Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0212125-123517 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0212125-123517
論文名稱
Title
保險業價值共創模式之多個案比較研究: 以南山人壽Nan Shan、Vitality UK、NRMA 及Lemonade為例
Comparative Multiple Cases Study of Value Co-Creation Models in the Insurance Industry: Examples from Nan Shan, Vitality UK, NRMA, and Lemonade
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
184
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2025-02-11
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2025-03-12
關鍵字
Keywords
價值共創、服務主導邏輯SDL、保險3.0價值轉型、健康管理、風險預防、次標準體市場、SDGs
Value Co-Creation, Service-Dominant Logic (SDL), Insurance 3.0 Transformation, Health Management, Risk Prevention, Substandard Risk Market, SDGs
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 407 次,被下載 8 次
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 407 times, has been downloaded 8 times.
中文摘要
摘要

本研究聚焦於價值共創模式在保險業的應用與影響,透過南山人壽Nan Shan、Vitality UK、NRMA 和 Lemonade 四個個案的深入剖析,系統性分析壽險與產險、傳統與新創保險公司在價值共創機制設計與運作上的異同,並探討其成效與影響。本研究以「三維式價值共創互動及影響因素」作為研究框架,涵蓋價值共創的三維度(公司價值、客戶價值、社會價值),並從價值共創運作模式、平台組成元素、及影響因素(促進因子與激勵因子)等多層次進行個案分析比較,揭示不同價值共創模式的設計邏輯、成功要素與實施挑戰,並對保險業的價值轉型提供具體建議。
本研究進一步探討保險公司與客戶互動平台的「外掛模式(Plug-in)」與「內嵌模式(Embedded)」對價值共創的影響,發現創新型公司(如 Vitality UK、Lemonade)採內嵌模式,透過業務流程自然驅動客戶參與,互動深度與持續性較高,而傳統保險公司(如南山人壽、NRMA)則為外掛模式,透過獨立於原作業系統之外的數位平台與客戶互動,但效果受限於客戶的主動性。
本研究的理論貢獻在於擴展價值共創理論對社會價值層面的影響範疇,證明保險業價值共創可創造企業、客戶及社會三層面的價值,如提升健康管理(南山人壽、Vitality UK)、減少風險事故(NRMA)、推動公益參與(Lemonade)。此外,本研究發現價值共創之促進因子與激勵因子的互補與協同效應,說明企業如何同時運用有效的互動設計,並合理配置資源以激勵客戶參與,進而增強價值共創的效果。
在實務應用層面,本研究為保險業的價值轉型提供可行路徑,特別借鑑 Vitality UK 內嵌模式,開發「次標準體」市場、運用數據驅動價值共創、連結 SDGs推動保險 3.0 價值轉型、優化南山人壽價值共創機制。本研究的成果不僅為保險業提供價值共創的操作指引,也為保險業的價值轉型與永續發展帶來啟發。
Abstract
Abstract
This study delves into the application and impact of value co-creation models in the insurance industry through four compelling case studies: Nan Shan Life, Vitality UK, NRMA, and Lemonade. It systematically examines differences and similarities in value co-creation mechanisms between life and general insurers, as well as traditional and innovative firms. Develops the "Three-Dimensional Value Co-Creation Interaction and Influencing Factors" framework that analyzes corporate, customer, and social value dimensions, operational models, platform components, and key influencing factors (facilitators and incentives). It reveals different models' design logic, success factors, and inferences, providing recommendations for value transformation in the insurance industry.
This study also examines plug-in and embedded platform models. Findings show that innovative insurers (e.g., Vitality UK, Lemonade) use embedded models, integrating customer participation into business processes for deeper engagement, while traditional insurers (e.g., Nan Shan Life, NRMA) adopt plug-in models, relying on separate digital platforms with lower customer involvement.
The study extends value co-creation theory by incorporating social value, demonstrating multi-dimensional benefits for companies, customers, and society, such as improved health management (Nan Shan Life, Vitality UK), reduced risk incidents (NRMA), and increased social welfare participation (Lemonade). Moreover, this study reveals how the complementarity and synergy between facilitators and incentives enable enterprises to optimize interactive design and resource allocation, effectively driving customer participation and enhancing value co-creation.
From a practical perspective, this study provides a roadmap for value transformation, including adopting Vitality UK's embedded model for the substandard risk market, leveraging data-driven value co-creation, integrating SDGs to drive Insurance 3.0 transformation, and optimizing Nan Shan Life's mechanisms. The findings offer actionable insights for business innovation, customer engagement, sustainable development, and the strategy of value transformation.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究重要性 4
第四節 研究問題 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 以客戶為中心的價值共創思維 7
第二節 價值的形成與定義 9
第三節 價值共創三構面與三維度 9
一、 價值共創三構面及二維度(公司面、客戶面)影響 10
二、 價值共創對社會面維度的影響 10
第四節 共創機制之互動模型 11
一、 互動平台的要素 11
二、 互動平台的「外掛」或「內嵌」模式 12
三、 互動平台的運作 12
第五節 價值共創的影響因素 14
一、 公司於價值共創設計中的「促進因子Facilitators」 14
二、 影響客戶參與互動的「激勵因子 Incentives」 16
第六節 價值共創動態機制分析 18
一、 公司端的動態循環:促進因子與共創機制優化 18
二、 客戶端的動態循環:激勵因子與代理參與 19
三、 公益與社會價值的強化循環 19
第七節 保險思維的演變 20
一、 商業保險形成 20
二、 價值共創機制開啟保險新時代 22
第八節 理論缺口及研究方向 22
第三章 研究之理論框架及分析步驟 24
第一節 研究之理論基礎 24
一、 價值共創分析框架 24
二、 互動創造機制 24
三、 價值共創影響因素 24
第二節 研究框架 25
第三節 研究步驟 26
第四章 研究方法 28
第一節 個案選擇 28
一、 涵蓋壽險與產險領域 28
二、 傳統與新創保險公司並列 28
三、 實施價值共創機制的保險公司 28
第二節 研究設計 30
一、 理論建構 (Theory Building) 30
二、 實證驗證 (Empirical Validation) 31
三、 應用導向 (Practical Implication) 31
第三節 研究方法的實施 31
一、 資料收集 31
二、 訪談資料 35
三、 參與式觀察法 36
四、 資料分析 37
五、 研究倫理考量 38
第五章 壽險個案價值共創模式資料分析 39
第一節 南山人壽 39
一、 南山人壽Nan Shan個案背景說明 39
二、 南山人壽Nan Shan個案分析 46
第二節 英國活力保險公司Vitality UK 57
一、 英國活力保險公司Vitality UK個案背景說明 57
二、 初步比較南山與Vitality的運作模式 64
三、 Vitality UK 個案分析 65
第六章 產險個案價值共創模式資料分析 74
第一節 澳洲產物保險NRMA 74
一、 澳洲產物保險NRMA 個案背景介紹 74
二、 NRMA 的Safety Hub個案分析 79
第二節 美國產險公司Lemonade 88
一、 美國產險公司Lemonade 個案背景介紹 88
二、 Lemonade個案分析 93
第七章 價值共創模式比較分析及研究發現 102
第一節 壽險與產險之價值共創模式比較 102
一、 壽險與產險價值共創模式之共同點分析 102
二、 壽險與產險價值共創模式之差異分析 108
第二節 傳統型 vs. 創新型保險公司之價值共創平台比較 111
一、 外掛模式:傳統保險公司(南山人壽、NRMA) 111
二、 內嵌模式:創新型保險公司(Vitality UK、Lemonade) 111
第三節 促進因子與激勵因子的相關性:外掛與內嵌模式的影響 113
一、 外掛式促進因子互動效果較弱,依賴激勵因子提升客戶參與度 113
二、 內嵌式促進因子互動效果強,聚焦激勵因子資源於目標達成 113
三、 促進因子與激勵因子的互補與協同效應 114
第四節 綜合比較 117
第八章 理論貢獻與實務建議 122
第一節 研究發現與理論貢獻 122
一、 理論實證 122
二、 理論缺口補充 123
三、 內嵌式與外掛式平台的影響機制 123
四、 提出促進因子與激勵因子的互補與協同效應 123
五、 多方共創模式的實證 123
第二節 實務建議 124
一、 借鏡Vitality 價值共創模式,運用於開發「次標準體」市場 124
二、 借鑒NRMA,建議台灣保險業以數據驅動價值共創 125
三、 連結SDGs的保險價值轉型,邁向保險3.0新時代 126
四、 以SROI評估價值共創的影響力 127
第三節 對南山人壽價值共創模式的建議 128
一、 強化平台整合,提升價值共創的連續性 128
二、 重塑業務人員價值主張,增強其體驗與代理參與,提高推動力 129
三、 擴大數位行銷與社群推動,強化客戶連結 130
四、 優化數據應用,強化個人化價值共創 131
第九章 結論 132
一、 研究發現與理論貢獻 132
二、 實務建議 133
三、 研究侷限性與對未來研究的建議 133
參考文獻 135
附錄 145
作者簡歷 173

參考文獻 References
參考文獻
台灣網路報告. (2022). 2022 台灣網路報告. 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心. https://report.twnic.tw/2022/
全球災害事件簿. (2024). 2019/2020年澳洲野火事件衝擊影響探討. Retrieved 2024.10.31 from https://den1.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/1132/1188/1205/53295/63455/
林立浩. (2024). 澳洲森林大火3萬人撤離, 當局:有災難性危險. CTWANT. Retrieved 2024.10.31 from https://www.ctwant.com/article/320742/
金融監督管理委員會金融史料陳列室. 金融業務發展史-保險業務. Retrieved 2024.2.1 from https://history.fsc.gov.tw/History?type=%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%AA%E5%B1%80
金融監督管理委員會保險局. (2023). 112年保險業財務指標. Retrieved 2024.6.17 from https://www.ib.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=48&parentpath=0,4
南山人壽60感謝有你. (2024). 南山60益起向前行. Retrieved 2024.09.20 from https://www.nanshanlife.com.tw/public_promotion/event/BamNanShan60/index.html
南山人壽. (2023). 南山人壽2023財務概況. 南山人壽. Retrieved 2024.6.17 from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nanshanlife.com.tw/nanshanlife/portal-api/File/5882
南山人壽. (2024). 企業價值. Retrieved 2024.6.26 from https://www.nanshanlife.com.tw/nanshanlife/about-company
南山人壽官網. (2024). 公司簡介. Retrieved 2024.09.18 from https://www.nanshanlife.com.tw/nanshanlife/about-company
馬自明. (2024). 業績掉、負淨值風暴不斷⋯40歲尹崇堯扛得起60歲南山?. 商業周刋. Retrieved 2024.09.20 from https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%A5%AD%E7%B8%BE%E6%8E%89%E3%80%81%E8%B2%A0%E6%B7%A8%E5%80%BC%E9%A2%A8%E6%9A%B4%E4%B8%8D%E6%96%B7%E2%8B%AF40%E6%AD%B2%E5%B0%B9%E5%B4%87%E5%A0%AF%E6%89%9B%E5%BE%97%E8%B5%B760%E6%AD%B2%E5%8D%97%E5%B1%B1%EF%BC%9F-230003500.html
國民健康署. (2023). 動動生活GO! 我家也是健身房!. Retrieved 2024.09.25 from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/fp-4631-54423-1.html
國泰人壽. (2024a). 企業價值. Retrieved 2024.7.9 from https://www.cathaylife.com.tw/cathaylife60/home/history/progress3
國泰人壽. (2024b). 核心價值與四大經營理念. Retrieved 2024.6.26 from https://www.cathaylife.com.tw/EasyAccess/about_intro.html
現代保險雜誌. (2024). 最新!壽險業務員定著率出爐 這一家公司進步最多. Retrieved 2024.09.24 from https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/LX7zZq0
陸洪. (2024). 美國Lemonade互聯網保險發展模式分析. 中國銀行保險報網. Retrieved 2024.11.14 from http://www.cbimc.cn/content/2024-01/19/content_506003.html
新光人壽. (2024). 經營理念與企業文化. Retrieved 2024.6.26 from https://easy-access.skl.com.tw/philosophy.html
廖于嬋. (2014). SAP南山人壽結盟打造保險業最佳實務. DIGITIMES. Retrieved 2024.7.9 from https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?id=0000384170_NU60AQHS812ZV9L3X9VAP
維基百科. (2024). 英國NHS. Retrieved 2024.10.16 from https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E5%9B%BD%E6%B0%91%E4%BF%9D%E5%81%A5%E7%BD%B2_(%E8%8B%B1%E6%A0%BC%E5%85%B0)
數位時代. (2023). 保險業插旗元宇宙!南山人壽數位轉型,健康手遊提升黏著度. Retrieved 2024.09.16 from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/76052/nanshanlife_202307
賴治怡. (2020). 2019坎城創意奬結案報告. 小魚廣告網工作室、坎城國際創意節台灣官方代表辦公室.
戴瑞瑤. (2024). 外溢保單夯 雙雄吃8成市場. 工商時報. Retrieved 2024.09.18 from https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E5%A4%96%E6%BA%A2%E4%BF%9D%E5%96%AE%E5%A4%AF-%E9%9B%99%E9%9B%84%E5%90%838%E6%88%90%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4-201000962.html
謝方娪. (2024). 首季外溢保單新契約保費逾52億 3大壽險貢獻9成. 中央社. Retrieved 2024.09.18 from https://money.udn.com/money/story/5613/7936192
AdNews-Australia. (2019, 2019.06.20). AdNews Australia. Retrieved 2024.11.12 from https://youtu.be/yJcDUAp76jI?si=8g37_QLysuGn2dJQ
Alexander, M., & Jaakkola, E. (2015). Customer engagement behaviours and value co-creation. In Customer engagement (pp. 3-20). Routledge.
Block, B. A., Bohrmann, J., Boltuc, M., Stefano, G. d., T’Serclaes, J.-W. d., Gagnon, N., Klier, O., Lebefromm, R., Ng, G., & Wray, P. (2021). The Pandemic Pushed Insurtech Funding to an All-Time High. BCG. https://www.bcg.com/industries/insurance/the-strategic-role-of-insurtechs-post-covid-19
BTheChange. (2017). The Flat-Fee Insurance Company Giving Underwriting Profits to Nonprofits. B THE CHANGE. Retrieved 2024.11.22 from https://bthechange.com/the-flat-fee-insurance-company-giving-excess-premium-payments-to-charity-e2d1cb05bd2a
Chen, L., Yuan, L., & Zhu, Z. (2021). Empirical study of consumer participation motivation in value cocreation within cultural and creative virtual brand communities. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(7), 1630-1647. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2020-0363
Corbae, G., Jensen, J. B., & Schneider, D. (2003). Marketing 2.0: Strategies for closer customer relationships. Springer Science & Business Media.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Deloitte. (2019). The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019 (Societal discord and technological transformation create a “generation disrupted”, Issue. Deloitte. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
Eggert, A., Ulaga, W., Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2018). Conceptualizing and communicating value in business markets: From value in exchange to value in use. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 80-90.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eling, M., & Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks. The Geneva papers on risk and insurance-issues and practice, 43, 359-396.
Fehy, D. (2024). Vitality Review 2024- Is it the best life and heslth insurance? . Retrieved 2024.10.24 from https://moneytothemasses.com/quick-savings/insurance-2/life-insurance/vitality-review-is-it-the-best-health-and-life-insurance
Fernandes, T., & Remelhe, P. (2016). How to engage customers in co-creation: customers’ motivations for collaborative innovation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095220
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research, 3, 178-183.
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co‐creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British journal of management, 26(3), 463-483.
Fuller, J. (2006). Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated by producers. Advances in Consumer research, 33, 639.
Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2009). Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260303
Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge university press.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 133-150.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Weman, E., & Pihlström, M. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9), 857-877.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences,
Haro, M. A. G., RUIZ, M. P. M., & CANAS, R. M. (2014). The effects of the value co-creation process on the consumer and the company. Expert Journal of Marketing, 2(2).
Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International journal of electronic commerce, 6(3), 25-39.
Hopkins, R. A., & Powers, T. L. (2009). Development and test of new dimensions of altruistic buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910954127
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Hu, F. (2017). 英國私人健保 Vitality 個人使用心得. Retrieved 2024.10.25 from https://www.cantabenglish.com/blog/-vitality
IAG. (2023). Annual report 2023. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.iag.com.au/sites/default/files/Documents/Results%20%26%20reports/FY23-annual-report.pdf
IAG. (2024). Purpose and Strategy. Retrieved 2024.6.26 from https://www.iag.com.au/about-us/who-we-are/purpose-and-strategy
Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2020). Co-creation: A Key Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Trust, and Customer Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4015-y
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514529187
Kasperowicz, L. (2024). Clearsurance community names Lemonade the Most Innovative Insurer of 2024 based on customer review data. Clearsurance. Retrieved 2024.11.21 from https://clearsurance.com/blog/lemonade-most-innovative-insurer
Kordupleski, R., & Simpson, J. (2003). Mastering Customer Value Management: The Art and Science of Creating Competitive Advantage. Pinnaflex Educational Resources inc.
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2019). Marketing 3.0: From products to customers to the human spirit. Springer.
Kraus, W. E., Powell, K. E., Haskell, W. L., Janz, K. F., Campbell, W. W., Jakicic, J. M., Troiano, R. P., Sprow, K., Torres, A., & Piercy, K. L. (2019). Physical Activity, All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality, and Cardiovascular Disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 51(6), 1270-1281. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001939
Lemonade. (2022). Listening to LTV6. Retrieved 2024.11.14 from https://www.lemonade.com/blog/lemonade-ltv6/
Lemonade. (2024a). A Breakdown of Lemonade’s 2024 Giveback. Retrieved 2024.11.14 from https://www.lemonade.com/blog/lemonade-2024-giveback/
Lemonade. (2024b). Forget Everything You Know About Insurance. https://www.lemonade.com/
Lemonade. (2024c). Shareholder Letter Q3 2024 Lemonade). Lemonade. https://s24.q4cdn.com/139015699/files/doc_downloads/2024/Shareholder-Letter-Q3-2024-vF-10-30-24-3pm.pdf
Libatique, R. (2024). NRMA Insurance redefines customer support with new initiative. Insurance Business. Retrieved 2024.11.1 from https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/au/news/breaking-news/nrma-insurance-redefines-customer-support-with-new-initiative-498225.aspx
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155-176.
MacAskill, W. (2015). Doing good better: Effective altruism and a radical new way to make a difference. Guardian Faber Publishing.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
NRMA. (2024). NRMA. Retrieved 2024.10.31 from https://www.nrma.com.au/about-the-company
NRMA safety tasks. (2018). Retrieved 2023.1.12 from https://www.nrma.com.au/firstsaturday/all
Olson, R. D., Vaux-Bjerke, A., Quam, J. B., Piercy, K. L., Troiano, R. P., George, S. M., Sprow, K., Ballard, R. M., Fulton, J. E., & Galuska, D. A. (2023). Physical activity guidelines for Americans. NADAR! SWIMMING MAGAZINE-Periódico científico em esportes e fitness aquático-natação, pólo aquático, nado sincronizado, saltos ornamentais, travessias aquáticas.
Parkinson, B. (2011). Interpersonal emotion transfer: Contagion and social appraisal. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(7), 428-439.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83-96.
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Prahalad, C. K., & Venkatram, R. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2013). Strategy and co-creation thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 41(6), 5-10.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196-205.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Saarijärvi, H., Kannan, P., & Kuusela, H. (2013). Value co‐creation: theoretical approaches and practical implications. European business review, 25(1), 6-19.
SCOR. (2024). SCOR’s Biological Age Model helps people live healthier with each step. Retrieved 2024.09.15 from https://www.scor.com/en/expert-views/scors-biological-age-model-helps-people-live-healthier-each-step
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158-166.
Sheng, M. L., Natalia, N., & Hsieh, C. Y. (2022). Reconceptualizing value creation: Exploring the role of goal congruence in the Co-creation process. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102947
Stoeckli, E., Dremel, C., & Uebernickel, F. (2018). Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world. Electronic Markets, 28, 287-305.
Storbacka, K., Brodie, R. J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P. P., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3008-3017.
Svensson, T., Saito, E., Svensson, A. K., Melander, O., Orho-Melander, M., Mimura, M., Rahman, S., Sawada, N., Koh, W.-P., Shu, X.-O., Tsuji, I., Kanemura, S., Park, S. K., Nagata, C., Tsugane, S., Cai, H., Yuan, J.-M., Matsuyama, S., Sugawara, Y.,…Inoue, M. (2021). Association of Sleep Duration With All- and Major-Cause Mortality Among Adults in Japan, China, Singapore, and Korea. JAMA Network Open, 4(9), e2122837-e2122837. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22837
The-Caples-Awards. (2019). NRMA Safety Hub. Retrieved 2023.1.12 from https://caples.org/2019-winners-results/?id=202&cat=Mobile
TheFintechTimes. (2024). Lemonade Celebrates Positive Social Impact, as Donations Surpass $10Milllion in Eighth Giveback. The Fintech Times. Retrieved 2024.11.21 from https://thefintechtimes.com/lemonade-celebrates-positive-social-impact-as-donations-surpass-10milllion-in-eighth-giveback/
Trenerry, C. F. (2009). The origin and early history of insurance: including the contract of bottomry. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
Tucker, L. A. (2020). Walking and biologic ageing: Evidence based on NHANES telomere data. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(9), 1026-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1739896
Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav, 51 Suppl(Suppl), S54-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
United Nations, D. o. E. a. S. A., & Development, S. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 5.8 from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 58-74.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing (1 ed.). J. Mark.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5-23.
Vitality. (2024). core purpose. Retrieved 2024.6.26 from https://www.vitalitygroup.com/company/
Vitality-Group. (2024). Vitality Group. Retrieved 2024.10.14 from https://www.vitalitygroup.com/company/
VitalityMedia. (2024). Steps lead the way to earn points. Retrieved 2024.10.25 from https://www.vitality.co.uk/media/vitality-member-data-shows-steps-are-the-most-popular-way-to-earn-points/
VitalityUK. (2024). life-claims-benefits-report-2024. V. UK. https://adviser.vitality.co.uk/resources/vitality-academy/
Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 20(2), 122-146.
Wilson, N. (2024). Lemonade's 2024 Giveback Celebrates its Eighth Year, Donating More Than $2 Million to Organizations Chosen by Customers. Lemonade. Retrieved 2024.11.22 from https://investor.lemonade.com/news-and-events/news/news-details/2024/Lemonades-2024-Giveback-Celebrates-its-Eighth-Year-Donating-More-Than-2-Million-to-Organizations-Chosen-by-Customers/default.aspx
Yin, J., Jin, X., Shan, Z., Li, S., Huang, H., Li, P., Peng, X., Peng, Z., Yu, K., Bao, W., Yang, W., Chen, X., & Liu, L. (2017). Relationship of Sleep Duration With All‐Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Dose‐Response Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(9), e005947. https://doi.org/doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.005947
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.


電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code