論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-02-07
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-02-07
論文名稱 Title |
以指數選擇權市場觀察投資人的賭博偏好 Investors’ Gambling Preference in the Index Options Market |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
53 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2022-06-17 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-02-07 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
指數選擇權、賭博偏好、樂透效果、投資人行為、偏態 index options, gambling preferences, lottery effect, investors behavior, skewness |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 162 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 162 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
過去文獻中,較少針對指數選擇權討論投資人的賭博偏好。本研究使用2002年到2021年的台灣加權股價指數選擇權買權資料,研究樂透屬性對指數選擇權報酬的影響。Kumar (2009)將樂透性質股票定義為具有高獨特性風險和獨特性偏態的低價股票。本文參考Bali et al. (2011)、Hung and Yang (2018)、Barberis and Huang (2008)等文獻,使用MAX及報酬偏態等變數當作賭博偏好的代理變數,實證結果顯示,無論價外、價平、價內選擇權,賭博偏好與台指選擇權報酬皆呈現顯著負相關。除此之外,週到期選擇權因存續期間短,更符合Kumar (2009)定義之樂透屬性。 台灣的金融市場為散戶為主的淺碟市場,本文檢驗了不同身份別投資人的交易行為,結果顯示散戶投資人、國內機構投資人交易台指選擇權較有樂透偏好,國外機構投資人則是相對理性。最後,本文將樂透變數作為買賣訊號,建立了有效且優於大盤之交易策略。 |
Abstract |
Investors' gambling preferences have rarely been less discussed with index options in recent studies. We use Taiwan-weighted stock price index option call data from 2002 to 2021 to examine the relationship between lottery-like attributes and index option returns. Kumar (2009) defined lottery-like stocks as low-priced stocks with high uniqueness risk and uniqueness skew. We use variables such as MAX and return skewness as proxy variables for gambling preference in Bali et al. (2011), Hung and Yang (2018) and Barberis and Huang (2008). There is a significant negative correlation between gambling preference and Taiwan index option return regardless of the moneyness of options. In addition, due to the short duration of the expiry options, it is more in line with the lottery attributes defined by Kumar (2009). Taiwan is a thin financial market dominated by retail investors. This study examines the trading behavior with different types of investors. The results show that retail investors and domestic institutional investors are more likely to trade lottery-like options. Foreign institutional investors are relatively rational. Finally, we use lottery variables as trading signals to establish an effective and outperformed trading strategy. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘 要 iii Abstract iv 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧與研究假說 3 第一節 賭博偏好 3 第二節 散戶的交易行為 6 第三節 研究假說 8 第三章 研究方法 9 第一節 資料來源 9 第二節 樂透偏好之衡量 10 第三節 考慮Delta避險的選擇權報酬 13 第四節 穩健性測試 14 第五節 不同投資人的樂透偏好 16 第六節 交易策略 17 第四章 實證結果 18 第一節 敘述統計 18 第二節 迴歸模型 19 第三節 穩健性測試 20 第四節 不同投資人的樂透偏好 20 第五節 交易策略 21 第五章 結論 23 第一節 結論 23 第二節 研究限制及建議 24 參考文獻 42 |
參考文獻 References |
中文部分 蘇育賢. (2012). 賭博與避險:選擇權交易動機之研究. 國立政治大學財務管理學系. 英文部分 Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5, 31-56. Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., and Zhang, X. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299. Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., and Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of financial economics, 99(2), 427-446. Bakshi, G., and Kapadia, N. (2003). Delta-hedged gains and the negative market volatility risk premium. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(2), 527-566. Barberis, N., and Huang, M. (2008). Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066-2100. Barber, Y.T. Lee, Y.J. Liu, T. Odean (2009). Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading? The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 22, Issue 2, 609–632 Blau, B. M., Bowles, T. B., and Whitby, R. J. (2016). Gambling preferences, options markets, and volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(2), 515-540. Blau, B. M. (2017). Skewness preferences, asset prices and investor sentiment. Applied Economics, 49, 812-822 Blau, B. M., Hsu, J., & Whitby, R. J. (2019). Skewness preferences and gambling cultures. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 58, 101206. Bo, X. C., Han, J., Liao, Y., Shi, J., and Yan, W. (2021). Do outliers matter? The predictive ability of average skewness on market returns using robust skewness measures. Accounting and Finance, 61(3), 3977-4006. Byun, S. J., and Kim, D. H. (2016). Gambling preference and individual equity option returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(1), 155-174. Cao, J., and Han, B. (2013). Cross section of option returns and idiosyncratic stock volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 231-249. Chan and Andy C.W.Chui (2016). Gambling in the Hong Kong stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 44, 204-218. Chen, Y., Kumar, A., & Zhang, C. (2021). Searching for gambles: gambling sentiment and stock market outcomes. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(6), 2010-2038. Cheng, I. H. (2019). The VIX premium. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(1), 180-227. Conrad, J., Dittmar, R. F., and Ghysels, E. (2013). Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 68(1), 85-124. Conrad, J., Kapadia, N., and Xing, Y. (2014). Death and jackpot: Why do individual investors hold overpriced stocks?. Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3), 455-475. Coval, J. D., and Shumway, T. (2001). Expected option returns. The journal of Finance, 56(3), 983-1009. Fong, W. M., and Toh, B. (2014). Investor sentiment and the MAX effect. Journal of Banking and Finance, 46, 190-201. Frino, A., Lepone, G., & Wright, D. (2019). Are paper winners gamblers? Evidence from Australian retail investors. Accounting & Finance, 59, 593-614. Gong, P., Wen, Z., Xiong, X., & Gong, C. M. (2021). When do investors gamble in the stock market?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101712. Green, T. C., and Hwang, B. H. (2012). Initial public offerings as lotteries: Skewness preference and first-day returns. Management Science, 58(2), 432-444. Groeneveld, R. A., and Meeden, G. (1984). Measuring skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 33(4), 391-399. Han, B., and Kumar, A. (2013). Speculative retail trading and asset prices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(2), 377-404. Harvey, C. R., and Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. The Journal of finance, 55(3), 1263-1295. Hu, C., Lin, J. C., & Liu, Y. J. (2022). What are the benefits of attracting gambling investors? Evidence from stock splits in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102199. Hung, W., and Yang, J. J. (2018). The MAX effect: Lottery stocks with price limits and limits to arbitrage. Journal of financial markets, 41, 77-91. Ji, Q., Quan, X., Yin, H., & Yuan, Q. (2021). Gambling preferences and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 128, 106158. Jondeau, E., Zhang, Q., and Zhu, X. (2019). Average skewness matters. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1), 29-47. Jones, C. M., Shi, D., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2021). Understanding Retail Investors: Evidence from China. SSRN working paper. Kumar, A. (2009). Who gambles in the stock market?. The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889-1933. Kumar, A., Page, J. K., and Spalt, O. G. (2011). Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. Journal of financial economics, 102(3), 671-708. Kumar, A., Page, J. K., & Spalt, O. G. (2016). Gambling and comovement. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(1), 85-111. Li, Y., Zhao, C., & Zhong, Z. K. (2021). Trading behavior of retail investors in derivatives markets: Evidence from Mini options. Journal of Banking & Finance, 133, 106250. Mitton, T., and Vorkink, K. (2007). Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(4), 1255-1288. Park, Y. H. (2015). Volatility-of-volatility and tail risk hedging returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 26, 38-63. Shen, H., Cheng, X., Han, L., & Chan, K. C. (2020). Are institutional investors subject to gambling preference? Evidence from detailed investor bids of IPO auctions in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1-17. Tsai, C. F., Chang, J. H., & Tsai, F. T. (2021). Lottery preferences and retail short selling. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101611. Tsai, S. C. (2013). Investors' information advantage and order choices in an order-driven market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 21(1), 932-951. Odean, Terrance (1999). Do investors trade too much?. American Economic Review 89, 1279-1298. Yao, S., Wang, C., Cui, X., & Fang, Z. (2019). Idiosyncratic skewness, gambling preference, and cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 53, 464-483. Zhang, T., Song, M., Li, K., & Liu, Z. (2021). Lottery preference and stock market return: Chinese evidence using daily and provincial data. Applied Economics Letters, 28(18), 1582-1588. Zhu, H. B., Zhang, B., & Yang, L. H. (2021). The gambling preference and stock price: Evidence from China's stock market. Emerging Markets Review, 49, 100803. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-02-07 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-02-07 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.147.73.85 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-02-07 Your IP address is 3.147.73.85 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2026-02-07. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2026-02-07 |
QR Code |