近幾年因疫情的衝擊之下，就業市場雖然受到影響但是人力需求仍然增加，因台灣邁向超高齡化的社會，但退休者及離職者的缺口還是存在，但在如此狀況下台灣當前根據勞動部統計處分析新人一個月內離職比率高達36.2%。全球化的趨勢與勞動力的流動下，人才的培育與留任成為企業不得不重視的課題之一。
因此，本研究主要目的為了探討在師徒功能關係之下，對工作敬業心及留任意願的影響程度，並探討在工作敬業心的影響作用下，對於師徒功能及留任意願的中介效果，及加入主動性人格特質之後，對工作敬業心與留任意願的調節效果。
本研究為避免共同方法變異的問題產生，特將題項隨機打亂，使填答者無法從問題預測本研究探討的目的。樣本共回收257份，經統計分析之後結果如下：
1. 師徒功能對留任意願具正向顯著影響。
2. 師徒功能對工作敬業心具有正向顯著影響。
3. 工作敬業心對留任意願具有正向顯著影響。
4. 工作敬業心在對師徒功能及留任意願之間具有中介效果。
5. 主動性人格特質在工作敬業心與留任意願之間不具調節效果。
依據以上研究結果，再提出具體的研究結論與建議供實務界與後續研究之參考。

In recent years, the job market has been affected by the impact of the epidemic, but the demand for manpower is still increasing. Taiwan is moving towards a super-aging society, but there is still a shortage after employees retire and resign. In this condition, the employee turnover rate who do a job within one month is up to 36.2%, this figure offered by the Statistics Office of the Ministry of Labor. In globalization and labor mobility, all enterprises have to pay attention to this big issue, how to cultivate and retain their employees.
Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to discuss whether mentorship function has an influence on job engagement and whether employees have willing to continue to stay. Furthermore, we discuss the mediating effect of job engagement and the moderating effect of proactive personality trait.
In order to avoid CMV, this questionnaire questions were randomized so that respondents could not predict the purpose of the study in advance. A total of 257 samples were collected. After statistical analysis of the data, the results are as follows:
1.Mentorship function has a significantly positive influence on employee intention to stay.
2.Mentorship function has a significantly positive influence on job engagement.
3.Job engagement has a significantly positive influence on employee intention to stay.
4.Job engagement has a mediating effect between mentorship function and intention to stay.
5.Proactive personality trait does not have a moderating effect between job engagement and intention to stay.
According to the results of the study, there are some concrete conclusions and suggestions for practical management and future study as references.

目錄
論文審定書....................................................................i
致謝...............................................................................ii
摘要..............................................................................iii
Abstract........................................................................iv
目錄...............................................................................v
圖目錄...........................................................................vi
表目錄...........................................................................vii
第一章 緒論.....................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機............................................1
第二節 研究目的........................................................2
第二章 文獻探討........................................................3
第一節 師徒功能........................................................3
第二節 留任意願........................................................6
第三節 主動性人格特質............................................8
第四節 工作敬業心..................................................11
第五節 各研究變項之間的關係..............................12
第三章 研究方法......................................................16
第一節 研究對象與資料搜集..................................16
第二節 研究變項之操作性定義與衡量工具.........18
第三節 測量模式......................................................23
第四節 資料分析方法..............................................25
第四章 實證分析與結果..........................................26
第一節 各研究變項之相關分析..............................26
第二節 各變項之迴歸分析......................................28
第三節 主動性人格特質對工作敬業心與留任意願調節效果分析..............................................................31
第五章 研究結論與建議..........................................32
第一節 研究結論......................................................32
第二節 管理實務意涵..............................................33
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議.........................34
參考文獻..................................................................36
附錄-問卷 ................................................................40

一、中文部份
李文武（2015）。師徒功能、組織承諾對離職傾向影響之研究。朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系碩士論文。
蔡淳如（2009）。師徒制與師徒功能對員工創新行為之影響－以知識分享為中介變數。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文。
林佳暖（2004），師徒關係與組織承諾 。國立中央大學人力資源管理研所碩士論文。
林晏鈴、張婉菁（2010）。師徒功能與工作壓力之關係：以組織社會化為中介變項。人力資源管理學報，3，75-96。
林姮妤（2007）。領導型態對員工組織自尊、敬業貢獻度與離職傾向之影響。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
高瑞堂、張婉菁（2017）。以角色理論觀點探討影響高科技產業員工離職傾向之因素。企業管理學報，115，1-26。
黃淑貞（2012）。如何強化新進人員的留任與表現？探討新進人員個人工作適配、個 人組織適配對其工作績效與離職行為的影響師徒制度與新進人員人格特質的干擾效果。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文 。
洪淑貞、林淑卿、蘇文凱（2018）。護理人員知覺的組織支持、主管支持與其敬業貢獻度之相關性探討－以中部某醫院為例。彰化護理，25(4)，13- 26。
洪意涵（2018）。高屏地區社工人員工作壓力與留任意願之研究。國立屏東大學社會發展學系碩士論文。
陳嘉彌（2003）。師徒式教育實習之理論與實踐。臺北：心理出版社。
陳慶瑜（2013）。僕人式領導與工作活力對留任意願之影響－以南臺科技大學為例。南台科技大學企業管理系人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳奕棋（2013）。影響員工留任意願之因素探討：以某國際觀光飯店為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳靜宜（2015）。主動性人格特質、工作生活平衡、工作敬業心與退卻行為之 相關研究。國立中正大學勞工關係學系碩士論文。
陳禹皓（2015）。影響員工留任意願之因素探討：以某國際觀光飯店為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳韻蓉（2015）。主動性人格特質、自我效能、工作投入與職涯滿足關係之研究－以保險從業人員為例。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士論文。
楊君琦（2013）。師父幽默與徒弟核心自我評價在主管型師徒關係中的角色。人力資源管理學報，13，1-20。
劉俊昌（2000）。企業文化契合度與留職傾向之研究：以中國石油公司為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
劉小平、鄧靖松（2008），員工敬業度探析。廣州中山大學管理學院碩士論文。
張婷婷、陸洛、黃睦芸（2011）。工作負荷與工作行為之關聯：主動性人格為調節變項，台灣管理學刊，11（2），177-195。
鄭瑩妮、胡昌亞、簡世文（2013）。師徒功能與徒弟知識分享。商略學報，5，37-56。
賴墩謙（2007）。組織文化對工作滿足及募兵制度推行成效之相關性探討－以空軍航機保修部隊為例。靜宜大學管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部份
Allen, T., Eby, L., Poteet, M., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127-135.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389-411.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
Chao, G. T., Walz, P., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 619-636.
Cummingham, C. J. L., & De La Rose, G. M. (2008). The interactive effects of proactive personality and work-family interference on well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 271-282.
Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Demerouti, E., Mostert, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Burnout and work engagement: A thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3), 209-222.
Dong, L., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Hinkin, T. R. (2012). When employees are out of step with coworkers: How job satisfaction trajectory and dispersion influence individual- and unit-level voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1360-1380.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Genevieve, E. C. (1990). Retention: Has it obstructed nursing’s view. Nursing Administration, 14, 70-75.
Kammeyer-Muelle, J. D., & Judge, T. A. (2008). A quantitative review of mentoring research: Test of a model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 269-283.
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phrase of mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625.
Lee, F. K., Dougherty, T. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). The role of personality and work values in mentoring programs. Review of Business, 21(1), 33-37.
Locke, E. A. (1982). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 67(1), 53-59.
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686- 1708.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237.
Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. H., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, H. B. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 493-522.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Psychology, 62, 237-240.
Moussa, M. N. (2013). Effects of perceived procedural justice and exchange ideology on employees’ affective commitment: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Business & Management, 8(18), 81-89.
Presbitero, A. (2015). Proactivity in career development of employees: The roles of proactive personality and cognitive complexity. Career Development International, 20(5), 525-538.
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (2001). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 543-565.
Reyes, P. (1990). Preliminary models of teacher organizational commitment: Implications for restructuring the workplace. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 169-174.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427.
Sosik, J. J., & Godshalk, V. M. (2000). Leadership styles, mentoring functions received, and job‐related Stress: A conceptual model & preliminary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(4), 365-390.
Wilson, J. A., & Elman, N. S. (1990). Organization benefits of mentoring. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 88-94.