Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0726121-211641 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0726121-211641
論文名稱
Title
誰是薪水小偷? 美國職棒球員怠惰、合約年現象之分析和預測
Who is the Slacker? The Analysis and Prediction of Shirking and Contract Year Phenomenon for MLB Players
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
64
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2021-08-26
關鍵字
Keywords
薪水小偷、美國職棒大聯盟、怠惰、合約年現象、WAR、預測模型
Slacker, MLB, Shirking, Contract Year Phenomenon, WAR, Prediction Model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 243 次,被下載 31
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 243 times, has been downloaded 31 times.
中文摘要
「薪水小偷」一詞時常用來稱呼簽完新約後表現下降的球員,這樣的行為在學術上稱為怠惰,此外有些球員在合約年時表現會異常得好,這樣的行為則被稱為合約年現象,球員若存在怠惰或合約年現象會大大影響球隊的表現,甚至球團的經營。因此,本研究使用了WAR這項球員表現指標來驗證怠惰與合約年現象存在與否,並透過預測模型來預測球員是否會怠惰,最後提供實務上的貢獻。
WAR(Win Above Replacement)是棒球界用來衡量球員表現的新指標,它是指一位球員比起同樣位置的替補級球員,能多為球隊帶來幾場比賽勝利。本研究使用20年期間的MLB自由球員數據,利用統計檢定比較「正常賽季」、「合約賽季」和「合約後賽季」的WAR差異,並且除了對全體自由球員檢驗外,也將球員分成簽訂複數年合約或簽訂一年合約的球員來分別檢驗,結果發現只有簽訂複數年合約的球員會有合約年現象,但無論是全體自由球員、簽訂一年合約、簽訂複數年合約的球員都會怠惰。
最後,為了預測球員是否會怠惰和找出怠惰的球員具備之特徵,本研究建立三個機器學習模型,並創立新的目標變數來歸類球員怠惰與否,發現會怠惰的投手和打者分別有不同的特徵,而預測結果也能幫助球團對新簽約的球員是否會怠惰有更可靠的判斷。
Abstract
The word “slacker” is referred to the players whose performances are decline after signing up the new contract, which is academically called shirking behavior. On the other hand, some players’ performances are unexpectedly well in their contract year, which is called contract year phenomenon. If players are shirking or in the contract year phenomenon will strongly influence the team’s performance, even the club’s management. Therefore, this research will use the WAR, the players’ performances index, to verify whether there exist shirking behavior and the contract year phenomenon among the players’ performances. Also, this research will develop the prediction model to predict whether the player is shirking and provides some practical contributions.
WAR (Win Above Replacement) is the new index to measure the players’ performances in the baseball league, which referred that how many games a player would win for the team compared to a position player. This research will use the data of MLB free agents in 20 years and use statistical test to compare the WAR differences of “normal season”, “contract season” and “post-contract season”. In addition, the research will categorize whole players from signing up multi-year contract to signing up one-year contract for the testing. It terms out that only the players who sign up multi-years contract are in the contract year phenomenon. However, the result show that whether the whole free agent, signing up one-year contract players, or signing up double-years contract players would be shirking.
Finally, to predict whether the players will be shirking and to find out the features of shirking players, this research will develop three machine learning models to develop new variables to categorize the players into shirking or not shirking and will also find out the different features of shirking pitchers and batters separately. And the prediction result can help clubs for reliable judgement of whether new signed-up players will be shirking.
目次 Table of Contents
論⽂審定書................................................................................................................................ i
致謝........................................................................................................................................... ii
摘要.......................................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract .................................................................................................................................... iv
第⼀章 緒論.............................................................................................................................. 1
第⼆章 ⽂獻探討...................................................................................................................... 5
第⼀節、 怠惰理論SHIRKING ........................................................................................... 5
第⼆節、 合約年現象CONTRACT YEAR PHENOMENON .................................................... 8
第三章 研究⽅法.................................................................................................................... 10
第⼀節、 資料來源概述.................................................................................................. 10
第⼆節、 資料欄位定義與介紹...................................................................................... 11
第三節、 研究流程.......................................................................................................... 15
第四節、 預測模型.......................................................................................................... 18
第四章 研究結果.................................................................................................................... 20
第⼀節、 第⼀階段結果.................................................................................................. 20
第⼆節、 第⼆階段結果.................................................................................................. 38
第五章 結論與建議................................................................................................................ 45
第⼀節、 研究結論.......................................................................................................... 45
第⼆節、 研究限制與建議.............................................................................................. 46
參考⽂獻.................................................................................................................................. 49
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
楊明修(2019)。熱門音樂預測、特徵變數趨勢及巨星現象之分析。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文,高雄市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8m8rd7

二、英文文獻
Ahlstrom, D., S. Si, and J. Kennelly. "Free-Agent Performance in Major League Baseball: Do Teams Get What They Expect?" Journal of Sport Management 13 (1999): 181-96. Print.

ARMINGER, G., & STEIN, P. (1997). Finite Mixtures of Covariance Structure Models with Regressors. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(2), 148–182. doi:10.1177/0049124197026002002

Barros, R. C., Basgalupp, M. P., de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F., & Freitas, A. A. (2012). A hyper-heuristic evolutionary algorithm for automatically designing decision-tree algorithms. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference - GECCO ’12. doi:10.1145/2330163.2330335

Berri, D. J., & Krautmann, A. C. (2006). Shirking on the Court: Testing for the Incentive Effects of Guaranteed Pay. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 536–546. doi:10.1093/ei/cbj033

Briskman, Colin, "Opportunistic Behavior in Major League Baseball: The Contract Year Phenomenon and The Shirking Effect" (2014). CMC Senior Theses. 861. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/861
Dinerstein, Michael. Free Agency and Contract Options: How Major League Baseball Teams Value Players. 2005, Department of Economics, Stanford University, CA.

Frick, B. (2011), Performance, salaries and contract length: empirical evidence from German soccer. International Journal of Sport Finance, 6, 87–118.

Glenn Knowles, James Murray, Michael Haupert, and Keith Sherony. Shirking in major league baseball in the era ofthe reserve clause. Nine: A Journal of Baseball History and Social Policy Perspectives, 12, 2003.

Hagan, Briton A.. "Characteristics and Success of Long-Term Contracts in Major League Baseball." (2017).https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ_hess_etds/83

Jeff Barrows , William Seyfried , "Player and Organization Performance: A Study of First-time Major League Baseball Free Agents," Universal Journal of Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 31 - 38, 2019. DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2019.070104.

Kahn, L. M. (1993). Free Agency, Long-Term Contracts and Compensation in Major League Baseball: Estimates from Panel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(1), 157. doi:10.2307/2109641

Konstantatos, Evan, “Performance of Major League Baseball Players during Their ‘Free Agency’ Season” (2009). Honors Projects in Finance. Paper 8.



Körting, T. S., Garcia Fonseca, L. M., & Câmara, G. (2013). GeoDMA—Geographic Data Mining Analyst. Computers & Geosciences, 57, 133–145. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.02.007

Krautmann, A. C. (1990). Shirking or Stochastic Productivity in Major League Baseball? Southern Economic Journal, 56(4), 961. doi:10.2307/1059884

Krautmann, A. C., & Donley, T. D. (2009). Shirking in Major League Baseball Revisited. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(3), 292–304. doi:10.1177/1527002508325817

Krautmann, A. C., & Solow, J. L. (2009). The Dynamics of Performance Over the Duration of Major League Baseball Long-Term Contracts. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(1), 6–22. doi:10.1177/1527002508327382

Lehn, Kenneth, 1982. "Property Rights, Risk Sharing, and Player Disability in Major League Baseball," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(2), pages 343-366, October.

Marburger, D. R. (2003). Does the Assignment of Property Rights Encourage or Discourage Shirking? Journal of Sports Economics, 4(1), 19–34. doi:10.1177/1527002502239656

Martin, Jason A., Trey M. Eggleston, Victoria A. Seymour, and Carrie W. Lecrom. 2011. "One-Hit Wonders: A Study of Contract-Year Performance among Impending Free Agents in Major League Baseball." NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture 20(1): 11-26.

Maxcy, J. (1997). Do long-term contracts influence performance in Major League Baseball? In W. Hendricks (Ed.), Advances in the economics of sport (pp. 157-176). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Maxcy, Joel. “Motivating Long-Term Employment Contracts: Risk Management in Major League Baseball.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 2004, 25, pp. 109-120.

Maxcy, J. G., Fort, R. D., & Krautmann, A. C. (2002). The Effectiveness of Incentive Mechanisms in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(3), 246–255. doi:10.1177/1527002502003003002

Myles, A. J., Feudale, R. N., Liu, Y., Woody, N. A., & Brown, S. D. (2004). An introduction to decision tree modeling. Journal of Chemometrics, 18(6), 275–285. doi:10.1002/cem.873

Peng, C. J., So, T. H., Stage, F. K., & St. John, E. P. (2002). The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals: 1988–1999. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 259–293.

Rodney Fort, Joel Maxcy (2003). Competitive Balance in Sports Leagues: An Introduction. Journal of Sports Economics, 4(2), 154–160.

Šarlija, N., Bilandžić, A., & Stanić, M. (2017). Logistic regression modelling: procedures and pitfalls in developing and interpreting prediction models. Croatian Operational Research Review, 8(2), 631–652. doi:10.17535/crorr.2017.0041

Scroggins, J. (1993, July). Shirking or stochastic productivity in Major League Baseball: Comment. Southern Economic Journal, 60, 239-240.

Sperandei, S. (2014). Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochemia Medica, 12–18. doi:10.11613/bm.2014.003

Stankiewicz, Katie (2009) "Length of Contracts and the Effect on the Performance of MLB Players," The Park Place Economist: Vol. 17. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace/vol17/iss1/17

Stiroh, Kevin J., Playing for Keeps: Pay and Performance in the NBA. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=334421 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.334421

Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 49(11):1225–1231

White, M. H., & Sheldon, K. M. (2013). The contract year syndrome in the NBA and MLB: A classic undermining pattern. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 196–205. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9389-7






三、網路資料
綜合報導(2021年4月30日)。球評驚陳偉殷成「軟投派」,日媒曝台灣英雄暖心舉動。聯合新聞網。檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/7001/5424325

綜合報導(2021年5月12日)。別再說薪水小偷!邦賈納連5場好投寫百年神數據。聯合新聞網。檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/6999/5452587

Baseball Reference. (n.d.). WAR Comparison Chart. Retrieved from https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_comparison.shtml

Slowinski, P. (2010). What is WAR?. Retrieved from https://library.fangraphs.com/misc/war/

Slowinski, P. (2012). fWAR, rWAR, and WARP. Retrieved from https://library.fangraphs.com/war/differences-fwar-rwar/
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code