Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0929120-141208 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0929120-141208
論文名稱
Title
奢華都是為了愛你!求偶思維對不同類型奢侈性消費之影響
The Pursuit of Luxury Is To Love You! The Impact of Mating Mind-Sets on Different Types of Luxury Consumption
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
183
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-10-29
關鍵字
Keywords
求偶思維、自我呈現、自我控制、自我許可、奢侈炫耀性消費、奢侈享樂性消費
self-presentation, self-control, self-permission, conspicuous luxury consumption, hedonic luxury consumption, mating mind-sets
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 203 次,被下載 10
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 203 times, has been downloaded 10 times.
中文摘要
摘要
奢侈品行銷大多依賴廣告為工具,風格多為簡約、彰顯尊榮等,且經常搭配名人代言,然奢侈品品牌也應考量消費者的心理因素,以激發購買慾望。過去研究多著重於消費者利用奢侈品作為提高聲望的一種策略,較少檢視是否有其他動機也可能驅動消費者購買奢侈品。本研究以「求偶思維」角度切入,檢視激發求偶思維對不同類型奢侈性消費影響的差異,並以消費者當下的感情狀態為干擾變數,嘗試解釋不同感情狀態下,對應自我呈現、自我控制、自我許可心理機制之影響,共進行一項預試、兩項實驗。
預試與實驗一皆為雙因子實驗設計,影片類型 (浪漫 vs. 非浪漫) 為組間因子,以操弄求偶思維的有vs.無激發,奢侈品廣告類型 (炫耀性vs.享樂性) 為組內因子;實驗二同樣為雙因子實驗設計,以異性素人的面孔吸引力 (高 vs. 低) 為組間因子,來操弄求偶思維的有激發vs.無激發,而奢侈品廣告類型 (炫耀性vs.享樂性) 為組內因子。三項實驗皆透過問項詢問當前感情狀態(有伴侶vs.無伴侶)。研究結果發現:(一)不論消費者性別、屬於何種感情狀態,都能被成功激發求偶思維;(二)在無伴侶的情況下激發求偶思維,會提升自我呈現動機,進而增加奢侈炫耀性消費;(三)在有伴侶的情況下激發求偶思維,會透過自我控制影響自我許可機制,進而增加奢侈享樂性消費;(四)在沒有預算限制的情況下,不論處於何種感情狀態,都會連帶驅動購買其他奢侈品項;(五)消費者性別不會干擾激發求偶思維對中介機制、應變數的影響。
本研究著重在求偶思維對不同類型奢侈性消費的影響,擴充求偶思維對行銷領域的作用,並創新地將受測者的感情狀態納入考量,對於相關領域具有理論貢獻;在實務貢獻方面,建議業者可嘗試在奢侈品廣告中透過文字或圖片操弄,激發消費者的求偶思維,或將品牌產品置入於喚起求偶思維的媒體情境,透過後續心理機制,讓消費者合理化自己購買奢侈品的行為,降低罪惡感的負面聯想,此將是業者欲提升奢侈品銷售可嘗試的手段。
Abstract
Abstract
Luxury marketing mostly relies on advertising as a tool. The style of advertising is often simple and honorable, and usually uses celebrity endorsements. However, luxury brands should also consider the psychological factors of consumers to stimulate purchase desire. Previous studies have focused on how consumers use luxury goods as a strategy to increase prestige, and less examined whether there are other motives that may also drive consumers to purchase luxury goods. This research starts from the perspective of “mating mind-sets”, examining the difference in the influence of activating mating mind-sets on different types of luxury consumption. It also uses the current relationship state in love of consumers as a moderator to explain how mating mind-sets affect luxury consumption by the mechanisms of self-presentation, self-control, and self-licensing under different relationship state conditions. One pilot study and two formal experiments were conducted to test the propositions.
Both the pilot study and the first experiment were two-factor experimental designs with the film type (romantic vs. non-romantic) as a between-subjects factor, and type of luxury advertising (conspicuous vs. hedonistic) as a within-subjects factor. Experiment 2 was also a two-factor experimental design, using the facial attractiveness of the opposite-sex noncelebrity models (high vs. low) as a between-subjects factor to manipulate the activation vs. non-activation of mating mind-sets, and type of luxury advertising (conspicuous vs. hedonistic) as a within-subjects factor. All the three experiments asked questions about the current relationship status in love (with partner vs. without partner). The research results revealed the following important findings. (1) Regardless of the gender and relationship state of consumers, their mating mind-sets can be successfully activated. (2) Activating mating mind-sets in consumers without a partner in love would increase motivation for self-presentation, thereby increasing conspicuous luxury consumption. (3) Activating mating mind-sets in consumers with a partner in love would drive the self-control mechanism and then self-licensing, thereby increasing hedonic luxury consumption. (4) In the absence of budget constraints, no matter what kind of relationship state they are in, activating mating mind-sets would drive the purchase of other luxury items. (5) Consumer gender would not moderate the influence of activating mating mind-sets on the internal mechanisms and luxury consumption.
This research focuses on the influence of mating mind-sets on different types of luxury consumption, expands the understanding of mating mind-sets effect in the marketing field, innovatively considers the moderation of consumer relationship state in love, and has theoretical contributions to related fields. In terms of practical contributions, practitioners can try to use text or pictures in luxury advertisements to activiate consumers’ mating mind-sets, or embed branded products in a media situation that evokes mating mind-sets. With subsequent psychological mechanisms, consumers can rationalize their purchase of luxury goods and reduce the negative associations of guilt. This could be the means that the practitioners can try to increase the sales of luxury goods.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書...................................................................................................................i
誌謝..............................................................................................................................ii
摘要.............................................................................................................................iii
Abstract........................................................................................................................iv
目錄.............................................................................................................................vi
圖次...........................................................................................................................viii
表次.............................................................................................................................ix
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 4
第四節、研究目的 8
第二章、文獻探討 9
第一節、求偶思維(Mating Mind-Sets) 9
第二節、印象管理之自我呈現(Self-Presentation) 13
第三節、自我控制(Self-control) 14
第四節、准許作用的自我許可(Self- licensing) 15
第五節、奢侈性消費(Luxury consumption) 16
第三章、研究架構與假說推論 20
第一節、研究架構 20
第二節、研究假說 20
第四章、預試及實驗一 25
第一節、研究方法 25
一、樣本與實驗設計 25
二、實驗刺激與前測 26
第二節、預試 38
(一)實驗程序 38
(二)變數衡量-操弄性檢驗 39
第三節、預試預結果分析 40
(一)研究樣本組成 40
(二)變數之平均數、標準差及量表信度分析 41
(三)操弄性檢驗與控制變數的檢定 42
(四)結果分析 44
第四節、實驗一 47
(一) 實驗程序 47
(二)變數衡量-操弄性檢驗 48
(三)實驗一結果分析 49
第五章、實驗二 64
第一節、研究方法 65
一、樣本與實驗設計 65
二、實驗刺激與前測 65
三、實驗程序 79
四、變數衡量 79
第二節、分析結果 81
一、研究樣本組成 81
二、變數之平均數、標準差及量表信度分析 83
四、控制變數之檢定 86
五、假說驗證 87
六、討論 93
第六章、結論與建議 95
第一節、研究發現 95
第二節、研究意涵 97
一、理論意涵 97
二、實務意涵 98
第三節、研究限制及未來研究方向 100
參考文獻 104
附錄 115
附錄一:前測一問卷 115
附錄二:前測二問卷 118
附錄三:預試問卷 122
附錄四:實驗一問卷 131
附錄五:前測三問卷 138
附錄六:前測四問卷 144
附錄七:實驗二問卷 156
圖次
圖1-1 GUCCI香水廣告的風格簡約...........................................................................2
圖1-2 Cartier手錶廣告展現尊榮及彰顯地位.............................................................2
圖1-3 CHANEL N5香水與好萊塢男星Brad Pitt合作代言.....................................3
圖1-4 DIOR JOY香水與好萊塢女星Jennifer Lawrence合作代言..........................3
圖3-1研究架構...........................................................................................................20
圖4-1實驗一研究架構...............................................................................................47
圖5-1研究二實驗架構...............................................................................................64
表次
表1-1求偶思維相關實驗研究...................................................................................7
表2-1五種奢侈品購買動機整理...............................................................................17
表4-1求偶思維評估與涉入程度之單一樣本t檢定結果........................................28
表4-2各影片之平均數比較.......................................................................................29
表4-3各影片之ANOVA多重比較..........................................................................29
表4-4女性產品奢侈性之單一樣本t檢定結果........................................................33
表4-5男性產品奢侈性之單一樣本t檢定結果........................................................35
表4-6預試產品的奢侈類型ANOVA分析表..........................................................36
表4-7預試受測者基本資料之描述統計...................................................................40
表4-8變數之平均數、標準差及量表信度分析結果...............................................41
表4-9影片操弄組別統計量.......................................................................................43
表4-10奢侈性操弄統計量.........................................................................................43
表4-11奢侈性操弄單一樣本t檢定分析結果..........................................................43
表4-12奢侈品類型辨認之統計量.............................................................................44
表4-13奢侈品辨認成對樣本t檢定結果.................................................................44
表4-14求偶思維操弄與感情狀態對於求偶思維評分之PROCESS Model 1分析結果.................................................................................................................................45
表4-15求偶思維操弄與感情狀態對於自我呈現之PROCESS Model 1分析結果.45
表4-16感情狀態干擾求偶思維操弄對於自我呈現影響之結果.............................45
表4-17求偶思維操弄與感情狀態對於自我控制之PROCESS Model 1分析結果.46
表4-18感情狀態干擾求偶思維操弄對於自我控制影響之結果.............................46
表4-19受測者基本資料之描述統計.........................................................................50
表4-20變數之平均數、標準差及量表信度分析結果.............................................51
表4-21影片類型對求偶思維及注意力影響的操弄組別統計量.............................52
表4-22奢侈性統計量.................................................................................................52
表4-23奢侈性單一樣本t檢定之分析結果..............................................................53
表4-24奢侈品類型辨認統計量................................................................................53
表4-25奢侈品類型辨認成對樣本t檢定結果..........................................................53
表4-26購買精品經驗與求偶思維激發之交叉列表.................................................54
表4-27購買精品經驗之卡方檢定分析結果.............................................................54
表4-28個人月收入對求偶思維之交叉表.................................................................55
表4-29個人月收入對求偶思維之卡方檢定結果分析.............................................56
表4-30在無伴侶的情況下求,偶思維對卡地亞購買意願之迴歸分析結果...........57
表4-31在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對愛馬仕購買意願之迴歸分析結果...........57
表4-32在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維透過卡地亞購買意願對愛馬仕購買意願影響之間接效果.............................................................................................................57
表4-33在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維透過卡地亞購買意願對愛馬仕購買意願影響之剩餘直接效果.....................................................................................................57
4-34在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對預算有限時卡地亞購買意願之迴歸分析結果.................................................................................................................................58
表4-35在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對預算有限時愛馬仕購買意願之迴歸分析結果.............................................................................................................................58
表4-36在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈炫耀性消費之迴歸分析結果..........58
表4-37在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈享樂性消費之迴歸分析結果..........59
表4-38在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對愛馬仕購買意願之迴歸分析結果..........59
表4-39在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對卡地亞購買意願之迴歸分析結果..........60
表4-40在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維透過愛馬仕購買意願對卡地亞購買意願之間接效果.....................................................................................................................60
表4-41在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維透過愛馬仕購買意願對卡地亞購買意願之剩餘直接效果.............................................................................................................60
表4-42在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對預算有限時愛馬仕購買意願之迴歸分析結果.............................................................................................................................61
表4-43在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對預算有限時卡地亞購買意願之迴歸分析結果.............................................................................................................................61
表4-44在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈享樂性消費之迴歸分析結果.........61
表4-45在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈炫耀性消費之迴歸分析結果.........61
表4-46實驗一假說驗證表.........................................................................................63
表5-1素人照片吸引力評估之單一樣本t檢定結果................................................67
表5-2素人組合照片吸引力評估之單一樣本t檢定結果........................................76
表5-3受測者基本資料之描述性統計.......................................................................82
表5-4變數之平均數、標準差及量表信度分析結果.................................................83
表5-5素人照片操弄組別統計量...............................................................................85
表5-6奢侈性統計量...................................................................................................85
表5-7奢侈性單一樣本t檢定之分析結果................................................................85
表5-8奢侈品類型辨認組別統計量...........................................................................86
表5-9奢侈品辨認成對樣本t檢定結果....................................................................86
表5-10品牌喜好統計量............................................................................................86
表5-11品牌喜好之成對樣本t檢定分析結果.........................................................86
表5-12購買精品經驗與求偶思維激發之交叉列表.................................................87
表5-13購買精品經驗之卡方檢定分析結果.............................................................87
表5-14在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對自我呈現動機之迴歸分析結果...............87
表5-15在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對自我控制動機之迴歸分析結果...............88
表5-16在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈炫耀性消費之迴歸分析結果..........88
表5-17在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈享樂性消費之迴歸分析結果..........88
表5-18在無伴侶的情況下,求偶思維透過自我呈現動機對奢侈炫耀性消費之間接效果.........................................................................................................................88
表5-19在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對自我控制動機之迴歸分析結果..............89
表5-20在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對自我呈現動機之迴歸分析結果..............89
表5-21在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈炫耀性消費之迴歸分析結果..........89
表5-22在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對奢侈享樂性消費之迴歸分析結果..........90
表5-23在有伴侶的情況下,自我控制透過道德感對放縱消費心態之間接效果...90
表5-24在有伴侶的情況下,自我控制對道德感之迴歸分析結果..........................90
表5-25在有伴侶的情況下,道德感對放縱消費心態之迴歸分析結果..................90
表5-26在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維對自我控制之迴歸分析結果......................91
表5-27在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維、自我控制對道德感之迴歸分析結果.....91
表5-28在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維、自我控制、道德感對放縱消費心態之迴歸分析結果.................................................................................................................92
表5-29在有伴侶的情況下,求偶思維、自我控制、道德感、放縱消費心態對奢侈享樂性消費之迴歸分析結果.................................................................................92
表5-30在有伴侶的情況下,序列中介效果分析....................................................92
表5-31實驗二假說驗證表........................................................................................93
參考文獻 References
江榮煥、李曉東 (2014)。兩性求偶動機與冒險行為信息的內隱聯結。成都師範學院學報,30(10),57-62。
周軒逸、蘇璿 (2018)。奢侈代表我的心!男性的伴侶守衛動機對奢侈品購買之
影響。管理學報,35(1),27-56。
素顏青衫客 (2019年4月4日)。浪漫唯美愛情韓國偶像劇的必備元素。每日頭條。取自
第一財經商業數據中心 (2017年8月21日)。新零售時代奢侈品消費趨勢:90後、95後漸成奢侈品核心人群。第一財經商業數據中心。取自https://cbndata.com/report/113?isReading=report&page=3
陳潔胤 (2018年10月12日)。光奢華還不夠!GUCCI瞄準千禧世代 靠策略贏市場大戰。SETN三立新聞網。取自https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=437239
喬瑞昕 (2019年12月22日)。三分之一的人買過奢侈品會後悔。上海金融報。取自http://money.sohu.com/20091222/n269133046.shtml
華麗志 (2018年11月24日)。YNAP假日季奢侈品消費調查結果:Instagram 對奢侈品消費者購物決策的影響力進一步擴大。推酷。取自https://www.tuicool.com/articles/iaIFVzV
鄭琪芳 (2019年八月29日)。全球奢侈品力量調查 這個品牌蟬聯第一。自由時報。取自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2899968
蔡進發 (2018)。求偶思維對自我複雜度,共品牌契合度與雌雄同體共品牌評
價之影響。管理評論,37(1),15-33。
蕭至惠、蔡進發、曾千桓 (2018)。沉浸戀愛氛圍將左右著消費者的思維與行
為?中山管理評論,26(2),135-172。
蘇金龍、蘇彥捷 (2017)。求偶動機的心理效應。心理科學進展, 25(4),
609-626.
Ainsworth, S. E., & Maner, J. K. (2014). Assailing the competition: Sexual
selection, proximate mating motives, and aggressive behavior in men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1648-1658.
Alina Dizik (2016年12月13日)。購物就像吸毒一樣會讓你上癮。BBC英倫網。取自 https://www.bbc.com/ukchina/trad/vert-cap-38300714?fbclid=IwAR3dwVyIDA9_ALdGTRr496sYslBB-idm2HVGzDxOuBaIHSY5_sPb4eWF_lQ
Allsopp, J. (2005). Premium pricing: Understanding the value of premium. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 4, 185-194.
Amatulli, C., & Guido, G. (2011). Determinants of purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: A laddering approach. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 123-136.
Anderson, W. T., & Cunningham, W. H. (1972). The socially conscious consumer. The Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 23-31.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(3), 225-247.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bagwell, L. S., & Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American Economic Review, 349-373.
Bain & Co (2014). World luxury market report. Paris: Bain & Co.
Bain & Co (2018). World luxury market report. Paris: Bain & Co.
Baker Jr, M. D., Sloan, H. N., Hall, A. D., Leo, J., & Maner, J. K. (2015). Mating and memory: Can mating cues enhance cognitive performance?. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(4). Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474704915623280
Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391-395.
Baughman, E. E., & Welsh, G. S. Personality: A behavioral science. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3-26.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.
BeautiMode時尚產業版 (2018年1月20日)。奢侈品牌連接千禧一代的焦慮。BeautiMode。取自 https://www.beautimode.com/article/content/84341/
Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194.
Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2013). A content analysis study of the use of celebrity endorsers in magazine advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 369-389.
Bian, Q., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1443-1451.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1-14.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232.
Cheng, Y. H., Huang, M. C. J., Chuang, S. C., & Ju, Y. R. (2015). Burger or yogurt? Indulgent consumption in impression management contexts. International Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 345-353.
Chiou, W. B., Wu, W. H., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2015). Beauty against tobacco control: Viewing photos of attractive women may induce a mating mindset, leading to reduced self-control over smoking among male smokers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 218-223.
Cohen, A. R. (1959). Some implications of self-esteem for social influence. In C. I. Hovland & I. L. Janis (Eds.). Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 19S9, 102-120.
Dahl, D. W., Honea, H., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). The nature of self-reported guilt in consumption contexts. Marketing Letters, 14, 159-171.
Dahl, D.W., Honea, H. & Manchanda, R.V. (2005). Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: Relationship, reciprocity, reparation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 307-315.
De Barnier, V., Falcy, S., & Valette-Florence, P. (2012). Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands. Journal of Brand Management, 19(7), 623-636.
Deloitte (2018a)。 2018全球奢侈品力量調查報告。取自https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/consumer-business/articles/2018cb-global-powers-of-luxury-goods.html
Deloitte (2018年8月6日b)。勤業眾信發布2018全球奢侈品力量調查報告。取自:https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/consumer-business/articles/2018-luxury-news.html
Deloitte (2019年8月29日)。勤業眾信發布《2019全球奢侈品力量調查》報告。取自https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/consumer-business/articles/2019-luxury-power-report.html#
Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dittmar, H. (1994). Material possessions as stereotypes: Material images of different socio-economic groups. Journal of Economic psychology, 15(4), 561-585.
Dittmar, H. (2007). Consumer culture, identity and well-being: The search for the'good life'and the'body perfect'. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Dosmukhambetova, D., & Manstead, A. S. (2013). Strategicreactions to infants: Female self-presentation in a romantic context. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(2), 288-303.
Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-44.
Dubois, B., & Laurent, G. (1994). Attitudes towards the concept of luxury: An exploratory analysis. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances, 1, 273-278.
Dunn, L., & Hoegg, J. (2014). The impact of fear on emotional brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 152-168.
Durante, K. M., Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Pair-bonded relationships and romantic alternatives: Toward an integration of evolutionary and relationship science perspectives. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53(1), 1-74. Burlington, VT: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.001
Eom, H. J., Seock, Y. K., & Hunt-Hurst, P. (2019). Purchase intention toward luxury brands among young adult consumers from social comparison perspective. Journal of Marketing Management and Consumer Behavior, 2(4). Retrieved from https://journal-of-marketing-management-and-consumer-behavior.com/index.php/JMMCB/article/view/92
Everaert, J., Duyck, W., & Koster, E. H. (2014). Attention, interpretation, and memory biases in subclinical depression: A proof-of-principle test of the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Emotion, 14(2), 331-340.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 154-158.
Fionda, A. M., & Moore, C. M. (2009). The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5-6), 347-363.
Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Ogden, C. L., & Johnson, C. L. (2002). Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. Jama, 288(14), 1723-1727.
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. London: Norton.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effect on thought and behavior. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York: Guilford.
Grafen, A. (1990). Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144(4), 517-546.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik Jr, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5-29.
Green, B. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (1994). The attractiveness of gender-typed traits at different relationship levels: Androgynous characteristics may be desirable after all. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 244-253.
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 63–76.
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non) conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281-294.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 85-102.
Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31(4), 22-27.
Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (1998). The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 464-473.
Hasford, J., Kidwell, B., & Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2017). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1238-1256.
Heatherton, T., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Hewitt, P. L., Blasberg, J. S., Flett, G. L., Besser, A., Sherry, S. B., Caelian, C., Papsdorf, M. and Birch, S., 2011. Perfectionistic self-presentation in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the perfectionistic self-presentation scale - Junior form. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 125-142.
Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-in-consistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 492-507.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140.
Hu, Y. W. (2014). Effects of mating mindsets on variety seeking (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/88369/881180198-MIT.pdf;sequence=2
Huang, X., Dong, P., & Zhang, M. (2019). Crush on you: Romantic crushes increase consumers’ preferences for strong sensory stimuli. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 53-68.
Huang, X., Huang, Z., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2018). The influence of social crowding on brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1068-1084.
Hung, K., (2018) Consumption of luxury hotel experience in contemporary China: causality model for conspicuous consumption. Tourism Review International, 22(3-4), 171-185.
Hwang, J. W. (2016). Effect of prosocial behaviors in a mating mindset on purchase decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(3), 463–480.
Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as a mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490800600302 .
Janssens, K., Pandelaere, M., Van den Bergh, B., Millet, K., Lens, I., & Roe, K. (2011). Can buy me love: Mate attraction goals lead to perceptual readiness for status products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 254-258.
Joireman, J., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1159-1168.
Jones, E. E., Rhodewalt, F., Berglas, S., & Skelton, J. A. (1981). Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 407-421.
Jones, J. C., & Barlow, D. H. (1990). Self-reported frequency of sexual urges, fantasies, and masturbatory fantasies in heterosexual males and females. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19(3), 269-279.
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marking Research, 43(2), 259-266.
Kim, J. (2016). The influence of mating goal activation and gender differences on the evaluation of advertisements containing sexual words. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(3), 205-213.
Kirchler, E., Rodler, C., Hoelzl, E., & Meier, K. (2001). Conflict and decision-making in close relationships: Love, money and daily routines. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.
Kuoppamäki, S. M., Wilska, T. A., & Taipale, S. (2017). Ageing and consumption in Finland: The effect of age and life course stage on ecological, economical and self‐indulgent consumption among late middle‐agers and young adults between 1999 and 2014. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 457-464.
LaTour, K. A., & LaTour, M. S. (2009). Positive mood and susceptibility to false advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 127-142.
Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark’s.
Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183-207.
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468.
Liu, H. H., & Chou, H. Y. (2016). Do longer or shorter budget temporal frames matter? Numerosity effects, mental budgets, and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(4), 422-441.
Maner, J. K., & Ackerman, J. M. (2015). Sexually selective cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 52-56.
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S, L., … Schaller, M. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63-78.
Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494-498.
McKinsey., 1990. The luxury industry: An asset for France, Paris, France: McKinsey.
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
Miller, G. (2009). Spent: Sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. Penguin.
Monga, A. B., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2012). The influence of mating mind-sets on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 581-593.
Monga, A. B., & Lau-Gesk, L. (2007). Blending cobrand personalities: An examination of the complex self. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 389-400.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33-43.
Mukhopadhyay, A., & Johar, G. V. (2009). Indulgence as self-reward for prior shopping restraint: A justification-based mechanism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 334-345.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472-489.
Nenkov, G. Y., Inman, J. J., & Hulland, J. (2007). Considering the future: The conceptualization and measurement of elaboration on potential outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 126-141.
Nia, A., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands?. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497.
Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business horizons, 41(6), 61-61.
O'Cass, A. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of a revised version of the Lennox and Wolfe revised self‐monitoring scale. Psychology & Marketing, 17(5), 397-419.
O’cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88.
O'cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 4(1), 25-39.
O'Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 278-294.
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Prus, R. (1993). Shopping with companions: Images, influences and interpersonal dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology, 16(2), 87-110.
Rachlin, H. (1997). Self and self-control. In J. G. Snodgrass & R. L. Thompson (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 818. The self across psychology: Self-recognition, self-awareness, and the self concept (pp. 85–97). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351-357.
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5-37.
Roux, E. (1995). Consumer evaluation of luxury brand extensions. Proceedings of the European Marketing Academy, ESSEC: Cergy-Pontoise, Paris, France, 1971-1980.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Scopelliti, I., Loewenstein, G., & Vosgerau, J. (2015). Miscalibrated predictions of emotional responses to self-promotion. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 234-235.
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(1-2), 11-36.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
Silverstein, M., & Fiske, N. (2003). Trading up: The new American luxury. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., & Rothman, A. J. (2012). Consumer decisions in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 304-314
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Teichmann, K. (2011). Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 889-896.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446.
Su, C., Zhou, K. Z., Zhou, N., & Li, J. J. (2008). Harmonizing conflict in husband–wife purchase decision making: Perceived fairness and spousal influence dynamics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(3), 378-394.
Sultan, A. J., Joireman, J., & Sprott, D. E. (2012). Building consumer self-control: The effect of self-control exercises on impulse buying urges. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 61-72.
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664-680.
Suzuki, S., Hamamura, T., & Takemura, K. (2019). Emotional fortification: Indulgent consumption and emotion reappraisal and their implications for well‐being. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(1), 25-31.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-322.
Thaler, R.H. (1991). Quasi rational economics. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1990). The lived meaning of free choice: An existential-phenomenological description of everyday consumer experiences of contemporary married women. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 346-361.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5(5), 297–302.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Tsai, W. S., Yang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2013). Young Chinese consumers’ snob and bandwagon luxury consumption preferences. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 290-304.
Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2011). Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces. Neuroimage, 54(1), 653-660.
Vargas, P. T., Duff, B. R., & Faber, R. J. (2017). A practical guide to experimental advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 101-114.
Veblen, Thorstein (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York, NY: MacMillan.
Verplanken, B., & Herabadi, A. (2001). Individual differences in impulse buying tendency: Feeling and no thinking. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S71-S83.
Vickers, J. S. & Renand, F. (2003). The marketing of luxury goods: An exploratory study–three conceptual dimensions. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 459-478.
Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(1), 1-15.
Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484-506.
Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 537-547.
Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834-854.
Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Nelson, T. E, & Kuo, M. (2002). Underage college students’ drinking behavior, access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies. Journal of American College Health, 50(5), 223-236.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 404-414.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 271(suppl_4), S177-S179.
Yarrow, K. (2014). Decoding the new consumer mind: How and why we shop and buy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1999). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford University Press.
Zhan, L., & He, Y. (2012). Understanding luxury consumption in China: Consumer perceptions of best-known brands. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1452-1460.
Zhong, J. Y., & Mitchell, V. W. (2010). A mechanism model of the effect of hedonic product consumption on well-being. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 152-162.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code