論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
「體」現後人類:當代文化再現中的失能、生物科技及新物質性 Embodying the Posthuman: Disability, Biotechnology, and New Materiality in Contemporary Cultural Representations |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
192 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-01-14 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-02-14 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
後人類、賽博格、生物科技、失能研究、假體、新物質主義、人工智能 Posthumanism, Cyborg, Biotechnology, Disability Studies, Prosthesis, Artificial Intelligence, Affective Embodiment |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5854 次,被下載 1 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5854 times, has been downloaded 1 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究論文透過羅西·布瑞多蒂所提出的超越自我,物種和死亡的三大後人文論述架構,探討當代電影,文學和文化中的後人類體現。本文首先耙梳科技進展如何衍生出新的社會形式和主體論述,並藉由凱瑟琳·鄧恩(Katherine Dunn)的《極客之愛》,安德魯·尼科爾(Andrew Niccol)的《千鈞一髮》和瑪格麗特·阿特伍德(Margaret Atwood)的 《末世男女》等作品,檢視文學如何反映出生物科技產業對於改造人體的無限可能,及相對的社會衝擊。生物科技產業對於未來社會的影響不僅僅反映在人類主體,而在跨物種以及人工智能的發展中也產生了舉足輕重的作用。本文將藉由亞歷克斯·加蘭德(Alex Garland)的《人造意識》原創劇本探討人工智能發展和情感體現之間的關聯。最後,本研究聚焦於科技和人文所產生的跨領域對話,以探索人類與後人類環境及新物質之間的交互作用。 |
Abstract |
My study in “Embodying the Posthuman: Disability, Biotechnology, and New Materiality in Contemporary Cultural Representations” explores Rosi Braidotti’s three distinctive configurations of posthuman embodiment—life beyond the self, species, and death—in modern film, literature, and cultural representations. Katherine Dunn’s Geek Love (1989), Andrew Niccol’s Gattaca (1997), and Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2003) are all literary works that focus on the prosthetic potentials and possible effects of biotechnology in order to explore the human animal’s entanglement with posthuman environments. Moving beyond the trepidation and excitement brought on by recent advances in genetic engineering and bionic prostheses, these works not only expose biotechnology’s roots in twentieth century biopolitical and disability studies, but also anticipate new forms of social subjectivity. While these works represent a diverse range of literary vision, all locate the material body as a prosthetic site of convergence for technology and posthuman becoming. Drawing upon the interdisciplinary efforts of posthumanist scholarship and disability studies in interrogating enhancive technologies as well as discerning the subsequent social impact, my research centers on the prominent themes of biotechnologically altered bodies, the commodification of disabled body matters, and marketing enhancive treatments as an alternative for abject bodies in our contemporary, using various representations of the prostheses as an organizing trope. Taken together, I argue that a technocapitalist approach to bio- and prosthetic technologies furthers the social construct of disability by allowing physical differences to reflect a widening gap in technological power, consumer capacity, as well as individual access to enhancive treatments. The effects of biotechnology are not only reflected on the human species, but also configure heavily in the advance of artificial intelligence, which I will further explore in the discussion of affective embodiment and new materiality in Alex Garland’s Ex Machina (2015). Taking Braidotti’s thoughts on posthuman life after theory as a point of departure, I will conclude by discussing future possibilities in posthuman bodies, interdisciplinary education, and the humanities. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Table of Contents Approval Page ……………………………………………………………i Acknowledgements…………………………………………………… ii Abstract…………………………………………………………… iii Introduction……………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter I Life beyond the Self: Subverting Normalcy and Commodifying the Disabled body in Geek Love……………………………………………………………… 27 Chapter II Marketing the Prosthesis: Supercrip and Superhuman Narratives in Contemporary Cultural Representations…………………………………………………53 Chapter III Perfecting Bodies: Who are the Disabled in Andrew Niccol’s Gattaca? ………………………………………………………………… 81 Chapter IV A Body of Assemblages: Manipulating Species, Life, and Death in Oryx and Crake…………………………………………………………………… 102 Chapter V Artificial Intelligence: Affective Embodiment and the Transmission of Affect in Ex Machina………………………………………………………………… 130 Conclusion: Reimagining Prosthetics: Cyborgs, AI, and the Humanities in Our Posthuman Future………………………………………………………………………152 Works Cited……………………………………………………………… 166 |
參考文獻 References |
Works Cited “A Bionic Man: Hugh Herr Strides Forward on Next-Generation Robotic Legs.” Redshift by Autodesk. Autodesk, 27 Jul. 2017. Web. 16 Nov. 2018. Adams, Rachel. “An American Tail: Freaks, Gender, and the Incorporation of History in Katherine Dunn’s Geek Love.” Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. Ed. Rosemarie Garland Thomson. New York: New York UP, 1996. 277-9. Print. Adelson, Eric. “Best Foot Forward.” Boston Magazine. Boston Magazine. 18 Feb. 2008. Web. 25 Mar. 2018. Agamben, Giorgio. The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003. Print. Aoun, Joseph E. Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018. Print. Alaniz, José. “Supercrip: Disability and the Silver Age Superhero.” International Journal of Comic Art 6.2 (2004): 304-24. Print. Allan, Kathryn. Disability in Science Fiction: Representations of Technology as Cure. New York: Macmillan, 2013. Print. Appleton, Sarah. “Corp(Se)ocracy: Marketing Death in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” LATCH 4 (2011): 63-73. Print. Anders, Abram. “Foucault and ‘the Right to Life’: From Technologies of Normalization to Societies of Control.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33.3 (2013): n.pag. Web. 25 Oct. 2018. Balf, Todd. “The Biomechatronic Man.” Outside. Outside, 6 Sept. 2017. Web. 25 Apr. 2018. Bates, Darren. “10 Ways to Target the Disability Market & Keep a Competitive Edge.” LinkedIn. LinkedIn, 30 Jun. 2016. Web. 5 Mar. 2017. Barfield, Woodrow. “The Process of Evolution, Human Enhancement Technology, and Cyborgs.” Philosophies. MDPI. 22 Feb. 2019. Web. 25 Apr. 2019. Barnes, Colin. Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: A Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst & Co., 1991. Print. ---. Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. Staffordshire: Keele UP, 1992. Print. ---. “Understanding the Social Model of Disability: Past, Present and Future.” Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. Ed. Nick Watson , Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas. New York: Routledge, 2012. 10-28. Print. Berlinguer, Giovanni. Everyday Bioethics: Reflections on Bioethical Choices in Daily Life. Ann Arbor: Baywood. 2003, Print. Berger, Ronald J. “Disability and the Dedicated Wheelchair Athlete: Beyond the Supercrip Critique.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 37.6 (2008): 647-78. Print. Berry, Wendell. Life is a Miracle. New York: Counterpoint, 2001. Print. Bérubé, Michael. “Disability, Democracy, and the New Eugenics.” Genetics, Disability, and Deafness. Ed. John Vickrey Van Cleve. DC: Gallaudet UP, 2004. 202-20. Print. ---. “Disability and Narrative.” PMLA 120. 2 (2005): 568-76. Print. Bianchi, Emanuela. “Aristotle’s Organism, and Ours.” Contemporary Encounters with Ancient Metaphysics. Ed. Abraham Jacob Greenstine and Ryan J. Johnson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2017. 138-57. Print. Boeke, Jef. D. et al. “The Genome Project-Write.” Science. 353. 6295 (2016): 126-7. Print. Bogue, Robert. “Brain‐computer Interfaces: Control by Thought.” Industrial Robot: An International Journal 37.2 (2010): 126-32. Print. Booher, Amanda K. Prosthetic Configurations: Rethinking Relationships of Bodies, Technologies, and (Dis)Abilities. Diss. Clemson U, 2009. Clemson: Tiger Prints, 2009. Print. Bouson, J. Brooks. “‘It’s Game Over Forever’”: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 39.3 (2004): 139-56. Print. Braddock, David and Susan Parish. “An Institutional Study of Disability.” Handbook of Disability Studies. Ed. Gary L. Albrecht, Katherine D. Seelman, and Michael Bury. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001. 11-68. Print. Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Oxford: Polity, 2013. Print. ---. “Affirming the Affirmative: On Nomadic Affectivity.” Rhizomes. Rhizomes, n.d. Web. 8 Aug. 2019. Breazeal, Cynthia. “Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59.1 (2003): 119-55. Print. Brennan, Teresa. The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2004. Print. Brey, Philip A.E. “Human Enhancement and Personal Identity.” New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. Ed. Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger, and Søren Riis. New York: Palgrave, 2008. 169-185. Print. Bruce, Cynthia. “Rev. of Dis/Ability Studies: Theorizing Disableism and Ableism, by Dan Goodley.” Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 5.2 (2016): 178-83. Print. Brydon, Diana. “Atwood’s Global Ethic: The Open Eye, The Blinded Eye.” Margaret Atwood: The Open Eye. Ed. John Moss and Tobi Kozakewich. Ottawa: U of Ottawa P, 2006. Print. Bynum, Caroline Walker. Metamorphosis and Identity. New York: Zone, 2001. Print. Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. Print. Charlton, James I. “Peripheral Everywhere.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 4.2 (2010): 195-200. Print. Chemers, Michael M. “Mutatis Mutandis: An Emergent Disability Aesthetic in ‘X-2: X-Men United.’” Disability Studies Quarterly 24.1 (2004): n.pag. Web. 25 Nov. 2018. Chrisman, Wendy L. “A Reflection on Inspiration: A Recuperative Call for Emotion in Disability Studies.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 5.2 (2011): 173-84. Print Cheu, Johnson. “De-gene-erates, Replicants and Other Aliens: (Re) defining Disability in Futuristic Film.” Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Ed. Mairian Corker and Tom Shakespeare. New York: Continuum, 2002. 198-212. Print. Clare, Eli. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation. 1st ed. Cambridge: South End P, 1999. Print. Clough, Patricia T. “The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies.” Theory, Culture & Society 25.1 (2008): 1-22. Print. Cole, David R. “The Actions of Affect in Deleuze: Others Using Language and the Language that We Make.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43.6 (2009): 549-61. Print. Cong, Le. et al. “Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems.” Science 339 (2013): 819-23. Print. Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-Hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Studies in Canadian Literature 31.1 (2006): 105-25. Print. Cooper, Melinda. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: Washington UP, 2008. Print. Couser, Thomas G. “Disability, Life Narrative, and Representation.” Equity and Excellence in Education 36.1 (2003): 40-49. Print. Covino, Ralph. “Star Wars, Limb Loss, and What It Means to Be Human.” Disability and Science Fiction: Representation of Technology as Cure. Ed. Kathryn Allen. New York: Palgrave, 2013. 103-13. Print. Crilley, Mariah. “Material Disability: Creating New Paths for Disability Studies.” CEA Critic 78.3 (2016): 306-11. Print. Davis, Lennard J. Bending Over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: NYU P, 2002. Print. ---. “Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled Body in the Nineteenth Century.” The Disability Studies Reader 2nd ed. Ed. Lennard Davis. London: Routledge, 2006. 3-16. Print. ---. “Introduction: Normality, Power, and Culture.” The Disability Studies Reader. 4th ed. Ed. Lennard J. Davis. London: Routledge, 2013. 1-14. Print. --- ed. The Disability Studies Reader 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006. Print. --- ed. The Disability Studies Reader 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2013. Print. ---. “The End of Identity Politics and the Beginning of Dismodernism: On Disability as an Unstable Category.” The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Lennard J. Davis. London: Routledge, 2006. 231-42. Print. ---. The End of Normal: Identity in a Biocultural Era. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2014. Print. Derrida, Jacques. “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow).” Critical Inquiry 28.2 (2002): 369-418. JSTOR. Web. 2 Dec. 2018. Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987. Print. del Rio, Elena. Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance: Powers of Affection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2008. Print. Demos, Virginia E. “An Affect Revolution: Silvan Tompkins’ Affect Theory.” Exploring Affect: The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tompkins. Ed. Virginia E. Demos. London: Cambridge UP, 1995. 17-26. Print. Dimarco, Danette. “Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained: Homo Faber and the Makings of a New Beginning in Oryx and Crake.” Papers on Language and Literature 41 (2005): 170-195. Print. Dunn, Katherine. Geek Love. New York: Vintage, 2002. Print. Ellis, Kathryn. “Reinforcing the Stigma: The Representation of Disability in GATTACA.” Australian Screen Education 32 (2003): 111-14. Print. Ellis, Katie and Mike Kent. Disability and New Media. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print. Erevelles, Nirmala. “Disability and the Dialectics of Difference.” Disability & Society 11.4 (1996): 519-38. Print. ---. “In Search of the Disabled Subject.” Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Ed. Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson and James Wilson. Carbondale: SIU Press, 2001. 92-114. Print. Engels, Friedrich. “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.” Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Basic Writings. Ed. Lewis S. Feuer. London: Collins, 1959. Print. Fendler, Lynn, and Irfan Muzaffar. “The History of the Bell Curve: Sorting and the Idea of Normal.” Educational Theory 58.1 (2008): 63-82. Print Ferreira, Maria Aline Salgueiro Seabra. I Am the Other: Literary Negotiations of Human Cloning. London: Praeger, 2005. Print. Finkelstein, Victor. Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund, 1980. Print. ---. “Outside: Inside Out.” Coalition (1996): 30-6. Print. Foley, Alan and Beth A. Ferri. “Technology for People, Not Disabilities: Ensuring Access and Inclusion.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 12.4 (2012): 192-200. Print. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 1995. Print. ---. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 1978. Print. Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Macmillan, 2002. Print. Gaggioli, Andrea et al. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine.” PsychNology Journal 1.2 (2003): 75-86. Print. Galer, Dustin. “Disabled Capitalists: Exploring the Intersections of Disability and Identity Formation in the World of Work.” Disability Studies Quarterly 32.3 (2012): n.pag. Web. 25 Nov. 2018. Garland, Alex. “Screenplay-Ex Machina.” Daily Script. Daily Script. Web. 8 Aug. 2019. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14:3 (2002): 1-32. Print. ---. “The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography.” Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. Ed. Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 56-75. Print. Gilbert, Pamela K. The Citizen’s Body: Desire, Health, and the Socialin Victorian England. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007. Print. Goggin, Gerard, and Christopher Newell. Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. Print. Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep Learning. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. Boston: MIT Press, 2016. Print. Goodley, Daniel. Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge, 2014. Print. ---. and Katherine Runswick-Cole. “Becoming Dishuman: Thinking about the Human through Dis/ability.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37.1 (2016): 1-15. Print. --- and ---. “The Body as Disability and Possibility: Theorising the ‘Leaking, Lacking and Excessive’ Bodies of Disabled Children, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research (2012): 1-19. Print. ---. and Rebecca Lawthom. “Posthuman Disability Studies.” Subjectivity 7 (2014): 342 - 61. Print. Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke UP, 2011. Print. Grosz, Elizabeth. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1994. Print. Grue, Jan. “The Problem of the Supercrip: Representation and Misrepresentation of Disability.” Disability Research Today: International Perspectives (2015): 204-218. Print. Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Oxford: Polity, 2003. Print. Halberstam, Judith M. and Ira Livingston eds. Posthuman Bodies (Unnatural Acts: Theorizing the Performative). Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1995. Print. Haller, Beth A., and Sue Ralph. “Are Disability Images in Advertising Becoming Bold and Daring? An Analysis of Prominent Themes in US and UK Campaigns.” Disability Studies Quarterly, 26. 3(2006): n.pag. Web. 15 Apr. 2019. Hanafin, Patrick. “On Reading Transpositions: A Response to Rosi Braidotti’s Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics.” Subjectivity 3 (2010): 131-36. Print. Haraway, Donna J. Modest−Witness@ Second−Millennium. FemaleMan−Meets−OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Rutledge, 1999. Print. ---. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. Print. ---. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print Hardin, Michael. “Fundamentally Freaky: Collapsing the Freak/Norm Binary in Geek Love.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 45.4 (2004): 337-46. Print. Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000. Print. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. London: U of Chicago P, 1999. Print. ---. “Postmodern Parataxis: Embodied Texts, Weightless Information.” American Literary History 2.3 (1990): 394-421. Print. Helgensen, Sally. “Hugh Herr Wants to Build a More Perfect Human.” strategy+business 85 (2016): 1-12. Print. Henke, Jennifer. “‘Ava’s body is a good one’: (Dis)Embodiment in Ex Machina.” American, British and Canadian Studies 29.1 (2017): 126-46. Print. Herbrechter, Stefan. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013. Print. Herr, Hugh. “The New Bionics that Let Us Run, Climb and Dance.” YouTube. YouTube, 29 Mar. 2014. Web. 25 Apr. 2018. Hillman, David and Ulrika Maude. The Body in Literature. London: Cambridge UP, 2015. Print. Hochman, Paul. “Bionic Legs, i-Limbs, and Other Super Human Prostheses You’ll Envy.” Fast Company. Fast Company, 1 Feb. 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2018. Howe, P. David. “Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics Technology and the (Dis)Empowerment of Disabled Athletes.” Sociology 45.5 (2011): 868-82. Print. Howells, Coral Ann. “Bad News.” Canadian Literature 183 (2004): 92-93. Print. Hullinger, Jessica. “This Girl Designed Her Own Superhero Prosthetic Arm, And It Shoots Sparkles.” Fast Company. Fast Company, 28 Mar. 2016. Web. 30 Mar. 2018. Jeffreys, Mark. “Dr. Daedalus and His Minotaur: Mythic Warnings about Genetic Engineering from J.B.S. Haldane, Francois Jacob, and Andrew Niccol’s Gattaca.” Journal of Medical Humanities 22.2 (2001): 137-52. Print. Kaminski, Rafal et al. “Elimination of HIV-1 genomes from human T-lymphoid cells by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.” Scientific Reports. Scientific Reports,7 Jul. 2016. Web. 21 Aug. 2019. Karpin, Isabel, and Roxanne Mykitiuk. “Going out on a Limb: Prosthetics, Normalcy and Disputing the Therapy/Enhancement Distinction.” Medical Law Review 16.3 (2008): 413-436. Print. Keiper, Adam. “The Age of Neuroelectronics.” Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future. Ed. Sean A. Hays et al. Berlin: Springer, 2013. 115-46. Print. Kirby, David A. “The New Eugenics in Cinema: Genetic Determinism and Gene Therapy in GATTACA.” Science Fiction Studies 27(2000): 193-215. Print. Kiss, Jemima. “What If A Bionic Leg Is So Good that Someone Chooses to Amputate?” The Guardian. The Guardian, 9 Apr. 2015. Web. 30 Mar. 2018. Kline, Ronald. “Where are the Cyborgs in Cybernetics?” Social Studies of Science 39.3 (2009): 331-62. Print. Kollek, Regine. “The Limits of Experimental Knowledge: A Feminist Perspective on the Ecological Risks of Genetic Engineering.” Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis 3.2 (1990): 125-35. Print. Ku, Chung-Hao. “Of Monster and Man: Transgenics and Transgression in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 32.1 (2006): 107-33. Print. Kumari Campbell, Fiona. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave, 2009. Print. LaufeyLöve, Rannveig Traustadóttir and James Gordon Rice. “Achieving Disability Equality: Empowering Disabled People to Take the Lead.” Social Inclusion 6.1 (2018): 1-8. Print. Lee, Bruce Y. “An Overlooked and Growing Market: People with Disabilities.” Forbes. Forbes, 2 Nov. 2016. Web. 5 Mar. 2017. Leys, Ruth. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37. 3 (2011): 434-72. Print. Li, Jing-ru et al. “Experiments that Led to the First Gene-edited Babies: The Ethical Failings and the Urgent Need for Better Governance.” Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology) 20.1 (2019): 32-8. Print. Linton, Simi. My Body Politic: A Memoir. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2006. Print. Longmore, Paul. “Screening Stereotypes: Images of Disabled People in Television and Motion Pictures.” Social Policy 16 (1985): 31-7. Print. Marx, Benjamin, Thomas Stoker and Tavneet Suri. “The Economics of Slums in the Developing World.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27.4 (2013): 187-210. Web. 15 August 2019. Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke UP, 2002. Print. ---. “The Autonomy of Affect.” Cultural Critique, 31(1995): 83-109. Print. ---. Politics of Affect. Oxford: Polity, 2015. Print. McRuer, Robert. “Cripping Queer Politics, or the Dangers of Neoliberalism.” The Scholar & Feminist Online 10.1-2 (2012): n.pag. Web. 5 May 2019. Miah, Andy. Genetically Modified Athletes: Biomedical Ethics, Gene Doping and Sport. London: Routledge, 2004. Print. Mitchell, Tom M. Machine learning. McGraw Hill Series in Computer Science. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 1997. Print. Mitchell, David T and Sharon L. Snyder. The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2015. Print. ---, ---. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2014. Print. ---, ---. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print. Moffat, Kirstine and Mark Bond. “‘The Ultimate Version of Who You are Now’: Performing the Gentleman Spy.” Adaptation 10.3 (2017): 352-68. Print. Mohr, Dunja M. “‘When Species Meet’: Beyond Posthuman Boundaries and Interspeciesism.” Social Justice and Canadian Speculative Fiction 37 (2017): 40-64. Print. Monceri, Flavia. “The Nature of the ‘Ruling Body’: Embodiment, Ableism and Normalcy.” Teoria 34 (2014): 183-200. Print. Morowitz, Linda. “The Monster Within: The Munsters, The Addams Family and the American Family in the 1960s.” Critical Studies in Television 2.1 (2007): 35-56. Print. “My 12 Pairs of Legs.” TEDTalk. YouTube, 11 Mar. 2009. Web. 21 Nov. 2019. Neicu, Maria. “Prosthetics Imagery: Negotiating the Identity of Enhanced Bodies.” Platform 6.2 (2012): 42-60. Narukas, J. Paul. “Between Words, Numbers, and Things: Transgenics and Other Objects of Life in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddams.” Critique 56 (2015): 1-25. Print. Nayar, Pramod K. Posthumanism. Oxford: Polity, 2014. Print. Nixon, Robert. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2011. Print. Norden, Martin F. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Dis-ability in the Movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1994. Print. Nussbaum, Martha. “Women and Equality: The Capabilities Approach.” International Labour Review 138.3 (1999): 227-45. Print. ---. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. Print. Orbaugh, Sharalyn. “Emotional Infectivity: Cyborg Affect and the Limits of the Human.” Mechademia 3 (2008): 150-72. Print. Pfeiffer, David. “Overview of the Disability Movement: History, Legislative Record, and Political Implication.” Policy Studies Journal 21.4 (1993): 724-734. Print. Pollack, Andrew. “Scientists Announce HGP-Write, Project to Synthesize the Human Genome.” New York Times. New York Times, 2 June 2016. Web. 27 September 2019. Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore's Dilemma: The Search for a Perfect Meal in a Fast-Food World. New York: Bloomsbury, 2006. Print. Posner, Richard A. “The End Is Near.” Rev. of Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood. New Republic 22 (2003): 31-36. Print. Poster, Mark. “Postmodern Virtualities.” Media and Cultural Studies. Ed. Meenakshi Durham and Douglas Kellner. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001. 611-25. Print. Puar, Jasbir. “’I Would Rather be a Cyborg Than a Goddess’: Becoming-intersectional of Assemblage Theory.” Philosophia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2.1 (2012): 49-66. Print. Pullin, Graham. Design Meets Disability. MIT Press, 2009. Punday, Daniel. “Narrative Performance in the Contemporary Monster Story.” The Modern Language Review 97.4 (2002): 803-20. Print. Ramlow, Todd R. “Bodies in the Borderlands: Gloria Anzaldúa’s and David Wojnarowicz’s Mobility Machines.” MELUS 31.3 (2006): 169-87. Print. Rifkin, Jeremy. The Biotech Century. New York: Penguin, 1998. Print. Ripat, Jacquie and Roberta Woodgate. “The Intersection of Culture, Disability and Assistive Technology.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6.2 (2011): 87-96. Print. Rognini, Giulio et al. “Multisensory Bionic Limb to Achieve Prosthesis Embodiment and Reduce Distorted Phantom Limb Perceptions.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (2018): n. pag. Web. 26 May. 2019. Rosenberg, Jothy. “Who Says Hugh Herr Can't Climb (part I).” YouTube. YouTube, 19 Jul. 2012. Web. 30 Mar. 2018. Roulstone, Alan. Disability and Technology: An Interdisciplinary and International Approach. London: Palgrave, 2016. Print. Russell, Emily. Reading Embodied Citizenship. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2011. Print. Russell, James. A., and Lisa Feldman Barrett. “Core Affect, Prototypical Emotional Episodes, and Other Things Called Emotion: Dissecting the Elephant.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76.5 (1999): 805-19. Russell, Marta, “What Disability Civil Rights Cannot Do: Employment and Political Economy,” Disability & Society 17.2 (2002): 117-135. Print. ---. and Ravi Malhotra. “Capitalism and Disability.” Socialist Register 38 (2002): 212-28. Print. Schalk, Sami. “Reevaluating the Supercrip.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 10.1 (2016): 71-86. Print. Seaman, Myra J. “Becoming More (Than) Human: Affective Posthumanisms, Past and Future.” Journal of Narrative Theory 37.2 (2007): 246-75. Print. Shakespeare, Thomas and Marian Corker. “A Journey Around the Social Model.” in Marian Corker and Thomas Shakespeare (eds), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Continuum: London (2002): 18-31. Print. Shamo, Lauren. “These Bionic Arms Make Kids Feel Like Superheroes.” Business Insider. Business Insider, 23 Feb. 2018. Web. 25 Apr. 2018. Shapiro, Joseph P. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Broadway Books, 1994. Print. Shildrick, Margrit. Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics. London: Routledge, 1997. Print. ---. “Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?”: Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics.” Hypatia 30.1 (2015): 13-29. Print. ---. Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. London: Sage. 2002. Print. Shogan, Debra. “The Social Construction of Disability: The Impact of Statistics and Technology.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 15.3 (1998): 269-77. Print. Siebers, Tobin. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2008. Print. Silva, Carla Filomena, and P. David Howe. “The (In)Validity of Supercrip Representation of Paralympian Athletes.” Journal of Sport & Social Issues 36.2 (2012): 174-94. Print. Smith, Rachel G. “Postmodernism and the Affective Turn.” Twentieth Century Literature 57.4 (2011): 423-46. Print. Sobchack, Vivian. “A Leg to Stand on: Prosthetics, Metaphor, and Materiality.” The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future. Ed. Marquard Smith and Joanne Morra. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. 2-41. Print. Song, Zhibin, Tian, Chuanyin and Jian S. Dai. “Mechanism Design and Analysis of a Proposed Wheelchair-exoskeleton Hybrid Robot for Assisting Human Movement.” Mechanical Sciences 10 (2019): 11-24. Print. Steels, Luc. “Fifty Years of AI: From Symbols to Embodiment - and Back.” 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4850 (2007): 18-28. Print. Stiker, Henri-Jacques. A History of Disability. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. Print. Suarez-Villa, Luis. Globalization and Technocapitalism: The Political Economy of Corporate Power. New York: Routledge, 2016. Print. Suchman, Lucy. “Subject Objects.” Feminist Theory 12.2 (2011):119- 45. Print. Sullivan, Nell. “Katherine Dunn’s Geek Love and the Vicissitudes of Class.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 54.4 (2013): 410-21. Print. Sun, Hsiao-yu. “Prosthetic Configurations and Imagination: Dis/ability, Body, and Technology.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 44.1 (2018): 13-39. Print. Symons, John. “The Individuality of Artifacts and Organisms.” Hist. Phil. Life Sci 32 (2010): 233-46. Print. Talaty, Mukul, Alberto Esquenazi, and Jorge Briceño. “Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics.” International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2013): 1-5. Print. Tamari, Tomoko. “Body Image and Prosthetic Aesthetics: Disability, Technology and Paralympic Culture.” Body and Society 23.4 (2017): 25-56. Taylor, Dianna. “Normativity and Normalization.” Foucault Studies 7 (2009): 45-63. Print. “The Double Amputee Who Designs Better Limbs.” Npr.org. NPR, 10 Aug. 2011. Web. 15 Nov. 2018. Thrift, Nigel. “Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect.” Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 86.1 (2004): 57-78. Print. Thurston, AJ. “Paré and Prosthetics: The Early History of Artificial Limbs.” ANZ J Surg 77.12 (2007): 1114-9. Print. Titchkosky, Tanya. “The Ends of the Body as Pedagogic Possibility.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 34.3-4 (2012): 82-93. Print. Tomkins, Silvan S. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Complete Edition: Two Volumes. New York: Springer, 2008. Print. Tremain, Shelley. “On the Government of Disability: Foucault, Power, and the Subject of Impairment.” The Disability Studies Reader 2nd ed.Ed. Lennard Davis. London: Routledge, 2006. 185-196. Print. Trevisan, Filippo. Disability Rights Advocacy Online: Voice, Empowerment and Global Connectivity. New York: Routledge, 2017. Print. Turing, A. M. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 49 (1950): 433-60. Print. Tusler, Anthony. How to Create Disability Access to Technology: Best Practices in Electronic and Information Technology Companies. World Institute on Disability, 2005. Print. Vaccari, Andrés. “Dissolving Nature: How Descartes Made Us Posthuman.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16.2 (2012): 138-86. Print. van der Tuin, Iris and Rick Dolphijn. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. London: Open Humanities P, 2012. Print. Von Burg, Ron. “Cinematic Genetics: GATTACA, Essentially Yours, and the Rhetoric of Genetic Determinism.” Southern Communication Journal 75.1(2010): 1-16. Print. Waldby, Catherine and Robert Mitchell. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Print. Wälivaara, Josefine. “Blind Warriors, Supercrips, and Techno‐Marvels: Challenging Depictions of Disability in Star Wars.” Popular Culture 51.4 (2018): 1036-56. Print. ---. “Marginalized Bodies of Imagined Futurescapes: Ableism and Heteronormativity in Science Fiction Munch's Painting? Painting Reproductions on Display.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 10(2018):226-245. Print. Wang, Gang et al. (2017). “CRISPR-Cas based antiviral strategies against HIV-1.” Virus Research 244. 29 Jul. 2017. Web. 15 Mar. 2019. Warren, Victoria. “American Tall Tale/Tail: Katherine Dunn’s Geek Love and the Paradox of American Individualism.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 45.4 (2004): 323-36. Print. Weese, Katherine. “Normalizing Freakery: Katherine Dunn's Geek Love and the Female Grotesque.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 41.4 (2000): 349-64. Print. Wendell, Susan. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge, 1996. Print. Williams, Simon J. “Is Anybody There? Critical Realism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate.” Sociology of Health & Illness 21.6 (1999): 797-819. Print. Wills, David. Prosthesis. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995. Print. Wilson, David L. and Zack Bowen. Science and Literature: Bridging the Two Cultures. Gainesville: UP of Florida, 2001. Print. Wilson, Elizabeth. Affect and Artificial Intelligence. Seattle: U of Washington P, 2010. Print. Wilson, James C. “(Re)Writing the Genetic Body-Text: Disability, Textuality, and the Human Genome Project.” Lennard J. Davis ed. The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2006, 67-79. Print. Wilson, Natalie. “Butler’s Corporeal Politics: Matters of Politicized Abjection.” International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 6.1-2 (2001): 109-21. Print. Wilson, Sharon R. “Frankenstein's Gaze and Atwood's Sexual Politics in Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood: The Open Eye. Eds. John Moss and Tobi Kozakewich. Ottawa: U of Ottawa P, 2006. Print. Wise, Paul H. “Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability.” The Future of Children 22.1 (2012): 169-91. Print. Wolbring, Gregor. “Expanding Ableism: Taking down the Ghettoization of Impact of Disability Studies Scholars.” Societies 2 (2012): 75-83. ---. “The Politics of Ableism.” Development 51.2 (2008): 252-58. Print. ---. “Is there an end to out-able? Is there an end to the rat race for abilities?” Journal: Media and Culture 11.3 (2008): n. pag. Web. 5 Mar. 2019. ---. “Expanding Ableism: Taking Down the Ghettoization of Impact of Disability Studies Scholars.” Societies 2.3 (2012): 75-83. Print. ---. “Obsolescence and Body Technologies.” Dilemata International Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (2010): 67-83. Print. Wolfe, Cary. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2010. Print. Wu, J. et al. “Interspecies Chimerism with Mammalian Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Cell 168.3 (2017): 473-86. Print. Xiao, Qiaoqiao, Guo, Deyin and Shuliang Chen. “Application of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing in HIV-1/AIDS Therapy.” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 9 (2019): 69. Print. Zhang XQ. “Risk-benefit Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Germline Editing Clinical Research on Human Embryos and Its Ethical Governance.” Sci Soc, 6.3 (2016):12-21. Print. Ziemke T. “Embodied AI as Science: Models of Embodied Cognition, Embodied Models of Cognition, or Both?” Embodied Artificial Intelligence. Luc Steels et al. eds. Berlin: Springer, 2004. 27-36. Print. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |