論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
準被動投資組合:風格因子增值公司債投資組合 Quasi-Passive Investment Portfolio: Corporate Bond Enhanced by Multi-Style Factor |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
82 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-12-19 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-12-26 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
增強指數基金、公司債市場、純因子投資組合、量化固定收益投資組合、因子投資 Quantitative Fixed-Income Portfolio Management, Pure Factor Investment Portfolio, Factor Investment, Corporate Bond Market, Enhanced Index Fund |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 250 次,被下載 10 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 250 times, has been downloaded 10 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究為探討因子投資如何應用於投資等級債券市場。目前已有許多股票因子投資的相關文獻及實務應用,但債券因子的發展卻相對緩慢,因為其資訊不透明的特性且債券條款更為複雜,導致債券的估值也較不精確。目前公司債投資仍以總體、產業及信用分析為主,但債券因子投資具有極大的發展價值及潛力,亦值得深耕研究。 欲瞭解哪些因子可以捕捉共同因素的風險或獲取超額報酬,應以結構式模型分解報酬之收益來源。本文採用Barra Risk Model Handbook (2007)純因子模型架構,除了沿用Jong and Fabozzi (2020)和Houweling and Zundert (2017)之因子,同時還納入槓桿、凸性及VaR因子來建構因子模型。在得知各因子所能獲取的因子報酬後,本文採用五分位數因子投資組合及訊息係數衡量因子是否有效,並挑選有效因子建構單因子及多因子之增值投資組合,最後比較其績效和給予建議。 研究結果發現槓桿、凸性和VaR因子能夠有效地作為區分債券報酬的指標,經過投資組合之因子曝險調整後,能獲得更高的風險調整後報酬以及正的資訊比率。然而,由純因子模型的結果得知單位曝險於VaR因子的投資組合並無法帶來超額報酬,因此推論VaR增值投組的超額報酬可能源自於對其他因子的曝險。此外,使用多因子構成的指數增值投資組合也有優於標竿投資組合的夏普比率,並且能有效地降低投資組合之最大回撤率。 |
Abstract |
This research is to explore how factor investing can be applied to the portfolio management of investment-grade bonds. There are currently many relevant reviews and practical applications of stock factor investing. However, the development of bond factors is still limited due to opaque and more complicated trading conditions of the bond market. At present, strategies for corporate bond investment are still dominated by macroeconomic, industry, and credit analyses, but bond factor investment has great development value and potential. In order to understand what factors can capture common factor risks or obtain excess returns, a structural model should continue to be studied to decompose sources of returns. This study adopts the pure factor model as described in the Barra Risk Model Handbook (2007) and combines Jong and Fabozzi (2020) and Houweling and Zundert (2017) factors. In addition, this study also incorporates leverage, convexity, and value-at-risk factors to construct a factor model. After exploring factor returns, this study uses the quintile portfolio and the information coefficient to measure whether the factors are practical and selects influential factors to construct single-factor and multi-factor enhanced portfolios. Finally, it compares their performances and provides suggestions. The results of this study show that leverage, convexity, and VaR factors can be used to effectively distinguish bond returns. Through adjusting weights of investment portfolios in this study in accordance with their factor exposures, higher risk-adjusted returns are obtained. However, the results of our pure factor model show that excess returns on the VaR factor portfolio cannot be obtained by unit exposures. Therefore, our results may mean that excess returns on the enhanced portfolios may derive from other factor exposures. In addition, the enhanced index portfolio can be used to effectively reduce the portfolio's maximum drawdown. |
目次 Table of Contents |
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii List of Tables vi List of Figures viii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation for Research 3 1.3 Research Purpose 6 2. Literature Review 7 2.1. Term Structure of Interest Rates 7 2.2. Factor Model and Asset Pricing 10 2.3. Corporate Bond Anomalies and Factors 12 2.4. Factor Timing Model 15 3. Data and Methodology 17 3.1 Empirical Process 17 3.2 Data Description 19 3.3 Nelson-Siegel Estimate Methodology 21 3.4 Corporate Bond Factors Definition 22 3.5 Establish Factor Exposure 29 3.6 Multi-Factor Model 29 3.7 Quintile Portfolio Analysis 32 3.8 Information Coefficient and Weighted Factor Scores 32 3.9 Factor Enhanced Method 34 4. Empirical Research 37 4.1 Empirical Results of the Factor Model 37 4.2 Single-Factor Portfolio 42 4.3 Multi-Factor Portfolio 60 5. Conclusion and Suggestions 65 5.1 Conclusion 65 5.2 Suggestion 66 Appendix 69 References 71 |
參考文獻 References |
1. Altman, E. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609. 2. Ang, A., Goetzmann, W. N., & Schaefer, S. (2009). Evaluation of active management of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, Report to the Norwegian Ministry of Finance. 3. Arnott, R., & Aked, M. (2016). Arnott on All Asset, Pimco. 4. Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. (2013). Value and Momentum Everywhere. Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985. 5. Bai, J., Bali, T. G., & Wen, Q. (2019). Common risk factors in the cross-section of corporate bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 619-642. 6. Banz, R. W. (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18. 7. Barillas, F., & Shanken, J. (2018). Comparing Asset Pricing Models. Journal of Finance, 73(2), 715-754. 8. Barra Risk Model Handbook (2007). MSCI. 9. Bektic, D., Wenzler, J. S., Wegener, M., Schiereck, D., & Spielmann, T. (2019). Extending Fama-French Factors to Corporate Bond Markets. Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(3), 141-158. 10. Bender, J., Sun, X., Thomas, R., & Zdorovtsov, V. (2018). The Promises and Pitfalls of Factor Timing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 44(4), 79-92. 11. Black, F., Derman, E., & Toy, W. (1990). A One-Factor Model of Interest Rates and Its Application to Treasury Bond Options. Financial Analysts Journal, 46(1), 33-39. 12. Breeden, D. T. (1979). An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 265-296. 13. Carhart, M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. 14. Chung, K. H., Wang, J., & Chunchi, W. (2019). Volatility and the Cross-section of Corporate Bond Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 397-417. 15. Crawford, S., Perotti, P., Price, R., & Skousen, C. (2019). Financial Statement Anomalies in the Bond Market. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(3), 105-124. 16. Culbertson, J. M. (1957). The Term Structure of Interest Rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(4), 485-517. 17. Dor, A. K., Dynkin, L., Hyman, J., Houweling, P., Leeuwen, E., & Penninga, O. (2007). Duration Times Spread. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33(2), 77-100. 18. FaBozzi, F. J., & Mann, S. V. (2011). The Handbook of Fixed Income Securities 8th. 19. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465. 20. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. 21. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. 22. Fama, E. F., & Macbeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636. 23. Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics,111(1), 1-25. 24. Gupta, T., & Kelly, B. (2019). Factor Momentum Everywhere. Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(3), 13-36. 25. Ho, Thomas S. Y. & Lee, Sang-Bin. (1986). Term Structure Movements and Pricing Interest Rate Contingent Claims. Journal of Finance, 41(5), 1011-1029. 26. Houweling, P., & Zundert, J. (2017). Factor Investing in the Corporate Bond Market. Financial Analyst Journal, 73(2), 1-16. 27. Hull, J., & White, A. (1990). Pricing Interest-Rate-Derivative Securities. Review of Financial Studies, 3(4), 573-592. 28. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91. 29. Jegadeesh, N., Noh, J., Pukthuanthong, K., Roll, R., & Wang, J. (2019). Empirical tests of asset pricing models with individual assets: Resolving the errors-in-variables bias in risk premium estimation. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 273-298. 30. John C. Cox, Jonathan E., Ingersoll, Jr., Stephen A., & Ross. (1985). A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Econometrica, 53(2), 385-408. 31. Jong, M. D., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2020). The Market Risk of Corporate Bonds. Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1). 32. Jostova, G., Nikolova, S., Philipov, A., & Stahel, A. W. (2013). Momentum in Corporate Bond Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(7), 1649–1693. 33. Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37. 34. Lucas, R. (1978). Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508-523. 35. Macaulay, F. (1938). The Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States Since 1856. National Bureau of Economic Research. 36. Markowitz, H. M. (March 1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. 37. Martellini, L., Priaulet, P., & Priaulet, S. (2003). Fixed-Income Securities: Valuation, Risk Management and Portfolio Strategies. 38. Menchero, J., & Morozov, A. (2010). Decomposing cross-sectional volatility. MSCI Research Insights. 39. Menchero, J., & Morozov, A. (2015). Improving Risk Forecasts Through Cross-Sectional Observations. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 41(3), 84-96. 40. Merton, Robert C. (1973). An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica, 41(5), 867-887. 41. Merton, Robert C. (1974). On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470. 42. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 261-296. 43. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American Economic Review, 433-443. 44. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783. 45. Nelson, C. R., & Siegel, A. F. (1987). Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves. Journal of Business, 60(4), 473-489. 46. Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28. 47. Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341-360. 48. Sharpe, William F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance. 19(3), 425-442. 49. Shiller, Robert J. (1987). Investor Behavior in the October 1987 Stock Market Crash: Survey Evidence. NBER Working Paper, no. w2446. 50. Stambaugh, Robert F., & Yu Yuan. (2016). Mispricing Factors. Review of Financial Studies, 30(4), 1270-1315. 51. Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2): 177–188. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |