論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
雙元領導對團隊創新行為的影響:檢視團隊學習導向的中介角色及團隊心理資本與安全性的調節作用 The Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Team Innovative Behaviors: Mediation Role of Team Learning Goal Orientation and Moderation Effects of Team Psychological Capital and Psychological Safety |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
77 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2022-09-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2022-09-17 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
雙元領導、團隊學習導向、團隊創新行為、團隊心理資本、團隊心理安全性 ambidextrous leadership, team learning orientation, team innovative behaviors, team psychological capital, team psychological safety |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 494 次,被下載 75 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 494 times, has been downloaded 75 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究探討在雙元領導與團隊創新行為之間的中介效果,並且檢視團隊心理資本及安全性的調節作用。問卷採兩階段方式發放給主管及團隊成員,中間間隔兩周時間,最終取得63位主管和274位團隊成員的63個團隊配對資料進行後續的統計分析。研究發現,主管開放式領導對團隊學習導向有正向影響,團隊學習導向正向影響團隊創新行為,團隊學習導向在主管開放式領導及團隊創新行為之間扮演完全中介的角色,同時,團隊心理資本與團隊心理安全也分別正向調節主管開放式領導行為對團隊學習導向的關係。然而,主管封閉式領導卻無顯著性影響。另一方面,事後分析結果則顯示,當主管同時展現開放式與封閉式領導時,將顯著影響團隊成員的團隊學習導向,進而促進團隊創新行為的產生。 根據分析結果,本研究建議主管應重視團隊學習導向對團隊創新行為的影響,以及團隊成員的心理資本及心理安全對團隊學習導向的正面調節效果。本研究最後分別對主管在領導方式的選擇及其對團隊氛圍的營造方向提供實務意涵,同時也提出對未來研究的建議,期望對企業團隊的後續研究提供實質的幫助。 |
Abstract |
This study aimed at revealing the mediation effect between ambidextrous leadership and team innovative behaviors. Meanwhile, the moderation effects of team psychological capital and team psychological safety are also examined. Two-phase surveys were distributed to leaders and team members with two-week intervals. A total of 63 leaders pairing with 274 team members’ data were collected eventually for quantitative analysis. Research findings were listed below. First, opening leadership behaviors are positively associated with team learning orientation which is also positively associated with team innovative behaviors. Second, team learning orientation fully mediates the relationship between opening leadership behaviors and team innovative behaviors. Third, team psychological capital and safety are found to positively moderate the relationship between opening leadership behaviors and team learning orientation. However, closing leadership behaviors do not produce same results with previous statements. Besides, the combination effect of opening and closing leadership behaviors was also positively confirmed with team learning orientation and team innovative behaviors. According to the analysis results, it is suggested that leaders should value the influence of team learning orientation on team innovative behaviors as well as the moderation effects of psychological capital and safety in strengthening team learning orientation. With practical implications for leaders choosing leadership style and building up team climate provided in the end along with some suggestions toward future researches, this study is expected to offer future researches in organizational teams some useful insights. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書.......................................................................i Acknowledgement...........................................................ii 摘要.................................................................................iii Abstract............................................................................iv 1. Introduction..................................................................1 1.1 Research Background..........................................1 1.2 Research Purpose................................................4 2. Literature Review..........................................................7 2.1 Ambidextrous Leadership Theory.......................7 2.2 Studied Variables.................................................9 2.3 Hypotheses Development.................................21 3. Methodology..............................................................28 3.1 Research Framework........................................28 3.2 Summary of Hypotheses..................................29 3.3 Sample and Data Collection.............................30 3.4 Measurements...................................................33 3.5 Analytic Strategies.............................................37 4. Results.........................................................................40 4.1 Data Aggregation................................................40 4.2 Correlation Analysis...........................................41 4.3 Regression Analysis and Hypotheses Test........43 4.4 Post Hoc Analysis...............................................50 5. Discussion...................................................................53 5.1 Summary of Research Findings.........................53 5.2 Theoretical Implications....................................54 5.3 Practical Implications........................................57 5.4 Limitations and Future Research......................59 References......................................................................61 |
參考文獻 References |
Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1-14. Alexander, L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management review, 39(4), 423-438. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. sage. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297-1333. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of management, 36(2), 430-452. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human resource development quarterly, 22(2), 127-152. Bledow, R., Frese, M., & Mueller, V. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership for innovation: The influence of culture. In Advances in global leadership. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2019). Psychological capital, team resources and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of psychology, 153(8), 784-802. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 552. Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(6), 709-729. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E. D., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128. Chen, H. L., & Lin, Y. L. (2018). Goal orientations, leader-leader exchange, trust, and the outcomes of project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 716-729. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Chiu, C. Y., Lin, H. C., & Ostroff, C. (2021). Fostering team learning orientation magnitude and strength: Roles of transformational leadership, team personality heterogeneity, and behavioural integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1), 187-216. Chi, N. W., Chung, Y. Y., & Tsai, W. C. (2011). How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone, and team processes 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1421-1454. Chi, N. W., & Huang, J. C. (2014). Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Group & Organization Management, 39(3), 300-325. Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78. Dawkins, S., Martin, A., Scott, J., & Sanderson, K. (2015). Advancing conceptualization and measurement of psychological capital as a collective construct. Human Relations, 68(6), 925-949. Dawkins, S., Martin, A., Scott, J., Sanderson, K., & Schüz, B. (2021). A cross-level model of team-level psychological capital (PsyCap) and individual-and team-level outcomes. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), 397-416. Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization science, 6(5), 524-540. Degoey, P. (2000). Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 51-102. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884. Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: the role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1084. Duc, L. A., Tho, N. D., Nakandala, D., & Lan, Y. C. (2020). Team innovation in retail services: the role of ambidextrous leadership and team learning. Service Business, 14(1), 167-186. Duncan, R.B., 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In Killman, R.H., Pondy L.R. Slevin, and D. (Eds), The Management of Organization, New York: North Holland, 1, pp. 167-188. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American psychologist, 41(10), 1040. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 1(1), 23-43. Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Boerner, S. (2013). A double‐edged sword: Transformational leadership and individual creativity. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 54-68. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative science quarterly, 504-529. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113-165. Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?. Organization Science, 21(3), 593-608. Gerlach, F., Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2021). Flexible adaptation of leader behavior: An experimental analysis of the beneficial effect of flexibility in innovation processes. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 20(4), 198. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Lee, D. R., & Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827-851. Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal, 52(4), 765-778. Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of psychology, 147(5), 435-453. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 693-706. Gupta, V., & Singh, S. (2015). Leadership and creative performance behaviors in R&D laboratories: Examining the mediating role of justice perceptions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 21-36. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall. Hannah, S. T., & Lester, P. B. (2009). A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations. The leadership quarterly, 20(1), 34-48. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of management journal, 45(5), 1029-1045. Harvey, J. F., Johnson, K. J., Roloff, K. S., & Edmondson, A. C. (2019). From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations, 72(11), 1726-1751. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494. Hetland, H., Skogstad, A., Hetland, J., & Mikkelsen, A. (2011). Leadership and learning climate in a work setting. European Psychologist, 16(3), 163. Heled, E., Somech, A., & Waters, L. (2016). Psychological capital as a team phenomenon: Mediating the relationship between learning climate and outcomes at the individual and team levels. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(3), 303-314. Hillis, D. M., & Bull, J. J. (1993). An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic biology, 42(2), 182-192. Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107-117. Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of management journal, 52(2), 280-293. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. Huang, C. C., & Jiang, P. C. (2012). Exploring the psychological safety of R&D teams: An empirical analysis in Taiwan. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(2), 175-192. Huang, L., & Luthans, F. (2015). Toward better understanding of the learning goal orientation–creativity relationship: The role of positive psychological capital. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 444-472. Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied psychology, 94(5), 1128. Hu, W., Luo, J., Chen, Z., & Zhong, J. (2020). Ambidextrous leaders helping newcomers get on board: Achieving adjustment and proaction through distinct pathways. Journal of Business Research, 118, 406-414. James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(2), 219. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of management journal, 47(3), 368-384. Jiang, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P., & Yang, J. (2017). The relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees’ deviant workplace behaviors: The mediating effects of psychological contract violation and organizational cynicism. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 732. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724. Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523. Keck, S. L., & Tushman, M. L. (1993). Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of management journal, 36(6), 1314-1344. Keller, T., & Weibler, J. (2015). What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager: Linking leadership and cognitive strain to balancing exploration and exploitation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 54-71. Klonek, F. E., Gerpott, F. H., & Parker, S. K. (2020). A conceptual replication of ambidextrous leadership theory: An experimental approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 101473. Kozlowski, S.W., & Bell, B.S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations. In N.W. Schmitt, S. Highhouse & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology volume 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 412–469). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Levitt, T. (2002). Creativity is not enough. Harvard business review, 80, 137-144. Li, Y., & Sun, J. M. (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 172-189. Liu, Y. (2013). Mediating effect of positive psychological capital in Taiwan's life insurance industry. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 41(1), 109-112. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human resource development quarterly, 21(1), 41-67. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572. Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. Mascareño, J., Rietzschel, E. F., & Wisse, B. (2021). Ambidextrous leadership: opening and closing leader behaviours to facilitate idea generation, idea promotion and idea realization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(4), 530-540. Mehmood, Q., Hamstra, M. R., Nawab, S., & Vriend, T. (2016). Authentic leadership and followers' in‐role and extra‐role performance: The mediating role of followers' learning goal orientation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(4), 877-883. Mehta, A., Feild, H., Armenakis, A., & Mehta, N. (2009). Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning. Journal of Management, 35(4), 1026-1046. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43-59. Mom, T. J., Fourné, S. P., & Jansen, J. J. (2015). Managers’ work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133-s153. Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812-828. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human resource management review, 27(3), 521-535. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, 97-146. Oluwafemi, T. B., Mitchelmore, S., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2020). Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 119, 195-208. O Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), 74-83. Ortega, A., Van den Bossche, P., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Rico, R., & Gil, F. (2014). The influence of change-oriented leadership and psychological safety on team learning in healthcare teams. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 311-321. Papachroni, A., & Heracleous, L. (2020). Ambidexterity as practice: Individual ambidexterity through paradoxical practices. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(2), 143-165. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53-79. Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Qian, J., Zhang, W., Qu, Y., Wang, B., & Chen, M. (2020). The enactment of knowledge sharing: The roles of psychological availability and team psychological safety climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 551366. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization science, 20(4), 685-695. Rego, A., Owens, B., Yam, K. C., Bluhm, D., Cunha, M. P. E., Silard, A., ... & Liu, W. (2019). Leader humility and team performance: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1009-1033. Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & e Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of business research, 65(3), 429-437. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The leadership quarterly, 22(5), 956-974 Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2016). A new perspective on individual ambidexterity and its relationship with innovative performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 14293). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Schein, E. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning. Organizational dynamics, 22(2), 40-52. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. Shin, S. J., Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2017). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational behavior, 38(1), 68-86. Shin, Y., Kim, M., & Lee, S. H. (2017). Reflection toward creativity: Team reflexivity as a linking mechanism between team goal orientation and team creative performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(6), 655-671. Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of management Journal, 57(6), 1592-1623. Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of management, 39(3), 684-708. Thayer, A. L., Petruzzelli, A., & McClurg, C. E. (2018). Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations. American Psychologist, 73(4), 363. Tho, N. D. (2020). Team psychological capital and innovation: the mediating of team exploratory and exploitative learning. Journal of Knowledge Management. Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of personality assessment, 87(1), 35-50. VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of applied psychology, 82(3), 390. van Knippenberg, D. (2017). Team innovation. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 211-233. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of management review, 29(2), 222-240. Wang, S., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Zhou, H. (2021). A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4), 1305-1326. Wang, X. H., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of organizational behavior, 36(3), 403-420. West, M.A., & Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester: Wiley. West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & Carsten, M. K. (2009). Team level positivity: Investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 249-267. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53(2), 323-342. Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees' self‐reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24-46. Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 87(4), 813-820. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |