論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-03-27
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-03-27
論文名稱 Title |
應用永續平衡計分卡執行企業策略之探討-以A公司為例 The Application of the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard in Corporate Strategy Execution: A Case Study of Company A |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
78 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2025-03-24 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-03-27 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
永續平衡計分卡、環境、社會與公司治理、平衡計分卡、績效管理、策略地圖 Sustainable Balanced Scorecard, Environmental, Social, and Governance, Balanced Scorecard, Performance Management, Strategy Map |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 437 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 437 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
隨著全球環境變遷與企業社會責任意識的提升,企業經營模式逐漸由傳統的財務 導向轉向更全面的永續發展策略。永續平衡計分卡是一種將環境、社會與公司治理三個指標納入傳統平衡計分卡的績效管理工具。本研究旨在探討永續平衡計分卡如何協助企業有效整合這三個指標,並應用於個案A公司之策略管理,以提升其永續競爭力。 本研究透過個案研究法,分析A公司之財務報告、永續報告及三個指標評分,運用永續平衡計分卡設計適合該企業的績效評估架構與策略地圖。研究結果顯示,透過永續平衡計分卡,企業能夠有效整合這三個指標,提升環境永續與社會責任表現;優化內部流程與資源配置,提高能源效率與降低碳排放;強化利害關係人管理,提升市場信任度與品牌價值以及促進學習與成長,提升員工創新能力與組織韌性。 本研究進一步針對A公司提出具體策略建議,包括這三個績效指標設計、策略執行機制強化及數位轉型應用,以作為鋼鐵產業及其他高碳排放產業企業推動永續管理的參考。 |
Abstract |
With the increasing emphasis on global environmental changes and corporate social responsibility, business models have gradually shifted from traditional financial-oriented approaches to comprehensive sustainable development strategies. The Sustainable Balanced Scorecard integrates environmental, social, and governance indicators into the traditional Balanced Scorecard framework, providing enterprises with a more holistic performance management tool. This study aims to explore how Sustainable Balanced Scorecard facilitates the effective integration of these three indicators into corporate strategy and how it can be applied to a case study of Company A to enhance its sustainable competitiveness. Using a case study methodology, this research examines Company A’s financial reports, sustainability reports, and three indicators’ scores to design a customized performance evaluation framework of Sustainable Balanced Scorecard and strategy map. The results show that Sustainable Balanced Scorecard provides many benefits including enabling enterprises to effectively integrate three indicators to improve environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility; optimizing internal processes and resource allocation, improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions; strengthening stakeholder management, increasing market trust and brand value as well as promoting learning and growth, fostering employee innovation and organizational resilience. This study further provides strategic recommendations for Company A including the design of three performance indicators, the reinforcement of strategy execution mechanisms, and the application of digital transformation. These insights offer a valuable reference for Taiwanese steel companies and other high-carbon-emission industries seeking to implement sustainable management practices. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書i 誌謝ii 摘要iii 英文摘要iv 目錄vi 圖次viii 表次ix 第一章 緒論1 1.1研究背景與動機1 1.1.1研究背景1 1.1.2研究動機2 1.2研究目的4 1.3研究流程5 第二章 文獻回顧7 2.1ESG7 2.2平衡計分卡9 2.3永續平衡計分卡11 2.4策略與執行15 第三章 研究方法20 3.1個案研究20 3.2研究架構與步驟21 3.2.1研究架構21 3.2.2研究步驟23 第四章 個案研究25 4.1個案概述與其策略評估25 4.2指標統計相關分析31 4.2.1財務指標31 4.2.2永續指標37 4.2.3相關分析44 4.3策略地圖與永續平衡分卡46 4.3.1構面指標47 4.3.2策略地圖54 4.3.3永續平衡分卡58 第五章 結論與建議60 5.1研究結論與貢獻60 5.2研究限制與建議60 5.3未來研究方向62 參考文獻63 一、中文文獻63 二、外文文獻63 |
參考文獻 References |
一、中文文獻 何欣怡、許評碩、李後昆、洪宗益、黃溢銓(2022)。台塑企業節能減碳邁向永續發展之路。燃燒季刊, (118), 41-48。 吳安妮(2003)。以策略為焦點促效益之提昇平衡計分卡之精髓,範疇及整合 (上)。 會計研究月刊,(211),45-54。 李光斌、 彭志強、王仁聖、林冠仲(2020)。 運用平衡計分卡建構台灣企業數位轉型之評估模型。科技管理學刊,25(4), 1-35。 施憲銘(2023)。企業投入ESG、員工工作投入及工作績效之研究。﹝博士論文。國立彰化師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2zmmvv。 陳依蘋(2003)。以平衡計分卡落實願景用執行力連結價值鏈平衡計分卡與執行力。 會計研究月刊, (211), 28-37。 陳俞均(2023)。建立台灣零售電商之永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構 ── 以momo為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5nfs9c。 黃可謙(2022)。以ESG創造企業價值之永續發展研究 – 以MSFT,GOOGLE,台達電,及台泥為研究對象。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/34padu。 楊心瑋(2023)。以平衡計分卡建構企業商業模式轉型之策略 - 以伺服器外商為例。﹝碩士論文。國立陽明交通大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/98c7sh。 鄭惠之(2006)。運用平衡計分卡創造企業綜效。會計研究月刊,(245), 28-30。 二、外文文獻 Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Fadzil, F. H. (2014). The effect of board of directors characteristics, audit committee characteristics and executive committee characteristics on firm performance in Oman: An empirical study. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 149-171. Alliance, G. S. I. (2021). Global sustainable investment review 2020 refer to https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf ArcelorMittal. (2021). ArcelorMittal signs MoU with the Spanish government supporting €1 billion investment in decarbonisation technologies. Retrieved from https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/media/press-releases/arcelormittal-signs-mou-with-the-spanish-government-supporting-1-billion-investment-in-decarbonisation-technologies/ Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 29-40. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281. Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 222-241. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585-604. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585-606. Hoque, Z., & James, W. (2000). Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12(1), 1-17. Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63-80. Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97-124. Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 193-221. Hsu, C. H., Chang, A. Y., & Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs–integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 629-645. Hristov, I., Chirico, A., & Appolloni, A. (2019). Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC). Sustainability, 11(7), 2119-. Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. Kaplan, Robert S, and David P Norton (1996). The Balanced Scorecard Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton,D.P. (2004). Strategy maps : Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy : how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. In Harvard business review (Vol. 89, Number 1/2, pp. 62–77). Harvard Business School Publ. Corp. Laine, M., Tregidga, H., & Unerman, J. (2021). Sustainability accounting and accountability. U.K., Londen: Routledge. Lu, M. T., Chang, S. C., & Huang, L. H. (2022). Using the sustainability-balanced scorecard for assessing sustainability issues of the green energy companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(2), 483-499. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107-115. Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2022). Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 367-384. Nguyen, D., Ngo, T., Nguyen, R., Cao, H., & Pham, H. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, balanced scorecard system and financial performance in the service sector: The case of Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9(13), 2215-2228. Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: maximizing performance and maintaining results. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. C.A.: Sage publications. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage : creating and sustaining superior performance. D.C: Free Press. Porter, M. E., & Strategy, C. (1980). Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Competitive Strategy. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster POSCO. (2021). POSCO pledges to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and lead low-carbon society. Retrieved from https://newsroom.posco.com/en/posco-pledges-to-achieve-carbon-neutrality-by-2050-and-lead-low-carbon-society/ Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. N.J: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2008). Managing the business case for sustainability. In EMAN-EU 2008 Conference (Vol. 7). S&P GLOBAL(2025). Corporate Sustainability Assessment refer to https://www.spglobal.com/esg/csa/ Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359-368. The SIGMA Project(2003). The SIGMA Guidelines-Toolkit:Sustainability Scorecard. https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Measuring_Progress_and_Eco_Footprinting/SIGMASustainabilityScorecard.pdf Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Chiu, A. S. (2020). A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119740. Van Zanten, J. A., & Van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3), 208-233. Vuorinen, T., Hakala, H., Kohtamäki, M., & Uusitalo, K. (2018). Mapping the landscape of strategy tools: A review on strategy tools published in leading journals within the past 25 years. Long Range Planning, 51(4), 586-605. Zharfpeykan, R., & Akroyd, C. (2022). Factors influencing the integration of sustainability indicators into a company's performance management system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 129988. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-03-27 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-03-27 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.97.14.87 現在時間是 2026-09-15 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2030-03-27 Your IP address is 18.97.14.87 The current date is 2026-09-15 This thesis will be available to you on 2030-03-27. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2030-03-27 |
QR Code |