論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-01-18
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-01-18
論文名稱 Title |
財務報表可比性與企業風險承擔分析-以台灣金融業為例 Financial Statement Comparability and Enterprise Risk-Taking: Empirical Analysis of Taiwanese Financial Institutions |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
59 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-12-27 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-01-18 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
財務報表可比性、風險承擔、規模、金融業、市場風險、營運風險 Financial statement comparability, Risk-taking, Size, Financial institutions, Market risk, Operational risk |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 48 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 48 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究探討了財務報表可比性與台灣金融業風險承擔之間的關係。透過台灣金融機構的樣本分析,研究結果顯示,財務報表可比性越高的金融機構,風險承擔行為顯著降低,尤其在小型金融機構中更為明顯。本研究使用三種風險測量指標(股票報酬率標準差、資產報酬率標準差及Z值)進行分析,並透過多種量化分析方法驗證了研究結果的穩健性,進一步證實了財務報表可比性對風險管理的重要性。本研究進一步發現,財務報表可比性能有效降低市場風險(如股票報酬率波動),但對營運風險的影響相對有限,可能反映台灣金融業高度監管環境的特性。此外,研究確認規模差異在此關係中的調節作用:對於小型金融機構,財務報表透明度提升能顯著減少經營風險;而對大型金融機構,內部治理與市場機制可能扮演更重要的角色。這些發現不僅強調財務報表可比性在風險管理中的重要性,也為監管機構及金融機構管理層提供具體政策建議。 |
Abstract |
This study investigates the relationship between financial statement comparability and risk-taking in Taiwan's financial institutions. Through an analysis of samples from Taiwan's financial institutions, the results reveal that higher financial statement comparability is associated with significantly reduced risk-taking behavior, particularly in smaller financial institutions. The study employs different risk measurement indicators and validates the robustness of its findings through various quantitative methods, further confirming the importance of financial statement comparability in risk management. Additionally, the study finds that financial statement comparability effectively reduces market risk (e.g., stock return volatility), but its impact on operational risk is relatively limited, possibly reflecting the highly regulated nature of Taiwan's financial sector. Furthermore, the research highlights the moderating role of financial institution size in this relationship: for smaller financial institutions, enhanced transparency in financial reporting significantly reduces operational risk; for larger financial institutions, internal governance and market mechanisms may play more critical roles. These findings emphasize the pivotal role of financial statement comparability in risk management and offer specific policy recommendations for regulators and financial industry leaders. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書..............................................................................................................i 誌謝.........................................................................................................................ii 摘要........................................................................................................................iii Abstract..................................................................................................................iv 目錄.........................................................................................................................v 圖次........................................................................................................................vi 表次.......................................................................................................................vii 第一章 緒論............................................................................................................1 第一節研究背景與動機........................................................................................1 第二節研究目的....................................................................................................2 第三節研究流程....................................................................................................4 第二章 文獻探討...................................................................................................6 第一節台灣金融業產業分析................................................................................6 第二節金融機構風險承擔....................................................................................7 第三節財務報表的可比性....................................................................................9 第四節財務報表可比性與銀行風險承擔的關係..............................................10 第三章 研究方法.................................................................................................14 第一節資料來源與樣本選擇..............................................................................14 第二節研究變數說明..........................................................................................14 第三節研究模型..................................................................................................21 第四章 研究結果與討論.....................................................................................24 第一節研究資料分析..........................................................................................24 第二節迴歸分析結果..........................................................................................36 第五章 結論與建議.............................................................................................44 第一節研究結論..................................................................................................44 第二節實務建議..................................................................................................45 第三節研究限制與未來研究建議......................................................................46 參考文獻..............................................................................................................47 |
參考文獻 References |
Akhigbe, A., and Martin, A. D. (2008). Influence of disclosure and governance on risk of US financial services firms following Sarbanes-Oxley. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(10), 2124–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.037 Armstrong, C. S., Core, J. E., Taylor, D. J., and Verrecchia, R. E. (2011). When Does Information Asymmetry Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00391.x Andres, P. de, and Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(12), 2570–2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.008 Ball, R., Robin, A., and Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1), 235–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.003 Berger, A. N., and Bouwman, C. H. S. (2011). How Does Capital Affect Bank Performance during Financial Crises? IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. Berger, A. N., and DeYoung, R. (2001). The Effects of Geographic Expansion on Bank Efficiency. Journal of Financial Services Research, 19(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011159405433 Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (2013). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 532–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.02.002 Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., and Lu, J. (2015). Size, leverage, and risk-taking of financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59, 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.018 Bhojraj, S., and Lee, C. M. C. (2002). Who Is My Peer? A Valuation-Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable Firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2), 407–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00054 Boyd, J. H., and Runkle, D. E. (1993). Size and performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90016-9 Brockman, P., and Unlu, E. (2009). Dividend policy, creditor rights, and the agency costs of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.007 Brown, K., Jha, R., and Pacharn, P. (2015). Ex ante CEO severance pay and risk-taking in the financial services sector. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.027 Bushman, R. M., and Williams, C. D. (2012). Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of Banks’ risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.04.002 De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., And Verdi, R. S. (2011). The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00415.x Chen, C. R., Steiner, T. L., and Whyte, A. M. (1998). Risk‐taking behavior and management ownership in depository institutions. Journal of Financial Research, 21(1), 1-16. DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., and Li, S. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.001 Demsetz, R. S., and Strahan, P. E. (1997). Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953695 DeYoung, R., and Hasan, I. (1998). The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(5), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00025-9 Fahlenbrach, R., and Stulz, R. M. (2011). Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.010 Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2010. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/PreCodSectionPageand cid=1176156317989 (accessed 7 January 2019). Flannery, M. J., Kwan, S. H., and Nimalendran, M. (2004). Market evidence on the opaqueness of banking firms’ assets. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(3), 419–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00185-5 Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., and Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003 Habib, A., Monzur Hasan, M., and Al-Hadi, A. (2017). Financial statement comparability and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 13(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.10.001 Habib, A., Hasan, M. M., and Al‐Hadi, A. (2020). Financial Statement Comparability and Idiosyncratic Return Volatility. International Review of Finance, 20(2), 383–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12227 Houston, J. F., Lin, C., Lin, P., and Ma, Y. (2010). Creditor rights, information sharing, and bank risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.008 Hughes, J. P., Lang, W. W., Mester, L. J., and Moon, C.-G. (1999). The dollars and sense of bank consolidation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23(2), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00088-0 Hughes, J. P., and Mester, L. J. (2013). Who said large banks don’t experience scale economies? Evidence from a risk-return-driven cost function. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 559–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.06.004 Jara Bertin, M., and Tomás Arias Moya, J. (2013). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting conservatism of reported earnings: Evidence from Chilean firms. Academia (Consejo Latinoamericano de Escuelas de Administración), 26(1), 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2013-0043 Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Jin, J. Y., Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., and Mathieu, R. (2013). Impact of FDICIA internal controls on bank risk taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 614–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.013 John, K., and Qian, Y. (2003). Incentive features in CEO compensation in the banking industry. Economic Policy Review - Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9(1), 109-. Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit Insurance, Risk, and Market Power in Banking. The American Economic Review, 80(5), 1183–1200. Kim, J.-B., Li, L., Lu, L. Y., and Yu, Y. (2016). Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2–3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.12.003 Kim, J., Li, L., Lu, L. Y., and Yu, Y. (2021). Financial statement comparability and managers’ use of corporate resources. Accounting and Finance (Parkville), 61(S1), 1697–1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12642 Kim, C. (Francis), Wang, K., and Zhang, L. (2019). Readability of 10‐K Reports and Stock Price Crash Risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2), 1184–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12452 Laeven, L., and Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003 Land, J., and Lang, M. H. (2002). Empirical Evidence on the Evolution of International Earnings. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.115 Lang, M., and Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491273 Mullineux, A. (2006). The corporate governance of banks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 14(4), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980610711144 Morgan, D. P. (2002). Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344506 O’Hara, M., and Shaw, W. (1990). Deposit Insurance and Wealth Effects: The Value of Being “Too Big to Fail.” The Journal of Finance (New York), 45(5), 1587–1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03729.x Qabrati, I., and Vardari, L. (2019). Risk Management in Banking Sector: Empirical Data from Commercial Banks in Kosovo. Prizren Social Science Journal, 3(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v3i1.71 Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of banking & finance, 33(7), 1340-1350. Saunders, A., Strock, E., and Travlos, N. G. (1990). Ownership Structure, Deregulation, and Bank Risk Taking. The Journal of Finance (New York), 45(2), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03709.x Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2008. Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards by US issuers. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington DC. https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2008/33 8982.pdf (accessed 7 January 2019). Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in Banking: Is Noninterest Income the Answer? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(5), 853–882. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2004.0076 Stiroh, K. J., and Rumble, A. (2006). The dark side of diversification: The case of US financial holding companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(8), 2131–2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.030 Saunders, A., and Song, K. (2018). Bank monitoring and CEO risk-taking incentives. Journal of Banking and Finance, 88, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.003 Yip, R. W. Y., and Young, D. (2012). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767–1789. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50192 Zhang, J. (2008). The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of accounting and economics, 45(1), 27-54. 金融監督管理委員會銀行局 (2024)。中華民國金融統計指標 (民國112年12月)。取自金融監督管理委員會。 金融監督管理委員會 (2024)。金融監督管理委員會112年年報。取自金融監督管理委員會。 庞淑霞, and 李霁友. (2024). 会计信息可比性与企业创新效率关系的实证研究. Frontiers of International Accounting, 13, 819. 馬泰成. (2005). 產業結構與利潤: 臺灣銀行市場的實證研究. 公平交易季刊, 13: 3 民 94.07, 61-92. 陳曉蓉, 郭照榮, 沈中華, 國立中山大學. 財務管理學系研究所, and 國立中山大學. 財務管理學系研究所. (2004). 發展中的台灣銀行業 : 結構的變遷與競爭挑戰 陳威甫(Wei-Fu Chen), 李靜芠(Jin-Wen Lee), and 黃心怡(Hsin-Yi Huang). (2019). 銀行業務多角化之經營績效探討-台灣實證. 商管科技季刊, 20(1), 1–24. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-01-18 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-01-18 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.118.31.157 現在時間是 2025-04-05 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2028-01-18 Your IP address is 18.118.31.157 The current date is 2025-04-05 This thesis will be available to you on 2028-01-18. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2028-01-18 |
QR Code |