論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-03-15
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-03-15
論文名稱 Title |
邊緣人好「客」? 社會排斥、客製化聯想與認知再評估對客製化產品購買的影響 Social Exclusion Enhances Customized Product Purchase? Influences of Customization Association and Cognitive Reappraisal |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
192 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-12-25 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-03-15 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
社會排斥、客製化產品、控制感流失、客製化聯想、認知再評估 social exclusion, customized product, loss of sense of control, consumer association with customization, cognitive reappraisal |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 154 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 154 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究欲探究社會排斥如何影響消費者對客製化產品的購買,消費者在經歷社會排斥後會造成控制感流失,因而增加客製化產品的購買。本研究經由三個實驗來驗證假設是否成立。實驗一檢測社會排斥對客製化產品購買意願的影響,並確認控制感流失為此消費行為的背後機制。實驗二探討經歷社會排斥和社會包容之消費者在不同的客製化聯想之下(控制感vs. 樂趣感vs. 獨特感)對客製化產品偏好的影響。實驗三則探究在有無認知再評估的情境下,經歷社會排斥和社會包容之消費者的客製化產品購買意願有何影響。 實驗分析結果發現,與經歷社會包容和經歷不幸的消費者相比,經歷社會排斥會增加客製化產品的購買,而控制感流失為此行為的潛在機制。除此之外,不同的客製化聯想也會影響此效果,當客製化與控制感聯想時,比起社會包容的消費者,社會排斥的消費者對客製化產品的購買意願較高。然而,當消費者將客製化與樂趣感或獨特感聯想時,社會排斥和社會包容的消費者在客製化產品購買則沒有差異。有無認知再評估也會影響其效果,當消費者進行認知再評估時,社會排斥對客製化產品購買的影響將減少。本研究之結果除了對社會排斥與客製化產品的研究領域做出理論貢獻,亦提供行銷人員在推廣客製化產品時的管理啟示。 |
Abstract |
This research aims to investigate how social exclusion influences consumers' intention to purchase customized products. Consumers who feel socially excluded tend to experience loss of sense of control, and thus they will increase the intention to purchase customized products. Three experiments are conducted to test the purposed hypotheses. Study 1 examines the impact of social exclusion on the intention to purchase customized products, and tests loss of sense of control as the underlying mechanism behind this behavior. Study 2 investigates the moderating effect of consumer association with product customization (sense of control vs. sense of enjoyment vs. sense of uniqueness). Study 3 examines the moderating role of cognitive reappraisal. The results show that consumers who feel socially excluded tend to purchase customized products than consumers who feel socially included and consumers who feel misfortunate. Additionally, loss of sense of control is found as underlying mechanism to explain customized product purchase behavior. Furthermore, different association with customization will also affect this effect. When consumers associate customization with sense of control, socially excluded individuals show higher intentions to purchase customized products than socially included ones. Howerver, no such differences found between socially excluded and socially included people when associating customization with sense of enjoyment or uniqueness. The impacts of social exclusion on customized product purchase are reduced when consumers are primed with cognitive reappraisal. The results of this research not only contribute to the social exclusion research but also provide marketers with managerial implications in promoting customized products. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖次 viii 表次 ix 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究背景 1 第三節 研究動機 4 第四節 研究目的與研究問題 5 第五節 研究架構與研究流程 5 第貳章 文獻探討 8 第一節 前言 8 第二節 社會排斥 8 第三節 客製化產品購買行為 14 第四節 控制感流失 15 第五節 客製化聯想 16 第六節 認知再評估 18 第七節 小節 22 第參章 研究設計與方法 23 第一節 前言 23 第二節 研究假設與架構 23 第三節 實驗設計建立 27 第四節 小結 28 第肆章 實驗一設計與分析 29 第一節 前言 29 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 29 第三節 研究設計 34 第四節 實驗一結果分析 35 第五節 小節 42 第伍章 實驗二設計與分析 43 第一節 前言 43 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 43 第三節 研究設計 47 第四節 實驗二結果分析 48 第五節 小節 54 第陸章 實驗三設計與分析 55 第一節 前言 55 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 55 第三節 研究設計 59 第四節 實驗三結果分析 60 第五節 小結 68 第柒章 結論與建議 69 第一節 前言 69 第二節 研究結果討論 69 第三節 研究貢獻 71 第四節 研究限制 74 第五節 未來研究建議 75 第六節 總節 78 參考文獻 79 附錄一:實驗一(社會排斥x控制感流失) 89 附錄一:實驗一(社會包容x控制感流失) 93 附錄一:實驗一(經歷不幸x控制感流失) 97 附錄二:實驗二(社會排斥x客製化聯想-控制感) 101 附錄二:實驗二(社會排斥x客製化聯想-樂趣感) 108 附錄二:實驗二(社會排斥x客製化聯想-獨特感) 115 附錄二:實驗二(社會包容x客製化聯想-控制感) 122 附錄二:實驗二(社會包容x客製化聯想-樂趣感) 129 附錄二:實驗二(社會包容x客製化聯想-獨特感) 136 附錄三:實驗三(社會排斥x認知再評估x干擾變數排序前) 143 附錄三:實驗三(社會排斥x認知再評估x干擾變數排序後) 148 附錄三:實驗三(社會排斥x無認知再評估x干擾變數排序前) 153 附錄三:實驗三(社會排斥x無認知再評估x干擾變數排序後) 158 附錄三:實驗三(社會包容x認知再評估x干擾變數排序前) 163 附錄三:實驗三(社會包容x認知再評估x干擾變數排序後) 168 附錄三:實驗三(社會包容x無認知再評估x干擾變數排序前) 173 附錄三:實驗三(社會包容x無認知再評估x干擾變數排序後) 178 |
參考文獻 References |
Adam, R., Schönfelder, S., Forneck, J., & Wessa, M. (2014). Regulating the blink: Cognitive reappraisal modulates attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 143. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. T. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 887-913. Arslan, G. (2019). Mediating role of the self-esteem and resilience in the association between social exclusion and life satisfaction among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109514. Atkinson, R., & Da Voudi, S. (2000). The concept of social exclusion in the European Union: Context, development and possibilities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(3), 427-448. Aydin, N., Fischer, P., & Frey, D. (2010). Turning to god in the face of ostracism: Effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 742-753. Bailyn, L. (1997). The impact of corporate culture on work-family integration. Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world, 209, 219. Balzarotti, S., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010). An Italian adaptation of emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 61-67. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676. Baumeister, R. F., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2015). Role of self-control failure in immoral and unethical actions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 66-69. Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589-604. Bozkurt, S., & Gligor, D. (2019). Scarcity (versus popularity) cues for rejected customers: The impact of social exclusion on cue types through need for uniqueness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 275-281. Chen, C. Y., Mathur, P., & Maheswaran, D. (2014). The effects of country-related affect on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1033-1046. Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017). The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 23-34. Chik, R. Z. W., & Lokman, A. M. (2006). Effect of product customization on consumers shopping enjoyment towards the intention to purchase online. In The International Conference on Business Information Technology (Vol. 2006). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: UPENA. Damian, R. I., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Aristotle’s virtue or dante’s deadliest sin? The influence of authentic and hubristic pride on creative achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 156-160. Dawson, S., Bloch, P. H., & Ridgway, N. M. (1990). Shopping motives, emotional states, and retail outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 66(4), 408-427. DeWall, C. N., & Richman, S. B. (2011). Social exclusion and the desire to reconnect. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 919-932. DeWall, C. N., Gilman, R., Sharif, V., Carboni, I., & Rice, K. G. (2012). Left out, sluggardly, and blue: Low self-control mediates the relationship between ostracism and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 832-837. Du, B., Li, Z., Yuan, J., Zheng, J., Shu, W., & Jin, Y. (2022). Customer's channel selection behavior on purchasing standardized and customized products: Optimized prices and channel performances. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 871322. Duclos, R., Wan, E. W., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Show me the honey! effects of social exclusion on financial risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 122-135. Erozkan, A. (2013). The effect of communication skills and interpersonal problem solving skills on social self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 739-745. Feinberg, M., Ford, B. Q., & Flynn, F. J. (2020). Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 1-19. Ford, B. Q., Feinberg, M., Lam, P., Mauss, I. B., & John, O. P. (2019). Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Does emotion regulation Trump political action? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 998-1015. Ford, M. B., & Collins, N. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 405-419. Froreich, F. V., Vartanian, L. R., Grisham, J. R., & Touyz, S. W. (2016). Dimensions of control and their relation to disordered eating behaviours and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Eating Disorders, 4(1), 1-9. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299. Harun, A., & Rokonuzzaman, M. (2021). Pursuit of loyalty in service recovery: The roles of brand equity and cognitive reappraisal as moderators. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 102601. Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause's attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363-380. Hwang, Y., & Mattila, A. S. (2019). Feeling left out and losing control: The interactive effect of social exclusion and gender on brand attitude. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 303-310. Jiang, H., Yang, Z., Sun, P., & Xu, M. (2018). When does social exclusion increase or decrease food self-regulation? The moderating role of time orientation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), 34-46. Kemp, E., Cowart, K., & Bui, M. M. (2020). Promoting consumer well-being: Examining emotion regulation strategies in social advertising messages. Journal of Business Research, 112, 200-209. Khairolt, F. B., Sulastri, S., Wahab, Z., & Widiyanti, M. (2021). The effect of social media advertising and face-to-face sales on purchase intention for customized products (case study of puncak jaya furniture). International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 4(1), 209-218. Kim, H. Y., & Lee, Y. (2020). The effect of online customization on consumers’ happiness and purchase intention and the mediating roles of autonomy, competence, and pride of authorship. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(5), 403-413. Kim, S. H., Vincent, L. C., & Goncalo, J. A. (2013). Outside advantage: Can social rejection fuel creative thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142(3), 605-611. Klug, G. C., & Schell, J. (2012). Why people play games: An industry perspective. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games (pp. 104-114). New York: Routledge. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992-1003. Krill, A. L., Platek, S. M., & Wathne, K. (2008). Feelings of control during social exclusion are partly accounted for by empathizing personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 684-688. Krishnan, H. S. (1996). Characteristics of memory associations: A consumer-based brand equity perspective. International Journal of research in Marketing, 13(4), 389-405. Lachman, M., Neupert, S. D., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2011). The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging. In K. W. Schaie & S. L. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 175–190). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. Leary, M. R. (1990). Response to social exclusion: social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 221-229. Lee, J., & Shrum, L. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544. Leroy, V., Grégoire, J., Magen, E., Gross, J. J., & Mikolajczak, M. (2012). Lead me not into temptation: Using cognitive reappraisal to reduce goal inconsistent behavior. PloS One, 7(7), e39493. Li, H., Liao, F., & Qing, P. (2022). How consumer expertise influences preference for customized food. Foods, 11(16), 2459. Loveland, K. E., Smeesters, D., & Mandel, N. (2010). Still preoccupied with 1995: The need to belong and preference for nostalgic products. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 393-408. Loxton, M., Truskett, R., Scarf, B., Sindone, L., Baldry, G., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Consumer behaviour during crises: Preliminary research on how coronavirus has manifested consumer panic buying, herd mentality, changing discretionary spending, and the role of the media in influencing behavior. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 166. Luo, M., & Chea, S. (2018). Cognitive appraisal of incident handling, affects, and post-adoption behaviors: A test of affective events theory. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 120-131. Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: a new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), 601-616. MacDonald, G., & Jensen-Campbell, L. A. (Eds.). (2011). Social pain: Neuropsychological and health implications of loss and exclusion. Washington: American Psychological Association. Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the porcupine problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55. Marathe, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). What drives customization? Control or identity? In Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer–Human Interaction Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 781-790. Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902-919. Mirowsky, J. (2013). Depression and the sense of control. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 407-425. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415. Moon, J., Chadee, D., & Tikoo, S. (2008). Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 31-39. Mourey, J. A., Olson, J. G., & Yoon, C. (2017). Products as pals: Engaging with anthropomorphic products mitigates the effects of social exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 414-431. O’Farrell, C., & Nordstrom, C. R. (2013). Workplace bullying: Examining self-monitoring and organizational culture. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture, 3(4), 6-17. Page, T., Thorsteinsson, G., & Ha, J. G. (2012). Using colours to alter consumer behaviour and product success. International Journal of Contents, 8(1), 69-73. Panno, A., Theodorou, A., Carrus, G., Imperatori, C., Spano, G., & Sanesi, G. (2020). Nature reappraisers, benefits for the environment: A model linking cognitive reappraisal, the “being away” dimension of restorativeness and eco-friendly behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1986. Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. A. (2014). Social exclusion/inclusion: Foucault's analytics of exclusion, the political ecology of social inclusion and the legitimation of inclusive education. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 99-115. Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260. Precht, L. M., Margraf, J., Stirnberg, J., & Brailovskaia, J. (2023). It’s all about control: Sense of control mediates the relationship between physical activity and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Current Psychology, 42(10), 8531-8539. Puri, R. (1996). Measuring and modifying consumer impulsiveness: A cost-benefit accessibility framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 87-113. Riachi, E., Holma, J., & Laitila, A. (2024). Psychotherapists’ perspectives on loss of sense of control. Brain and Behavior, 14(1), e3368. Ross, C. E., & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of The Sociology of Mental Health (pp. 369-370). Dordrecht: Springer Publishing Sasmita, J., & Suki, N. M. (2015). Young consumers’ insights on brand equity. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(3), 276-292. Seo, S., & Lang, C. (2019). Psychological antecedents to customized apparel purchases. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(1), 66-81. Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of marketing, 69(1), 32-45. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549-570. Su, L., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., & DeWall, C. N. (2016). Social exclusion and consumer switching behavior: A control restoration mechanism. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 99-117. Su, L., Wen, E. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Filling an empty self: The impact of social exclusion on consumer preference for visual density. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 808-824. Think with Google. (2018, 四月). 更有主導性的消費者總是期待享有客製化體驗。Google。網址: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/zh-tw/consumer-insights/consumer-journey/%E6%9B%B4%E6%9C%89%E4%B8%BB%E5%B0%8E%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%B6%88%E8%B2%BB%E8%80%85%E7%B8%BD%E6%98%AF%E6%9C%9F%E5%BE%85%E4%BA%AB%E6%9C%89%E5%AE%A2%E8%A3%BD%E5%8C%96%E9%AB%94%E9%A9%97/ Trentin, A., Perin, E., & Forza, C. (2014). Increasing the consumer-perceived benefits of a mass-customization experience through sales-configurator capabilities. Computers in Industry, 65(4), 693-705. Troy, A. S., Wilhelm, F. H., Shallcross, A. J., & Mauss, I. B. (2010). Seeing the silver lining: Cognitive reappraisal ability moderates the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 10(6), 783-795. Tunçel, N., & Kavak, B. (2022). Being an ethical or unethical consumer in response to social exclusion: The role of control, belongingness and self‐esteem. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(2), 459-474. Van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 918-928. Wan, E. W., Xu, J., & Ding, Y. (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1109-1122. Wang, Y., Xu, A. J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). L’Art Pour l’Art: Experiencing art reduces the desire for luxury goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(5), 786-810. Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need‐threat model. Advances in experimental social psychology, 41, 275-314. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762 Wymer, W., & Samu, S. (2009). The influence of cause marketing associations on product and cause brand value. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14(1), 1-20. Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560-567. Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838-842. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-03-15 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-03-15 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.15.221.46 現在時間是 2025-04-04 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2029-03-15 Your IP address is 3.15.221.46 The current date is 2025-04-04 This thesis will be available to you on 2029-03-15. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2029-03-15 |
QR Code |