Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0723122-112614 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0723122-112614
論文名稱
Title
社會投資報酬率分析法標準化建構
Standardized Construction of Social Return on Investment
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
84
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-06-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-08-23
關鍵字
Keywords
永續發展、影響力投資、社會投資報酬率分析法、影響力評估、永續投資
Sustainability, Impact Investing, Social Return on Investment Analysis, Impact Evaluation, Sustainable Investment
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 233 次,被下載 3
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 233 times, has been downloaded 3 times.
中文摘要
隨著全球化浪潮下,氣候變遷與社會不平等的問題日趨明顯。永續議題開始備受重視,從企業社會責任到ESG投資浪潮,永續投資已逐漸變成熟。發展至今,產生了影響力投資。影響力投資旨在產生更積極的行動,注重兼具利潤與社會效益,且目標是明確產生可衡量的影響力。也因此影響力評估的發展為學術的重要研究重點之一。本研究希望將社會投資報酬率分析法(Social Return on Investment)進行完整的研究,用以促進影響力評估的發展,社會投資報酬率分析法能夠計算出投入一塊錢能夠產生幾塊錢的社會效益,在結構上存在多元的方法,並且因為目的的不同,容易產生評估的差異性。因此透過本研究能達成三個目的。第一個目的是要完整分析SROI的分析效益。思考現行存在的困難點,並探究如何最大化這些效益,第二個主要的研究目的為建構SROI分析法的標準化結構,透過文獻對架構建立合理性與效益分析,最後則希望過此研究,能夠發現SROI的策略開發方法。透過本次研究更能夠有效分析模型,了解模型差異造成的影響。並在策略的開發上,提供研究與數據應該聚焦的主軸,希望此結構在實務上能有所應用,創造更大的影響力,總結來說,本研究建議未來評估能夠以此利基下,彰顯更多SROI分析之價值,在影響力投資的發展下,貢獻一份心力。
Abstract
With the wave of globalization, the issues of climate change and social inequality have become increasingly severe. Sustainability issues begin to get more attention. From corporate social responsibility to the ESG investment, sustainable investing become more and more mature, which has led to the rise of impact investing. Impact investing aims to lead to more active action. Impact investing focuses on both profit and social benefit with the clear goal of generating measurable impact. As a result, the development of impact evaluation has become one of the most important academic research priorities. This study aims to conduct a complete study of Social Return on Investment (SROI) in order to promote the development of impact evaluation. Social Return on Investment (SROI) can calculate the amount of social benefit that can be generated by investing one dollar. There are multiple approaches in the structure, and the differences between them may arise due to different purposes. Therefore, this study serves three purposes. The first objective is to fully analyze the benefits of SROI analysis, exploring the existing difficulties, and try to maximize these benefits. The second objective of the study is to develop a standardized construction of the SROI analysis method, conducting the analysis of rationality and effectiveness through the literature. Finally, it is hoped that this research will lead to the discovery of strategic development model for SROI. Through this study, we can effectively analyze the model and understand the influence from the differences between models. It also provides the key subject on which the research and data should be focused during the strategy development. The study is expected to be applied in practical evaluation to create a greater impact. To conclude, we suggests that future evaluations are able to demonstrate the value of SROI analysis based on this article.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
CONTENTS v
List of Figures vii
List of Tables viii
1.INTRODUCTION1
1.1.Background1
1.2.Motivation2
1.3.Purpose4
1.4.Expectation effect6
2.LITERATURE REVIEW8
2.1.Impact investing8
2.2.Benefits of Social Return on Investment Evaluation11
3.RESEARCH METHOD17
3.1.Social Return on Investment Analysis17
3.2.Construction of SROI standardized analysis24
4.RESEARCH RESULTS OF OUTPUT ANALYSIS26
4.1.Scope analysis26
4.2.Stakeholder Analysis30
4.3.Activity output and cost34
5.RESEARCH RESULTS OF OUTCOME ANALYSIS41
5.1.Outcome and Indicator41
5.2.Financial proxy52
5.3.Factors and Duration59
5.4.Sensitivity Analysis and Strategy Evaluation65
6.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION68
6.1.Conclusion68
6.2.Recommendation72
References74

參考文獻 References
Albaladejo-Pina, L. P., & Díaz-Delfa, M. T. (2009). Tourist preferences for rural house stays: Evidence from discrete choice modelling in Spain.
Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2010). The ambitions and challenges of SROI.
Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary sector review, 4(1), 3-18.
Banke-Thomas, A. O., Madaj, B., Charles, A., & van den Broek, N. (2015). Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review. BMC public health, 15(1), 1-14.
Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185.
Boyle, K. J. (2003). Introduction to Revealed Preference Methods.
Cordery, C., & Sinclair, R. (2013). Measuring performance in the third sector. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management.
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of banking & finance, 35(8), 2137-2147.
Emerson, J., & Cabaj, M. (2000). Social return on investment.
Fujiwara, D. (2013). A General Method for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Wellbeing Data: Three-Stage Wellbeing Valuation.
Fujiwara, D., & Campbell, R. (2011). Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis : Stated Preference, Revealed Preference and Subjective Well-Being Approaches.
Geczy, C., Jeffers, J. S., Musto, D. K., & Tucker, A. M. (2021). Contracts with (social) benefits: The implementation of impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 697-718.
A Guide to Social Return on Investment. (2012).
Jardine, C., & Whyte, B. (2013). Valuing desistence? A social return on investment case study of a throughcare project for short-term prisoners. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33(1), 20-32.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic perspectives, 20(1), 3-24.
Krlev, G., Münscher, R., & Mülbert, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI): state-of-the-art and perspectives-a meta-analysis of practice in Social Return on Investment (SROI) studies published 2002-2012.
Lawlor, E., Beitler, D., Kersley, H., Steed, S., & Cottingham, M. (2009). A Bit Rich: Calculating the real value to society of different professions. New Economics Foundation.
Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. In Environmental management accounting and supply chain management (pp. 171-202). Springer.
Maier, F., Schober, C., Simsa, R., & Millner, R. (2015). SROI as a method for evaluation research: Understanding merits and limitations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1805-1830.
Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., Como, E., & Bagnoli, L. (2015). Investing in volunteering: Measuring social returns of volunteer recruitment, training and management. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 2104-2129.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923-941.
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method.
Mook, L., Sousa, J., Elgie, S., & Quarter, J. (2005). Accounting for the value of volunteer contributions. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(4), 401-415.
Olsen, S. (2003). Social return on investment: Standard guidelines.
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of banking & finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
Ryan, P. W., & Lyne, I. (2008). Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment. Education, Knowledge & Economy, 2(3), 223-237.
Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth.
Sajardo, A., & Serra, I. (2011). The economic value of volunteer work: Methodological analysis and application to Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 873-895.
Scholten, P. (2019). Value Game : A method for involving customers in valuing outcomes.
Taplin, D. H., Clark, H., Collins, E., & Colby, D. C. (2013). Theory of change. Technical papers: a series of papers to support development of theories of change based on practice in the field. ActKnowledge, New York, NY, USA.
Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). A stakeholder analysis. Health policy and planning, 15(3), 338-345.
Venkatachalam, L. (2004). The contingent valuation method: a review.
Wellbeing Guidance for Appraisal:Supplementary Green Book Guidance (2021).
White, P. C. L., & Lovett, J. C. (1999). Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK.
Wood, C., & Leighton, D. (2010). Measuring social value: the gap between policy and practice.
Yates, B. T., & Marra, M. (2017). Social Return On Investment (SROI): Problems, solutions… and is SROI a good investment? Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 136-144.

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code