Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0025124-151351 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0025124-151351
論文名稱
Title
公務員與主管適配能保障升遷?升遷機會對主動行為的影響
The Effect of Subordinate-Supervisor Fit of Promotion Opportunities and Proactivity Behavior for Civil Servants
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
84
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-01-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-01-25
關鍵字
Keywords
社會交換理論、個人主管適配、升遷機會、主動行為、領導部屬社會交換
Social Exchange Theory, Person-Supervisor Fit, Promotion Opportunity, Proactive behavior, Leader-Member Social Exchange
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 169 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 169 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
公務員升遷制度受法律保障,並享有終身聘雇,看似擁有穩定升遷的機會。 然而,公務員升遷機會卻沒有想像中的容易,與主管之間的關係影響升遷機會的 可能。因此,本研究採用社會交換理論作為研究框架,試圖探討「個人主管適配」、 「升遷機會」與「主動行為」之間的影響關係,接著再探討「升遷機會」對「個 人主管適配」和「主動行為」之間存在中介效果;「領導部屬社會交換」對「個 人主管適配」和「升遷機會」之調節效果。
本研究是以線上問卷發放之方式,對象為台灣正職之公務人員,問卷採三階 段發放,每階段間隔兩週施測,共回收 404 份有效問卷。後續以 SPSS 26.0 進行 階層迴歸分析 (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002) 進行假設結果檢定,研究結果發現, 升遷機會完全中介個人主管適配與主動行為之間的關係,且個人主管適配與升遷 機會呈現正相關,升遷機會與主動行為間亦有正向影響關係。最後在調節效果中, 領導部屬社會交換關係對個人主管適配與升遷機會之調節效果正向關係假設並 未獲得數據支持。本研究根據研究結果,提出實務之管理意涵與未來之研究方向 供後續研究者參考。
Abstract
In Taiwan, the promotion system for civil servants is protected by law, and they benefit from being a civil servant. One of the benefits is lifetime commitment. They seem to have stable promotion opportunities. However, the promotion opportunities for civil servant are not easy as imagined. Because the relationship with supervisor affects the possibility of promotion opportunities. This study uses social exchange theory as a framework to explore the relationship between “Person Supervisor Fit”,” Promotion Opportunities”, and “Proactive Behavior”, Furthermore, it investigates the mediator effects between “Person Supervisor Fit” and “Proactive Behavior”, and the moderating effects of “Leader-Member Social Exchange”, “Person Supervisor Fit”, and ”Promotion Opportunities”.
This research employed an online questionnaire distributed to employed civil servant from public apartment in Taiwan. The survey was conducted in three waves, each separated by a two-week interval, resulting in a total of 404 valid responses. The data is analyzed with the SPSS 26.0 hierarchical regression analysis (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002) to test the research hypotheses. The research results find that promotion opportunities completely mediate the relationship between personal supervisor fit and proactivity behavior, and the person supervisor fit is positively related to promotion opportunities. Also, there is a positive relating between promotion opportunities and proactivity behavior. Finally, the hypotheses of leader member social exchange moderate the relationship between person supervisor fit and promotion opportunities was not supported by the data. Based on the research results, this study proposes practical management implications and future research directions for reference by subsequent researchers.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ................................................................................................................... ⅰ
中文摘要 ....................................................................................................................... ⅱ
英文摘要 .................................................................................................................... ⅲ
第一章 緒論 ................................................................................................................. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 .................................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的 ................................................................................................................................ 7
第二章 文獻探討 ......................................................................................................... 9
第一節 社會交換理論與心理契約 .................................................................................................... 9
第二節 個人與主管適配 .................................................................................................................. 11
第三節 升遷機會 .............................................................................................................................. 13
第四節 個人主管適配與升遷機會之關係 ...................................................................................... 16
第五節 主動行為 .............................................................................................................................. 17
第六節 個人主管適配與主動行為之關係 ...................................................................................... 19
第七節 升遷機會與主動行為之關係 .............................................................................................. 20
第八節 領導部屬社會交換 .............................................................................................................. 21
第九節 領導部屬社會交換調節個人主管適配與升遷機會 .......................................................... 23
第三章 研究方法 ....................................................................................................... 24
第一節 研究架構 .............................................................................................................................. 24
第二節 研究對象與程序 .................................................................................................................. 25
第三節 研究變項與工具 .................................................................................................................. 26
第四節 資料分析方法 ...................................................................................................................... 28
第四章 研究結果 ....................................................................................................... 31
第一節 樣本結構統計及相關分析 .................................................................................................. 31
第二節 中介效果檢定分析 .............................................................................................................. 41
第三節 調節效果檢定階層迴歸分析 .............................................................................................. 49
第五章 討論與建議 ................................................................................................... 52
第一節 研究結果與討論 .................................................................................................................. 52
第二節 管理意涵 .............................................................................................................................. 55
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 .......................................................................................................... 57
參考文獻 ..................................................................................................................... 58
附錄.............................................................................................................................. 70

圖目錄
圖3-1 研究架構 .......................................................................................................... 24
圖4-1 領導部屬社會交換對個人主管適配與主動行為之交乘作用圖(N=404)
...................................................................................................................................... 51

表目錄
表4-1 樣本特性(N=404) ...................................................................................... 32
表4-2 個人與主管適配量表 ..................................................................................... 33
表4-3 領導部署社會交換量表 ................................................................................. 34
表4-4 升遷機會量表 ................................................................................................. 35
表4-5 主動行為量表 ................................................................................................. 36
表4-6 各變項之驗證性因素分析整體配適度指標比較表(N=404) .................. 38
表 4-7 平均數、標準差、皮爾森相關係數(N=404) .......................................... 40
表 4-8 個人主管適配與升遷機會之階層迴歸分析 (N=404) ............................ 42
表 4-9 個人主管適配與主動行為之階層迴歸分析(N=404) .............................. 44
表 4-10 升遷機會與主動行為之階層迴歸分析(N=404) .................................... 46
表 4-11 升遷機會對個人主管適配與主動行為之中介效果階層迴歸分 ............... 48
表 4-12 領導部屬社會交換對個人主管適配與主動行為之調節效果分析(N=404)...................................................................................................................................... 50
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
呂育誠(2005)。公務人員績效評量結果融入陞遷制度之研究 (上)。公務人員月刊,114,10-17。
呂育誠(2006)。公務人員績效評量結果融入陞遷制度之研究 (下) 。公務人員月刊,115,15-19。
呂佳螢(2013)。組織權力、組織透明度與組織正義和政府績效之影響性研究。文官制度季刊,5(2),93-120。
邱育琤、徐永明(2004)。「新政府」,「舊官僚」?中央政黨輪替與行政菁英流動。公共行政學報,12,1-40。
吳宗憲(2012)。臺南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究—以個人/組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報,43,91-126。
張鎧如(2019)。回顧公共服務行為動機理論─淺談強化公務人員從事公共服務行為之策略。T&D 飛訊,250,1-24。
張潤書、施能傑、蔡秀涓、蕭鈺(1996)。公務人員陞遷制度之研究。銓敘部專案委託研究計畫報告。
張潤翯 丶施能傑 、蔡秀涓 、爾鈺(1996)。公務人員陞遷制度之研究。銓敘部專案委託研究計畫報告。
張容榕(2019)。心理契約、組織承諾與工作滿意度之關連性研究-以某私立科技大學為例。樹德科技大學學報,21(2),49-74。
蔡良文(2010)。人事行政學:論現行考銓制度。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
蔡秀涓(1996)。我國政府部門升遷現象之研究:從組織政治觀點(未出版博碩士論文)。台北政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
黃煥榮(1995)。組織中之潛在權力和權力運用結構面與行為面之探討。法政學報,3,47-64。
黃煥榮(2000)。組織中玻璃天花板效應之研究:行政院部會機關女性陞遷之實證(未出版博碩士論文)。台北國立政治大學公共行政學系博士學位論文。
黃煥榮(2007)。公務人員升遷之衡量模式:兼論性別差異之比較分析。考銓季刊,50,216-237。
黃煥榮(2007)。組織權力與網絡關係對公務人員升遷之影-性別之比較分析。人事月刊,45,2-16。
黃煥榮(2007)。突破玻璃天花板─女性行政菁英事業生涯發展的問題與展望。國家菁英季刊,3(4),85-108。
劉力仁(2019)。銓敘部統計 107 年公務員離職率低於 1%。取自自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2999859。2020/09/04。
曾執轡(2020)。去考公務員?人力流動率超乎想像,戳破公職「鐵飯碗」神 話。取自鳴人堂。https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/121013/5000415。
徐葳倫、羅士朋(2021)。每年走 1500 人 鐵飯碗留不住年輕人!學者:分 發制度出問題。取自 yahoo 新聞。
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%AF%8F%E5%B9%B4%E8%B5%B01500%E 4%BA%BA- %E9%90%B5%E9%A3%AF%E7%A2%97%E7%95%99%E4%B8%8D%E4% BD%8F%E5%B9%B4%E8%BC%95%E4%BA%BA- %E5%AD%B8%E8%80%85- %E5%88%86%E7%99%BC%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E5%87%BA%E5 %95%8F%E9%A1%8C-145353490.html。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影 響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
林鉦棽、彭台光 (2012) 。組織研究的中介檢測:緣起、爭議、研究設計和分析。 管理學報,29(4),333-354
彭錦鵬(2010)。二十一世紀文官制度改革的重點。人事月刊,50(3),24-36。 葉穎蓉(2004)。由心理契約檢視員工工作身份對工作態度與行為的影響-以公部門的約聘人員為例。人力資源管理學報,4(4),105-129。

二、英文文獻
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Allen, G. (1997). Antecedents and outcomes of promotion system. Human Resource Management, 36(2), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199722)36:2<251::AID- HRM6>3.0.CO;2-W
Allen, T. D. (2006). Rewarding good citizens: The relationship between citizenship behavior, gender, and organization rewards. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 120-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00006.x
Andela, M., & van Der Doef, M. (2019). A comprehensive assessment of the person– environment fit dimensions and their relationships with work-related outcomes. Journal of Career Development, 46(5), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318789512
Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). A career lexicon for the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(4), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.3145317
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 23-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393590
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
Bartol, K. M., and Martin, D. C. (1988). Influences on managerial pay allocations: A dependency perspective. Personnel Psychology, 41(2), 361-378.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02390.x
Bartol, K. M., and Martin, D. C. (1990). When politics pays: Factors influencing managerial compensation decisions. Personnel Psychology, 43(3), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02398.x
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior : A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior,14(2), 103118.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro-self, prosaically, and pro- organizational foci of proactive behavior: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X439208
Bernardin, H. J. (1979). The predictability of discrepancy measures of role constructs. Personnel Psychology, 32, 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb00474.x
Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Leader-Member Social Exchange (LMSX): Development and Validation of a Scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 979-1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.443
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301 Blau, P.M. (1964). Power and Exchange in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.),
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159509.003.0019
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self- representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(1), 83-93.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
Bright, L. (2008). Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees?. The American Review of Public Administration. 38(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008317248
Caldwell, D.F., and C.A. O’Reilly. (1990). Measuring Person-job Fit with a Profile- comparison Process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 648–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.648
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration. Journal of Applied Psychology,89(5), 822–834.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822
Chatman, J.A. (1989). Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-organization Fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–49. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279063
Chatman, J.A. (1991). Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1989.4980837
Chan, A. K. W., Ngai, G. S. K., & Choi, P. K. (2016). Contextualising the career pathways of women principals in Hong Kong: A critical examination. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.884919
Chi, N. W., and Pan, S. Y. (2012). A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance: the mediating roles of perceived person-job fit, and person-organization fit.J. Bus. Psychol, 27(1), 43–56.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9211-z
Chung, P.P., Leung, K. (2001). Effects of performance information and physical attractiveness on managerial decisions about promotion. Journal of Social Psychology, 128(6), 791-801.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9924557
Chuang, A., Shen, C.-T., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Development of a multidimensional instrument of person–environment fit: The perceived person–environment fit scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology, 65(1), 66-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12036
Chu, C. I., Hsu, H. M., Price, J. L., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). Job satisfaction of hospital nurses: an empirical test of a causal model in Taiwan. International Nursing Review, 50(3), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.2003.00165.x
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2005). Organization development and change Cincinnati. OH: South–Western College Publishing.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture,part II.Case study: A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology and Sociology, 10(1-3), 51-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(89)90013-7
Cohen, Y. & Pfeffer, J. (1986). Organizational hiring standards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1),1-24.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2392763
Coyle-Shapiro, J. and Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the U. K. public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug018
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. and Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Czerw, A., & Czarnota-Bojarska, J. (2016). Dopasowanie człowiek-środowisko i postawa wobec pracy jako motywatory zachowań organizacyjnych [Person– environment fit and attitude to work as motivators of organizational behavior]. Psychologia Społeczna, 1(36), 8-19. http://doi.org/10.7366/1896180020163601
Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
De Gregorio, M. B., & Fisher, C. D. (1988). Providing performance feedback: Reactions to alternative methods. Journal of Management, 14(4), 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400410
De Souza, Gita. (2002). A Study of the Influence of Promotions on Promotion Satisfaction and Expectations of Future Promotions among Managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1034
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 11(3), 618-634.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
Dries, N., Pepermans, R., Hofmans, J., & Rypens, L. (2009). Development and validation of an objective intra-organizational career success measure for managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.564
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Lawrence KA. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716-736. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069412
Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/256956
Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent development and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership, 65-114. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 37–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/256630
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139–161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behavior and career outcomes: Differences for men and women?. Journalof Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability, and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6),827- 844.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
Gilliand, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4),694-734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258595
Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University.
Graen, G. B. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In Dunnette, M. D., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader- member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of Organizational Justice. Psychology Press. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance:
Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 5(2), 327- 347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Hassan, S., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2015). Leadership and performance of public employees: Effects of the quality and characteristics of manager-employee relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1127- 1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu002
Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hattab, S., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Daswati, D. and Niswaty, R. (2022), The effect of toxic leadership on turnover intention and counterproductive work behaviour in Indonesia public organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0142
Hays, S.W., and R.C. Kearney. 1997. Riding the Crest of a Wave: The National Performance Review and Public Management Reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699708525187
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace. Hull. R. P. &Umansky. P. H. Mowday, Porter and Steers (1982). Employee- Organization Linkage: The Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Tumover. New York: Academic Press.
Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29(1), 115-156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.000555
Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 12-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.92.5.1286
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.
Kim, S. (2012). Does Person‐Organization Fit Matter in the Public ‐Sector? Testing the Mediating Effect of Person‐Organization Fit in the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Work Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830-840.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02572.x
Kim, T. Y., & Kim, M. (2013). Leaders’ moral competence and employee outcomes: The effects of psychological empowerment and person–supervisor fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1238-1
Kim, S.W., Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W., & Watson, T. W. (1996). The determinants of career intent among physicians at a U.S. Air Force hospital. Human Relations, 49(7), 947–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900704
Kok, R., & Meyer, L. (2018). Towards an optimal person-environment fit: A baseline study of studentteachers' personality traits. South African Journal of Education, 38(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje。 v38n3a1409
Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta‐analysis OF person–job, person– organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Kwon, J. O., & Kang, J. M. (2019). The Effect of Person-Environment Fit (Person- Job Fit, Person- Organization Fit, Person-Supervisor Fit) and Job Embeddedness on Turnover Intention in Clinical Nurses. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.3.307
Lam, S. S., & Schaubroeck, J. (2000). The role of locus of control in reactions to being promoted and to being passed over: A quasi experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556386
LePine, J., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853
Li, C. S., Kristof‐Brown, A. L., & Nielsen, J. D. (2019). Fitting in a group: Theoretical development and validation of the Multidimensional Perceived Person–Group Fit scale. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 139-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12295 Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal. 53(5), 1090-1109.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management journal, 23(3), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.2307/255511
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Luu, T. (2018). Discretionary HR practices and proactive work behaviour: The mediation role of affective commitment and the moderation roles of PSM and abusive supervision. Public Management Review, 20(6), 789-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1335342
Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and devel-opment in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
Marstand, A. F., Martin, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2017). Complementary person- supervisor fit: An investigation of supplies-values (SV) fit, leader-member exchange (LMX) and work outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 28(3), 418-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.008
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivations and personality. New York: HarperCollins. Messersmith, J. G., Guthrie, J. P., Ji, Y. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2011). Executive turnover: The influence of dispersion and other pay system characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021654
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of management Review, 22(1), 226-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180265
Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
Mo, S., & Shi, J. (2017). Linking ethical leadership to employees' organizational citizenship behavior:Testing the multilevel mediation role of organizational concern. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2734-x
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person–environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1
Newman, M. A. (1993). Career advancement: Does gender make a difference? The American Review of Public Administration, 23(4), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409302300404
O’Reilly, C.A., J. Chatman and D.F. Caldwell. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-organization Fit. Academy of Management Journal,
34(3), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/256404
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing. Parker, S. K., Williams, H., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Pergamit, M. R., & Veum, J. R. (1999). What is a Promotion?. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(4), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525065
Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. D C Heath.
Price, J. L. (2001). Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover. International Journal of manpower,22(7), 600-624.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006233
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine.
Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757
Seong, J. Y., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Park, W. W., Hong, D. S., & Shin, Y. (2015). Person–group fit: Diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1184-1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312453738
Smith, M. A. (2002). Subordinate–supervisor “fit” using the Big Five personality constructs. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Toronto, Canada.
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522-552. https://doi.org/10.2307/259332
Thompson JA. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of management, 29(4), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00023-0
Van Eerde, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 575–586.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.575
Van Dyne, L. Graham, J. W., & R. M. Dienesch, (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802. https://doi.org/10.2307/256600
Van Vianen, A. E. M., Shen C. T., & Chung A. (2011). Person–organization and person–supervisor fit: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 906 926. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.726
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Wan, H., Sulaiman, M., Omar, A. (2012). Procedural justice in promotion decision of managerial staff in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380903424167
Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487– 499.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487
Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46(12), 1431-1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304601204
Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., Kraimer, M.L., & Graf, I.K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation, and supervisor in predicting career success. Journal of Organization Behavior, 20(5), 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199909)20:5<577::AID- JOB958>3.0.CO;2-0
Wayne, S. J., R. C. Liden, I. K. Graf and G. R. Ferris (1997). The Role of Upward Influence Tactics in Human Resource Decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01491.x
Webster, J. R., & Beehr, T. A. (2013). Antecedents and outcomes of employee perceptions of intra‐organizational mobility channels. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 919-941.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1823
Zalesny, M.D., & Graen, G.B. (1987). Exchange theory in leadership research. In A. Kieser, G.Reber, & R. Wanderer (Eds.), Handbook of leadership (714-727). Stuttgart, Germany: C.E. Paeschel, Verlag.
Zulkifli, N., & Ali, K. (2017). Accentuating The Positive Organizational Behaviour and Work Engagement Concepts Towards Job Performance Quality of Public Sector Staff in WilayahPersekutuan Putrajaya. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 5(2), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2017.529
Zhang, Z., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader–follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0865
Zhu, W., Chew, I. K. H., & Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO Transformational Leadership and Organizational Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Human-Capital-Enhancing Human Resource Management. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.06.001
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-01-25
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-01-25

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.222.166.127
現在時間是 2024-11-21
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2029-01-25

Your IP address is 18.222.166.127
The current date is 2024-11-21
This thesis will be available to you on 2029-01-25.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2029-01-25

QR Code