本研究主要想要瞭解高雄市前金區青銀共居社會住宅的實施成效、使用者滿意度探討，以及青銀共居社宅之管理意涵。透過問卷調查居住於社宅的青年與銀髮族群，來達成研究目的。前金青銀共居社宅總共48戶，扣除剛遷出之1戶青年戶及1戶保留戶，社宅空間為100%滿載，申請狀況踴躍。社宅內有醫院講座、韻律舞蹈、音樂歡唱等活動，長輩與年輕世代會互相幫忙，互相照顧小孩，如此的老青互助是這棟社宅的日常，形成正向的互助循環，多數社區活動均為青銀世代共同參與，顯示社宅內青銀世代間互動情形良好。
社宅機能面(室內通風、採光、設備狀況、社宅周邊生活機能、社宅內社區照顧關懷據點及定點托育服務空間)普遍獲得住戶的高滿意度(高達90%)，顯示高雄市青銀共居社會住宅實施成效良好。
高雄市青銀共居社會住宅是一項全新嘗試，對於改善高齡化社會問題有一定之助益，例如在社宅內的社區活動，由於青年跟銀髮族群一起進行活動，青年族群可以從中學習到長輩做人處事的態度，老年人也因為年輕人的陪伴，無形中補償了高齡化社會孤獨的一面，亦可藉由與青年族群聊天的過程獲得新穎的觀念與想法，如此精神層面的互補性是一般集合式大廈無法滿足的。
本論文在管理實務的貢獻為探究出青年戶及長青戶對於社宅機能之需求是大相逕庭的，青年戶對於社宅機能著重於托育服務、幼兒園、文康休閒空間、社會福利機構、社區開放綠地；長青戶對於社宅機能著重於社會福利機構、長期照顧機構、社區活動中心、文康休閒空間、小型醫療院所。社會住宅管理單位在規劃社宅社區機能階段，可將不同年齡層之住戶需求納入考量。

This research mainly wants to understand the user’s satisfaction and implementation effect of Qianjin District intergenerational co-living social housing in Kaohsiung City, as well as the management implications of intergenerational co-living social housing. Through investigating young people and silver-haired people living in social housing , to achieve the purpose of the research. There are 48 households in the intergenerational co-living social housing in Qianjin District. After deducting 1 young household who have just moved out and 1 reserved household, the social housing’s space is 100% full. The application status is very active. There are static activities, hospital lectures, rhythmic dance, music singing in the social housing. The elders and the younger generation will help each other and look after children with each other. Such mutual assistance between the old and the young is the daily life of this social housing, forming a positive mutual aid cycle. Most of the community activities are participated by the intergenerational generation, which shows that the interaction between the intergenerational generation in the social housing is good.
The functional aspects of the social housing (indoor ventilation, lighting, equipment conditions, life functions around the social housing, community care centers, and designated nursery service spaces) are generally highly satisfied by the residents (up to 90%), showing that implementation of intergenerational co-living social housing works well in Kaohsiung City.
Intergenerational co-living social housing in Kaohsiung City is a brand-new attempt, which is helpful to improve the social problems of aging. For example, because the youth and the silver-haired people carry out community activities in social housing together, the young people can learn the attitude of being a person and doing things from the elders. The elders also compensate for the lonely side of the aging society because of the company of the young people, and they can also acquire novel concepts and ideas through the process of chatting with the youth group. Such spiritual complementarity cannot be satisfied in normal collective housing.
The contribution of this paper in management practice is to find out that the needs of the young households and the evergreen households for the function of the social housing are quite different. The young households focus on the function of the social housing, such as childcare services, kindergartens, cultural and recreational spaces, social welfare institutions, and community open green spaces; Evergreen households focus on social welfare institutions, long-term care institutions, community activity centers, cultural and recreational spaces, and small medical institutions for the functions of social housing. The social housing management unit can take into consideration the needs of residents of different age groups in the stage of planning the functions of the social housing.

論文審定書…………………………………………………………… i
誌謝………………………………………………………………….... ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………….…... iii
英文摘要………………………………………..…………………….. iv
目錄………………………………………………………………….... vi
圖次………………………………………………………………….... viii
表次………………………………………………………………….... ix
第 一 章 緒 論…………………………………………………….. 1
第一節 研究背景…………………………………………………. 1
第二節 研究動機…………………………………………………. 2
第三節 研究問題與目的…....……………………………………. 3
第四節 研究流程…………………………………………………. 4
第 二 章 文 獻 探 討……………………………………………... 5
第一節 社會住宅的定義…………………………………………. 5
第二節 臺灣社會住宅政策現況…………………………………. 5
第三節 青銀共居社會住宅發展背景……………………………. 9
第四節 國內外青銀共居社會住宅實際案例…………………… 14
第 三 章 研 究 方 法……………………………………………… 20
第一節 問卷調查法……………………………………………… 20
第二節 個案選擇………………………………………………… 20
第 四 章 分 析 與 發 現..………………………………………… 21
第一節 研究對象基本資料……………………………………… 21
第二節 受訪者基本資料分析…………………………………… 21
第三節 社宅居住現況與機能分析……………………………… 23
第四節 參與活動與需求改善…………………………………… 26
第 五 章 討 論 與 結 論..………………………………………… 30
第一節 社會住宅文獻貢獻……………………………………… 30
第二節 對管理實務之貢獻....…………………………………… 36
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議……………………………… 37
參考文獻……………………………………………………….……… 38
附錄……………………………………………………….………… 41

中文部分
王清海(2004)。我國國民住宅政策之研究-以台北市為例。國立臺北科技大學，臺
北市。
謝志鴻(1995)。國民住宅供需之研究。國立政治大學，臺北市。
高白芬(2010)。國民住宅政策轉型之探討-以高雄市為例。國立高雄第一科技大學，高雄市。
蘇倍慶(2001)。國宅待售戶出租可行性探討-以新竹市國民住宅為例。國立成功大
學，臺南市。
劉宜君(2019)。高齡社會的跨代共居議題探討。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，7(2)，
99-108。
蔡璧徽(2016)。獨居長者孤寂感、焦慮與憂鬱的相關因子之探討--檢視社會支持網
絡的緩衝作用。國立臺北護理健康大學，臺北市。
楊靜俐(2007)。臺灣的家戶組成變遷:1990-2050。臺灣社會學刊，38，135-173。
黃淑娟(2017)。建構「三代同鄰」宜居社區可行性之探討－以東京「東雲CODAN
集合住宅」型態為例。崑山科技大學，臺南市。
陳倩如(2017)。我國老人住居安養模式之可行性探討-以共居模式為例。中原大學，桃園市。
司馬蕾(2016)。同一屋簷下的“共異體”-高齡者與青年共用居住的可能性與實踐。
城市建築，2，28-31。

外文部分
Chang, C.O. (2013). Public Housing Policy in Taiwan. The Future of Public Housing,
Chapter 6, 85-101.
Grange, A.L. (2007). Commodification and Urban Development: A Case Study
of Taiwan. Housing Studies, 21(1), 53-76.
Quinio, V. (2019). Is co-living a housing solution for vulnerable older people?
Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research. Available at:
Literature-Review-_web-version-300119.pdf (nationwidefoundation.org.uk).
Aiyar, S. (2016). The Impact of Workforce Aging on European Productivity. IMF
Working Paper, Available at: The Impact of Workforce Aging on European Productivity (imf.org).
Bloom, D.E. (2008). Population Aging and Economic Growth in Asia, The Economic Consequences of Demographic Change in East Asia. National Bureau of Economic
Research-East Asian Seminar on Economics (NBER-EASE), 19, 61–89.
Maestas, N. (2016). The Effect of Population Aging on Economic Growth, the Labor
Force and Productivity. NBER Working Paper. No. w22452.
Weiss, M. (2016). Productivity and Age: Evidence from Work Teams at the Assembly
Line. J. Econ. Ageing. 19, 30–42.
Burtless, G. (2013). The Impact of Population Aging and Delayed Retirement on
Workforce Productivity. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Working
Paper No. 2013-11.
Prettner, K. (2013). Population Aging and Endogenous Economic Growth. J. Popul.
Econ. 26, 811–834.
Shafique, A. (2018). Co-Living and the Common Good. London: RSA. Available at:
https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/rsa-co-living.pdf.
Lao, R. (2020). Aging together: senior co-housing within a pocket community.
Unitec Institute of Technology, New Zealand.
Edwards, W.J.W. (2010). Taupaenui Maori positive aging. Massey University, New
Zealand.
Fond, M.L. (2013). CoHousing Cultures: Handbook for Self-Organized, Community-
Oriented and Sustainable Housing. Published by Jovis Verlag.
Bev, J. (2017). Cohousing: An Enduring Idea but Is It a New Opportunity for Older People? Population Ageing Technical Advisory Group at Western Bay of Plenty Sub-region
Working Paper. Available at: https://renting.goodhomes.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/cohousing-final-25-jan-2017-1.pdf.
Barnes, S. (2002). The design of caring environments and the quality of life of older people. Ageing & Society. 22(6), 775-789.

網路部分
聯合新聞網(2021)。新北青銀共居，各社宅擴大續辦。2022年7月1日取自https://udn.com/news/story/7323/5907138。
自由時報(2018)。陽明老人公寓試辦「青銀共居」，學生省租金還有薪。2022年7月1日取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2426733。
公視新聞網(2020)。高雄首批老青共居社宅，7/1開放申請。2022年7月1日取自https://news.pts.org.tw/article/485134。
公益交流站(2019)。青銀跨代，同居零距離-盤點歐、日5種「青銀共居」新型態
。2022年6月24日取自https://npost.tw/archives/52257。
The New Lens關鍵評論(2017)。荷蘭銀髮創新的啟示：歡樂和支持，就是終老住宅的核心。2022年6月24日取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/83897。
倡議(2019)。放眼海外，來看看他國的青銀共居是怎麼樣的? 2022年6月24日取自https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/11817/3731481。
好房網(2020)。高雄市老青共居社宅，「青年家庭」32戶明起公告招租。2022年6月24日取自https://news.housefun.com.tw/news/article/825573256094.html。
內政部營建署(2022)。社會住宅興辦計畫(第二次修正合訂本)。2022年6月28日取自https://www.cpami.gov.tw/filesys/file/EMMA/1110169560.pdf。
New Zealand Statistics (2015). Growth of one-person and two-person households driven by ageing population. 2022年6月29日取自Growth of one-person and two-person households driven by ageing population | Stats NZ.
New Zealand Statistics (2017). Half a million more households expected. 2022年6月29日取自Half a million more households expected | Stats NZ.
Ridout (2020). How older people are finding new ways to carve out communities. 2022年6月30日取自How older people are finding new ways to carve out communities | Stuff.co.nz.
Kure Home Health (2020). How Intergenerational Connections Benefit Both Old & Young. 2022年6月30日取自https://www.kurehomehealth.com/post/how-intergenerational-connections-benefit-both-old-young.
Eke Panuku Development Auckland (2022).What We Do? 2022年7月1日取自
https://www.ekepanuku.co.nz/about/what-we-do.