論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
透過《最藍的眼睛》觀看自愛的症狀式表現 Seeing through The Bluest Eye: A Symptomatic Presentation of Self-Love in the Look |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
127 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2015-01-26 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2015-02-13 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
《最藍的眼睛》、沙特哲學、精神分析、施虐與受虐、自愛、觀看、唐尼‧莫里森 Self-Love, Look, Sado-masochism, Toni Morrison, The Bluest Eye, Sartrean Philosophy, Psychoanalysis |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5762 次,被下載 1016 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5762 times, has been downloaded 1016 times. |
中文摘要 |
本論文以尚-保羅‧沙特的存在主義哲學及斯拉沃熱‧紀傑克的精神分析觀點來討論唐尼‧莫里森的小說《最藍的眼睛》中,非裔美國人的「自愛」(self-love)如何幫助他們呈現自身在白人社會中的定位和價值。我認為莫里森以設定主角一家(The Breedloves)為「純黑」來對照「混血」非裔美國描述了人們如何在一個文化價值不同於自身種族背景的社會中展現自我。因此,我以書中人物適應社會遇到的挫折來證明他們內心的「自愛」如何變相地透過「自鄙」(self-debasement)的行為模式去迎合白人社會的價值進而安頓在群體中。以此觀點,我欲表示在此框架下的非裔美國人之所以會產生自我懷疑及自卑感終究是歸於他們本身的「自愛」而非「自恨」(self-hatred)。論述包含四個部分。緒論介紹作者唐尼‧莫里森與理論家尚─保羅‧沙特、斯拉沃熱‧紀傑克的背景、回顧以角色「自恨」作結之文獻,以進一步連結到本論文之理論結構及論點。第一章闡述唐尼‧莫里森的小說《最藍的眼睛》裡的角色如何透過白人的審美觀及「外界眼光」(outside gaze)來看待自己以致產生自我厭惡感(self-loathing)。欲證明各種「自鄙」的行為及情緒皆來自於角色本身的「自愛」而非「自恨」,我將以沙特定義的「厭惡」(repugnance)和「恨」(hatred)來詮釋純黑和混血黑人如何化悲憤為力量、突破社會框架來證明自我。第二章我以沙特定義的虐待者(sadist)及被虐者(masochist)、紀傑克的拉岡式精神分析來歸納純黑非裔家庭(The Breedloves)展露「自愛」的兩種基本方式,以及主角琵可拉(Pecola Breedlove)的「自愛」如何有症狀(symptom)地展現使她超脫自我。結論重申前述兩章概要和本篇論文的分析結果。 |
Abstract |
This thesis attempts to counter a generally acknowledged view in regard to the essence of hatred, observed as a lack of interracial appreciation within the Afro-American assemblage in Toni Morrison’s first published novel, The Bluest Eye. In effort to explain my standpoint, I endeavor to bring lights from existential phenomenology and psychoanalytical philosophy respectively from Jean-Paul Sartre and Slavoj Žižek. To support my argument, I will examine diverse visions of cultural studies and literary reviews, and provide textual evidence of self-love to defy critics’ remarks of self-hatred in the characters. According to Toni Morrison, the aesthetic principle in the white society is the prying eye, a “secret” which causes the Afro-American subjects’ social inferiority and self-loathing. Despite different approaches to analyze this scenario in the black community, critics conclude that the Afro-American characters’ self-debasement is a sign of their hatred toward the self and other blacks along with the internalization of white aesthetics. In this thesis, I argue that the characters’ self-debasement/self-loathing is only a “mode” of nature to adapt to the norms of white society rather than an inherent hatred toward their own blackness as critics imply. I analyze all occurrences critics see as Afro-Americans’ self-hating gestures with theories concerning the look and desire in one’s building of identity based on “self-love.” Thus I consider all characters’ negative emotions (such as shame, anger, and repugnance) toward themselves and others are merely “temporary presentation of the ego” owing to their frustrated self-love; therefore, “self-debasement” should not be considered as hatred of any sort. To support my ideas, I use Jean-Paul Sartre’s notions of “ego’s transcendence,” “hatred’s dubitable nature,” and “two patterns in the being-for-others” to examine characters’ self-love responding the “outside gaze” in terms of the “mode of being”; to continually justify self-love, I apply Slavoj Žižek’s notions of “symptom,” “ideological fantasy,” and “unconscious desire as the Thing” to focus on the protagonist’s self-identification with others based on her “symptomatic” gestures of self-love in the “mode of being.” |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i Acknowledgement ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv Introduction 1 Toni Morrison Jean-Paul Sartre Slavoj Žižek Literature Review Theoretical Framework Thesis Structure Chapter One: Projecting the Outside Gaze: Interpreting Characters’ Racial Self-Loathing in the Look 53 Pecola’s Relief of Frustration with Self-Love Pecola’s Obsession of Objects of Love The Ambivalent Nature of Self-Love Pauline’s Devotion into Hard Work with Self-Love Cholly’s Passion of Funkiness with Self-Love Geraldine’s Self-Built Quality Life with Self-Love Chapter Two: Patterning the Map of Self-Love: Analyzing Symptomatic Gestures in the Being-for-Others 79 Cholly’s Sadist Expression of Self-Love Pauline and Pecola’s Masochist Expression of Self-Love in Liberation Pecola’s Symptomatic Gestures of Self-Love before Liberation Symbolization of Pecola’s Self-Love after Liberation Pecola’s Imaginary Identification in the Thing Conclusion 105 Works Cited 111 |
參考文獻 References |
Breger, Claudia. “The Leader’s Two Bodies: Slavoj Žižek’s Postmodern Political Theology.” Diacritics 31.1 (2001): 72-90. JSTOR. Web. 20 November 2014. Brosman, Catharine Savage. “Seeing through the Other: Modes of Vision in Sartre.” South Central Review 4.4 (1987): 61-73. JSTOR. Web. 23 November 2014. Bloom, Harold. “Summary and Analysis.” Bloom’s Guides: The Bluest Eye. NY: Blooms Lit. Criticism, 2010. 43. Bump, Jerome. “Racism and Appearance in The Bluest Eye: A Template for an Ethical Emotive Criticism.” College Literature 37.2 (2010): 147-70. Project Muse. Web. 19 February 2014. Bjork, Patrick Bryce. “The Bluest Eye: Selfhood and Community.” The Novels of Toni Morrison: The Search for Self and Place within the Community. NY: P. Lang, 1992. 31-54. Cox, Gary. The Sartre Dictionary. London: Continuum, 2008. Cohen, Tom. “Beyond ‘The Gaze’: Žižek, Hitchcock, and the American Sublime.” American Literary History 7.2 (1995): 350-78. JSTOR. Web. 20 November 2014. Cormier-Hamilton, Patrice. “Black Naturalism and Toni Morrison: The Journey away from Self-Love in The Bluest Eye.” MELUS 19.4 (1994): 109-27. JSTOR. Web. 19 February 2014. Catalano, Joseph S. “Background.” A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre’s Being and Nothingness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1985. 1-13. Cooper, Lauren D. “Rousseau on Self-Love: What We’ve Learned, What We Might Have Learned.” The Review of Politics 60.4 (1998): 661-83. JSTOR. Web. 5 February 2015. Davis, Cynthia A. “Self, Society, and Myth in Toni Morrison’s Fiction.” Modern Critical Views: Toni Morrison. Ed. Harold Bloom and S. T. Joshi. NY: Chelsea House, 1990. 7-26. Denard, Carolyn C. “What the Black Women Thinks about Women’s Lib.” Toni Morrison: What Moves at the Margin. Ed. Toni Morrison. Jackson: The University of Mississippi Press, 2008. 18-30. Dean, Tim. “Art as Symptom: Žižek and the Ethics of Psychoanalytic Criticism.” Diacritics 32.2 (2002): 20-41. JSTOR. Web. 19 July 2014. Fisher, Berenice. “Guilt and Shame in the Women’s Movement: The Radical Idea of Action and Its Meaning for Feminist Intellectuals.” Feminist Studies 10.2 (1984): 185-212. JSTOR. Web. 19 July 2014. Force, Pierre. “Self-Love, Identification, and the Origin of Political Economy.” Yale French Studies 92 (1997): 46-64. JSTOR. Web 5 February 2015. Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Trans. James Strachey. Comp. Ivan Smith. Vol. 1-24. London: Hogarth, 1959. Grimsley, Ronald. “An Aspect of Sartre and the Unconscious.” Philosophy 30.112 (1955): 33-44. JSTOR. Web. 26 July 2013. Gutierrez, Ricardo Jose E. “The Phenomenon, Slavoj Žižek: Deadly Jester or Thinker of Our Age?” Rev. of In Defense of Lost Causes, by Slavoj Žižek. Kritike 7.2 (2013): 112-129. Gardner, Sebastian. “The Basic Ontology.” Sartre’s Being and Nothingness: A Reader’s Guide. NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2009. 38-88. Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. “Doing the Impossible: Slavoj Žižek and the End of Knowledge.” Critical Inquiry 29.3 (2003): 453-85. JSTOR. Web. 23 March 2014. Harris, Trudier. Fiction and Folklore: The Novels of Toni Morrison. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press, 1993. Heinze, Denise. “Beauty and Love: The Morrison Aesthetic.” The Dilemma of Double Consciousness in Toni Morrison’s Novels. Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1993. 14-54. Kovács, András Bálint. “Sartre, the Philosophy of Nothingness, and the Modern Melodrama.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64.1 (2006): 135-45. JSTOR. Web. 22 November 2014. Kuenz, Jane. “The Bluest Eye: Notes on History, Community, and Black Female Subjectivity.” African American Review 27.3 (1993): 421-31. JSTOR. Web. 10 July 2014. Klotman, Phyllis R. “Dick-and-Jane and the Shirley Temple Sensibility in The Bluest Eye.” Black American Literature Forum 13.4 (1979): 123-25. JSTOR. Web. 19 February 2014. Khan, Md. Reza Hassan. “The Framework of Racism in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye: A Psychosocial Interpretation.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 5.2 (2014): 25-28. JSTOR. Web. 4 July 2014. Lacan, Jacque. “The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power.” Écrtis : The First Complete Edition in English. Trans. Bruce Fink. NY: W. W. Norton, 2007. 489-542. Loose, Rik. “Toxicomania and the Death Drive in Lacan.” The Death Drive: New Life for a Dead Subject? Ed. Robert Weatherill. London: Rebus, 1999. 60-96. Laycock, Steven W. “Sartre and a Chinese Buddhist Theory of No-Self: The Mirroring of Mind.” Buddhist-Christian Studies 9 (1989): 25-42. JSTOR. Web. 22 November 2014. Mellard, James M. “Lacan and the New Lacanians: Josephine Hart’s Damage, Lacanian Tragedy, and the Ethics of Jouissance.” PMLA 113.3 (1998): 395-407. JSTOR. Web. 22 November 2014. Monteiro, Kenneth P. “The Black Self-Hatred Paradigm Revisited: An Africentric Analysis.” Ethnicity and Psychology: African-, Asian-, Latino-, and Native American Psychologies. Iowa: Kendall, 1995. 45-53. Miner, Madonne M. “Lady No Longer Sings the Blues: Rape, Madness, and Silence in The Bluest Eye.” Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye. Ed. Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea, 1999. 13-26. McKay, Nellie Y. and Toni Morrison. “An Interview with Toni Morrison.” Contemporary Literature 24.4 (1983): 413-29. JSTOR. Web. 25 November 2014. Morris, Phyllis Sutton. “Sartre on The Transcendence of the Ego.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46.2 (1985): 179-98. JSTOR. Web. 23 March 2014. Machado, Roberto Pinheiro. “Nothingness and the Work of Art: A Comparative Approach to Existential Phenomenology and the Ontological Foundation of Aesthetics.” Philosophy East and West 58.2 (2008): 244-66. JSTOR. Web. 22 November 2014. Minsky, Rosalind. “Consuming ‘Goods.’” Psychoanalysis and Culture: Contemporary States of Mind. New Brunswick: The University of Rutgers Press, 1998. 185-211. Morrison, Toni. The Bluest Eye. NY: Plume, 1994. Myers, Tony. Slavoj Žižek. London: Routledge, 2003. Owens, Craig N. “Mirrored Stages: Monologues, Split Subjects, and the Truth of the Absurd.” The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 43.1 (2010): 57-67. JSTOR. Web. 5 February 2015. Peach, Linden. “The Bluest Eye.” Modern Novelist: Toni Morrison. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 1995. 24-38. Rosenberg, Ruth. “Seeds in Hard Ground: Black Girlhood in The Bluest Eye.” Black American Literature Forum 21.4 (1987): 435-45. JSTOR. Web. 10 July 2014. Rushing, Robert. “What We Desire, We Shall Never Have: Calvino, Žižek, and Ovid.” Comparative Literature 58.1 (2006): 44-58. JSTOR. Web. 4 September 2014. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank, eds. Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1995. Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Transcendence of the Ego: An Existential Theory of Consciousness. Trans. Forrest Williams and Robert Kirkpatrick. NY: Noonday, 1972. ---. Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. NY: Washington Square, 1992. Sharpe, Matthew. “The Aesthetics of Ideology, or ‘The Critique of Ideological Judgment in Eagleton and Žižek.” Political Theory 34.1 (2006): 95-120. JSTOR. Web. 25 November 2014. Samuels, Wilfred D., and Clenora Hudson-Weems. “The Damaging Look: The Search for Authentic Existence in The Bluest Eye.” Toni Morrison. Boston: Twayne, 1990. 10-30. Tangney, June Price, et al. “Shame, Guild, and Embarrassment: Will the Real Emotion Please Stand Up?” Psychological Inquiry 16.1 (2005): 44-8. JSTOR. Web. 11 July 2014. Taylor, Paul A. “Big (Br)Other: Psychoanalyzing the Media.” Žižek and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2010. 63-90. Vogt, Erik. “Exception in Žižek’s Thought.” Diacritics 37.2/3 (2007): 61-77. JSTOR. Web. 20 July 2014. Werrlein, Debra T. “Not so Fast, Dick and Jane: Reimagining Childhood and Nation in The Bluest Eye.” MELUS 30.4(2005): 53-72. JSTOR. Web. 19 February 2014. Wiesel, Elie. Interview by Alvin P. Sanoff. “One Must Not Forget,” U.S. News & World Report. 27 October. 1986. Television. Woodward, Kathleen. “Traumatic Shame: Toni Morrison, Televisual Culture, and the Cultural Politics of the Emotions.” Cultural Critique 46 (2000): 210-40. JSTOR. Web. 10 July 2014. Williams, Lisa. “The Bluest Eye.” The Artist as Outsider in the Novels of Toni Morrison and Virginia Woolf. Westport: Greenwood, 2000. 53-78. Willis, Susan. “Eruptions of Funk: Historicizing Toni Morrison.” Black American Literature Forum 16.1(1982): 34-42. JSTOR. Web. 19 February 2014. Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology: The Essential Žižek. NY: Verso, 1989. ---. The Plague of fantasies. London: Verso, 1997. ---. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. 2nd ed. NY: Verso, 2008. ---. Interrogating the Real. “Lacan––At What Point is he Hegelian?” London: Continuum, 2006. 26-36. ---. “Critical Response: A Symptom––of What?” Critical Inquiry 29.3 (2003): 486-503. JSTOR. Web. 17 July 2014. ---. “The Ambiguity of the Masochist Social Link.” Perversion and the Social Relation. Ed. Molly Anne Rothenberg and Dennis Foster. London: Duke University Press, 2003. 112-25. ---. “A Leftist Plea for Eurocentrism.” Critical Inquiry 24.4 (1998): 988-1009. JSTOR. Web. 3 October 2014. ---. “Schelling-for-Hegel: The ‘Vanishing Mediator.’” The Invisible Remainder: On Schelling and Related Matters. London: Verso, 2007. 92-186. ---. “Psychoanalysis and the Post-Political: An Interview with Slavoj Žižek.” New Literary History 32.1 (2001): 1-21. JSTOR. Web. 01 May 2014. ---. “Risking the Impossible.” Conversations with Žižek. Cambridge: Polity, 2004. 1-22. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |