論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
探討在SNS送禮背景下,影響收禮者滿意度與使用SNS平台送禮意圖的前因 Exploring the Antecedents Influencing Gift Recipient's Satisfaction and Intention to Use SNS Gifting Platforms |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
114 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-06-24 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-02-08 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
感知價值、社會交換理論、收禮者視角、送禮、社群網路服務、送禮體驗模型、滿意度 perceived value, Social Exchange Theory (SET), recipient's perspective, gift-giving, Social Networking Services (SNS), gift-giving experience model, satisfaction |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 73 次,被下載 6 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 73 times, has been downloaded 6 times. |
中文摘要 |
社群網路服務(SNS)日益普及,其推出的送禮服務平台帶來新的場景影響,也使得收送禮者的考量和感受與傳統送禮體驗有所不同。然而,現有SNS的研究有限,且研究主要集中於送禮者的動機,未充分考慮收禮者對SNS禮物價值的看法。為了協助平台業者設計、開發更貼合禮物交換雙方需求的服務環境,使SNS禮物平台在龐大卻競爭激烈的送禮商機推出合適的差異化策略,本研究旨在探討影響收禮者滿意度與使用SNS平台送禮意圖的前因,為業者優化SNS送禮平台提供具體建議。 本研究開發一個探究收禮者滿意度與使用SNS送禮意圖前因的模型,該模型建基於社會交換理論並參考Larsen & Watson(2001)的送禮體驗模型,從收禮者的角度考察SNS禮物平台的特徵及其帶來的價值感受。研究整理了收禮者對禮物本身的感受與收禮過程體驗所感知的價值構面,並將其分類,「SNS禮物兌換和轉送限制」、「SNS禮物的非個人性」視為交換的負面結果,即為交換的「成本」;而「SNS收禮的便利性」、「SNS禮物的社會效用」、「SNS禮物的愉悅」、「SNS禮物的適當性」視為交換的正面結果,即交換的「收益」。 接著通過實證資料檢驗了這些前因對收禮者整體感知價值的影響,進一步探討感知價值是否影響收禮者的滿意度與使用SNS平台送禮的意圖,採量化問卷方式研究,共回收387份有效問卷。結果顯示,感知價值會正向影響收禮者滿意度與使用意圖,收禮者滿意度會正向影響使用意圖;且預期收益(即便利性、愉悅、社會效用、禮物的適當性)會透過感知價值的評估間接影響收禮者的滿意度與送禮意圖。本研究加深對於收禮者對SNS禮物平台價值的理解,也為SNS平台業者優化設計和營銷策略提供了具體建議。 |
Abstract |
The advent of Social Networking Services (SNS) has introduced new dynamics to gift exchange, yet research primarily focuses on the motivations of gift-givers, neglecting recipients' perspectives. This study addresses this gap by investigating the antecedents influencing recipients' satisfaction and their intention to use SNS gift platforms. Drawing from Social Exchange Theory and Larsen & Watson's gift-giving experience model, the research categorizes recipients' perceptions into positive ("benefits") and negative ("costs") outcomes. Based on a quantitative survey of 387 valid responses, the study finds that perceived value positively impacts recipients' satisfaction and usage intention. Recipients' satisfaction also positively influences their intention to use SNS gift-giving platforms. Furthermore, expected benefits (convenience, pleasure, social utility, appropriateness of SNS gifts) indirectly affect recipients' satisfaction and intention to use these platforms through the evaluation of perceived value. This study deepens our understanding of recipients' perceptions of SNS gift platforms' value and provides specific recommendations for optimizing design and marketing strategies. By addressing the needs of both gift-givers and recipients, SNS platform operators can enhance user experience and differentiate their services in a competitive market. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 禮物與傳統送禮 6 第二節 社群網路服務與SNS送禮平台 13 第三節 社會交換理論 22 第四節 感知價值、滿意度與使用意圖 24 第五節 收禮者在SNS平台的感知價值 28 第三章 研究架構與研究方法 36 第一節 研究架構與假說 36 第二節 變數操作性定義與衡量方式 38 第三節 資料蒐集與分析工具 45 第四章 資料分析與研究結果 46 第一節 樣本結構分析 46 第二節 量測模型分析 54 第三節 敘述性統計分析 59 第四節 結構模型分析與假說驗證結果 66 第五章 研究結論與建議 71 第一節 研究討論與結論 71 第二節 研究貢獻與建議 75 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 80 參考文獻 82 附錄 92 附錄一:本研究問卷 92 附錄二:收禮者對LINE GIFT的改善建議 99 |
參考文獻 References |
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of marketing, 58(3), 53-66. Areni, C. S., Kiecker, P., & Palan, K. M. (1998). Is it better to give than to receive? Exploring gender differences in the meaning of memorable gifts. Psychology & Marketing, 15(1), 81-109. Babin, B. J., Gonzalez, C., & Watts, C. (2007). Does Santa have a great job? Gift shopping value and satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 24(10), 895-917. Bagozzi, R. P. (1974). Marketing as an Organized Behavioral System of Exchange: A comprehensive and analytic structure for interpreting behavior in marketing relationships. Journal of marketing, 38(4), 77-81. Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of marketing, 39(4), 32-39. Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. Journal of marketing Research, 20(1), 21-28. Belk, R. W. (1976). It's the thought that counts: A signed digraph analysis of gift-giving. Journal of consumer research, 3(3), 155-162. Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving behavior. Research in marketing, 2(1), 95-126. Belk, R. W. (1996). Gift giving: A research anthology. Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 59-83. Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of consumer research, 20(3), 393-417. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 351-370. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley. Bodur, H. O., & Grohmann, B. (2005). Consumer responses to gift receipt in business‐to‐consumer contexts. Psychology & Marketing, 22(5), 441-456. Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. Journal of consumer research, 17(4), 375-384. Bradford, T. W., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (2013). Orchestrating rituals through retailers: An examination of gift registry. Journal of Retailing, 89(2), 158-175. Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American journal of Sociology, 94, S180-S214. Cavanaugh, L. A., Gino, F., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2015). When doing good is bad in gift giving: Mis-predicting appreciation of socially responsible gifts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 178-189. Chakrabarti, R., & Berthon, P. (2012). Gift giving and social emotions: experience as content. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 154-161. Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American journal of Sociology, 94, S180-S214. Chen, C. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2018). What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 293-303. Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in human behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343. Chow, W. S., & Shi, S. (2015). Investigating customers' satisfaction with brand pages in social networking sites. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(2), 48-58. Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. Handbook of social psychology, 61-88. Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of retailing, 76(2), 193-218. Davies, G., Whelan, S., Foley, A., & Walsh, M. (2010). Gifts and gifting. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 413-434. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. Davis, J. (1972). Gifts and the UK Economy. Man, 7(3), 408-429. Dong, X., & Wang, T. (2018). Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: The role of IT affordances. International journal of information management, 42, 49-64. Dubé, L., & Morin, S. (2001). Background music pleasure and store evaluation: intensity effects and psychological mechanisms. Journal of business Research, 54(2), 107-113. Durgee, J. F., & Sego, T. (2001). Gift-Giving as a Metaphor for Understanding New Products that Delight. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1). Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer‐mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. Emerson, R. M. 1976. Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2: 335-362. Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. S. (2009). Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404-409. Fornell, C. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Publications Sage. Pillai, R. G., & Krishnakumar, S. (2019). Elucidating the emotional and relational aspects of gift giving. Journal of Business Research, 101, 194-202. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of consumer research, 33(2), 283-290. Gino, F., & Flynn, F. J. (2011). Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 915-922. Givi, J., & Galak, J. (2022). Gift recipients’ beliefs about occasion‐based and nonoccasion‐based gifts: The importance of signaling care and meeting expectations in gift giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 445-465. Givi, J., Birg, L., Lowrey, T. M., & Galak, J. (2023). An integrative review of gift‐giving research in consumer behavior and marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 529-545. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review, 161-178. Gupta, M., Parvathy, Givi, J., Dey, M., Kent Baker, H., & Das, G. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on gift giving. Psychology & Marketing, 40(4), 629-642. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature. Hao, C., & Hai-tao, C. (2020). Gift giving via social network services: the case of a WeChat mini-program used in China. Data Technologies and Applications, 54(4), 481-502. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. Hollenbeck, C. R., Peters, C., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Gift giving: a community paradigm. Psychology & Marketing, 23(7), 573-595. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American journal of sociology, 63(6), 597-606. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace. Hsiao, K. L., & Chen, C. C. (2018). What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 103-113. Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2015). What drives purchase intention for paid mobile apps?–An expectation confirmation model with perceived value. Electronic commerce research and applications, 14(1), 46-57. Kim, H. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Examining gifting through social network services: A social exchange theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 805-828. Komter, A., & Vollebergh, W. (1997). Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 747-757. Kwon, H., Koleva, B., Schnädelbach, H., & Benford, S. (2017, February). " It's Not Yet A Gift" Understanding Digital Gifting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 2372-2384). Larsen, D., & Watson, J. J. (2001). A guide map to the terrain of gift value. Psychology & Marketing, 18(8), 889-906. Ledden, L., Kalafatis, S. P., & Samouel, P. (2007). The relationship between personal values and perceived value of education. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 965-974. Lee, C. K., Yoon, Y. S., & Lee, S. K. (2007). Investigating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and recommendations: The case of the Korean DMZ. Tourism management, 28(1), 204-214. Lee, S. H., Choi, S. J., & Kim, H. W. (2020). What makes people send gifts via social network services? A mixed methods approach. Internet Research, 30(1), 315-334. Lemmink, J., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (1998). The role of value in the delivery process of hospitality services. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(2), 159-177. Li, G., Li, G., & Kambele, Z. (2012). Luxury fashion brand consumers in China: Perceived value, fashion lifestyle, and willingness to pay. Journal of business research, 65(10), 1516-1522. Likert, R. (1932). A Technique fort he Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of psychology, 22, 5-52. Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in human behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training, 40(1-2), 155. Mamonov, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2017). Exploring factors affecting social e-commerce service adoption: The case of Facebook Gifts. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 590-600. Mayet, C., & Pine, K. J. (2010). The psychology of gift exchange. University of Hertfordshire. McDougall, G. H., & Levesque, T. (2000). Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equation. Journal of services marketing, 14(5), 392-410. Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological theory, 21(1), 1-17. \ Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American journal of sociology, 105(5), 1396-1427. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 17(4), 460-469. Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of retailing. Otnes, C., Lowrey, T. M., & Kim, Y. C. (1993). Gift selection for easy and difficult recipients: a social roles interpretation. Journal of consumer research, 20(2), 229-244. Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 25, 154-161. Park, S. Y. (1998). A comparison of Korean and American gift‐giving behaviors. Psychology & Marketing, 15(6), 577-593. Park, Y., & Yi, Y. (2022). Is a gift on sale “heart-discounted”? Givers’ misprediction on the value of discounted gifts and the influence of service robots. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102489. Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of consumer Research, 36(3), 434-447. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of general psychology, 7(1), 84-107. Poe, R. L. (1977). Equilibrium in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 83(5), 1225-1260. Qian, W., Razzaque, M. A., & Keng, K. A. (2007). Chinese cultural values and gift‐giving behavior. Journal of Consumer marketing, 24(4), 214-228. Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European journal of marketing, 30(2), 19-30. Ritzer, G. (1983). The macrosociology of exchange. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 70-79. Robben, H. S., & Verhallen, T. M. (1994). Behavioral costs as determinants of cost perception and preference formation for gifts to receive and gifts to give. Journal of economic Psychology, 15(2), 333-350. Romele, A., & Severo, M. (2016). The economy of the digital gift: From socialism to sociality online. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(5), 43-63. Ruffle, B. J. (1999). Gift giving with emotions. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 39(4), 399-420. Ruth, J. A., Otnes, C. C., & Brunel, F. F. (1999). Gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal relationships. Journal of consumer research, 25(4), 385-402. Sherry Jr, J. F. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 157-168. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170. Shmargad, Y., & Watts, J. K. (2016). When online visibility deters social interaction: The case of digital gifts. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36(1), 1-14. Shurmer, Pamela (1971), "The Gift Game," New Society, 18(482), 1242-1244. Skågeby, J. (2010). Gift-giving as a conceptual framework: framing social behavior in online networks. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 170-177. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220. Taute, H. A., & Sierra, J. J. (2015). An examination of emotional information management in gift giving and receipt. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2), 203-218. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information systems research, 21(4), 675-687. Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2007). User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value. Information & Management, 44(1), 63-73. Wang, T., Mai, X. T., & Thai, T. D. H. (2021). Approach or avoid? The dualistic effects of envy on social media users’ behavioral intention. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102374. Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 164-181. Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Yale, L. J. (1993). Three Motivations for Interpersonal Gift Giving: Experiental, Obligated and Practical Motivations. Advances in consumer research, 20(1). Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 25, 139-153. Wooten, D. B. (2000). Qualitative steps toward an expanded model of anxiety in gift-giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 84-95. Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177. Yahia, I. B., Al-Neama, N., & Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 11-19. Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social psychology quarterly, 235-248. Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & marketing, 21(10), 799-822. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22. Zhang, X., Xiang, Y., & Hao, L. (2019). Virtual gifting on China’s live streaming platforms: hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 340-355. Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New media & society, 17(7), 1007-1024. LINE官網:https://linecorp.com/tw/pr/news/tw/2023/4610 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |