論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
社群媒體上業者的負面評論回應策略對旁觀者品牌態度之影響—以品牌個性作為干擾變數 The impact of online complaint response on observers' brand attitudes: moderation by brand personality |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
61 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-06-21 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-02-06 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
服務補救、業者回應、公平理論、品牌態度、品牌個性 service recovery, brand personality, brand attitude, complaint response, justice theory |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 160 次,被下載 1 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 160 times, has been downloaded 1 times. |
中文摘要 |
現代人的消費習慣是在購買產品或服務以前先去網路上查品牌的評價。其他顧客過去的消費經驗對消費者而言是一項重要的消費參考依據,因此企業需要小心處理公開平台上的負面評價、謹慎選擇回應策略。除了要讓留下負面評價的當事人感到滿意之外,網路上的旁觀者們(Observer)也可能是品牌是未來的消費者,他們的感受也很重要。企業要選擇適當的策略,盡量讓消費者們對品牌留下更好的印象。 此篇論文主要在探討負面評價回應策略對旁觀者的品牌態度的影響。本研究採取2X3的實驗設計,探討刺激型和稱職型兩種不同品牌個性的業者,在面對負面評價時分別採取三種不同的企業回應策略,會不會對旁觀者的品牌態度產生不同的效果。觀察品牌個性各別會對哪些策略產生正面或負面的干擾效果。 研究結果發現:刺激型的經驗品品牌在面對負面評價時做出的回應策略相較於稱職型的品牌會對品牌態度有更正面的影響。其中,刺激型品牌和程序公平的交互作用會增強旁觀者的品牌態度。網路上的回應策略是面向社會大眾的,企業的一舉一動都會成為旁觀者的參考指標。旁觀者對企業產生越高的品牌態度,越有機會從事消費行為,因此企業除了關心當事人的感受,也應該同時考慮回應策略對旁觀者的效果。 |
Abstract |
Consumers often rely on online reviews before making purchasing decisions. It is crucial for businesses to carefully manage negative reviews and select their complaint response strategies on public platforms since the experiences shared by other customers serve as important reference for thousands of online observers. These observers’ brand attitudes are easily influenced by the information they receive. Apart from satisfying the individuals who leave negative feedback, businesses also need to consider potential customers who act as observers on the internet. In the previous service recovery research, the satisfaction of complainants with the company's response depends on the perceived distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice of these response. In other words, the higher the perceived levels of justice score during the complaint process, the higher the satisfaction with the complaint handling. Compared to the previous research, this paper will focus on the observers’ brand attitudes rather than complainants’ brand attitudes. Also, the research will examine the moderating effect of brand personality to check the impact of brand personality on the relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice and observers’ brand attitudes. A 2 (brand personality) x 3 (complaint response) experimental design was adopted to explore the effects of excitement or competence brand personality with three different complaint responses. The research result shows that excitement brand has a more positive impact on observers’ brand attitudes than competence brand. Moreover, the interaction between excitement brand and procedural justice further enhances observers’ brand attitudes. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目錄 論文審定書 i 論文公開授權書 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論1 第二章 文獻探討4 第一節 業者回應策略4 第二節 旁觀者的品牌態度12 第三節 品牌個性的調節作用14 第四節、經驗品品牌個性的調節作用17 第三章 研究方法21 第一節、研究方法與對象21 第二節、問卷內容設計22 第三節、實驗流程設計25 第四節、前測31 第四章 研究結果32 第一節、敘述統計32 第二節、因素分析33 第三節、信度分析36 第四節、迴歸分析—調節效果檢驗38 第五章 結論與建議41 第一節、研究結果41 第二節、研究貢獻和管理意涵41 第三節、研究限制43 第四節、未來研究建議43 參考文獻44 附錄 47 圖次 圖2-1 TAX, BROWN & CHANDRASHEKARAN 的服務補救流程圖6 圖2-2 研究架構圖20 圖3-1: APRIL HOTEL 官方網站概念圖23 圖3-2: 君子酒店官方網站概念圖24 圖3-3 實驗流程圖30 表次 表 2-1 公平理論三因子文獻內容整理10 表2-2 JENNIFER AAKER品牌個性量表15 表3-1 實驗分組25 表 3-2 TAX, BROWN & CHANDRASHEKARAN公平理論名目型定義26 表 3-3 操作型定義:公平程度量表27 表 3-4 品牌態度名目型定義整理28 表 3-5 操作型定義:品牌態度量表29 表4-1 樣本次數分配表32 表4-2 公平程度量表的KMO與BARTLETT檢定33 表4-3 公平程度量表旋轉係數矩陣(調整後)34 表4-4 品牌態度量表的KMO與BARTLETT檢定34 表4-5 品牌態度量表旋轉係數矩陣35 表4-6公平程度量表可靠性統計量36 表4-7 公平程度量表各題項之CRONBACH’S ALPHA36 表4-8 公平程度量表可靠性統計量37 表4-9 品牌態度量表各題項之CRONBACH’S ALPHA37 表4-10分配公平、程序公平、互動公平、品牌個性對品牌態度之交互作用分析39 表4-11分配公平、程序公平、互動公平、品牌個性之迴歸係數40 |
參考文獻 References |
1. 邵丹,楊俊 & 徐中和.(2004). 服務失誤與服務補救對客戶滿意度的影響分析. 科技進步與對策, 21(6), 132-134. 2. 王英櫻(2001)。服務補救之顧客滿意度--以公平理論來探討。﹝碩士論文。中國文化大學﹞ 3. 薛仲崴(2019)。網路社群旁觀者下的負面評論回應策略 - 負面評論動機作為調節作用。﹝碩士論文。正修科技大學﹞ 4. 黃識銘, & 方世榮. (2008). 服務補救策略的研究-關係行銷的觀點. 管理與系統, 15(1), 1-31. 5. 高潔瑩, 王又鵬, & 李潤楠. (2020). 品牌形象, 知覺價值以及品牌態度對購買意圖影響效果之探討. 環球科技人文學刊,(26), 21-42. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 34(3), 347-356. Adams, J. S. (2005). Equity theory. Organizational behavior I: Essential theories of motivation and leadership, 134-159. Austin, W. G. (1979). Justice, freedom and self-interest in intergroup relations. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 67, 20-37. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. Research in organizational behavior. Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing science, 17(1), 45-65. Bowlby, J. (1979). The bowlby-ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 637-638. Cho, Y., Im, I., Hiltz, R., & Fjermestad, J. (2002, January). An analysis of online customer complaints: implications for web complaint management. In Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2308-2317). IEEE. Clemmer, E. C., & Schneider, B. (1996). Fair service. Advances in services marketing and management, 109-126. Deighton, J., & Kornfeld, L. (2009). Interactivity's unanticipated consequences for marketers and marketing. Journal of Interactive marketing, 23(1), 4-10. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319. Einwiller, S. A., & Steilen, S. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites–An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public relations review, 41(2), 195-204. Fournier, S. M. (1994). A consumer-brand relationship framework for strategic brand management. University of Florida. Freling, T. H., & Forbes, L. P. (2005). An empirical analysis of the brand personality effect. Journal of product & brand management, 14(7), 404-413. Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992). Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business research, 25(2), 149-163. Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs being fair-managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in organizational behavior, 12, 111-157. Grönroos, C. (1988). Service quality: the six criteria of good perceived service quality. Review of business, 9(3), 10-13. Hart, C. W., Heskett, J. L., & Sasser Jr, W. E. (1990). The profitable art of service recovery. Harvard business review, 68(4), 148-156. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard university press. Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of consumer research, 17(2), 141-148. Jiménez, F. R., & Mendoza, N. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 226-235. Jutla, D., Craig, J., & Bodorik, P. (2001, January). Enabling and measuring electronic customer relationship management readiness. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 10-pp). IEEE. Kartajaya, H., Kotler, P., & Setiawan, I. (2016). Marketing 4.0: moving from Traditional to Digital. John Wiley & Sons. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22. Kudeshia, C., & Kumar, A. (2017). Social eWOM: does it affect the brand attitude and purchase intention of brands?. Management Research Review, 40(3), 310-330. Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. ACR North American Advances. Menon, G., Jewell, R. D., & Unnava, H. R. (1999). When a company does not respond to negative publicity: cognitive elaboration vs. negative affect perspective. ACR North American Advances. Miller, J. L., Craighead, C. W., & Karwan, K. R. (2000). Service recovery: a framework and empirical investigation. Journal of operations Management, 18(4), 387-400. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of political economy, 78(2), 311-329. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer New York. Rosenberg, M. J. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. Attitude organization and change, 1-14. Roy, P., Khandeparkar, K., & Motiani, M. (2016). A lovable personality: The effect of brand personality on brand love. Journal of brand Management, 23, 97-113. Siebert, A., Gopaldas, A., Lindridge, A., & Simões, C. (2020). Customer experience journeys: Loyalty loops versus involvement spirals. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 45-66. Sherell, D. L., & Reidenbach, E. R. (1986). A consumer responses framework for negative publicity: Suggestions for responses strategies. Akron Business and Economic Review, 17(2), 37-44. Spreng, R. A., Harrell, G. D., & Mackoy, R. D. (1995). Service recovery: impact on satisfaction and intentions. Journal of Services marketing. Sung, Y., & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology & marketing, 27(7), 639-661. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 62(2), 60-76. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of personality and social psychology, 25(2), 151. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |