Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0105123-165446 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0105123-165446
論文名稱
Title
是人還不是人?不同病毒擬人化手法對恐懼感與行為意圖之影響:以調節焦點作為干擾變數
“To be a Human or not to be a human?” The Effect of Using Different Types of Anthropomorphic Virus on Sense of Fear and Behavior Intention: The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Focus
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
114
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-01-16
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-02-05
關鍵字
Keywords
病毒擬人化、恐懼感、行為意圖、調節焦點、解釋水平理論
Virus Anthropomorphism, Sense of Fear, Behavioral intentions, Regulatory focus, Construal Level Theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 59 次,被下載 11
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 59 times, has been downloaded 11 times.
中文摘要
隨著Covid-19病毒自2019年12月30日中國湖北省武漢市華南海鮮批發市場爆發,全世界在短時間內迅速地產生了翻天覆地的變化,且Covid-19透過口沫傳染迅速的傳播至世界各國,並導致了許多國家經濟大亂、恐慌,生活步調瞬間起了變化。確診案例節節攀升,死亡人數也逐漸升溫,世界各國雖不斷努力宣導病毒之傳染性、產生之症狀反應以及該如何預防等公衛訊息,但宣傳效果卻阻止不了人心的惶恐與懼怕。而台灣也躲不過Covid-19冠狀病毒的襲擊,於2020年1月21日出現首例確診,引起了全台灣人民的恐慌。

而在學術研究領域中關於病毒擬人化研究僅針對外觀擬人化做探討,因此本研究欲以病毒外觀擬人化與人類外觀擬人化探討不同類型的擬人化會如何對恐懼感以及行為意圖產生影響,亦此同時,本研究也將調節焦點納入,以進行深入探討是否會影響病毒擬人化之恐懼感程度。

本研究採用實驗法進行,實驗一設計採用病毒擬人化 (病毒外觀擬人化vs人類外觀擬人化) x2 (調節焦點:促進型焦點vs預防型焦點) 之二因子實驗設計,有效樣本數為171份;實驗二採用病毒擬人化 (病毒外觀擬人化vs人類外觀擬人化) 之單因子實驗設計,有效樣本為191份,上述兩種實驗不同之處為調節焦點之測量方式不同,實驗一之干擾變數調節焦點為情境式設計,而實驗二則透過量表方式來檢測受測者之長期調節焦點類型。

本研究透過這兩個實驗以了解病毒擬人化對於恐懼感以及行為意圖之間的影響以及調節焦點對病毒擬人化之影響。研究結果發現人類外觀擬人化較容易引起高度恐懼感且對於行為意圖會有較顯著之影響。其次,自我調節焦點為促進型焦點之框架下,人類外擬人化亦會引起較高程度之恐懼感,與本研究預期病毒外觀擬人化會引起較高程度之恐懼感相反。以上結果期許可以用於未來公衛宣導以及學術研究上能有進一步之探討上有所幫助。
Abstract
The Covid-19 outbreak started at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan City, China, on December 30, 2019. The world has undergone earth-shaking changes ever since. Due to the pandemic and the global lockdowns implemented by governments, many companies are on the brink of bankruptcy. However, the health propaganda and guidelines cannot cease the fear of the virus, the number of confirmed cases is still rising, and the number of deaths is increasing. Taiwan is no exception. The first confirmed case was discovered on January 21, 2020.

The previous research on Virus Anthropomorphism shows there needs to be more focus on the types of anthropomorphic appearance of viruses. Therefore, this study aims to explore different anthropomorphic appearances of viruses to discuss whether they affect the sense of fear and behavioral intentions. It also examines if the regulatory focus will affect the feeling of fear.

In this study, two experiments were conducted under the regulatory focus theory. Experiment 1, with 171 valid samples, used a two-factor experimental design to compare the appearance with human traits and the appearance with virus traits pair-wisely with promotional focus and preventive focus. Experiment 2, with 191 valid samples, used a single-factor experimental design with the scale evaluation to verify its impacts.

The two experiments show that the impact of anthropomorphism with human traits on the public in terms of a sense of fear and behavior intention is more significant than what was expected. Though the result of this study is opposite to the original expectation, it might also contribute to the advocacy for public health in the future.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書i
誌謝ii
中文摘要iii
英文摘要iv
目錄v
圖次vii
表次viii
第壹章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景1
第二節 研究動機5
第三節 研究問題6
第貳章 文獻回顧8
第一節 擬人化(Anthropomorphism)8
一、擬人化定義8
二、擬人化的手法9
三、病毒擬人化9
四、過去擬人化之研究10
第二節 恐懼感(Sense of Fear)11
第三節 調節焦點理論(Regulatory Focus Theory)12
一、調節焦點理論12
二、解釋水平理論12
三、調節焦點與解釋水平適配性13
第四節 行為意圖(Behavior Intention)14
第參章 研究假說16
第肆章 研究方法20
第一節 實驗一21
第二節 實驗二25
第伍章 研究結果29
第陸章 結論與建議45
第一節 主要研究發現與討論45
第二節 理論貢獻47
第三節 實務貢獻48
第四節 研究限制與未來方向49
參考文獻51
附錄一 正式問卷55

參考文獻 References
Addo, P. C., Jiaming, F., Kulbo, N. B., & Liangqiang, L. (2020). COVID-19: fear appeal favoring purchase behavior towards personal protective equipment. The Service Industries Journal, 40(7-8), 471-490.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of consumer research, 34(4), 468-479.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of consumer research, 39(2), 307-323.
Ahn, H.-K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological science, 25(1), 224-229.
Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-9.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure sciences, 13(3), 185-204.
Avis, M. (2011). Anthropomorphism and animism theory in branding. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.
Balachandran, A. K., Alagarsamy, S., & Mehrolia, S. (2020). Suicide among children during Covid-19 pandemic: An alarming social issue. Asian journal of psychiatry, 54, 102420.
Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639-650.
Cyranoski, D. (2020). Profile of a killer: the complex biology powering the coronavirus pandemic. Nature, 581(7806), 22-27.
De Boer, J., Wouter Botzen, W., & Terpstra, T. (2015). More than fear induction: Toward an understanding of people's motivation to be well‐prepared for emergencies in flood‐prone areas. Risk analysis, 35(3), 518-535.
Dolinski, D., Gromski, W., & Zawisza, E. (1987). Unrealistic pessimism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 127(5), 511-516.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion, 98(45-60), 16.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review, 114(4), 864.
Fan, J.-G., Kim, S.-U., & Wong, V. W.-S. (2017). New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia. Journal of hepatology, 67(4), 862-873.
Gómez, M. I., Barrett, C. B., Raney, T., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Meerman, J., Croppenstedt, A., Carisma, B., & Thompson, B. (2013). Post-green revolution food systems and the triple burden of malnutrition. Food Policy, 42, 129-138.
Hart, P. M., Jones, S. R., & Royne, M. B. (2013). The human lens: How anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 105-121.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. (2 ed.). The Guilford Press.
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American journal of psychology, 57(2), 243-259.
Hendriks, M. C., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2006). Social messages of crying faces: Their influence on anticipated person perception, emotions and behavioural responses. Cognition and Emotion, 20(6), 878-886.
Hendrix, K. S., & Hirt, E. R. (2009). Stressed out over possible failure: The role of regulatory fit on claimed self-handicapping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 51-59.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American psychologist, 52(12), 1280.
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of consumer research, 14(3), 404-420.
Huang, W.-H. (2021). Get Rid of Mr. Virus: The Effect of Injurant Anthropomorphism on the Intention to Engage in Protective Behavior. Health Communication, 1-10.
Hunnius, S., de Wit, T. C., Vrins, S., & von Hofsten, C. (2011). Facing threat: Infants' and adults' visual scanning of faces with neutral, happy, sad, angry, and fearful emotional expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 25(2), 193-205.
Kaplan, S., Wan, W., & Achenbach, J. (2020). The Coronavirus isn’t alive. That’s why it’s so hard to kill. Washington Post, 23.
Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2012). The role of regulatory focus and self-view in “green” advertising message framing. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 25-39.
Keller, P., Lee, A. Y., & Sternthal, B. (2004). Construing fit to judgment: The effects of regulatory focus and level of construal. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.
Kemper, T. D. (1978). Toward a sociology of emotions: Some problems and some solutions. The American Sociologist, 30-41.
Kim, J., Yang, K., Min, J., & White, B. (2022). Hope, fear, and consumer behavioral change amid COVID‐19: Application of protection motivation theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(2), 558-574.
Laksmidewi, D., Susianto, H., & Afiff, A. Z. (2017). ANTHROPOMORPHISM IN ADVERTISING: THE EFFECT OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION ON CONSUMER PURCHASE INTENTION. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(1).
Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism management, 27(4), 589-599.
Lanier Jr, C. D., Rader, C. S., & Fowler III, A. R. (2013). Anthropomorphism, marketing relationships, and consumption worth in the Toy Story trilogy1. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 26-47.
Latimer, A. E., Rivers, S. E., Rench, T. A., Katulak, N. A., Hicks, A., Hodorowski, J. K., Higgins, E. T., & Salovey, P. (2008). A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 826-832.
Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A. D., & Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive–phenomenological analysis. In Theories of emotion (pp. 189-217). Elsevier.
Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of consumer research, 36(5), 735-747.
Liu, H. H. (2011). Impact of regulatory focus on ambiguity aversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 412-430.
May, F., & Monga, A. (2014). When time has a will of its own, the powerless don't have the will to wait: Anthropomorphism of time can decrease patience. Journal of consumer research, 40(5), 924-942.
Mehrolia, S., Alagarsamy, S., & Solaikutty, V. M. (2021). Customers response to online food delivery services during COVID‐19 outbreak using binary logistic regression. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 396-408.
Morewedge, C. K., & Clear, M. E. (2008). Anthropomorphic God concepts engender moral judgment. Social Cognition, 26(2), 182-189.
Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(1), 1.
Newton, F. J., Newton, J. D., & Wong, J. (2017). This is your stomach speaking: Anthropomorphized health messages reduce portion size preferences among the powerless. Journal of Business Research, 75, 229-239.
Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5(3), 161-200.
Shao, X., Jeong, E., & Jang, S. (2021). Effectiveness of anthropomorphism in ugly food promotion: Do gender and age matter? Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 24(5), 596-611.
Shin, H., & Kang, J. (2020). Reducing perceived health risk to attract hotel customers in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Focused on technology innovation for social distancing and cleanliness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102664.
Taylor, R. K. (2000). Marketing strategies: Gaining a competitive advantage through the use of emotion. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.
Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. (2020). COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates. Depression and anxiety, 37(8), 706-714.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological review, 117(2), 440.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Ulaby, N. (2020). Little demons, death and biting dogs: how we picture disease. NPR News.
van Esch, P., Arli, D., Gheshlaghi, M. H., Andonopoulos, V., von der Heidt, T., & Northey, G. (2019). Anthropomorphism and augmented reality in the retail environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 35-42.
Vickers, N. J. (2017). Animal communication: when i’m calling you, will you answer too? Current biology, 27(14), R713-R715.
Wan, J., Kulow, K., & Cowan, K. (2022). It’s Alive! Increasing protective action against the coronavirus through anthropomorphism and construal. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(1), 81-88.
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219-232.
Wessner, D. R. (2010). The origins of viruses. Nature Education, 3(9), 37.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological science, 17(7), 592-598.
Winterich, K. P., & Haws, K. L. (2011). Helpful hopefulness: The effect of future positive emotions on consumption. Journal of consumer research, 38(3), 505-524.
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.
Yahaghi, R., Ahmadizade, S., Fotuhi, R., Taherkhani, E., Ranjbaran, M., Buchali, Z., Jafari, R., Zamani, N., Shahbazkhania, A., & Simiari, H. (2021). Fear of COVID-19 and perceived COVID-19 infectability supplement theory of planned behavior to explain Iranians’ intention to get COVID-19 vaccinated. Vaccines, 9(7), 684.
Yang, K., Kim, J., Min, J., & Hernandez-Calderon, A. (2021). Effects of retailers’ service quality and legitimacy on behavioral intention: the role of emotions during COVID-19. The Service Industries Journal, 41(1-2), 84-106.
Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2009). Regulatory focus and message framing: A test of three accounts. Motivation and Emotion, 33(4), 435-443.
Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336-1341.
Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers' responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486-496.
Zhao, Y., & Bacao, F. (2020). What factors determining customer continuingly using food delivery apps during 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic period? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102683.
Zhou, X., Kim, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of consumer research, 45(5), 953-972
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code