因應AIOT時代的到來，這些大企業發現，通過與新創企業密切的互動，有助於加速自身轉型的速度，更快的找到自身數位轉型的方法。對於各國政府，培養新創企業之重要性已經上升至維護國家未來產業競爭能力的層級，尤其是對於地小人少，靠知識經濟為主的國家，例如以色列、韓國、法國、新加坡等政府先後推出本國版本的創新創業政策，誓言通過國家的力量去改善本國創業環境。他們普遍採用修改法規、資金補助、建構或引入加速器、促進國際化這四大手段，視乎在創新創業政策上有『國際共識』。在台灣，我們同樣是以知識經濟為主地小人少的國家，科技部於2016年開始參考各國政策推出台灣的創新創業政策，包括模仿其他國家成立台灣科技新創基地，推出相關配套吸引國際團隊與國外加速器、資金來到台灣，通過這樣的國際交流，逐步改善台灣的創業環境與新創團隊的實力。然而，目前在創業生態系統的文獻上，「國際共識」的創業政策對於創業生態系統發展的影響認識並不多，同時於台灣創業生態系統的文獻與政策干預的效果文獻是缺乏的，在新創企業越來越重要的今天這是重要的。
本文通過對於2016-2019年科技部施行的創新創業政策做出個案回顧，通過文獻探討、10份政府資料分析、5組新創團隊的深度訪談，我們成功建構出台灣創業生態系統的發展脈絡模型，我們發現科技部在『資金補助』+『建構加速器』、『修改法規』等介入手段較為成功，在『促進國際化』、『引入加速器』等介入手段較為無效，並認為政府干預創業生態系統發展的關鍵在於政府本身的執政效率以及資訊流通程度，對於創業生態系統文獻給出補充。

In response to the AIOT era, large companies have discovered that interacting with startups can help accelerate the speed of corporate transformation and find solutions for digital transformation. For the government, the country’s entrepreneurial environment will affect the country’s future industrial competitiveness. Especially for small countries, countries that rely mainly on the knowledge economy, such as Israel, South Korea, Singapore, etc. These governments have successively introduced their own versions of innovation and entrepreneurship policies, vowing to improve their own entrepreneurial environment through the power of the country. They adopt methods such as amending laws and regulations, funding subsidies, constructing or introducing accelerators, and promoting internationalization.
In Taiwan, we are also a small country dominated by a knowledge-based economy. The Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST) began to implement Taiwan’s innovation and entrepreneurship policies in 2016 with reference to the policies of various countries. In 2017, MOST established Taiwan Tech Arena(TTA). Attract international teams, foreign accelerators, and funds to Taiwan, and through such international exchanges, gradually improve Taiwan’s entrepreneurial environment and strengthen Taiwan’s startups.
However, in the current literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems, there is not much understanding of the impact of innovation and entrepreneurship policies on the management of entrepreneurial ecosystems-building, and the literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems and policy interventions in Taiwan is lacking.
This article reviewed the innovation and entrepreneurship policies implemented by MOST from 2016 to 2019, through literature discussion, 10 government data analysis, and in-depth interviews with 5 groups of startups. We have successfully constructed the development context model of Taiwan’s entrepreneurial ecosystem. We have found that interventions such as "funding subsidies", "accelerator construction" and "modification of regulations" are successful, and methods such as "promoting internationalization" and "introducing accelerators" are ineffective. The conclusion that the key to government intervention in the development of the entrepreneurial ecosystem lies in the government’s governance efficiency and the degree of information circulation, which supplements the literature on the entrepreneurial ecosystem.

論文審定書 i
公開授權書 ii
誌謝 iii
摘要 iv
Abustract v
目錄 vii
圖次 ix
表次 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 7
第三節 研究目的 1
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 國家創新系統相關研究 3
第二節 創業生態系統相關研究 1
第三節 早期階段創業生態系統政策相關研究 10
第四節 總結 14
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 研究架構 16
第二節 研究設計 19
第三節 資料分析之方法 25
第四章 資料整理分析 27
第一節 個案背景－科技部介紹 27
第二節 科技部政策文件分析結果 30
第三節 國外機構之研究報告分析結果 34
第四節 訪談資料分析結果 36
第五節 研究分析結果討論 45
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 結論 51
第二節 研究貢獻 56
第三節 未來研究建議 57
參考文獻 58
附錄 訪談逐字稿 66

參考文獻
中文參考文獻
行政院經濟建設委員會(2013)。台灣經濟發展歷程與策略。臺北市：行政院經濟建設委員會
吴金希, & 李宪振. (2012). 台湾工研院科技成果转化经验对发展新兴产业的启示. 中国科技论坛, (2012 年 07), 89-94.
科技部(2019)。109 年「研發成果萌芽計畫」個案申請說明。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2017)。科技部補助新型態產學研鏈結計畫作業要點。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2021)。青年科技創新創業基地建置計畫。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2017)。105年科技部年報。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2018)。106年科技部年報。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2019)。107年科技部年報。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2020)。108年科技部年報。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2020)。科技部 TTA 暨「研發成果創業加速及整合推廣計畫」新創案源加速作業辦法 第26版。臺北：行政院科技部
科技部(2015)。科技部鏈結矽谷計畫 「台灣創新創業中心選拔新創團隊赴矽谷」。臺北：行政院科技部
博士創新之星計畫辦公室(2020)。109年博士創新之星計畫簡章。臺北：國家實驗研究院
國家實驗研究院(2020)。「創新創業激勵計畫」選拔辦法 第30版。臺北：國家實驗研究院
梁明義, & 王文音. (2002)。台灣半世紀以來快速經濟 發展的回顧與省思. 金融投資與經濟發展: 紀念梁國樹教授第六屆學術研討會論文集 (127-130 頁)。臺北: 國立台灣大學經濟學系.
國家發展委員會(2016)。亞洲·矽谷推動方案 行動計畫。臺北：國家發展委員會 
英文參考文獻
Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501-514.
Aoyama, Y. (2009). Entrepreneurship and regional culture: The case of Hamamatsu and Kyoto, Japan. Regional Studies, 43(3), 495-512.
Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.
Baron, T., & Harima, A. (2019). The role of diaspora entrepreneurs in start-up ecosystem development-a Berlin case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 36(1-2), 74-102
Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of business venturing, 11(1), 3-22.
Blaug, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship before and after Schumpeter. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Bollingtoft, A., & Ulhoi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency?. Journal of business venturing, 20(2), 265-290.
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST review, 14(1), 14-19.
Epetimehin, F. M., & Ekundayo, O. (2011). Organizational knowledge management: survival strategy for Nigeria insurance industry. Interdisciplinary Review of Economics and Management, 1(2).
Fayolle, A., & Redford, D. T. (2014). Handbook on the entrepreneurial university. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and corporate change, 10(4), 861-891.
Feld, B. (2020). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons.
Grabher, G., & Stark, D. (1997). Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional studies, 31(5), 533-544.
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939.
Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small business economics, 35(2), 227-244.
Lavender, J., Moore, C. & Smith, K. (2020). Venture Pulse Q4 2020. (KPMG Q4VC)
Lichtenstein, G. A., & Lyons, T. S. (2006). Managing the community’s pipeline of entrepreneurs and enterprises: A new way of thinking about business assets. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(4), 377-386.
Kim, J. H., & Wagman, L. (2014). Portfolio size and information disclosure: An analysis of startup accelerators. Journal of Corporate Finance, 29, 520-534.
Kenney, M., & Von Burg, U. (1999). Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and corporate change, 8(1), 67-103.
Kenney, M., Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries. Research Policy, 42(2), 391-407.
Kimatu, J. N. (2016). Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1-7.
Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: a data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1260-1283.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.4553.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs,1(781), 1-13.
Lundvall, B. Å. (2016). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, 85.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77-102.
Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban studies, 53(10), 2118-2133.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The startup factories. NESTA. http://www. nesta. org. uk/library/documents/StartupFactories. pdf.
Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K. (2016). From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: the case of government sponsorship in St. Louis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5-6), 448-470.
Niosi, J., Godin, B., & Manseau, A. (2000). Canada's national system of innovation. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
Nicolas, R. (2004). Knowledge management impacts on decision making process. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 20-31.
OECD. (2008). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy China. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2000). Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Omotayo, F. O. (2015). Knowledge Management as an important tool in Organisational Management: A Review of Literature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1(2015), 1-23.
Pustovrh, A., Rangus, K., & Drnovšek, M. (2020). The role of open innovation in developing an entrepreneurial support ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119892.
Pugh, R., MacKenzie, N. G., & Jones-Evans, D. (2018). From ‘Techniums’ to ‘emptiums’: the failure of a flagship innovation policy in Wales. Regional studies, 52(7), 1009-1020.
Radinger-Peer, V., Sedlacek, S., & Goldstein, H. (2018). The path-dependent evolution of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE)–dynamics and region-specific assets of the case of Vienna (Austria). European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1499-1518.
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
Stam, E., & Bosma, N. (2015). Local policies for high-growth firms. The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, 286-305.
Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 1-24.
Sampat, B. N. (2006). Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy, 35(6), 772-789.
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.
Spigel, B., & Vinodrai, T. (2020). Meeting its Waterloo? Recycling in entrepreneurial ecosystems after anchor firm collapse. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-22.
Schäfer, S., & Henn, S. (2018). The evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems and the critical role of migrants. A Phase-Model based on a Study of IT startups in the Greater Tel Aviv Area. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 317-333.
Saxenian, A. (2001). The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communtiies and Industrial Upgrading. Berkely Planning Journal 15 (1): 3–31.
Saxenian, A. (2002). Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant High-Growth Entrepreneurs. Economic Development Quarterly 16 (1): 20–31.
Saxenian, A. (2005). From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development 40 (2): 35–61
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2021). Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042258721998948.
Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity.
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association.
Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2020). Proximities and the emergence of regional industry: Evidence of the liability of smallness in Malta. European Planning Studies, 28(2), 380-399.
網路參考文獻
Anisa Menur A. Maulani. (2019). South Korea’s thriving startup ecosystem: How “aggressive” VC investment, gender diversity play a role in it. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://e27.co/the-south-korean-startup-ecosystem-is-thriving-20191204/
Alcantara, C., Schaul, K., De Vynck, G. & Albergotti, R. (2021). How Big Tech got so big:Hundreds of acquisitions. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2021/amazon-apple-facebook-google-acquisitions/
McGlocklin, M. (2021). Global Survey Reveals CFOs Prioritizing Digital Transformation Investments. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210427005140/en/Global-Survey-Reveals-CFOs-Prioritizing-Digital-Transformation-Investments
Furr, N., Shipilov, A. (2019). Digital Doesn't Have to Be Disruptive. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://hbr.org/2019/07/digital-doesnt-have-to-be-disruptive
Waters, R. (2021). Big Tech’s surging growth stuns Wall Street. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://www.ft.com/content/42c5f1d6-36e5-4117-b30e-635c85c6a55c
The Economist. (2021). The most dangerous place on Earth. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://www.economist.com/leaders/2021/05/01/the-most-dangerous-place-on-earth
Venture capital in Israel. (2021). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venture_capital_in_Israel&oldid=1017109090
INSIDE(2017)。Facebook、微軟、Amazon 竟然都在一家法國火車站開育成中心？。取自https://www.inside.com.tw/article/9712-station-f-france
王琬昀(2018)。企業加速器：新創團隊與企業的橋梁。取自：https://www.iii.org.tw/Focus/FocusDtl.aspx?fm_sqno=12&f_sqno=ahBaOPqpobcHfZuahyButA__
李曉雲(2017)。2017創新創業生態系統建構方案。檢自：https://spark.stpi.narl.org.tw/public/article/show?id=8a8a839165c1b60b0165c1b61430000a
鄭芝珊(2020)。看見台灣新創能量 2020 iCAN X TTA Batch#2 Demo Day登場。檢自：https://money.udn.com/money/story/5635/5058221
陳文義(2017)。數位轉型無所不在，美妝大廠萊雅加入科技創投行列。檢自：https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/111423
郭芝榕(2015)。擅於打群架，韓國創業生態圈大躍進。檢自：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/35269/BN-ARTICLE-35269
數位時代(2020)。創新創業激勵計畫FITI引路 點亮學研團隊的創業路。檢自：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/60313/fiti01
錢玉紘(2021)。離1奈米更近了！台積電攜手台大提出半導體新材料「鉍」，有何特色？。檢自：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62859/tsmc-ntu-nature-research
戴雅真(2020)。經濟學人：疫情重創全球各國 台灣卻再現榮景。檢自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202012030404.aspx
羅瑞瑜(2019)。「槍桿、吵架與創業」──以色列如何成為新創企業之國？。檢自：https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/11441