Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0723122-235540 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0723122-235540
論文名稱
Title
深思熟「綠」? 產品訴求論點、情境圖像、調節焦點框架對綠色廣告效果之影響
Feeling Uncertain about Green Products? The Effects of Product Arguments, Context Images, and Regulatory Focus Frames in Green Advertising
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
152
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-07-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-08-23
關鍵字
Keywords
綠色廣告、產品訴求論點、情境圖像、調節焦點框架、效能不確定性、感知有用性
green advertising, product arguments, context images, regulatory focus frames, performance uncertainty, perceived usefulness
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 147 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 147 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
世界各國不論企業政府,鑒於環境反撲意識到環境對地球的重要性,進而推廣減塑、永續發展等相關政策及綠色產品。然而,過去卻有研究指出41% 的消費者會因其對綠色產品的不確定性而沒有意願購買,以及也有相關研究說明有環保意識的消費者更傾向認為綠色產品相較一般產品效果更差。因此本研究在不同調節焦點框架下,檢視綠色廣告的產品訴求論點與情境圖像如何相互搭配,能提升綠色廣告之效果,並期望能藉此降低消費者對綠色產品效能的不確定性,不再總認為綠色產品的效能不比一般產品,而能提升對綠色產品的感知有用性,進而提升產品態度與購買意願。
本研究採實驗法,執行兩個實驗,並以便利抽樣,於線上招募年滿18 歲且具有購買綠色產品能力的消費者為實驗樣本。個別檢視在促進焦點框架下及預防焦點框架下的綠色廣告中,產品訴求論點和情境圖像之搭配,如何透過效能不確定性、感知有用性,進一步影響消費者的產品態度和購買意願。研究結果顯示,促進焦點框架下的綠色廣告中,人像使用產品圖像搭配功能型綠色論點會產生較佳的產品態度與購買意願;而大自然圖像則是搭配產品論點會產生較佳的產品態度與購買意願,且上述效果係透過降低效能不確定性及提升感知有用性所序列中介。預防焦點框架下的綠色廣告中,大自然圖像搭配任何產品訴求論點效果皆無異;而人像使用產品圖像搭配情感型綠色論點時,可產生較佳產品態度與購買意願,且同樣透過效能不確定性及感知有用性所序列中介。
本研究在綠色廣告情境下,釐清產品訴求論點、情境圖像、調節焦點框架、效能不確定性與感知有用性的效果,並給予管理經營電商平台或廣告設計人員,在推廣綠色產品時,其產品訴求論點與情境圖像在搭配上的實務建議。
Abstract
Enterprises and governments in the world have realized the importance of the environment to the earth because of climate change and natural disasters, and then promoted relevant policies, such as plastic reduction and sustainable development, and green products. However, past studies have shown that 41% of consumers are unwilling to buy green products owing to their uncertainty about green products. Related studies have also shown that environmentally conscious consumers are more likely to think that green products are less effective than general products. Therefore, this study examines how the product arguments and context images in green advertising under different regulatory focus frames can be matched with each other, which can improve the effects of green advertising. Accordingly, this study hopes to reduce consumers’ uncertainty about the performance of green products, which then improves the perceived usefulness of green products, thereby enhancing product attitudes and purchase intentions.
This study conducted two experiments, and used convenience sampling to recruit consumers who are over 18 years old and have the ability to purchase green products as experimental samples. Two experiments separately examined how the product arguments and context images in green advertising under the promotion focus frame and prevention focus frame exerted effects on consumers’ product attitudes and purchase intentions through performance uncertainty and perceived usefulness. The analytical results reveal that in green advertising with the promotion focus frame, the image of a person using the product paired with functional green arguments will generate better product attitudes and purchase intentions; while the natural image paired with product beneficial arguments will generate better product attitudes and purchase intentions, and these effects are serially mediated through reducing uncertainty about performance and increasing perceived usefulness. In green advertising with the prevention focus frame, the effects of the natural image paired with any type of product arguments have no difference; while the image of a person using the product paired with emotional green arguments can generate better product attitudes and purchase intentions, and the effect is also serially mediated through performance uncertainty and perceived usefulness.
This study clarifies the effects of product arguments, context images, regulatory focus frames, performance uncertainty and perceived usefulness in green advertising on e-commerce platforms. It also provides practical implications on how to choose effective product arguments with context images when promoting green products under different regulatory focus frames.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書i
誌謝ii
中文摘要iii
英文摘要iv
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 2
第三節、研究問題 7
第四節、研究目的 7
第二章、文獻探討 10
第一節、綠色廣告 10
第二節、產品訴求論點 12
一、產品論點 12
二、功能型綠色論點與情感型綠色論點 13
第三節、綠色廣告中的大自然圖像 15
第四節、心理模擬 17
第五節、調節焦點框架 18
第六節、效能不確定性 20
一、綠色產品的效能不確定性 20
二、效能不確定性與感知有用性 22
第三章、研究架構與假說推論 23
第一節、研究架構 23
第二節、研究假說推論 23
第四章、研究方法 30
第一節、樣本及實驗設計 31
第二節、實驗刺激與前測 31
一、前測一 32
二、前測二 34
第三節、實驗程序 40
第四節、變數衡量 42
一、中介變數 42
二、應變數 43
三、操弄性檢驗變數 44
四、控制變數─綠色消費經驗 46
第五章、研究結果 48
第一節、實驗一分析結果 48
一、樣本描述 48
二、信度分析 49
三、操弄性檢驗 50
四、假說驗證 50
五、研究小結 58
第二節、實驗二分析結果 60
一、樣本描述 60
二、信度分析 61
三、操弄性檢驗 62
四、假說驗證 63
五、研究小結 69
第六章、結論與建議 71
第一節、研究結果 71
第二節、理論貢獻 74
第三節、實務意涵 79
第三節、研究限制 83
第四節、未來研究方向 84
參考文獻 87
附錄一 106
附錄二 113
附錄三 118
附錄四 123
附錄五 129
附錄六 132
附錄七 139
參考文獻 References
溫子豪(2019年7月2日)。限塑膠吸管全面施行 316不銹鋼銷量占5成。卡優新聞網。取自https://www.cardu.com.tw/news/detail.php?38470。
資策會產業情報研究所(2019年6月3日)。網購調查系列-網購消費占比達16.5% 愛用電商平台大排名。資策會產業情報研究所。取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=516。
資策會產業情報研究所(2022年5月12日)。【零售電商消費者調查系列一】6成網友愛用蝦皮24h、momo 行動App購物冠軍為蝦皮 10大網購數位科技 消費者最重視電子支付、跨平台比價。資策會產業情報研究所。取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=621&List=1。
戴鑫、吳丹、荆美星、童詩蘭(2009)。西方綠色廣告發展和研究综述。管理學報,6(5),704。
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49.
Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224-237.
Ahamat, A., Ahmad, S. Z., & Mohd, R. B. K. (2018). An empirical investigation on Malaysians' green purchasing behaviour. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 32(3), 237-254.
Al-Qeisi, K., Dennis, C., Alamanos, E., & Jayawardhena, C. (2014). Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2282-2290.
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33-45.
Azizi, S., Meshkani, F.A., & Mousa, R.A. (2016). Identifying and ranking the factors affecting the adoption of biofuels. Management Science Letters, 6(9), 585-590.
Baek, T. H., Yoon, S., & Kim, S. (2015). When environmental messages should be assertive: Examining the moderating role of effort investment. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 135-157.
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
Banerjee, S., Gulas, C. S., & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 21-31.
Barrios, A., Wilson, B., & Arias, C. (2017). Getting the sustainability message across: An endorsed Colombian environmental cinematographic strategy. International Journal of Advertising, 36(6), 910-927.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991).Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
Bezawada, R., & Pauwels, K. (2013). What is special about marketing organic products? How organic assortment, price, and promotions drive retailer performance. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 31-51.
Bhatnagar, N., & McKay-Nesbitt, J. (2016). Pro-environment advertising messages: The role of regulatory focus. International Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 4-22.
Biehal, G., Stephens, D., & Curio, E. (1992). Attitude toward the ad and brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 21(3), 19-36.
Bosone, L., & Martinez, F. (2017). When, how and why is loss-framing more effective than gain-and non-gain-framing in the promotion of detection behaviors? International Review of Social Psychology, 1(30), 184-192.
Buck, R., Anderson, E., Chaudhuri, A., & Ray, I. (2004). Emotion and reason in persuasion: Applying the ARI model and the CASC Scale. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 647-656.
Bullard, O., & Penner, S. (2017). A regulatory-focused perspective on philanthropy: Promotion focus motivates giving to prevention-framed causes. Journal of Business Research, 79, 173-180.
Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising, 22, 27-39.
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Ekinci, Y. (2015). Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: Enhancing reviews’ usefulness for high risk-averse travelers. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1829-1835.
Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: Temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336.
Cauberghe, V., De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2010). Simultaneous exposure to a program and advertising content in an interactive context: Perceptual and semantic interference and reinforcement. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 972-978.
Chan, R. Y. (2000). The effectiveness of environmental advertising: The role of claim type and the source country green image. International Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 349-375.
Chan, R.Y. K., Leung, T. K. P., & Wong, Y. H. (2006). The effectiveness of environmental claims for services advertising. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(4), 233-250.
Chang, H. H., Fang, P. W., & Huang, C. H. (2015). The impact of on-line consumer reviews on value perception. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 27(2), 32-57.
Chang, H., Zhang, L., & Xie, G. X. (2015). Message framing in green advertising: The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 158-176.
Chang, K. C., Hsu, C. L., Hsu, Y. T., & Chen, M. C. (2019). How green marketing, perceived motives and incentives influence behavioral intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 336-345.
Chekima, B., Wafa, S. A. W. S. K., Igau, O. A., Chekima, S., & Sondoh Jr, S. L. (2016). Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3436-3450.
Chen, M. Y., & Chiu, C. I. (2016). Go green: How to influence the perceived effectiveness of a green product? International Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 622-641.
Chen, S. Y. (2016). Green helpfulness or fun? Influences of green perceived value on the green loyalty of users and non-users of public bikes. Transport Policy, 47, 149-159.
Chen, Y. & Chang, C. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502-520.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489-500.
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2012). Green marketing: A study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly products. Asían Social Science, 8(12), 117-126.
Chernev, A. (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 557-565.
Chernev, A., & Carpenter, G. S. (2001). The role of market efficiency intuitions in consumer choice: A case of compensatory inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 349-361.
Chou, H. Y. (2019). Effects of pronoun use in campaign advertisements on young Taiwanese voters. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(2), 165-186.
Codini, A. P., Miniero, G., & Bonera, M. (2018). Why not promote promotion for green consumption? The controversial role of regulatory focus. European Business Review, 30(5), 554-570.
Coeterier, J. F. (1983). A photo validity test. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(4), 315-323.
Colarelli, S. M., & Dettmann, J. R. (2003). Intuitive evolutionary perspectives in marketing practices1. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 837-865.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Dahl, D. W., & Hoeffler, S. (2004). Visualizing the self: Exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks for new product evaluation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 259-267.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Dens, N., Pelsmacker, P. D., & Puttemans, B. (2011). Text or pictures? Effectiveness of verbal information and visual cues in advertisements for new brands versus extensions. In Advances in Advertising Research, 2, 341-355.
Dijkstra, A., Rothman, A., & Pietersma, S. (2011). The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychology & Health, 26(8), 1036-1048.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1-19.
D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., & Khosla, R. (2007). Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15(2), 69-78.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Psychology and Marketing, 12, 459-466.
Elbert, S. P., & Ots, P. (2018). Reading or listening to a gain-or loss-framed health message: Effects of message framing and communication mode in the context of fruit and vegetable intake. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 573-580.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.
Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37-48.
Fassnacht, M., & Koese, I. (2006). Quality of electronic services: Conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. Journal of Service Research, 9(1), 19-37.
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603-637.
Finger, M. (1994). From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships between environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 141-160.
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 148-164.
Gam, H. J., Cao, H., Farr, C., & Kang, M. (2010). Quest for the eco-apparel market: A study of mothers’ willingness to purchase organic cotton clothing for their children. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(6), 648-656.
Grimmer, M., & Woolley, M. (2014). Green marketing messages and consumers’ purchase intentions: Promoting personal versus environmental benefits. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(4), 231-250.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Janssen, M., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions–insights from user-generated content on Twitter. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(6), 771-800.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2008). Virtual nature experiences as emotional benefits in green product consumption: The moderating role of environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 818-842.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza- Ibáñez, V. (2009). Green advertising revisited: Conditioning virtual nature experiences. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 715-739.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza- Ibáñez, V. (2010). Beyond savanna: An evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 119-128.
Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., & Alija, P. (2013). Nature imagery in advertising: Attention restoration and memory effects. International Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 183-210.
Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., D’souza, C., Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2014). Environmental threat appeals in green advertising: The role of fear arousal and coping efficacy. International Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 741-765.
Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., & Eisend, M. (2016). Nature imagery in non-green advertising: The effects of emotion, autobiographical memory, and consumer's green traits. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 427-440.
Hartmann, P., Ibáñez, V. A., & Sainz, F. J. F. (2005). Green branding effects on attitude: Functional versus emotional positioning strategies. Marketing intelligence & planning, 23(1), 9-29.
Haryanto, H., Purnomo, H., & Wiyono, W. (2018). The intention to adopt a green product (a study on a green fuel product (pertalite)). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200(1), 12-25.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.
Hazlett, A., Molden, D. C., & Sackett, A. M. (2011). Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst? Regulatory focus and preferences for optimism and pessimism in predicting personal outcomes. Social Cognition, 29(1), 74-96.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring preferences for really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 406-420.
Homer, P. M. (2006). Relationships among ad-induced affect, beliefs, and attitudes: Another look. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 35-51.
Huertas-Garcia, R., Consolación, C. & Mas-Machuca, M. (2016). How a sustainable message affects brand attributes. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(3), 466-482.
Huettl, V., & Gierl, H. (2012). Visual art in advertising: The effects of utilitarian vs. hedonic product positioning and price information. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 893-904.
Hull IV, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 101-114.
Iyer, E., & Banerjee, S. B. (1993). Anatomy of green advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 494-501.
Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Advances in Consumer Research, 3(3), 1-19.
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272-1287.
Juharsah, J., & Hartini, H. (2014). The role of attitude as relationship mediation between products knowledge and ethnocentrism on purchasing intention of Buton special woven (study on the city of Bau-Bau). International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(11), 26-34.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202.
Kao, T. F., & Du, Y. Z. (2020). A study on the influence of green advertising design and environmental emotion on advertising effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118294.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoptionacross time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2012). The role of regulatory focus and self-view in “green” advertising message framing. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 25-39.
Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2014). “I eat organic for my benefit and yours”: Egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 18-32.
Kawakami, T., & Parry, M. E. (2013). The impact of word of mouth sources on the perceived usefulness of an innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1112-1127.
Kilbourne, W. E. (1995). Green advertising: Salvation or oxymoron? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 7-20.
Kilbourne, W. E. (2004). Sustainable communication and the dominant social paradigm: Can they be integrated? Marketing Theory, 4(3), 187-208.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kong, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). When does green advertising work? The moderating role of product type. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(3), 197-213.
Krishna, A., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 159-168.
Krstić, J., Kostić-Stanković, M., & Cvijović, J. (2021). Green advertising and its impact on environmentally friendly consumption choices- A review. Industrija, 49(1), 93-110.
Ku, H. H., Kuo, C. C., Wu, C. L., & Wu, C. Y. (2012). Communicating green marketing appeals effectively: The role of consumers’ motivational orientation to promotion versus prevention. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 41-50.
Laksmidewi, D., & Soelasih, Y. (2019). Anthropomorphic green advertising: How to enhance consumers’ environmental concern. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 29(1), 72-84.
Larson, J. S., Redden, J. P., & Elder, R. S. (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188-194.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.
Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 573-586.
Leonidou, L.C., Leonidou, C.N., Palihawadana, D. & Hultman, M. (2011). Evaluating the green advertising practices of international firms: A trend analysis. International Marketing Review, 28(1), 6-33.
Liang, B., Runyan, R. C., & Fu, W. (2011). The effect of culture on the context of ad pictures and ad persuasion: The role of context-dependent and context-independent thinking. International Marketing Review, 28(4), 412-434.
Lin, Y. C., & Chang, C. C. A. (2012). Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125-134.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864.
Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). Negative returns on positive emotions: The influence of pride and self-regulatory goals on repurchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 833-840.
Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
Markopoulos, P. M., & Clemons, E. K. (2013). Reducing buyers' uncertainty about taste-related product attributes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(2), 269-299.
Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115-127.
Matthes, J., Wonneberger, A., & Schmuck, D. (2014). Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1885-1893.
Mimouni-Chaabane, A., & Volle, P. (2010). Perceived benefits of loyalty programs: Scale development and implications for relational strategies. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 32-37.
Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 12-24.
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318-332.
Mou, J., Shin, D. H., & Cohen, J. (2017). Understanding trust and perceived usefulness in the consumer acceptance of an e-service: A longitudinal investigation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(2), 125-139.
Mugge, R. (2011). The effect of a business-like personality on the perceived performance quality of products. International Journal of Design, 5 (3), 67-76.
Musgrove, C. C. F., Choi, P., & Chris Cox, K. (2018). Consumer perceptions of green marketing claims: An examination of the relationships with type of claim and corporate credibility. Services Marketing Quarterly, 39(4), 277-292.
Nabilla, F. (2019). Advertising attitude, green purchase intention and environmental concern: Promoting functional versus emotional appeals. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 5(4), 199-223.
Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823-839.
Olivier, J. (2021, August 19). For Many Taiwanese, “Buying Green” Has Long Been a Priority. Taiwan Business TOPICS. Retrived from https://topics.amcham.com.tw/2021/08/taiwanese-buying-green-priority/
Omar, N. A., Ramly, S. M., Alam, S. S., & Nazri, M. A. (2015). Assessing the effect of loyalty program benefits in satisfaction-loyalty relationship: Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 43, 145-159.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10-11), 1160-1166.
Ovčjak, B., Heričko, M., Polančič, G. (2015). Factors impacting the acceptance of mobile data services- A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 53, 24-47.
Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Neural correlates of reflection on goal states: The role of regulatory focus and temporal distance. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 412-425.
Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Russell, C. A. (2015). Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing’. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 107-134.
Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 563-576.
Peter, J. P., & Ryan, M. J. (1976). An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2), 184-188.
Petit, O., Javornik, A., & Velasco, C. (2022). We eat first with our (digital) eyes: Enhancing mental simulation of eating experiences via visual-enabling technologies. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 277-293.
Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260.
Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281-293.
Polonsky, M. J., Carlson, L., Grove, S., & Kangun, N. (1997). International environmental marketing claims: Real changes or simple posturing? International Marketing Review, 14(4), 218-232.
Poor, M., Duhachek, A., & Krishnan, H. S. (2013). How images of other consumers influence subsequent taste perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 124-139.
PwC Global (2021). A time for hope: Consumers’ outlook brightens despite headwinds. December 2021 Global Consumer Insights Pulse Survey. Retrived from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/consumer-markets/consumer-insights-survey.html
Reed, L. I., & DeScioli, P. (2017). The communicative function of sad facial expressions. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1-9.
Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H., & Spence, M. T. (2006). Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(1), 6-24.
Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Visual imagery: Applications to advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 101-106.
Sar, S., & Anghelcev, G. (2015). Congruity between mood and message regulatory focus enhances the effectiveness of anti drinking and driving advertisements: A global versus local processing explanation. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 421-446.
Sarkar, J. G., Sarkar, A., & Yadav, R. (2019). Brand it green: Young consumers’ brand attitudes and purchase intentions toward green brand advertising appeals. Young Consumers, 20(3), 190-207.
Sayed, A.R., El Saghier, N.M., Sadek, H. H. (2021). The effect of green brand and trust on consumers’ purchasing intention: The mediation role of attitude towards green brands Egypt case. Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences, 58(5), 61-101.
Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 184-198.
Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Naderer, B. (2018). Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect-reason-involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 127-145.
Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., Naderer, B., & Beaufort, M. (2018). The effects of environmental brand attributes and nature imagery in green advertising. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 414-429.
Schuhwerk, M. E., & Lefkoff-Hagius, R. (1995). Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45-54.
Schultz, R. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1975). Implementing operations research/management science. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.
Segev, S., Fernandes, J., & Wang, W. (2015). The effects of gain versus loss message framing and point of reference on consumer responses to green advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(1), 35-51.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 285-293.
Sharma, A., & Joshi, S. (2017). Green consumerism: Overview and further research directions. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 7(2), 206-223.
Shin, S. I., Lee, K. Y., & Yang, S. B. (2016). How do uncertainty reduction strategies influence social networking site fan page visiting? Examining the role of uncertainty reduction strategies, loyalty and satisfaction in continuous visiting behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 449-462.
Sohn, S. (2017). A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 22-33.
Suh, J. C. (2009). The role of consideration sets in brand choice: The moderating role of product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing, 26(6), 534-550.
Taute, H. A., McQuitty, S., & Sautter, E. P. (2011). Emotional information management and responses to emotional appeals. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 31-44.
Taylor, C. R. (2015). A call for more research on ‘green’ or environmental advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 573-575.
Tsai, Y. C., and Yeh, J. C. (2010). Perceived risk of information security and privacy in online shopping: A study of environmentally sustainable products. African Journal of Business Management 4(18), 4057-4066.
Tucker, E. M., Rifon, N. J., Lee, E., & Reece, B. B. (2012). A test of green claim types and the role of individual consumer characteristics for green ad response. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 9-23.
Usrey, B., Palihawadana, D., Saridakis, C., & Theotokis, A. (2020). How downplaying product greenness affects performance evaluations: Examining the effects of implicit and explicit green signals in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 49(2), 125-140.
Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541-549.
Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011). Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167-180.
Van Vugt, M. (2009). Averting the tragedy of the commons: Using social psychological science to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 169-173.
Wu, K., Vassileva, J., Zhao, Y., Noorian, Z., Waldner, W., & Adaji, I. (2016). Complexity or simplicity? Designing product pictures for advertising in online marketplaces. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 17-27.
Xie, H., Minton, E. A., & Kahle, L. R. (2016). Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation. Marketing Letters, 27(4), 627-644.
Xue, F., & Muralidharan, S. (2015). A green picture is worth a thousand words? Effects of visual and textual environmental appeals in advertising and the moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(1), 82-106.
Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 344-363.
Yoon, H. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Understanding green advertising attitude and behavioral intention: An application of the health belief model. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(1), 49-70.
Yu, J., Coulson, K. R., Zhou, J. X., & Wen, J. (2013). Substantive and associative claims in environmental communication: A study of fortune 500 websites. Journal of Promotion Management, 19(2), 211-223.
Zemack-Rugar, Y., & Klucarova-Travani, S. (2018). Should donation ads include happy victim images? The moderating role of regulatory focus. Marketing Letters, 29(4), 421-434.
Zhang, Z., Hou, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Applying complexity theory to understand Chinese consumers’ decision-making in innovative products. International Studies of Management & Organization, 49(2), 191-212.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-23
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-23

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.144.113.197
現在時間是 2024-05-06
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-08-23

Your IP address is 3.144.113.197
The current date is 2024-05-06
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-08-23.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-08-23

QR Code