Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0723122-122950 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0723122-122950
論文名稱
Title
建構國家創新創業生態系統之研究─以台灣經濟部為例
A Study on Formation of National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: The Cases of the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
70
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-06-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-08-23
關鍵字
Keywords
研發型法人、創新創業生態系統、中小型企業、新創、數位轉型
Government and research institutes, Innovation ecosystem, Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Startups, Digital transformation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 218 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 218 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
台灣產業結構主要以中小型企業為基礎,近年來,因工業4.0而起的數位轉型浪潮席捲全球,各界逐漸將新創發展視為產業轉型的關鍵動能,世界各地也陸續興起創新創業的風潮,以解決經濟成長趨緩的問題。而台灣在中小型企業的內部資源與創新能力不足之前提下,該如何因應新科技的趨勢進行數位轉型。本研究透過分析經濟部研發型法人所提供之創新創業服務流程,確定在生態系統中的關鍵角色以及產官研之間的互補關係,探討研發型法人如何結合新創產業需求,建立創新創業生態系統,以協助傳統中小型企業轉型與升級,進而帶動下一波的經濟成長。
研究結果發現,經濟部研發型法人的創育機構,通常將本身定位為中介者,以鏈結創新創業生態系統所需要的資源與角色,媒合新創與傳統中小型企業的合作機會,目的是要協助傳統產業轉型,同時促進新創產業發展。其提供的服務大致上包含:舉辦活動、財稅法諮詢、空間租借、工具圖書館、技術輔導、資金媒合、產品化、小量試產、商業化等。其主要參與者包括:經濟部中小企業處、研發型財團法人、法人的創育機構、國內外加速器、天使人與創投、業師、傳統中小型企業、新創公司。
目前台灣創新創業生態系統的主要挑戰包括:1) 國內市場太小,若新創的產品或服務只設定在台灣當地市場,較不利於新創發展;2)資金不足,新創要獲得第一筆投資並不容易,若沒有天使資金,新創更難以進行A輪、B輪;3)若各部會能共同合作打造創新創業生態系統,將有利於串聯生態系統所需的資源。
Abstract
Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in supporting industrial development over the past few decades in Taiwan. In recent years, the wave of digital transformation initiated by Industry 4.0 has swept across the world. However, it is difficult for SMEs to transform with limited resources and innovation capacity. Therefore, this paper explores how government and research institutes facilitate the innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem for the digital transformation of Taiwan’s industry.
Our results demonstrate that the incubators of the research institutes tend to position themselves as intermediaries, to connect the required resources and actors of the ecosystem. The purpose is to promote the digital transformation of SMEs while boosting the development of startups. They provide services such as space, activities, training courses, competitions, funds matching, consulting, government grants, etc. The main actors in the ecosystem include the Small and Medium Enterprise Administration of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, research institutes, incubators of the research institutes, accelerators, angel investors and venture capital, mentors, small and medium-sized enterprises, and start-ups.
The current challenges facing the innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem in Taiwan. Firstly, the domestic market is too small. The startups should not only focus on the local market in Taiwan, or it will be a disadvantage to the development. Secondly, startups have insufficient funds. It can be extremely difficult for startups to get funded. And thirdly, if different departments can work together to build an innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem, it will be beneficial to connect the resources required.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書……………………………………………………………………….i
摘要……………………………………………………………………………....ii
Abstract…………………………………………………………...……………..iii
目錄……………………………………………………………………………...iv
圖次………………………………………………………………………............v
表次………………………………………………………………………...........vi
第一章 緒論......................................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景............................................................................................. 1
第二節 研究動機與目的..................................................................................9
第三節 研究流程............................................................................................11
第二章 文獻探討............................................................................................12
第一節 中小型企業的創新............................................................................12
第二節 國家創新系統....................................................................................13
第三節 創新創業生態系統............................................................................14
第三章 研究方法............................................................................................20
第一節 研究架構............................................................................................20
第二節 次級資料分析....................................................................................21
第三節 深度訪談法........................................................................................22
第四節 訪談大綱設計....................................................................................23
第四章 研究結果與分析................................................................................25
第一節 經濟部推動創育產業的起源............................................................25
第二節 台灣研發型財團法人介紹...............................................................25
第三節 研究對象與機構之介紹....................................................................28
第四節 法人建立的創新創業生態系統........................................................31
第五節 小結....................................................................................................44
第五章 結論....................................................................................................52
第一節 經濟部建構的國家創新創業生態系統............................................52
第二節 研究意涵............................................................................................56
第三節 未來研究建議....................................................................................57
參考文獻.........................................................................................................58

參考文獻 References
Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research policy, 43(3), 476-494.
Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., & Márkus, G. (2019). Global Entrepreneurship Index. T. G. E. a. D. Institute.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Allocca, M. A., & Kessler, E. H. (2006). Innovation Speed in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00389.x
Auerswald, P. E., & Branscomb, L. M. (2003). Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3), 227-239.
Balzat, M., & Hanusch, H. (2004). Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 14(2), 197-210.
Baraniuk, C. (2018). Why we shouldn’t try to replicate Silicon Valley https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20180208-why-we-shouldnt-replicate-silicon-valley-evolution
Bianchi, M., Campodall'Orto, S., Frattini, F., & Vercesi, P. (2010). Enabling open innovation in small‐and medium‐sized enterprises: how to find alternative applications for your technologies. R&d Management, 40(4), 414-431.
Breznitz, D. (2014). Why Silicon Valley Shouldn’t Be the Model for Innovation. Harvard business review.
Carayannis, E. G., & Von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2), 95-110.
Chan, C. S. R., Patel, P. C., & Phan, P. H. (2020). Do differences among accelerators explain differences in the performance of member ventures? Evidence from 117 accelerators in 22 countries. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 224-239.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California management review, 45(3), 33-58.
Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&d Management, 36(3), 229-236.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan management review, 48(2), 22.
Crișan, E. L., Salanță, I. I., Beleiu, I. N., Bordean, O. N., & Bunduchi, R. (2021). A systematic literature review on accelerators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(1), 62-89.
De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand. 35(1), 125-146.
Dr Freeman, R., Freeman, C., Sussex, S. P. R. U. U., Unit, U. o. S. S. P. R., & Freeman, S. (1987). Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=rA20AAAAIAAJ
Emden, Z., Calantone, R. J., & Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of product innovation management, 23(4), 330-341.
Feld, B. (2020). Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. John Wiley & Sons.
Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Wright, M. (2015). What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614547827
Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Rundquist, J. (2012). Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: the importance of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of product innovation management, 29(4), 573-589.
Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic management journal, 19(12), 1193-1201.
Griffiths-Hemans, J., & Grover, R. (2006). Setting the stage for creative new products: investigating the idea fruition process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 27-39.
Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111-121.
Hallen, B., Cohen, S., & Bingham, C. (2016). Do Accelerators Accelerate? If So, How? The Impact of Intensive Learning from Others on New Venture Development. Ssrn. In.
Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2021). Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. Handbook of Research on Business and Technology Incubation and Acceleration, 39-63.
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS),
Isenberg, D. (2010). The Big Idea: How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard business review.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1(781), 1-13.
Isenberg, D., & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scaleup Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 11, 70-96. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00248
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard business review.
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
Kayal, A. A. (2008). National innovation systems a proposed framework for developing countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 74-86.
Kelley, D. J., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. E. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011, 7, 2-38.
Klačmer Čalopa, M., Horvat, J., & Lalić, M. (2014). Analysis of financing sources for start-up companies. Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 19(2), 19-44.
Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision sciences, 36(1), 97-133.
Kousalova, S. (2018). The Dutch government supports ambitious start-ups. Czech Dutch Chamber of Commerce. https://www.cdcc.nl/the-dutch-government-supports-ambitious-start-ups/
Larson, A. (1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 173-188.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First‐mover advantages. Strategic management journal, 9(S1), 41-58.
Lipparini, A., & Sobrero, M. (1994). The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(2), 125-140.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
Markham, S. K., Ward, S. J., Aiman‐Smith, L., & Kingon, A. I. (2010). The valley of death as context for role theory in product innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 27(3), 402-417.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77-102.
Mason, N. W., & De Bello, F. (2013). Functional diversity: a tool for answering challenging ecological questions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(5), 777-780.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Oakey, R. P., Rothwell, R., & Cooper, S. (1988). The management of innovation in high-technology small firms: innovation and regional development in Britain and the United States. Praeger.
Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high‐tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. Journal of small business management, 50(2), 283-309.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of innovation and new technology, 3(1), 77-95.
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24.
Propris, L. D. (2002). Types of innovation and inter-firm co-operation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 337-353.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2015). Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship in England and Wales. Environment and Planning A, 47(2), 392-411.
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. W. E. Forum.
Sendler, U. (2017). The internet of things: Industrie 4.0 unleashed. Springer.
Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the incubator system: critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management(3), 146-155.
Smith, K. (1997). Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations, 2, 86-106.
Somsuk, N., Wonglimpiyarat, J., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2012). Technology business incubators and industrial development: resource‐based view. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(1), 49-72.
Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small business economics, 41(3), 537-562.
Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small business economics, 56(2), 809-832.
Stam, F., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. USE Discussion paper series, 16(13).
Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308-331.
Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital. International small business journal, 23(5), 487-511.
Valliere, D., & Peterson, R. (2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Evidence from emerging and developed countries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21(5-6), 459-480.
Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251-258.
Vossen, R. W. (1998). Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International small business journal, 16(3), 88-94.
Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped? Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 167-237.
王茂臻. (2012, 2012年6月20日). 打入國際供應鏈 串起台灣競爭力. 聯合報. https://sdgs.udn.com/sdgs/story/7636/737948
王健全, 林柏君, 彭素玲, 賴偉文, 張亞亘, 謝孟錡, & 陳穎萱. (2020). 2020年中小企業白皮書.
王琬昀, & 張筱祺. (2020). 臺灣創育產業關鍵報告. 財團法人資訊工業策進會.
行政院科技會報辦公室. (2015). 行政院生產力4.0發展方案. 台灣經濟論衡
李建興. (2015). 全球最大螺絲聚落 岡山傳奇. 今周刊, (949).
周樹林. (2014, 2014年1月23日). 代工製造產業的發展契機:雲端製造. 資策會產業情報研究所. https://mic.iii.org.tw/industry.aspx?id=82
林瑋琦. (2017). 德國工業4.0產業趨勢與衍生商機大揭密. 外貿協會.
邱奕嘉. (2008). 中小企業成長三大創新. 哈佛商業評論.
侯良儒. (2014, 2014年12月17日). 張忠謀:台灣應多養小公司 推動轉型 https://readers.ctee.com.tw/cm/20141217/a05aa5/579345/share
洪懿妍. (2003). 工研院領軍未來技術 — 創新推手. 天下雜誌, (279). https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5108858
徐曉慧. (1989). 畢德士:彈性是成功的碁石. 天下雜誌, (102). https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5104388
陳映璇. (2021). 窺見近未來100微趨勢!哪些產業將大轉型?下一波商機在哪. 數位時代, (320). https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/60744/industry-global-cloud-personalization-covid-19
鹿特丹台灣貿易中心. (2019). 上下齊心 荷蘭新創生態系統趨成熟. 經貿透視雙周刊, (525).
賀桂芬. (2017). 工業4.0戰國時代開打!. 天下雜誌. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5085043?template=transformers
賀桂芬, & 辜樹仁. (2016). 工業4.0─58秒的競爭. 天下雜誌. https://topic.cw.com.tw/2016industry4.0/article.html
廖家宜. (2020, 2020年6月29日). 全球50%水龍頭來自台灣 水五金產業擴大智慧製造需求. DIGITIMES 電子時報. https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&cat1=20&cat2=&id=0000588081_Q031JXGX7WH9GM2OSS5RL
鄭郁萌. (2019). 小鎮台霸 高雄小港的客製遊艇王. 商業周刊, (1658).
盧志浩. (2015, 2015年6月8日). 工業 4.0 為製造業轉型找路. 天下雜誌. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5068194
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-23
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-23

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.21.162.87
現在時間是 2024-04-29
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-08-23

Your IP address is 3.21.162.87
The current date is 2024-04-29
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-08-23.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-08-23

QR Code