論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
不當督導與心理幸福感之關聯及中介機轉探討 An Exploration of the Relationship and the Mediating Mechanisms Between Abusive Supervision and Psychological Well-Being |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
67 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2021-07-26 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2021-09-27 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
不當督導、心理幸福感、自我關注、他人關注、中介機轉、邊界條件 Abusive Supervision, Psychological Well-being, Self-focused, Other-focused, Mediating Mechanisms, Boundary Condition |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 504 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 504 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本論文的目的是探討不當督導與心理健康之間的關係。通過實證研究(研究一)和文獻綜述(研究二),這兩項研究的結果可以通過整合前人提出的中介機制來說明不當督導對員工心理健康的影響。 研究一採用資源理論的觀點來探討不當督導與心理健康分別是自我關注(憂鬱)和其他關注(同理關懷)相關結果之間的關係。研究 一 的模型把來自組織層面的資源,也就是員工所資源的組織支持度,作為進一步檢驗減輕不當督導與心理健康之間關係的邊界條件。研究的結果暗示,資源理論對透過障礙評價解釋不當督導對於情緒的關係有效,但與過去研究的發現結果一致,對於透過挑戰型評價的中介作用卻無法解釋不當督導與情緒關係。另一方便,研究發現了知覺的組織支持的限制,特別是對於經驗他人焦點情緒的不當督導的員工而言。除了從資源理論來說明不當督導與心理健康之間的關係外,研究 二在理論上採用了更廣泛且豐富的中介機制視角,作為補充於研究一當中只採用單一中介機轉來解釋不當督導到心理健康的關係。通過這樣的研究設計,本論文可以能夠提出更多已經被驗證過的中介機轉和相對應的邊界條件來闡明一系列實際干預措施。最後,本論文提出一個綜合橋接理論,以認知信念作為對未來研究的理論討論與臨床工作者在實際介入不當督導下處遇層次和策略作為本論文對未來研究的方向和建議。 |
Abstract |
The goal of this dissertation was to explore the relationship between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. Through an empirical study (Study one) and literature review (Study two), the results of these two studies can illustrate the impacts of abusive supervision on employees' psychological well-being from the integration of the mediating mechanisms proposed by previous scholars. Study one adopted the viewpoint of resource theory to explore the relationship between abusive supervision and outcomes related to self-focus (depression) and other-focus (empathic concern). In addition, the model of Study one also involved resources from the organizational context to further examine as a boundary condition mitigating the relationship between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. In line with the previous studies, resource theory could partially explain the relationship between abusive supervision and emotions. Challenge appraisal was not able to mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and empathic concern. This leads to further direction in theoretical development. Apart from regarding resource theory illustrating the relationship between abusive supervision and psychological well-being in Study one, Study two adopted a wider perspective of mediating mechanisms theoretically. By doing so, this dissertation can recommend a series of practical interventions by more proposed boundary conditions corresponding to mediating mechanisms. Finally, an overarching theory with cognitive beliefs was proposed for future research and practitioners. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目錄 論文審定書 i General Introduction ii Acknowledgements 致謝 iv 中文摘要 v Abstract vi 目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 viii Study One 1 Introduction 1 Literature Review 3 Method 10 Analytical Strategies 12 Study Two 21 Introduction 21 Methods 23 Conceptualization of Psychological Well-Being 24 Mechanisms Connecting Abusive Supervision and Psychological Well-Being 30 An Over-Arching Perspective from Current Mediating Mechanisms 34 Boundary Conditions 36 General Discussion 41 Theoretical Contributions 42 Practical Contributions 43 Future Directions and Limitations 44 Conclusion 46 References 47 Appendices 53 Appendix1: Questionnaire for leaders (wave1) 53 Appendix2: Questionnaire for middle level leaders and employee (wave2) 57 |
參考文獻 References |
Atwater, L., Kim, K. Y., Witt, A., Latheef, Z., Callison, K., Elkins, T. J., & Zheng, D. (2016). Reactions to abusive supervision: Examining the roles of emotions and gender in the USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(16), 1874–1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1088887 Balwant, P. (2021). Is There a Bright Side to Destructive Leadership? How Gordon Ramsay Leads Change in Nightmare Kitchens. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21723 Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 723–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706066852 Bernardo, A. B. I., Daganzo, M. A. A., & Ocampo, A. C. G. (2018). Abusive Supervision and Well-Being of Filipino Migrant Workers in Macau: Consequences for Self-Esteem and Heritage Culture Detachment. Social Indicators Research, 139(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1446-7 Bisno, B., Thompson, L. W., Breckenridge, J., & Gallagher, D. (1985). Cognitive variables and the prediction of outcome following an intervention for controlling depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(5), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173006 Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work & Stress, 25(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.634281 Carlson, D., Ferguson, M., Hunter, E., & Whitten, D. (2012). Abusive supervision and work–family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.003 Chan, M. E., & McAllister, D. J. (2014a). Abusive Supervision Through the Lens of Employee State Paranoia. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0419 Chan, M. E., & McAllister, D. J. (2014b). Abusive Supervision Through the Lens of Employee State Paranoia. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0419 Chi, S.-C. S., & Liang, S.-G. (2013). When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.006 Davis, H., & Turner, M. J. (2020). The use of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) to increase the self-determined motivation and psychological well-being of triathletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 9(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000191 Edwards, J. R. (1992). A Cybernetic Theory of Stress, Coping, and Well-Being in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.2307/258772 Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 Gerich, J. (2017). The relevance of challenge and hindrance appraisals of working conditions for employees’ health. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(3), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000038 Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Kauffman, S. B. (2018). Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434 Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008 Hobman, E. V., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2009). Abusive Supervision in Advising Relationships: Investigating the Role of Social Support. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00330.x Kalantari, M., Kalantari, M., Abdi, M., & Morteza Modares Gharavi, M. (2020). The role of personality traits and irrational beliefs in predicting Gender Dysphoria. Clinical Psychology and Personality, 18(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.22070/cpap.2020.2922 Kim, J. K., Holtz, B. C., & Hu, B. (2020). Rising above: Investigating employee exemplification as a response to the experience of shame induced by abusive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 861–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12327 Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (20). Stress, appraisal, and coping (11. [print.]). Springer. Li, X., Qian, J., Han, Z. R., & Jin, Z. (2016). Coping with Abusive Supervision: The Neutralizing Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Political Skill on Employees’ Burnout. Current Psychology, 35(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9363-5 Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive Supervision and Employee Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Power Distance Orientation. Applied Psychology, 62(2), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00520.x Lopes, B. C., Kamau, C., & Jaspal, R. (2019). Coping With Perceived Abusive Supervision: The Role of Paranoia. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818795821 Lyubovnikova, J., West, T. H. R., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2018). Group & Organization Management, 43(3), 382–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118769742 Mackey, J. D., Ellen, B. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 732–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.003 Mathur, G., & Singh Chauhan, A. (2018). JHRM- Depression, Abusive Supervision, Org Deviance. Human Resource Management Journal, XXI. Mawritz, M. B., Folger, R., & Latham, G. P. (2014). Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety: GOALS AND ABUSIVE SUPERVISION. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1879 Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000002 Moore, E., Adams, H., Ellis, T., Thibault, P., & Sullivan, M. J. L. (2018). Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(3), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1254283 Oh, J. K., & Farh, C. I. C. (2017). An Emotional Process Theory of How Subordinates Appraise, Experience, and Respond to Abusive Supervision Over Time. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0347 Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (2003). An Empirical Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023962332399 Peltokorpi, V., & Ramaswami, A. (2021). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ physical and mental health: The effects of job satisfaction and power distance orientation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(4), 893–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511617 Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Folger, R. (2013). Abusive Supervision Climate: A Multiple-Mediation Model of its Impact on Group Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237 Richman, J. A., Flaherty, J. A., & Rospenda, K. M. (1996). Perceived workplace harassment experiences and problem drinking among physicians: Broadening the stress/alienation paradigm. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 91(3), 391–403. Ryff, C. D. (n.d.). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. 13. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 Scheuer, M. L., Burton, J. P., Barber, L. K., Finkelstein, L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2016). Linking Abusive Supervision to Employee Engagement and Exhaustion. Organization Management Journal, 13(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2016.1214063 Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030687 Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375 Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812 Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive Supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539 Velez, M. J., & Neves, P. (2016). Abusive supervision, psychosomatic symptoms, and deviance: Can job autonomy make a difference? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039959 Vogel, R. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2020a). Recurring Nightmares and Silver Linings: Understanding How Past Abusive Supervision May Lead to Posttraumatic Stress and Posttraumatic Growth. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0350 Vogel, R. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2020b). Recurring Nightmares and Silver Linings: Understanding How Past Abusive Supervision May Lead to Posttraumatic Stress and Posttraumatic Growth. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0350 Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover. Journal of Management, 33(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297582 Wu, T.-Y., Hu, C., & Yang, C.-C. (2013). Abusive Supervision and Workload Demands from Supervisors: Exploring Two Types of Supervisor-related Stressors and their Association with Strain: Supervisor-related Stressors and Strain. Stress and Health, 29(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2440 Zhang, J., & Liu, J. (2018). Is abusive supervision an absolute devil? Literature review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9551-y |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |