隨著社會經濟發展和資訊科技的進步，再加上企業對程式人員的需求日益增加，使得電子指導平台-Codementor越來越多人使用。電子指導平台不同於傳統的實體教學，其提供的服務能打破時間和空間的限制，平台中有來自不同地區、不同背景的導師可供學生選擇，導師可以透過平台及時協助學生解決問題，取得額外收入。然而，電子指導平台也面臨許多問題。由於線上平台的導師和學生之間存在資訊不對稱，導師來自世界各地，其教學方式也都不同。對於大部分學生來說，只能瀏覽平台中的導師個人資料頁面中的各式資訊選擇適合的導師。因此，電子指導平台中的各式資訊，對於學生進行決策的影響是巨大的，該決策不僅關係到雙方的互動效率，還關係到學生是否能夠最大程度地選擇到合適的導師。此外，學生的決策對導師而言也是相當重要的，因為該決策會影響到導師的收益。
本研究從能展示導師能力的文化資本理論將導師個人資料頁面中的各式資訊進行分類，接著透過焦點團體法確保其分類的有效性，之後從導師和學生的角度，透過主觀的層級分析法，分別探討Codementor平台中導師認為平台中哪些訊號較能吸引學生，學生認為平台中哪些訊號較影響其選擇導師。研究結果指出，雙方皆認為文化資本中的實體化資本最為重要。對導師方而言，平台中的專業技術、本週特選導師徽章、評價星級數、已教授次數和評價人數之訊號較能吸引學生，其中評價星級數、已教授次數和評價人數是由教導過的學生所給予的評價；對學生方而言，導師的工作經歷、專案經歷、專業技術、評價星級數的訊號是選擇導師的重要考量因素，其中工作經歷、專案經歷、專業技術是屬於描述型資訊。

Socio-economic development and the advancement of information technology, coupled with the increasing demand for programmers in enterprises, the E-mentoring platform Codementor is increasingly used by more and more people. Unlike traditional teaching, the e-mentoring platform provides services that break time and space constraints, with mentors from different regions and backgrounds available for mentees to choose from. However, the e-mentoring platform also faces many problems. Due to the information asymmetry between mentors and mentees on the online platform, instructors come from all over the world and their teaching styles are different. For most mentees, they can only browse the mentor's personal page in the platform to choose the mentor. Therefore, the information in the e-mentoring platform has a great influence on the decision making of students, which is not only related to the efficiency of interaction between the two parties but also related to whether the mentees can maximize the selection of the right mentor. In addition, the mentee’s decision is also important to the mentor because it affects the mentor's income.
This study categorized the information in the mentor's profile page from the Cultural Capital Theory, which demonstrates the mentor's ability, and then used the Focus Group method to ensure the validity of the categorization. The results of the study indicated that the mentor thought that the platform was more attractive to mentees and the mentees thought that the platform influenced their choice of mentors. The results of the study indicated that the signals of expertise, featured mentor of the week, star ratings, number of sessions/jobs, and number of raters on the platform were more attractive to mentees, among which the star ratings, number of sessions/jobs, and number of raters are important by the mentees. For the mentees, the work experience, project experience, expertise, and star ratings of the mentors are important factors in selecting mentors.

論文審定書i
摘要ii
Abstractiii
目錄v
圖目錄vii
表目錄viii
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的5
第三節研究流程6
第二章文獻探討7
第一節電子指導7
第二節Codememtor8
第三節訊號理論14
第四節文化資本20
第五節層級分析法22
第三章研究方法37
第一節Codementor平台的訊號傳遞37
第二節研究設計38
第三節研究流程42
第四章資料分析與討論44
第一節樣本基本資料描述44
第二節文化資本權重之分析46
第三節實體化資本權重之分析48
第四節內在化資本權重之分析50
第五節制度化資本權重之分析52
第六節整體權重分析54
第七節學生方訊號內容吸引力問卷結果55
第五章結論與建議57
第一節研究結論57
第二節實務貢獻64
第三節學術貢獻65
第四節研究限制與未來建議66
參考文獻67
附錄一層級分析法線上問卷系統76
附錄二導師方受測者邀請信81
附錄三導師方正式實驗問卷82
附錄四學生方受測者報名表85
附錄五學生方正式實驗問卷87

Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in Economics (pp. 235-251). Elsevier.
Akin, L., & Hilbun, J. (2007). E-mentoring in three voices. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1), 1-22.
Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., Saberi, M., & Zhou, Z. (2019). Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 6(1), 153-162.
Awang, A., Ab Ghani, A. T., Abdullah, L., & Ahmad, M. F. (2017). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with cosine consistency index for coastal erosion problem: A case study of setiu wetlands. Journal of Computer Science & Computational Mathematics, 7(4), 107-118.
Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(3), 797-817.
Baum, D., & Spann, M. (2014). The interplay between online consumer reviews and recommender systems: An experimental analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(1), 129-162.
Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 7-56.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York, Greenwood).
Buchanan, A. (1988). Principal/agent theory and decision making in health care. Bioethics, 2(4), 317-333.
Butterworth, K., Hayes, B., & Zimmerman, M. (2011). Remote and rural: do mentors enhance the value of distance learning continuing medical education? Education for Health, 24(3), 539-561.
Ch, A. H. (2006). Effect of guidance services on study attitudes, study habits and academic achievement of secondary school students. Bulletin of Education & Research, 28(1), 35-45.
Chan, N. K. (2019). The rating game: The discipline of Uber’s user-generated ratings. Surveillance and Society, 17(1), 183-190.
Cheng, E. W., Li, H., & Ho, D. C. (2002). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A defective tool when used improperly. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(4), 341-361.
Cheung, R. (2014). The influence of electronic word-of-mouth on information adoption in online customer communities. Global Economic Review, 43(1), 42-57.
Chin, K. S., Chiu, S., & Tummala, V. R. (1999). An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001‐based EMS. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
Chong, J. Y., Ching, A. H., Renganathan, Y., Lim, W. Q., Toh, Y. P., Mason, S., & Krishna, L. K. (2020). Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: A systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(1), 195-226.
CompTIA. (2022). Tech Jobs Growth Exceeds Expectations for the Month, CompTIA Report Shows. CompTIA. https://www.comptia.org/newsroom/press-releases/tech-jobs-growth-exceeds-expectations-for-the-month-comptia-report-shows
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), 39-67.
Cook, A. C., Faulconbridge, J. R., & Muzio, D. (2012). London's legal elite: Recruitment through Cultural Capital and the reproduction of social exclusivity in city professional service fields. Environment and Planning A, 44(7), 1744-1762.
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International journal of construction management, 19(5), 436-452.
Doloi, H. (2008). Application of AHP in improving construction productivity from a management perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 26(8), 841-854.
Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic literature, 44(1), 5-42.
Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264-288.
Gao, G., Greenwood, B. N., McCullough, J., & Agarwal, R. (2012). A digital soapbox? The information value of online physician ratings. Academy of Management Proceedings,
Garen, J. E. (1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1175-1199.
Gaskill, L. R. (1991). Same‐sex and cross‐sex mentoring of female protégés: A comparative analysis. The Career Development Quarterly, 40(1), 48-63.
Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469-487.
Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., & Harker, P. T. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process. Applications and Studies, Berlin, Heidelberg, 21(2), 94-98.
Guitouni, A., & Martel, J.-M. (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), 501-521.
Guse, J., Schweigert, E., Kulms, G., Heinen, I., Martens, C., & Guse, A. H. (2016). Effects of mentoring speed dating as an innovative matching tool in undergraduate medical education: a mixed methods study. PLoS One, 11(2), e0147444.
Hale, A. K. (2019). The relationship between mentors' motivation levels, job satisfaction levels, and intention to stay in current organization. Northcentral University.
Headlam‐Wells, J., Gosland, J., & Craig, J. (2005). “There's magic in the web”: e‐mentoring for women's career development. Career Development International, 10(6), 444-459.
Homitz, D. J., & Berge, Z. L. (2008). Using e‐mentoring to sustain distance training and education. The Learning Organization, 15(4), 326-335.
Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the total environment, 409(19), 3578-3594.
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009). Searching for experience on the web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of marketing, 73(2), 55-69.
Jackson, V. A., Palepu, A., Szalacha, L., Caswell, C., Carr, P. L., & Inui, T. (2003). “Having the right chemistry”: A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(3), 328-334.
Kabassi, K. (2019). Evaluating museum websites using a combination of decision-making theories. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 14(5-6), 544-560.
Kabir, G., & Hasin, M. A. A. (2013). Integrating modified Delphi method with fuzzy AHP for optimal power substation location selection. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 3(4), 381-398.
Kessous, A., & Valette-Florence, P. (2019). “From Prada to Nada”: Consumers and their luxury products: A contrast between second-hand and first-hand luxury products. Journal of Business Research, 102, 313-327.
Kim, C. C., Kim, E. J., Curiel-Lewandrowski, C., Marks, V., Maloney, M., & Frieden, I. J. (2013). A model in dermatology for long-distance mentoring. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 68(5), 860-862.
Kim, Y. H., & Kim, M. (2010). A new approach for assessment and comparison of websites: Using the modified balanced scorecard and analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(6), 676-695.
Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of marketing, 64(2), 66-79.
Klein, T. J., Lambertz, C., & Stahl, K. O. (2016). Market transparency, adverse selection, and moral hazard. Journal of political economy, 124(6), 1677-1713.
Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., & Wallenius, J. (1992). Multiple criteria decision support-A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 63(3), 361-375.
Kotrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.
Lam, K., & Zhao, X. (1998). An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(2), 389-413.
Leary, M. R. (2019). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Routledge.
Li, J., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Yen, D. C., & Liu, X. (2019). Economic success of physicians in the online consultation market: A Signaling Theory perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(2), 244-271.
Liang, H., Xue, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Understanding online health information use: The case of people with physical disabilities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(6), 2.
Mahayosnand, P., & Bermejo, D. M. (2021). Best Practices for E-mentoring Student Researchers-Tutorials and Tools for Greater Efficiency and Effectiveness.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148.
Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. (2012). Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce. Information & Management, 49(5), 240-247.
Melón, M. G., Beltran, P. A., & Cruz, M. C. G. (2008). An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study. Omega, 36(5), 754-765.
Merenluoto, S. (2009). The connection of cultural capital with success in master’s degree programs in Finnish higher education. Research on Finnish Society, 2, 29-38.
Molino, P., Aiello, L. M., & Lops, P. (2016). Social question answering: Textual, user, and network features for best answer prediction. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 35(1), 1-40.
Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (Vol. 156). Sage.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
Neely, A. R., Cotton, J., & Neely, A. D. (2017). E-mentoring: A model and review of the literature. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 220-242.
Nolan, A., & Molla, T. (2017). Teacher confidence and professional capital. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 10-18.
Numata, M., Sugiyama, M., & Mogi, G. (2020a). Barrier analysis for the deployment of renewable-based mini-grids in myanmar using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Energies, 13(6), 1400.
Numata, M., Sugiyama, M., & Mogi, G. (2020b). Barrier analysis for the deployment of renewable-based mini-grids in myanmar using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Energies, 13(6), 215-231.
Ocker, R. J. (2005). Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 48(1), 22-39.
Olian, J. D., Carroll, S. J., Giannantonio, C. M., & Feren, D. B. (1988). What do proteges look for in a mentor? Results of three experimental studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33(1), 15-37.
Opitz, I., Zoll, F., Zasada, I., Doernberg, A., Siebert, R., & Piorr, A. (2019). Consumer-producer interactions in community-supported agriculture and their relevance for economic stability of the farm–An empirical study using an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of rural studies, 68, 22-32.
Ostovare, M., & Shahraki, M. R. (2019). Evaluation of hotel websites using the multicriteria analysis of PROMETHEE and GAIA: Evidence from the five-star hotels of Mashhad. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 107-116.
Palanisamy, R., & Foshay, N. (2013). Impact of user’s internal flexibility and participation on usage and information systems flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(4), 195-209.
Pathania, A., & Rasool, G. (2017). Investigating e tailer’s perceived website quality using analytical hierarchy process technique. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 1016-1023.
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS quarterly, 105-136.
Pennanen, M., Bristol, L., Wilkinson, J., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2016). What is ‘good’mentoring? Understanding mentoring practices of teacher induction through case studies of Finland and Australia. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 27-53.
Pfund, C., Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, K. (2016). Defining attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 20(2), 238-248.
Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(3), 271-293.
Rajak, M., & Shaw, K. (2019). Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Technology in Society, 59, 101-186.
Rekik, R., Kallel, I., Casillas, J., & Alimi, A. M. (2016). Using multiple criteria decision making approaches to assess the quality of web sites. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 14(7), 747-761.
Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 17(1), 1-18.
Rouyendegh, B. D., Topuz, K., Dag, A., & Oztekin, A. (2019). An AHP-IFT integrated model for performance evaluation of E-commerce web sites. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(6), 1345-1355.
Rowland, K. N. (2012). E-Mentoring: An Innovative Twist to Traditional Mentoring. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7, 228-237.
Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1(1-2), 69-97.
Roy, P. K., Ahmad, Z., Singh, J. P., Alryalat, M. A. A., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Finding and ranking high-quality answers in community question answering sites. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(1), 53-68.
Saaty, T., & Kearns, K. (1985). Analytical planning: The organization of system. In: Oxford.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation. RWS publications, USA.
Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In Mathematical models for decision support (pp. 109-121). Springer.
Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P. (2014). Analytical planning: The organization of system (Vol. 7). Elsevier.
Schichtel, M. (2010). Core-competence skills in e-mentoring for medical educators: A conceptual exploration. Medical teacher, 32(7), 248-262.
Schindler, P. S. (2019). Business research methods. McGraw-Hill Education.
Scott, A., & Vick, S. (1999). Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principal‐agent theory to the doctor‐patient relationship. Scottish journal of political economy, 46(2), 111-134.
Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281-306). Elsevier.
Spremann, K. (1987). Agent and principal. In Agency theory, information, and incentives (pp. 3-37). Springer.
Stack Overflow. (2020). Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2020. Stack Overflow. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice (Vol. 20). Sage publications.
Tadelis, S. (2016). Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 321-340.
Tinoco-Giraldo, H., Torrecilla Sanchez, E. M., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). E-mentoring in higher education: a structured literature review and implications for future research. Sustainability, 12(11), 4344.
Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 200-213.
Weber, T. A. (2014). Intermediation in a sharing economy: insurance, moral hazard, and rent extraction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 35-71.
Weiner, J., Small, A. C., Lipton, L. R., Stensland, K. D., Aristegui, J., Grossman, M., & Gliatto, P. (2014). Establishing an online mentor database for medical students. Medical education, 48(5), 542-543.
Yang, H., Guo, X., Wu, T., & Ju, X. (2015). Exploring the effects of patient-generated and system-generated information on patients’ online search, evaluation and decision. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(3), 192-203.
Yilmaz, Z. (2022). Ranking online shopping websites by considering the criteria weights. Journal of Business Research, 144, 497-512.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316.
Yu, X., Guo, S., Guo, J., & Huang, X. (2011). Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3550-3557.
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview. Technological and economic development of economy, 17(2), 397-427.
朱永光. (2016). Codementor平台 軟體工程師人才市集. 作家生活誌. https://showwe.tw/blog/article.aspx?a=3088
李宜萱. (2021). 奉行工程師友善優先！Arc 用程式解惑社群Codementor成功經驗，打造面向工程師的遠距求職平台. 創業小聚. https://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/47638