在城市發展中，不應只著重於大興土木的公共建設，公園綠地也應成為城市發展的重點之一。高雄的特色公園可以視為城市發展的標誌，公園的存在和空間規劃直接影響了城市的生活品質。從服務使用者的觀點來看，了解特色公園是否符合他們的需求至關重要。使用者的意見和感受直接反映了公園對當地社區的實際影響，因為公園使用者是最頻繁使用公園的人群，也是對公園功能和設施最有實際體驗的群體。
本研究強調公園綠地在城市發展規劃中的重要性，尤其是在北高雄的市政新都心－凹仔底農十六重劃區域，因為該區住宅區及商業區陸續成形，人口快速聚集，所以缺乏可供民眾休憩的大型優質空間。凹子底公園的誕生解決了這個問題，成為區域裡不可或缺的公共空間。為了提供更好的服務，研究者進行深度訪談，了解使用者對公園特色設施功能和良好的設施環境的需求和滿意度，以及使用SWOT分析，從內外部環境因素的角度，全面檢視凹子底公園的優勢、弱點、機會和威脅，以有針對性的改進建議，提供高雄市政府在制定公園經營管理方針時的參考。

When developing a city, it is vital to think about more than just massive public construction. Also, it is important to think about how much green space there is. Kaohsiung’s featured park can be a symbol of city development because a city’s living quality is affected by park area and spatial planning. Thus, it is crucial to comprehend from the user's point of view, and that these users' opinions have a direct impact on the community's significance, making these opinions experimental and important.This study emphasizes the role of green areas in city development, particularly the new city center of the north Kaohsiung-Aozihdi redistricting area.
This new district has large population of residential and business, but is lack of spacious space and the creation of Aozihdi Park become a substantial public park to solve the space problem. The study offers specific recommendations for improvement by applying SWOT analysis to thoroughly evaluate Aozihdi Park Park's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats from the perspectives of both internal and external environmental factors. These recommendations can serve as a resource for Kaohsiung City Government when developing the park's operation and management policies.

審定書 i
謝　誌 ii
摘　要 iii
Abstract iv
目　錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的與問題 4
第四節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 特色公園的特質 7
第二節 友善兒童公園指標 9
第三章 研究理論 14
第一節 服務體驗 14
第二節 SWOT分析 15
第四章 研究設計 17
第一節 研究方法 17
第二節 研究範圍與對象 23
第三節 訪談大綱與訪談分析 24
第五章 研究分析 28
第一節 服務體驗 28
第二節 民眾對共融式公園評價 31
第三節 共融式公園SWOT分析 38
第六章 研究發現與建議 42
第一節 研究發現 42
第二節 研究建議 45
參考文獻 49

一、中文部分
林郁軒（2019）。戶外開放空間的遊戲場設計（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣科技大學建築系，臺北市。
吳欣璉(2020)。共融式遊戲場幼兒遊戲行為之個案研究〔未出版碩士論文〕。國立台中教育大學。
侯錦雄（1999）。休閒生活態度與鄰里公園使用行為之不同層級城市比較─以台北、台中、彰化市居民為例。戶外遊憩研究，12(2)，55-69。
康健雜誌公共事務，2021《康健》「健康城市大調查」台北市穩住寶座，高雄超車台中。康健雜誌。取自https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/84999。
陳翠莉（2005）。引進商業活動對都市公園環境品質影響之研究。逢甲大學建築與都市計畫所碩士論文。
陳麗瑜（2005）。都會濕地公園水質淨化功能及規劃策略之研究，國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系碩士論文。
淺野房世（2017年11月13日）。共融式的遊具規劃設計。2017臺北共融性兒童遊戲場 PLAY FOR ALL研討會，臺北市集思交通部國際會議中心。
曾慈慧、董娟鳴、莊明霞(2017)。都市鄰里公園的友善兒童環境指標建構。臺灣建築學會「建築學報」，99，55-77。
黃瑞琴（1991）。質的教育研究方法。台北市：心理。
楊淑朱（2000）。台灣省公私立幼稚園戶外遊戲場調查與評估研究(E87050)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-E87050-1
楊淑朱、蔡佳燕(2010)。戰後台灣社會生態對兒童遊戲的影響。幼兒教保研究，(5)， 133-153。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。台北市：心理。
二、英文部分
Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767-787.
Borry, E. L. (2018). Linking theory to television: Public administration in Parks and Recreation. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(2), 234-254.
Buchel, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 12, 169-177.
Chawla, L., & Malone, K. (2003). Neighbourhood quality in children's eyes. Children in the city: home, neighbourhood and community, 118-141.
Christensen, P., & O’Brien, M. (2003). Children in the City: Home Neighbourhood and Community. Routledge.
Frost, J. L. (1992). Play and Playscapes: Instructor's Guide. Delmar Publishers.
Garde, A. (2014). Citizen participation, design competition and the product in urban design: Insights from the Orange County Great Park. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 89-118.
Hayward, D. G., Rothenberg, M., & Beasley, R. R. (1974). Children’s play and urban playground environments: A comparison of traditional, contemporary, and adventure playground types. Environment and Behavior, 6(2), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657400600201
Horelli, L. (2007). Constructing a Theoretical Framework for Environmental Child-Friendliness. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 267–292.
Howard, A. (2006). What Constitutes Child Friendly Communities and How Are They Built. Perth, Australia: Australian Research Alliance for Children & Youth (ARACY).
Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00073-2
Liang, H., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Assessing the public transport service to urban parks on the basis of spatial accessibility for citizens in the compact megacity of Shanghai, China. Urban Studies, 55(9), 1983-1999.
Lynch, H., Moore, A., Edwards, C., & Horgan, L. (2020). Advancing play participation for all: The challenge of addressing play diversity and inclusion in community parks and playgrounds. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(2), 107-117.
Moore, R. C. (1986). Childhood's Domain: Play and Place in Child Development. London, UK: Croom Helm.
Moore, R. C. (2017). Childhood's domain: Play and place in child development (Vol. 6). Routledge.
Mowen, A. J., Kyle, G. T., & Jackowski, M. (2007). Citizen preferences for the corporate sponsorship of public-sector park and recreation organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 93-118.
Nigel Piercy, William Giles (1989), Making SWOT Analysis Work, Marketing Intelligence & Planning Volume 7, Issue 5/6. 1989. PP 5-7.
Nordström, M. (2010). Children’s Views on Child-friendly Environments in Different Geographical, Cultural and Social Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 47(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009349771
Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018). Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: An environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 156-169.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
Sister, C., Wolch, J., & Wilson, J. (2010). Got green? Addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal, 75(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9303-8
Thompson, L. (1997). Citizen attitudes about service delivery modes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(3), 291-302.
Trischler, J., & Zehrer, A. (2012). Service design: Suggesting a qualitative multistep approach for analyzing and examining theme park experiences. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(1), 57-71.
Wicks, B. E., & Crompton, J. L. (1986). Citizen and administrator perspectives of equity in the delivery of park services. Leisure Sciences, 8(4), 341-365.
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
Woolcock, G., & Steele, W. (2008). Child-friendly community indicators–A literature review. Urban Research Program, Griffith University and NSW Commission for Children and Young People.