interface. Psychological review, 117(3), 945.
Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The economic journal, 75(299), 493-517.
Bergadaa, M. M. (1990). The role of time in the action of the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 289-302.
Bergson, H. (1959). L'évolution créatrice, puf. In: Paris.
Blair, M. E., & Innis, D. E. (1996). The effects of product knowledge on the evaluation of warranteed brands. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 445-456.
Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7-27.
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
Buchanan, J. M. (2008). Opportunity Cost. The New Plalgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. In: Palgrave Macmillan, London, United Kingdom.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the" planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(3), 366.
Carlson, J. R., Ross, W. T., Coulter, R. A., & Marquardt, A. J. (2019). About time in marketing: an assessment of the study of time and conceptual framework. AMS Review, 9(3), 136-154.
Carrillat, F. A., Lafferty, B. A., & Harris, E. G. (2005). Investigating sponsorship effectiveness: Do less familiar brands have an advantage over more familiar brands in single and multiple sponsorship arrangements? Journal of Brand Management, 13(1), 50-64.
Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: Temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336.
Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375-389.
Chang, C. C., Chang, S. S., Chang, J. H., & Chien, Y. L. (2013). Which is the better option? Quicker or cheaper? Psychology & Marketing, 30(1), 90-101.
Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 39(12), 2910-2935.
Chang, S.-S., & Chang, J.-H. (2013). People's preference patterns for gains/losses in multiple time period situations. Psychological reports, 113(2), 635-646.
Chattopadhyay, A., & Nedungadi, P. (1992). Does attitude toward the ad endure? The moderating effects of attention and delay. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 26-33.
Chen, C.-F., & Chen, F.-S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism management, 31(1), 29-35.
Chen, H. S., Severt, K., Shin, Y. H., Knowlden, A., & Hilliard, T. W. (2018). “How’d you sleep?” measuring business travelers’ sleep quality and satisfaction in hotels. Journal of hospitality and tourism Insights.
Cian, L., Longoni, C., & Krishna, A. (2020). Advertising a desired change: When process simulation fosters (vs. hinders) credibility and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 489-508.
Clark, P. A. (1985). A review of the theories of time and structure for organizational sociology.
Cratty, B. J. (1984). Psychological preparation and athletic excellence. Mouvement Pub.
Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn*, G. J. (1999). The use of visual mental imagery in new product design. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 18-28.
Dahl, D. W., & Hoeffler, S. (2004). Visualizing the self: Exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks for new product evaluation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 259-267.
Department of Health, P. A., Health Improvement and Protection. (2011). Start Active, Stay Active: A report on physical activity from the four home
countries’ Chief Medical Officers. https://www.gov.uk
Dhar, R., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). The effect of common and unique features in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 193-203.
Escalas, J. E., & Luce, M. F. (2003). Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 246-254.
Escalas, J. E., & Luce, M. F. (2004). Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274-285.
Farace, S., Roggeveen, A., Villarroel Ordenes, F., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Grewal, D. (2020). Patterns in motion: How visual patterns in ads affect product evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 49(1), 3-17.
Ferguson, Y. L., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Should goal-strivers think about “why” or “how” to strive? It depends on their skill level. Motivation and Emotion, 34(3), 253-265.
Festjens, A., & Janiszewski, C. (2015). The Value of Time. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 178-195.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 553-561.
Friedman, E. M., Savary, J., & Dhar, R. (2018). Apples, oranges, and erasers: The effect of considering similar versus dissimilar alternatives on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 725-742.
Friedman, L. A., & Neumann, B. R. (1980). The effects of opportunity costs on project investment decisions: A replication and extension. Journal of Accounting Research, 407-419.
Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317(5843), 1351-1354.
Gossen, H. H. (1854). Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.
Gourville, J. T. (1998). Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal reframing on transaction evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 395-408.
Gourville, J. T. (2003). The effects of monetary magnitude and level of aggregation on the temporal framing of price. Marketing Letters, 14(2), 125-135.
Graham, R. J. (1981). The role of perception of time in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(4), 335-342.
Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? Journal of personality and social psychology, 43(1), 89.
Gross, B. L. (1987). Time scarcity: Interdisciplinary perspectives and implications for consumer behavior. Research in consumer behavior, 2(2), 1-54.
Harber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 255-264.
Hornik, J., & Zakay, D. (1996). Psychological time: The case of time and consumer behaviour. Time & Society, 5(3), 385-397.
Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G. J., & Berning, C. K. (1976). Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 320-339.
Jacques, E. (1982). The Form of Time Heinemann London.
Kappes, H. B., & Morewedge, C. K. (2016). Mental simulation as substitute for experience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(7), 405-420.
Kim, B. K., Choi, J., & Wakslak, C. J. (2019). The image realism effect: the effect of unrealistic product images in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 48(3), 251-270.
Kling, J., & Riggs, L. A. (1971). Experimental psychology Holt. Reinhart and Winston, USA.
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., & Sheveland, A. (2011). How many roads lead to Rome? Equifinality set‐size and commitment to goals and means. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 344-352.
Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2012). Economics and microeconomics. Worth publisher ISBN-10, 1429283424, 2012.
La Ferle, C., & Choi, S. M. (2005). The importance of perceived endorser credibility in South Korean advertising. Journal of current issues & research in advertising, 27(2), 67-81.
Langan, R., & Kumar, A. (2019). Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving. Journal of Business Research, 99, 295-305.
Larrick, R. P., Nisbett, R. E., & Morgan, J. N. (1993). Who uses the cost-benefit rules of choice? Implications for the normative status of microeconomic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), 331-347.
Larson, J. S., Redden, J. P., & Elder, R. S. (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188-194.
Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dube, L. (1995). Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110-119.
Lembregts, C., & Pandelaere, M. (2013). Are all units created equal? The effect of default units on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1275-1289.
Lien, N.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2013). Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story format. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516-522.
Luo, L., Ratchford, B. T., & Yang, B. (2013). Why we do what we do: A model of activity consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(1), 24-43.
Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. Psychological process and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application, 45-63.
Lv, X., Li, H., & Xia, L. (2020). Effects of haptic cues on consumers' online hotel booking decisions: the mediating role of mental imagery. Tourism management, 77, 104025.
Lynch Jr, J. G., Netemeyer, R. G., Spiller, S. A., & Zammit, A. (2010). A generalizable scale of propensity to plan: The long and the short of planning for time and for money. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 108-128.
Macdonnell, R., & White, K. (2015). How construals of money versus time impact consumer charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 551-563.
MacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1990). An exploratory study of the effects of imagery processing and consumer experience on expectations and satisfaction. ACR North American Advances.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143.
Malkoc, S. A. (2022). Why Are Donors More Generous with Time Than Money? The Role of Perceived Control over Donations on Charitable Giving. Journal of Consumer Research.
McGrath, J. E. (1988). The social psychology of time: New perspectives. Sage Publications, Inc.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Un inédit de Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 67(4), 401-409.
Monga, A., May, F., & Bagchi, R. (2017). Eliciting time versus money: Time scarcity underlies asymmetric wage rates. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(4), 833-852.
Munichor, N., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2018). The influence of time-interval descriptions on goal-pursuit decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(2), 291-303.
Muñoz-Vilches, N. C., van Trijp, H., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2020). Pleasure or Health? The Role of Mental Simulation in Desire and Food Choices. . Foods,, 9(8), 1099.
Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263-276.
Neumann, B. R., & Friedman, L. A. (1978). Opportunity costs: Further evidence through an experimental replication. Journal of Accounting Research, 400-410.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994a). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric theory.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994b). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.
Okada, E. M., & Hoch, S. J. (2004). Spending time versus spending money. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313-323.
Oliver Richard, L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York ˈ NY: Irwin-McGraw-Hill.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2002). It's about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization science, 13(6), 684-700.
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223-230.
Park, K., & Ryu, G. (2019). The effect of price fluency and duration framing in price advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 511-527.
Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260.
Plantinga, A., Krijnen, J. M., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2018). Evidence for opportunity cost neglect in the poor. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 65-73.
Punj, G. (2012). Income effects on relative importance of two online purchase goals: Saving time versus saving money? Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 634-640.
Putrevu, S. (2008). Consumer responses toward sexual and nonsexual appeals: The influence of involvement, need for cognition (NFC), and gender. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 57-70.
Rai, D., Lin, C.-W. W., & Jiraporn, N. (2021). The impact of scheduling styles on time-limited promotions: The moderating role of redemption frames. Journal of Business Research, 135, 774-786.
Rhee, H. T., & Yang, S.-B. (2015). Does hotel attribute importance differ by hotel? Focusing on hotel star-classifications and customers’ overall ratings. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 576-587.
Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 767-782.
Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. (1960). Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components.(Yales studies in attitude and communication.), Vol. III.
Rudd, M., Vohs, K. D., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological science, 23(10), 1130-1136.
Shipp, A. J., & Cole, M. S. (2015). Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often? Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 237-260.
Simonson, I., Bettman, J. R., Kramer, T., & Payne, J. W. (2013). Comparison selection: An approach to the study of consumer judgment and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 137-149.
Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(3), 169-185.
Spiller, S. A. (2011). Opportunity cost consideration. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 595-610.
Spiller, S. A. (2019). Opportunity cost neglect and consideration in the domain of time. Current opinion in psychology, 26, 98-102.
Su, L., & Gao, L. (2014). Strategy compatibility: The time versus money effect on product evaluation strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 549-556.
Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American psychologist, 53(4), 429.
Taylor, S. E., & Schneider, S. K. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social cognition, 7(2), 174-194.
Thompson, D. V., Hamilton, R. W., & Petrova, P. K. . (2009). When mental simulation hinders behavior: The effects of process-oriented thinking on decision difficulty and performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 562-574.
Titchener, E. B. (1899). The intensity, extent and duration of sensation.
Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., Chastin, S. F., Altenburg, T. M., & Chinapaw, M. J. (2017). Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)–terminology consensus project process and outcome. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 14(1), 1-17.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(6), 876.
Van der Waldt, D., Van Loggerenberg, M., & Wehmeyer, L. (2009). Celebrity endorsements versus created spokespersons in advertising: A survey among students. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 12(1), 100-114.
Van Osselaer, S. M., & Janiszewski, C. (2012). A goal-based model of product evaluation and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 260-292.
Waytz, A., Hershfield, H. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2015). Mental simulation and meaning in life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(2), 336.
Zauberman, G., & Lynch Jr, J. G. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 23.
Zauberman, G., & Urminsky, O. (2016). Consumer intertemporal preferences. Current opinion in psychology, 10, 136-141.
Zhang, N., Ji, L.-J., & Li, Y. (2017). Cultural differences in opportunity cost consideration. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 45.
Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2007). Mental simulation and preference consistency over time: The role of process-versus outcome-focused thoughts. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 379-388.
Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2011). Mental simulation and product evaluation: The affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 827-839.

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code