鑑於當前臺灣太陽能光電產業在原料供應、關鍵技術、人力資源以及資金成本等管理層面所遭遇的問題，對臺灣太陽能光電產業經營管理現況的進一步瞭解與剖析著實有其必要性。因此，本研究採用資料包絡分析、麥氏生產力指數以及管理決策矩陣等研究與分析方法評估臺灣電池廠商經營績效，將12家廠商根據管理決策矩陣的4個象限區分為第I象限競爭力高而持續進步者、第II象競爭力低而持續進步者、第III象限競爭力低而進步衰退者以及第IV象限競爭力高而進步衰退者等4種類型。根據各研究方法的分析結果顯示，第四期位於第I象限屬競爭力高而持續進步者有元皓、嘉貿以及昱晶等3家廠商；位於第II象限屬競爭力低而持續進步者有陽光能源-DR與綠晁等2家廠商；位於第III象限的有頂晶科、茂迪、元晶以及新日光等4家廠商；位於第IV象限的則有益通、昇陽光電以及太極等3家廠商。以12家廠商整體而言，影響12家廠商經營效率不佳主要原因來自規模效率的無效率所致，其次才為技術效率的無效率。再者，影響整體12家廠商經營效率衰退的原因主要為生產技術的衰退影響所致。最後，本研究亦分別對12家廠商提出經營管理與策略等實務上的建議。

In view of encountering problems on material supply, critical technology, human resource, and capital cost of the photovoltaic (PV) industry in Taiwan. It’s necessary to get further understanding and analysis of the operating status of the photovoltaic industry in Taiwan. Therefore, the research adopted data envelopment analysis (DEA), Malmquist productivity index (MPI), and managerial decision-making matrix to evaluate the performance of solar cell manufacturers of Taiwan and then to divide 12 solar cell manufacturers into four groups: Quadrant I: high competitiveness and continuous progress, Quadrant II: low competitiveness but continuous progress, Quadrant III: low competitiveness and persistent recession, and Quadrant IV: high competitiveness but persistent recession by managerial decision-making matrix. The analysis results of the fourth period show that there are three firms in quadrant I, Digisine, Solarjoin, and Gintech; two firms in quadrant II, Solargiga and Ablytek; four firms in the quadrant III, Tynsolar, Motech, Tsec, and Neo Solar; three firms in the quadrant IV, E-Ton, Solartech, and Tainergy. Taken as a whole, the source of inefficiency of 12 firms mainly comes from scale inefficiency, followed by technical inefficiency. Moreover, the source of the recession of operational efficiency mainly comes from the recession of technical change (TC). At last, the research proposed managerial practice and strategic advice to 12 firms separately.

論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 研究流程 8
第四節 論文架構 10
第貳章 文獻探討 11
第一節 臺灣太陽能光電產業發展現況 11
第二節 資料包絡分析（DEA） 20
第三節 麥氏生產力指數（MPI） 35
第四節 太陽能光電產業績效評估相關文獻 41
第五節 管理決策矩陣 47
第六節 績效評估與策略 61
第參章 研究設計 68
第一節 分析流程 68
第二節 決策單位與研究時期 71
第三節 投入項、產出項與資料來源 73
第四節 差額變數基礎超效率（Super-SBM）模式 76
第五節 改良後之管理決策矩陣 85
第肆章 實證分析 87
第一節 投入項與產出項篩選 87
第二節 效率分析 94
第三節 效率分析之總結 108
第四節 生產力分析 114
第五節 生產力分析之總結 127
第六節 管理決策矩陣分析 132
第七節 管理決策矩陣分析之總結 150
第伍章 結論與建議 177
第一節 結論 177
第二節 建議 183
參考文獻 186
附錄 209
附錄一 2013年12家太陽能電池廠商投入項與產出項資料彙整表 209
附錄二 2014年12家太陽能電池廠商投入項與產出項資料彙整表 210
附錄三 2015年12家太陽能電池廠商投入項與產出項資料彙整表 211
附錄四 2016年12家太陽能電池廠商投入項與產出項資料彙整表 212
附錄五 2017年12家太陽能電池廠商投入項與產出項資料彙整表 213

中文文獻
1. 丁誌魰，謝青燕（2019）。旅館業經營績效之研究－以台灣上市櫃之旅館為例。環境與管理研究，20（1），97-113。
2. 王京明（2013）。德國廢核政策之研析。經濟前瞻，149，90-97。
3. 王智玄、雷立芬（2019）。臺灣人壽保險業效率評估與管理決策矩陣。亞太經濟管理評論，22（1&2期），1-16。
4. 江梓安、李國榮、黃怡甄（2015）。臺灣太陽能電池產業之研發績效評估與專利佈局分析。創新與經營管理學刊，6（1），1-22。
5. 吳嘉興、邱曉瑩（2014）。台灣發展太陽光電產業之關鍵成功因素分析。管理資訊計算，3（2），78-95。
6. 吳濟華、何柏正（2008）。組織效率與生產力評估－資料包絡分析法。臺北市：前程文化。
7. 呂紹旭（2018）。台灣太陽能產業發展。光連：光電產業與技術情報，136，26-28。
8. 呂錫民（2015）。全球太陽能政策綜合評論。冷凍空調與能源科技雜誌，96，74-86。
9. 李文福、王媛慧（2012）。台灣國際觀光旅館效率與生產力之分析－由下而上分解法，應用經濟論叢，2012生產力與效率特刊，39-89。
10. 李正文（2011）。從永續發展觀點探究台灣太陽能光電產業之關鍵因素。先進工程學刊，6（3），221-230。
11. 李東杰、鄭雅云、薛金愛（2011）。上市、櫃及公開發行之太陽能廠商的績效與影響因素分析。南臺學報，36（4），47-61。
12. 李鴻祥、謝志光、校正興、陳依兌（2017）。整併策略對於醫療產業經營績效的影響：以臺北市立聯合醫院為例。健康管理學刊，15（2），21-37。
13. 卓正欽、葛建培（2017）。績效管理：理論與實務（3版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
14. 卓佳慶（2011）。以非射線資料包絡分析法衡量本國銀行OBU之營運績效。臺灣銀行季刊，62（2），25-41。
15. 周明璇、陳文智、簡禎富，（2013）。建構半導體廠跨廠績效評估以提昇資源分配決策品質之研究。品質學報，20（4），427-444。
16. 拓墣產業研究所（2011）。全球太陽能產業未來商機探討。臺北市：拓墣科技。
17. 帥嘉珍、魏思平（2016）。台灣太陽能產業之績效評估－兩階段資料包絡分析之應用。明新學報，42（1），109-124。
18. 柯信名、陳芃婷、虞孝成（2011）。政府政策對太陽光電業者經營模式之影響。產業與管理論壇，13（3），4-31。
19. 胡均立、王啟時（2015）。兩岸線上遊戲廠商的效率分析：兩階段資料包絡分析法之應用。中華管理發展評論，4（1），1-24。
20. 胡凱傑、馮正民、王鈞暐（2013）。偏遠地區公路客運補貼路線之績效評估。運輸計劃季刊，42（3），275~304。
21. 胡耀祖（2015）。我國綠能產業及科技發展現況與展望。中國鑛冶工程學會會刊，59（3），9-18。
22. 孫遜（2004）。資料包絡分析法－理論與應用。新北市：揚智文化。
23. 徐中琦、許志忠（2011）。臺灣壽險業經營效率之研究－資料包絡分析法之應用。台灣銀行季刊，62（4），42-67。
24. 徐木蘭、陳必碩、許金田、孔祥科（2006）。《易經》早期管理決策模式與西方管理決策模式之比較分析。管理學報，23（3），289-307。
25. 徐彰孚、李榮貴、洪夢禪（2013）。整合FANP與DEMATEL於太陽光發電廠廠址之評選模式。臺灣企業績效學刊，7（1），1-24。
26. 翁振益、周瑛琦（2007）。決策分析－方法與應用。臺北市：華泰文化。
27. 馬道（2013）。整併風潮下太陽能產業的轉型升級。經濟前瞻，145，110-113。
28. 張東生、王明妤、高志昕（2009）。發展多重對應關係之技術專利地圖：以薄膜太陽能電池為例。科技管理學刊，14（3），109-138。
29. 張椿柏、王育偉、胡素雲（2019）。以BCG矩陣探討現金減資對公司股價報酬之影響。財金論文叢刊，31，13-35。
30. 陳怡靜（2021）。2020年我國太陽光電產業回顧與展望。新竹縣：工業技術研究院。
31. 陳芙萱（2019）。我國太陽能產業推動政策之探討。中華行政學報，25，107-121。
32. 陳俊合（2018）。臺灣營建業上市公司經營績效評估－資料包絡分析法應用。建築學報，106，17-30。
33. 陳富強、方顯光、李佩霓（2016）。探討台灣地區國際觀光旅館經營績效與智慧資本之關係。全球管理與經濟，12（2），17-38。
34. 陳新民、謝志光（2015）。臺灣金融保險產業上市公司整併效應之模擬研究－資料包絡分析策略矩陣之應用。評價學報，9，21-43。
35. 陳新民、羅乾鐘（2014）。臺灣金融保險產業之資料包絡分析策略矩陣定位研究－以2011年度上市公司為例。聯大學報，11（1），207-221。
36. 陳筱琪、陳文良（2011）。探討臺灣矽晶圓太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式。企業管理學報，89，81-105。
37. 陳筱琪、陳文良、胡宜中（2014）。探討台灣薄膜太陽能電池產業之合作網路評估模式：以多目標決策之觀點。科技管理學刊，19（2），1-24。
38. 陳澤義、陳啟斌（2018）。企業診斷與績效評估：策略管理觀點（5版）。臺北市：華泰文化。
39. 彭開琼、張佳雯、吳思函（2015）。建設產業財務績效與風險值：奢侈稅前後比較。住宅學報，24（2），55-71。
40. 曾俊洲（2008a）。台灣太陽能光電產業暨全球相關法規制度（Ⅰ）－產業分析。品質月刊，44（7），54-61。
41. 曾俊洲（2008b）。台灣太陽能光電產業暨全球相關法規制度（Ⅱ）－全球相關法規與制度。品質月刊，44（8），41-47。
42. 曾俊洲（2009）。全球金融風暴對我國太陽能光電產業之影響分析。品質月刊，45（3），47-54。
43. 游啟聰、黃曉玲、林原慶、康志堅（2011）。2015年太陽光電產業競爭力預測分析－以臺灣、中國大陸、日本、韓國為例。產業與管理論壇，13（3），32-56。
44. 黃財源、戴丹伶（2013）。台灣鋼鐵工業效率之評估（2009年～2011年）－資料包絡分析法之應用。國立屏東商業技術學院學報，15，373-420。
45. 黃智賢（2011）。太陽相關能源的機會與挑戰－從地震海嘯引發福島核電事故談起。光學工程，114，1-8。
46. 黃鏡如、傅祖壇、黃美瑛（2008）。績效評估：效率與生產力之理論與應用。臺北市：新陸書局。
47. 楊翔如（2018）。2018年台灣太陽光電產業趨勢和市場現況。臺北市：經濟部推動綠色貿易專案辦公室。
48. 溫金豐（2019）。組織理論與管理（5版）。臺北市：華泰文化。
49. 經濟部加工出口區管理處（2011）。2011加工出口區推動太陽能產業發展策略。高雄市：經濟部加工出口區管理處。
50. 過子庸、何其穎（2012）。對世界三大核災事故－三哩島、車諾比及福島核災之研析。前瞻科技與管理，2（1），123-146。
51. 趙永祥、白宗民、邱素津（2019）。國際化深度與多角化策略對企業財務績效與價值影響之研究－以台灣地區傳統產業及新興高科技產業為例。全球管理與經濟，15（2），1-24。
52. 劉光泰、阮碧華（2012年10月）。太陽能產業應用企業資源規劃之重要性。 2 0 1 2 健 康 與 管 理 學 術 研 討 會發表之論文，元培科技大學。
53. 劉明德、徐玉珍（2013）。臺灣亟需有遠見的再生能源政策與做法－德國經驗的啟示。公共行政學報，43，127-150。
54. 劉家瑜（2012年7月）。眾志成城，迎戰全球白熱化競爭：策略聯盟發揮群體戰力。貿易雜誌，253，8-12。
55. 劉書彬（2013）。311核災後德國核能政策之研究－兼論德國核能治理之公民參與。臺灣民主季刊，10（3），131-179。
56. 劉國棟，邵任民、冠州能源科技團隊（2011）。太陽光電：世界五強爭霸戰。臺北市：鼎茂圖書。
57. 樊晉源、林品華、張書豪、洪文琪、陳曉郁（2015）。太陽能電池產業技術與標準初探。臺北市：財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
58. 蔡建宗、簡立賢（2017）。臺灣肉品市場經營績效之研究。台灣農學會報，18（2），189-212。
59. 蔡柳卿、楊朝旭、彭智偉（2013）。台商母公司研發資產與大陸子公司財務績效之關聯性：論企業策略之調節角色。中山管理評論，21（4），799-851。
60. 蔡進譯（2005）。超高效率太陽電池－從愛因斯坦的光電效應談起。物理雙月刊，27（5），701-719。
61. 蔡毓如、尤晴韻（2020）。國際太陽光電產業及技術發展趨勢。臺灣經濟研究月刊，43（4），21-28。
62. 蔡榮發、張淑娟、張原嘉（2016）。台灣上市半導體公司經營績效評估與分析。創新與管理，12（1），111-136。
63. 薄喬萍（2007）。績效評估之資料包絡分析法。臺北市：五南圖書。
64. 簡禎富（2014）。決策分析與管理－紫式決策分析以全面提升決策品質（2版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
65. 魏久峰、李建裕、尤晴韻（2013）。行銷創新策略對台灣文創業行銷創新績效的影響。創業管理研究，8（3），85-111。
66. 嚴奇峰、李英睿（2018）。以資源為基礎之結構－行為－績效觀點下的策略群組分析：台灣太陽能電池產業實證研究。商略學報，10（1），1-22。

西文文獻
1. Aguinis, H., (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
2. Ahn, Y. H. & Min, H., (2014). Evaluating the multi-period operating efficiency of international airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index. Journal of Air Transport Management, 39, 12-22.
3. Ali, A. I. & Seiford, L. M., (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 9(6), 403-405.
4. Ali, A. I., Lerme, C. S., & Seiford, L. M., (1995). Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), 462-473.
5. Alsaleh, M., Zubair, A. O., & Abdul-Rahim, A. S., (2020). Productivity growth and its determinants of the bioenergy industry in the EU28 region: Empirical evidence using Malmquist productivity index. Business Strategy and Development, 3(4), 531-542.
6. Amani, N., Valami, H. B., & Ebrahimnejad, A., (2018). Application of Malmquist productivity index with carry-overs in power industry. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3151-3165.
7. Amarakoon, U., Weerawardena, J., & Verreynne. M., (2018). Learning capabilities, human resource management innovation and competitive advantage. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(10), 1-31.
8. Andersen, P. & Petersen, N. C., (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.
9. Andrews, K. R., (1980). The Concept of Corporate Strategy (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
10. Ansoff, H. L., (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11. Ansoff, H. L., (1988). The new corporate strategy. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Antony, J. P. & Bhattacharyya, S., (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs-Part 2: An empirical study on SMEs in India. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(3), 42-52.
13. Anwar, J. & Hasnu, S. A. F., (2017). Strategy-performance relationships: A comparative analysis of pure, hybrid, and reactor strategies. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 14(4), 446-465.
14. Armstrong, R., (2019). Revisiting strategy mapping for performance management: a realist synthesis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(4), 721-752.
15. Babafemi, I. D., (2015). Corporate strategy, planning and performance evaluation: A survey of literature. Journal of Management Policies and Practices, 3(1), 43-49.
16. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W., (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
17. Bennett, N. & Lemoine, G. J., (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311-317.
18. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E., (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
19. Büyüközkan, G. & Karabulut, Y., (2018). Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 253-267.
20. Cai, H., Liang, L., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Wei, L., & Xie, J., (2019). An empirical study on the efficiency and influencing factors of the photovoltaic industry in China and an analysis of its influencing factors. Sustainability, 11(23), 6693.
21. Cameron, K. & Whetten, D., (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models. New York, NY: Academic press.
22. Camioto, F. D. C., Rebelatto, D. A. D. N., & Rocha, R. T., (2016). Energy efficiency analysis of BRICS countries: a study using data envelopment analysis. Gestão & Produção, 23(1), 192-203.
23. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E., (1982). The economic theory of index number of the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414.
24. Chandler, A. D., (1962). Strategy and structure chapters in the history of industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E., (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
26. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E., (1979). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4), 339.
27. Charnes, R., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M., (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
28. Chen, W. T., Lee, Y. I., Mortis, L., & Wang, C. H., (2020). Data envelopment analysis in apartment building performance measurement: A Case Study. Journal of Innovative Technology, 2(1), 9-17.
29. Chen, W. T., Wang, C. W., Tan, P. S., Lu, S. T., & Pan, N. H., (2018). Analysis of the performance of condominium building management performance in central Taiwan. International Journal of Organizational Innovation. 10(4), 301-314.
30. Chiu, S., Hsiao, C., & Wu, H., (2015). Measuring pitchers’ performance using data envelopment analysis with advanced statistics. Contemporary Management Research, 11(4), 351-384.
31. Choudhary, P. & Srivastava, R. K., (2019). Sustainability perspectives- a review for solar photovoltaic trends and growth opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 589-612.
32. Chueh, H. E. & Jheng, J. Y., (2012a). Applying data envelopment analysis to evaluation of Taiwanese solar cell industry operational performance. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 4(4), 1-8.
33. Chueh, H. E. & Jheng, J. Y., (2012b). Evaluation of Taiwanese solar cell industry operational performance using two-stage data envelopment analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 224, 51-54.
34. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P., (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
35. Cohen, S., (2013, November 25). The answer to climate change is renewable energy, not nuclear power [Web Newsletter]. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-cohen/the-answer-to-climate-cha_b_4337435.html
36. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K., (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. New York, NY: Springer US.
37. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J., (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New York, NY: Springer US.
38. Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G., (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
39. Daft, R. L., (2021). Organization Theory and Design (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
40. Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M., & Kostova, T., (2020). The impact of market based institutional reforms on firm strategy and performance: Review and extension. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101073.
41. Demsetz, H., (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1),1-9.
42. DeYoung, D. J. & Conner, R. F., (1982). Evaluator preconceptions about organizational decision making. Evaluation Review, 6(3), 431-440.
43. Dibrell, C., Craig, J. B., & Neubaum, D. O., (2014). Linking the formal strategic planning process, planning flexibility, and innovativeness to firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 2000-2007.
44. Drucker, P. F., (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
45. Drucker, P. F., (1988). Peter Drucker on the profession of management. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
46. Duhaime, I. M., Hitt, M. A., & Lyles, M. A., (2021). Strategic management: State of the field and its future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47. Egilmez, G. & McAvoyc, D., (2013). Benchmarking road safety of U.S. states: A DEA-based Malmquist productivity index approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53(1), 55-64.
48. Emrouznejad, A. & Yang, G. L., (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61(1), 4-8.
49. Epstein, M. K. & Henderson, J. C., (1989). Data envelopment analysis for managerial control and diagnosis. Decision Sciences, 20(1), 90-119.
50. Ervural, B. C., Ervural, B., & Zaim, S., (2016). Energy efficiency evaluation of provinces in Turkey using data envelopment analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 139-148.
51. Fancello, G., Carta, M., & Serra, P., (2020). Data envelopment analysis for the assessment of road safety in urban road networks: A comparative study using CCR and BCC models. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 736-744.
52. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Roos. P., (1998). Malmquist productivity indexes: A survey of theory and practice. In R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, R. R. Russell (Eds.), Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist (pp.127-190). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
53. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren B., & Roos, P., (1994a). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 253-272). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
54. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P., (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980-1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1/2), 85-101.
55. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. & Zhang, Z., (1994b). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.
56. Farrell, M. J., (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-281.
57. Fathi, B., Ashena, M., & Bahari, A. R., (2021). Energy, environmental, and economic efficiency in fossil fuel exporting countries: A modified data envelopment analysis approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 588-596.
58. Fitzsimmons, J. A. & Fitzsimmons, M. J., (2011). Service management: Operations, strategy, information technology (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
59. Flamholtz, E. G., (1996). Effective organizational control: A framework, applications, and implications. European Management Journal, 14(6), 596-611.
60. Fursov, V. A., Lazareva, N. V., Solovieva, I. V., Fattakhova, A. R., & Vaslavskaya, I. Y., (2016). Evaluation of Performance of Enterprise Development Strategy Implementation. Journal Of Advanced Research In Law And Economics, 6(1), 79-87.
61. Gandhi, A. & Shankar, R., (2016). Strategic resource management model and data envelopment analysis for benchmarking of Indian retailers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(2), 286-312.
62. García-Alcaraz, J. L., Díaz-Reza, R., Maldonado-Macías, A., & Rico-Pérez, L., (2015). Recent DEA applications to industry: A literature review from 2010 to 2014. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 4(1), 9-20.
63. Gibbons, R., (2003). Team theory, garbage cans and real organizations: some history and prospects of economic research on decision‐making in organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 753-787.
64. Gimbert, X., Bisbe, J., & Mendoza, X., (2010). The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Strategy Formulation Processes. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 477-497.
65. Gökgöz, F. & Erkul, E., (2019). Investigating the energy efficiencies of European countries with super efficiency model and super SBM approaches. Energy Efficiency, 12(3), 601-618.
66. Golany, B. & Roll, Y., (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250.
67. González-Rodríguez, M. R., Jiménez-Caballero, J. L., Martín-Samper, R. C., Köseoglu, M. A., & Okumus, F., (2018). Revisiting the link between business strategy and performance: Evidence from hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 21-31.
68. Goshu, Y. Y. & Kitaw, D., (2017). Performance measurement and its recent challenge: a literature review. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 18(4), 381-402.
69. Gürtürk, M., (2019). Economic feasibility of solar power plants based on PV module with levelized cost analysis. Energy, 171, 866-878.
70. Hamann, P. M. & Schiemann, F., (2021). Organizational performance as a set of four dimensions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Research, 127, 45-65.
71. Hedley, B., (1977). Strategy and the “business portfolio”. Long Range Planning, 10(1), 9-15.
72. Herrmann, J. W., (2017). Rational Decision Making. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1-9. http://doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat07928
73. Hill, C. W. L., Schilling, M. A., & Jones, G. R., (2020). Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Puchong Selangor, Malaysia: Cengage Learning Asia.
74. Ho, J. L. Y., Wu, A., & Wu, S. Y. C., (2014). Performance measures, consensus on strategy implementation, and performance: Evidence from the operational-level of organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(1), 38-58.
75. Hossain, H. & Kader, M. A., (2020). An analysis on BCG growth sharing matrix. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 11(10), 21899-21905.
76. Hsiao, J. M., (2012). Measuring the operating efficiency of solar cell companies in Taiwan with data envelopment analysis. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9 (12), 1899-1905.
77. Hsu, C. F., Li, R. K., Kang, H. Y., & Lee, A. H. U., (2014). A systematic evaluation model for solar cell technologies. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-16.
78. Jayanthi, S., Witt, E. C., & Singh, V., (2009). Evaluation of potential of innovations: A DEA-based application to U.S. photovoltaic industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(3), 478-493.
79. Jia, F., Sun, H., & Koh, L., (2016). Global solar photovoltaic industry: an overview and national competitiveness of Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 550-562.
80. Kline, R. B., (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
81. Koopmans, T. C., (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Eds.), Activity analysis of production and allocation: proceedings of a conference (pp. 33-97). New York, NY: Wiley.
82. Köseoglu, M. I., Topaloglu, C., Parnell, J. A., & Lester, D. L., (2013). Linkages among business strategy, uncertainty and performance in the hospitality industry: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 81-91.
83. Kotane, I. & Kuzmina-Merlino, I., (2012). Assessment of financial indicators for evaluation of business performance. European Integration Studies, 5, 213-219.
84. Kotane, I., (2015). Evaluating the importance of financial and non-financial indicators for the evaluation of company’s performance. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 37(1), 80-94.
85. Lambson, V. E., (1987). Is the concentration-profit correlation partly an artifact of lumpy technology?. The American Economic Review, 77(4), 731-733.
86. Le Roy, F. & Czakon, W., (2016). Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 3-6.
87. Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., & Lin, C. Y., (2014). A Performance evaluation model using FAHP/DEA and the Malmquist productivity index to assess the photovoltaics industry in Taiwan. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 42(1), 211-228.
88. Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Lin, C. Y., & Shen, K. C., (2015). An integrated decision-making model for the location of a PV solar plant. Sustainability, 7(10), 13522-13541.
89. Lee, A. H. I., Lin, C. Y., Kang, H. Y., & Lee, W. H., (2012). An integrated performance evaluation model for the photovoltaics industry. Energies, 5(4), 1271-1291.
90. Leiblein, M. J. & Reuer, J. J., (2020). Foundations and Futures of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 1-33.
91. Li, N., Liu, C., & Zha, D., (2016). Performance evaluation of Chinese photovoltaic companies with the input-oriented dynamic SBM model. Renewable Energy, 89, 489-497.
92. Li, Y., Nie, D., Zhao, X., & Li, Y., (2017). Market structure and performance: An empirical study of the Chinese solar cell industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 78-82.
93. Lin, C. S. & Lin, C. Y., (2018). An empirical study of efficiency evaluation with dynamic strategy trajectory based on DEA algorithm and BCG model: A case study of securities industry. Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 91-106.
94. Lindblom, C. E., (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 40(6), 517-526.
95. Liou, H. M., (2010). Overview of the photovoltaic technology status and perspective in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(4), 1202-1215.
96. Liu, C. S., Hsiao, C. T., Chang, D. S., & Hsiao, C. H., (2016). How the European Union’s and the United States’ anti-dumping duties affect Taiwan's PV industry: A policy simulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 296-305.
97. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Lu, W. M., (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33-45.
98. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y., (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978-2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15.
99. Louma, M., (2015). Revisiting the strategy-performance linkage: An application of an empirically derived typology of strategy content areas. Management Decision, 53(5), 1083-1106.
100. Lu, S. M., (2016). Economic concepts of energy efficiency - A review. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 5(8), 817-832.
101. Madsen, D. Ø., (2017). Not dead yet: The rise, fall and persistence of the BCG matrix. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), 19-34.
102. Maletić, R., Kreća, M., & Maletić, P., (2013). Application of DEA methodology in measuring efficiency in the banking sector. Economics of Agriculture, 60(4), 843-855.
103. Malmquist, S., (1953). Index numbers and indifference curves. Trabajos de Estatistica, 4(1), 209-242.
104. March, J. G., (1982). Theories of choice and making decisions. Society, 20(1), 29-39.
105. Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Streimikiene, D., Jusoh, A., & Khoshnoudi, M., (2017). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1298-1322.
106. Mariappan, P., (2016). Performance analysis of Indian public sector banks based on their investment level. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 4(3), 83-105.
107. McAdam, R., Bititci, U. S., & Galbraith, B., (2017). Technology alignment and business strategy: A performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 7168-7186.
108. Micheli, P., Mura, M., & Agliati, M., (2011). Exploring the roles of performance measurement systems in strategy implementation: The case of a highly diversified group of firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(10), 1115-1139.
109. Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C., (2003). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
110. Mousavi, M. M., Ouenniche, J., & Xu, B., (2015). Performance evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models: An orientation-free super-efficiency DEA-based framework. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 64-75.
111. Mustafa, F. S., Khan, R. U., & Mustafa, T., (2021). Technical efficiency comparison of container ports in Asian and Middle East region using DEA. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(1), 12-19.
112. Najar, A. V., Pooya, A., Zoeram, A., & Emrouznejad, A., (2018). Assessing the relative performance of nurses using data envelopment analysis matrix (DEAM). Journal of Medical Systems, 42(125), 1-9.
113. Nicola, A. D., Gitto, S., & Mancuso, P., (2013). Airport quality and productivity changes: A Malmquist index decomposition assessment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 58, 67-75.
114. Nižetić, S., Šolić, P., López-de-Ipiña González-de-Artaza, D., & Patrono, L., (2020). Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, issues and challenges towards a smart and sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122877.
115. Norman, M. & Stoker, B., (1991). Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance. New York, NY: Wiley.
116. Nudurupati, S. S., Bititci, U. S., Kumar, V., & Chan, F. T. S., (2011). State of the Art Literature Review on Performance Measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279-290.
117. Örkcü, H. H., Balıkçı, C., Dogan, M. I., & Genç, A., (2016). An evaluation of the operational efficiency of Turkish airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index: 2009-2014 case. Transport Policy, 48, 92-104.
118. Ozbek, M. E., de la Garza, J. M., & Triantis, K., (2009). Data envelopment analysis as a decision-making tool for transportation professionals. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135(11), 822-831.
119. Paprika, Z. Z., Wimmer, A., & Szanto, R., (2008). Managerial decision making and competitiveness: The case of Hungary. Competitiveness Review, 18(1/2),154-167.
120. Parradoa, C., Girard, A., Simon, F., & Fuentealba, E., (2016). 2050 LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy) projection for a hybrid PV (photovoltaic)-CSP (concentrated solar power) plant in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Energy, 94, 422-430.
121. Peltzman, S., (1977). The gains and losses from industrial concentration. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2), 229-263.
122. Perkins, S., (2015, April 30). Climate change could eventually claim a sixth of the world’s species [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/climate-change-could-eventually-claim-sixth-world-s-species
123. Perrini, F. & Tencati, A., (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 296-308.
124. Phillips, F., Chang, J., & Su, Y. S., (2019). When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm’s performance? A simulation study. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 88-96.
125. Porter, M. E., (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
126. Prabowo, H. E. T. & Cabanda, E., (2011). Stochastic frontier analysis of Indonesian firm efficiency: A note. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 8(2), 74-91.
127. Puranam, P., Stieglitz, N., Osman, M., & Pillutla, M. M., (2015). Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 337-392.
128. Qehaja, A. B., Kutllovci, E., & Pula, J. S., (2017). Strategic management tools and techniques: A comparative analysis of empirical studies. Croatian Economic Survey, 19(1), 67-99.
129. Rashidi, K., Shabani, A., & Saen, R. F., (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for estimating energy saving and undesirable output abatement: a case study in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 241-252.
130. Ray, S. C. & Desli, E., (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 1033-1039.
131. Reeves, M., Haanaes, K., & Sinha, J., (2012). Your strategy needs a strategy: How to choose and execute the right approach. Harvard Business Review, 90(9), 76-83.
132. Robbins, S. P. & Coulter, M. A., (2020). Management, Global Edition (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
133. Rostamzadeh, R., Akbarian, O., Banaitis, A., & Soltani, Z., (2021). Application of DEA in benchmarking: A systematic literature review from 2003-2020. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(1), 175-222.
134. Seiford, L. M. & Zhu, J., (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288.
135. Seiford, L. M., (1996). Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2/3), 99-137.
136. Shephard, R. W., (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
137. Simon, H. A., (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. London, England: Macmillan.
138. Soetanto, T. V. & Fun, L. P., (2015). Super slack-based model efficiency and stock performance of manufacturing industry listed in Indonesian stock exchange. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211,1231-1239
139. Su, Y. S., (2013). Competing in the goal solar photovoltaic industry: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2013, 1-11.
140. Sueyoshi, T. & Goto, M., (2015). Japanese fuel mix strategy after disaster of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant: Lessons from international comparison among industrial nations measured by DEA environmental assessment in time horizon. Energy Economics, 52, 87-103.
141. Sueyoshi, T. & Wang, D., (2017). Measuring scale efficiency and returns to scale on large commercial rooftop photovoltaic systems in California. Energy Economics, 65, 389-398.
142. Sueyoshi, T., Yuan, Y., & Goto, M., (2017). A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment. Energy Economics, 62, 104-124.
143. Szilagyi, A. D., (1984). Management and Performance. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
144. Thorén, K. & Vendel, M., (2019). Backcasting as a strategic management tool for meeting VUCA challenges. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 298-312.
145. Tone, K., (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.
146. Tone, K., (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32-41.
147. Udayakumar, M. D., Anushree, G., Sathyaraj, J., & Manjunathan, A., (2021). The impact of advanced technological developments on solar PV value chain. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45(Part 2), 2053-2058.
148. Urban, M. C., (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348(6234), 571-573.
149. Wang, C. T. & Chiu, C. S., (2014). Competitive strategies for Taiwan's semiconductor industry in a new world economy. Technology in Society, 36, 60-73.
150. Wang, D. D. & Sueyoshi, T., (2017). Assessment of large commercial rooftop photovoltaic system installations: Evidence from California. Applied Energy, 188, 45-55.
151. Wang, K., (2015). Energy efficiency index via data envelopment analysis (DEA): Methodology and application. In J. Yan (Series Ed.), Handbook of Clean Energy Systems: Vol. 6. Sustainability of Energy Systems (pp. 1-17). doi.org/10.1002/9781118991978.hces083
152. Wang, S. & Sun, X., (2020). The global system-ranking efficiency model and calculating examples with consideration of the nonhomogeneity of decision-making units. Expert Systems, 37(4), e12272.
153. Wheelen, T. L. & Hunger, J. D., (2012). Strategic management and business policy: toward global sustainability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
154. White, M. A. & Bruton, G. D., (2011). The management of technology and innovation: A strategic approach. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
155. Wojcik, V., Dyckhoff, H., & Clermont, M., (2019). Is data envelopment analysis a suitable tool for performance measurement and benchmarking in non-production contexts?. Business Research, 12(2), 559-595
156. Woo, C., Chung, Y., Chun, D., Seo, H., & Hong, S., (2015). The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 367-376.
157. Xue, M. & Harker, P. T., (2002). Customer efficiency: Concept and its impact on e-business management. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 253-267.
158. Yoshikuni, A. C. & Albertin, A. L., (2018). Effects of strategic information systems on competitive strategy and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 2018-2045.
159. Yun, S., Lee, J., & Lee, S., (2019). Technology development strategies and policy support for the solar energy industry under technological turbulence. Energy Policy, 124, 206-214.
160. Zhang, F. & Gallagher, K., S., (2016). Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China's PV industry. Energy Policy, 94, 191-203.
161. Zhang, L., Wang, J., Wen, H., Fu, Z., & Li, X., (2016). Operating performance, industry agglomeration and its spatial characteristics of Chinese photovoltaic industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 373-386.
162. Zhang, N. & Kim, J. D., (2014). Measuring sustainability by energy efficiency analysis for Korean power companies: A sequential slacks-based efficiency measure. Sustainability, 6(3), 1414-1426.
163. Zheng, B. & Prince, P. E., (2015). Purchasing efficiency measurement of selected Chinese PV panels using data envelopment analysis (DEA). The Undergraduate Review, 11, 148-155.
164. Zhou, H., Liu, Q., Yan, K., & Du, Y., (2021). Deep Learning Enhanced Solar Energy Forecasting with AI-Driven IoT. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1-11.
165. Zimková, E., (2014). Technical efficiency and super-efficiency of the banking sector in Slovakia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 780-787.