論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
潛在消費者對純電動車使用意圖之探討 An Exploration of Potential Consumers Behavioral Intention to Adopt Battery Electric Vehicles |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
72 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2025-07-17 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2026-01-31 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
純電動車、科技接受模型、綠色消費、永續態度、使用意圖 Battery Electric Vehicle, Technology Acceptance Model, Green Consumption, Sustainable Attitude, Behavioral Intention |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 165 次,被下載 6 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 165 times, has been downloaded 6 times. |
中文摘要 |
近年來,隨著全球環保意識的提升,消費者也對綠色產品的關注逐漸增加, 這樣的現象促使了電動車市場的快速成長。 而許多國家更為了減少碳排放,已經 推出了相關的措施及補貼政策,以促進綠色交通工具的普及。例如,政府對購買 純電動車提供的購車補助、減稅優惠、免費或優惠的充電設施,以及對車主的免 稅或減免政策,均大幅降低了電動車的購買成本,提升了消費者的購買意圖。 雖然在 2021 年至 2024 年間,電動車銷售量大幅成長,並吸引許多國內車主 從傳統燃油車轉向電動車,然而根據交通部 112 年《自用小客車使用狀況調查 報告》顯示,消費者不願購置純電動車的主要考量依序為:充電設施不健全、單 次充電後續航力不足以及價格過高。這顯示在兼顧環保節能、實用性與價格的綜 合考量下,油電混合車反而成為多數消費者較青睞的選擇。 本研究旨在探討潛在消費者對純電動車的使用意圖。基於科技接受模型 (TAM),本研究結合感知有用性、感知易用性與永續態度,建構純電動車採用 意願之研究架構,並透過網路問卷蒐集台灣地區 477 份有效樣本,採用獨立樣 本 t 檢定及多元迴歸分析驗證研究假設。 研究結果顯示,感知有用性、感知易用性與永續態度皆對使用者態度及使用 意圖具有顯著正向影響 ,而使用者態度進一步顯著影響使用意圖。研究結論指出, 若能同時提升消費者對純電動車的有用性與易用性感受,並強化其永續態度, 將 能有效促進其採用意願。 |
Abstract |
In recent years, with the rise of global environmental awareness, consumers have increasingly paid attention to green products, driving the rapid growth of the electric vehicle (EV) market. To reduce carbon emissions and promote the adoption of green transportation, many governments have implemented measures and incentive programs, such as purchase subsidies, tax reductions, free or discounted charging facilities, and exemptions from certain vehicle taxes. These policies have significantly lowered the cost of purchasing EVs and enhanced consumers’ purchase intentions. Although EV sales grew substantially from 2021 to 2024, attracting many domestic car owners to switch from traditional fuel vehicles, the 2023 Ministry of Transportation and Communications Survey on the Use of Private Passenger Cars revealed that the main reasons for not purchasing pure EVs are: insufficient charging infrastructure, limited driving range per charge, and high purchase prices. This indicates that, when considering environmental benefits, practicality, and cost, hybrid vehicles remain the preferred choice for many consumers. This study aims to explore potential consumers intention to adopt pure EVs. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this research incorporates perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and sustainability attitude to construct a research framework for EV adoption intention. Using an online survey, 477 valid responses were collected in Taiwan, and the hypotheses were tested using independent-sample t-tests and multiple regression analysis. The results show that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and sustainability attitude all have significant positive effects on user attitude and usage intention, while user attitude further has a significant positive impact on usage intention. The findings suggest that enhancing consumers perception of the usefulness and ease of use of pure EVs, along with strengthening their sustainability attitude, can effectively promote adoption intention. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖次 vii 表次 viii 1.緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的與問題 3 1.3本論文架構 4 2.文獻探討 5 2.1電動車款基本介紹 6 2.2純電車市場概況 7 2.3環保意識對於消費者的影響 12 2.4科技接受模型 14 2.5 應用科技接受模型TAM於電動車的文獻回顧 19 3.研究方法 21 3.1研究設計 21 3.2研究假設 23 3.3問卷設計 25 3.4研究變數之衡量問項 27 3.5資料蒐集與分析 32 4.資料分析結果 33 4.1樣本結構分析 33 4.2敘述性統計分析 36 4.3信效度分析 40 4.4相關分析 45 4.5迴歸分析與假說驗證 46 4.6 差異性分析 48 5.結論與建議 49 5.1研究結論 49 5.2研究貢獻 52 5.3研究限制與未來方向 53 參考文獻 54 附錄 研究問卷 59 |
參考文獻 References |
中文文獻 E. Hazel(2020)。網路問卷的優缺點?什麼是網路抽樣?問卷設計的原則。Medium。https://medium.com/hazelbases/ce42244248bd 何汶(2024)。EV、BEV、PHEV 代表什麼?純電車、油電混合車有何不同?電動車名詞一次看懂。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/72853/ev-bev-hev-phev-erev-fcev 吳旻蓁(2023)。特斯拉與比亞迪的頂尖對決。工商時報。https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20230601700587-431003 吳金榮(2025)。全球電動車銷售排行榜!中國 2 關鍵壓倒性勝利,特斯拉 2025 沒力了。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/82705/top-20-bestselling-ev-2024 姚惠茹(2022)。電動車市場大爆發!得電池者得天下,台廠受惠 6 大「電池概念股」一次看。經理人。https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/66194 宣明智、傅瑋瓊(2022)。電動車產業大未來。天下文化。 宣明智、傅瑋瓊(2022)。電動車比一比!認識三大類型電動車,優缺點一圖看懂。今周刊。 https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180696/post/202209140025 黃少華(2001)。網路調查的價值與局限。網路社會學通訊期刊。https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/18/18-03.htm 張建鈞(2025)。特斯拉 3 大市場銷量大跌!一次看電動車龍頭卡關因素,這是全面敗退開端。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/82831/tesla-jeopardy-competition-china-ev 陳映璇(2024)。納智捷 n7 拿下電動車單月銷售冠軍,強壓特斯拉!n7 懶人包:規格、價格、評價一次看。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/78409/luxgen-n7-schedule 陳英傑(2025)。電動車免徵牌照稅再延 5 年!立委協商修法 2030 年才開徵。自由時報。https://auto.ltn.com.tw/news/27491/ 郭采樺(2024)。什麼是插電式油電車 PHEV?曾經的大冷門,為何銷量激增 59%?一文拆解美國車市現況。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/80283/phev-ev-hev-whos-better-2024 郭采樺(2025)。全球汽車業大洗牌,裁員、換隊友、價格流血戰汽車巨頭遭遇哪些難題。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/81770/2024-electric-car-honda-nissan 郭采樺(2025)。納智捷 n7 憑什麼贏?AI 導入銷售、客服、電池管理 3 大領域,完成「任務」還能得積分。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/80810/luxgen-n7-model-c-2024 鄭冠淳(2024)。淨零先鋒:臺灣電動車市場的崛起與未來。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13739 鄭冠淳(2025)。臺灣 2024 年電動車市場現況及發展趨勢。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13790 閻大維(2021)。淺談電動車驅動馬達技術發展概況。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13616 編輯部(2025)。實驗測試有誤差?史丹佛大學與 SLAC 合作研究指出電動車電池壽命可能較預期高出 40% 之多。小七車觀點。https://www.7car.tw/articles/read/108969 網易科技(2023)。電動車依然太貴,60% 的人下不了手!電動車 v.s 燃油車,誰才更省錢。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/74971/ev-car-svmr-money-than-fuel 鉅亨研報(2023)。能源車 40% 成本來自電池?新能源車 3 種類型、5 大系統,成本結構一次看。Yahoo 股市。https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/055125962.html 莊文嘉(2025)。2024 年全球電動車主要市場概況。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13796 Jack H.(2024)。純電車、油電車、氫能車市場匹變!純電車的黃金時代將沒落?油電車迎來復興。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/80720/bev-car-net-zero 英文文獻 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall. Autovista24. (2024). Is the global EV market slowing down? Autovista24. https://autovista24.autovistagroup.com/news/is-the-global-ev-market-slowing-down/ Bireswar Dutta, & Hsin-Ginn Hwang. (2021). Consumers purchase intentions of green electric vehicles: The influence of consumers technological and environmental considerations. Sustainability, 13(21), 12025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112025 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dube, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556 Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519 Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2015). Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014 Jiang, S. (2016). Purchase intention for electric vehicles in China from a customer-value perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(4), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.641 Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., & Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062 Kavita Sharma, Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2022). Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2078–2092. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3237 Keusch, F. (2015). Why do people participate in web surveys? Applying survey participation theory to internet survey data collection. Management Review Quarterly, 65(3), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-014-0111-y Kihm, A., & Trommer, S. (2014). The new car market for electric vehicles and the potential for fuel substitution. Energy Policy, 73, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.021 Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00269.x Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4 Müller, J. M. (2019). Comparing technology acceptance for autonomous vehicles, battery electric vehicles and car sharing—A study across Europe, China and North America. Sustainability, 11(16), 4333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164333 Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006 Roberts, J. A. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behavior: A cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(4), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1995.11501709 Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004 Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144 Team Counterpoint. (2023). Global electric vehicle market share. Counterpoint. https://www.counterpointresearch.com/insights/global-electric-vehicle-market-share/ Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 Zhang, X., & Dong, F. (2020). Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |