Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0912121-231410 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0912121-231410
論文名稱
Title
為什麼有話不自己說?探討建言影響力與建言及沉默的關係:自我知覺同事建言期待的中介效果及團隊認同與自我知覺建言影響力的調節效果
Why not speak by yourself? Exploring the Relationship between Voice Influence, Voice, and Silence: The Mediating Role of Perceived Coworker's Voice Expectation and the Moderating Roles of Group Identification and Self-perceived Voice Influence
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
52
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-10-04
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2021-10-12
關鍵字
Keywords
同事建言期待、建言影響力、團隊認同、建言、沉默
Coworker's Voice Expectation, Voice Influence, Group Identification, Voice, Silence
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 158 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 158 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
建言除了代表員工希望改善現況的想法以外,同時也隱含建言者對於組織的期許,當員工願意發聲時,可以使組織透過多方管道的建議不斷優化進而提升整體競爭力。但是,在實務情境中,即便員工持有改善建議或想法,卻可能因為各種因素導致員工未能展現建言行為,而是將建言想法委由他人代為陳述。除實務現象以外,在過往建言的學術研究中,亦較少聚焦於同事間彼此認定影響力之於建言者後續行為展現的關係,更無探討他人觀點對於建言者的評價是否引發建言者知覺他人(同事)建言期待的差異。因此,本研究以綜合他人(同事)與自我認定觀點的方式,探討他人(同事)評估建言者之建言影響力對於建言者自我知覺同事建言期待程度,會如何影響建言者後續行為模式之歷程,除此之外,亦加入團隊認同與建言者自我評估之建言影響力作為調節要素,並以角色認定理論的觀點探討建言者之整體行為變化歷程。本研究採用滾雪球抽樣法收集170組之有效對偶問卷,並以迴歸分析進行假設驗證。研究結果發現,他人(同事)知覺建言影響力與建言者之建言及沉默的關係會受到建言者自我知覺同事建言期待的中介,此外,在較高團隊認同的情境下,更會加強建言者知覺同事建言期待與建言之間的正向關係。最後,本研究亦依據此次研究結果提出相關管理意涵與未來研究建議,以供未來研究者參考。
Abstract
Voice represents employees' ideas to improve the current situation and implies voicer's expectations for the organization. Organizations can be optimized through the advice of multiple channels to enhance competitiveness continuously when employees are willing to speak up. However, in practical situations, even employees have advice or ideas, they may not deliver their opinions due to various reasons therefore switching the ideas to otheres to speak up. Previous voice research less focused on the relationship between coworkers' mutual recognition of influence and the subsequent behavior of voicer, nor has it explored whether the opinions of others will affect voicer's perceived coworker's voice expectation. Therefore, this study integrated the perspective of coworker's and voicer's to explore how coworker's perceived voicer's voice influence affects voicer's perceived coworker's voice expectation and the voicer's follow-up behavior pattern. In addition, group identification and voicer's self-perceived voice influence is added as moderating variables by using Role Identity Theory. We use Snowball sampling to collect 170 pairs of effective respond and test the hypothesis by regression analysis. The results showed that the relationship between coworker's perceived voice influence and voicer's voice and silence behavior would be mediated by voicer's perception of coworker's voice expectation. Besides, in the situation of high group identification, the positive relationship between voicer's perception of coworker's voice expectation and voice behavior will be strengthened. Finally, this research also proposes management implications and future research advice based on future researchers' reference results.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖次 vi
表次 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 建言與沉默之定義回顧 4
第二節 他人知覺建言影響力與自我知覺同事建言期待 6
第三節 自我知覺同事建言期待的中介歷程 9
第四節 員工建言與沉默的調節效果 11
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究對象與施測時程 14
第二節 研究工具 17
第三節 資料分析方法 23
第四章 研究結果 24
第一節 測量模型分析 24
第二節 敘述性統計資料與相關係數 25
第三節 假設檢定 27
第五章 研究結論與建議 30
第一節 研究結果討論 30
第二節 管理意涵 32
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 34
參考文獻 37
附錄 41
附件一、第一次問卷調查 41
附件二、第二次問卷調查 44
參考文獻 References
一、 中文文獻
王豫萱, & 胡昌亞(2013)。再探組織認同之本質: 2002-2012 之研究回顧與前瞻。人力資源管理學報, 13(4),頁 107-137。
周麗芳, 任金剛, & 林守紀.(2013). 轉型領導與建言行為: 文化價值觀的關鍵角色. 組織與管理, 6(2), 115-159.
林守紀, 周麗芳, 任金剛, & 曾春榮(2017)。員工建言行為: 回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報, 17(1),頁 1-33。
洪贊凱, & 嚴之妤(2017)。社會影響觀點探討建言行為的有效影響途徑: 情感型信任及知覺同事網絡中心性的調節校果。人力資源管理學報, 17(4),頁 91-113。
鄭伯壎(2002)。組織認同: 理論與本質之初步探索分析, 中山管理評論, 10(1), 45-64。
賴鳳儀, 林鉦棽, 陳曉玲, 李郁芩, & 湯蕙娟(2016)。主管與同事關係品質對建言行為的非線性關係: 心理安全知覺的中介角色。人力資源管理學報, 16(3),頁 1-28。
二、 英文文獻
Ahmed, I., Ramzan, M., Mohammad, S. K., & Islam, T.(2011). Relationship between perceived fairness in performance appraisal and OCB: Mediating role of organizational commitment. International journal of academic research, 3(5), 15-20.
Alkahtani, A.(2015). Organizational citizenship behavior(OCB) and rewards. International Business Research, 8(4), 210.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A.(1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis(77/78), 345-348.
Ashford, S., Sutcliffe, K., & Christianson, M.(2009). Leadership, voice, and silence. Voice and silence in organizations, 175-201.
Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., Wilson, D. C., Volpone, S. D., & Killham, E. A.(2011). DOES VOICE GO FLAT? HOW TENURE DIMINISHES THE IMPACT OF VOICE. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 147-158. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20403
Avery, D. R., & Quiñones, M. A.(2002). Disentangling the effects of voice: the incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 81.
Cheng, J. W., Lu, K. M., Chang, Y. Y., & Johnstone, S.(2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of supervisor‐attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81-102.
DiBenigno, J.(2020). Rapid relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 20-60.
Dong, X. T., & Chung, Y. W. (2021). The mediating effect of perceived stress and moderating effect of trust for the relationship between employee silence and behavioral outcomes. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1715-1737.
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C.(2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Edwards, M. R.(2009). HR, perceived organisational support and organisational identification: an analysis after organisational formation. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 91-115.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M.(2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(5), 804.
Epitropaki, O.(2013). A multi‐level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated–mediated model. Journal of organizational Behavior, 34(1), 65-86.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K.(2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630.
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A.(2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013-1034.
Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A. A., & Ferris, G. R.(2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and reputation: Mediators in the relationships between accountability and job performance and satisfaction. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 15(4), 381-392.
Hirschman, A. O.(1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states(Vol. 25): Harvard university press.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L.(1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L.(2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Liu, W., Tangirala, S., Lam, W., Chen, Z., Jia, R. T., & Huang, X.(2015). How and when peers' positive mood influences employees' voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 976.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y.(2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R.(2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525-548.
Morrison, E. W.(1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
Morrison, E. W.(2014). Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 173-197.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J.(2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D.(2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183.
Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L.(1991). Giving blood: the development of an altruistic identity: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pinder, C., & Harlos, K.(2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-369. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
Prince, R., & Rao, M.(2021). Efficacy beliefs and employee voice: the role of perceived influence and manager openness. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Riley, A., & Burke, P. J.(1995). Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quterly, 61-73.
Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous III, A. G.(1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
Satterstrom, P., Kerrissey, M., & DiBenigno, J.(2021). The voice cultivation process: How team members can help upward voice live on to implementation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 380-425.
Sherf, E. N., Parke, M. R., & Isaakyan, S.(2021). Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 114-148.
Stryker, S.(1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions.
Tangirala, S., Kamdar, D., Venkataramani, V., & Parke, M. R.(2013). Doing right versus getting ahead: The effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees' voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1040.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R.(2008a). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R.(2008b). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R.(2012). Ask and you shall hear(but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 251-282.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A.(1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Venkataramani, V., & Tangirala, S.(2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 582.
Villinski, A. P.(2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review.
Walumbwa, F. O., Morrison, E. W., & Christensen, A. L.(2012). Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: The mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 953-964.
Wu, W., Tang, F., Dong, X., & Liu, C.(2015). Different identifications cause different types of voice: A role identity approach to the relations between organizational socialization and voice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 251-287.
Xie, X.-Y., Ling, C.-D., Mo, S.-J., & Luan, K.(2015). Linking colleague support to employees’ promotive voice: A moderated mediation model. Plos one, 10(7), e0132123.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-10-12
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-10-12

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.220.59.69
現在時間是 2024-04-30
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-10-12

Your IP address is 18.220.59.69
The current date is 2024-04-30
This thesis will be available to you on 2026-10-12.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2026-10-12

QR Code