論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-06-03
論文名稱 Title |
賦權領導與員工建言行為:檢視當責感與關係能量的中介角色 Empowering Leadership and Employee Voice: The Mediating Roles of Felt Accountability and Relational Energy |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
46 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-05-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-06-03 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
賦權領導、建言行為、當責感、關係能量、中介效果 empowering leadership, employee voice, felt accountability, relationship energy, mediation effect |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 610 次,被下載 5 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 610 times, has been downloaded 5 times. |
中文摘要 |
隨著員工意識的崛起,員工對於工作職場環境的關注度越來越高,這也成為企業重要的努力方向之一,企業要如何提高自己的競爭力來因應環境的變遷,已是現今重要的議題,賦予員工適度的自主權和授權也逐漸受到重視。本研究旨在探討賦權領導對於員工建言行為的影響,並藉此探討當責感和關係能量在其中的中介作用。本研究以臺灣地區各產業的員工作為研究對象,總計回收217份有效問卷。研究結果顯示,賦權領導對建言行為具有正向影響,且當責感在賦權領導和建言行為之間具有中介效果,同時,賦權領導對關係能量也有正向影響。然而,關係能量與建言行為之間的關係未達到顯著,且關係能量未能中介賦權領導與建言行為之間的關係。本研究結果支持了賦權領導和當責感對於建言行為的積極影響,並提供了有助於理解組織中建言行為的相關因素的洞察,並對未來研究方向提出建議。 |
Abstract |
With the rise of employee awareness, employees now pay more attention to workplace environment. Companies are also driven by these changes to increase their competitiveness to adapt, topic such as empowering leadership and authorization within the employee society is well discussed nowadays. This research focuses on exploring the impact of empowering leadership on employee voice, and further discusses the roles of employee accountability and relationship energy in between. 218 valid surveys are collected from a variety of industries in Taiwan, and the results indicate that empowering leadership has a positive correlation with employee voice, and employee accountability is a mediator variable between empowering leadership and employee voice. Empowering leadership also has a positive correlation with relationship energy; however, relationship energy is not correlated to employee voice, and relationship energy is no a mediator variable between empowering leadership and employee voice. Study results support the theory of empowering leadership and accountability having direct and strong impact on employee voice, and provide insights about factors associated with employee voice within the organization for future studies. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文定審書 i 摘 要 ii Abstract iii 目 錄 iv 圖 次 vi 表 次 vii 第壹章 緒論 1 第貳章 文獻探討 4 第一節、 賦權領導 4 第二節、 建言行為 5 第三節、 當責感 6 第四節、 關係能量 7 第五節、 社會訊息處理理論 8 第六節、 資源保存理論 8 第七節、 各變項間的關係探討 9 第參章 研究方法 16 第一節、 研究架構與假設 16 第二節、 研究對象與資料收集方式 16 第三節、 研究量表 18 第四節、 資料分析方法 19 第肆章 研究結果 21 第一節、 驗證性因素分析 21 第二節、 相關分析 23 第三節、 假設檢定 24 第伍章 結論與建議 28 第一節、 理論意涵 28 第二節、 管理實務意涵 29 第三節、 研究限制與未來研究建議 31 參考文獻 33 |
參考文獻 References |
中文文獻 張文隆(2008)。當責式管理。中國生產力中心,台北。 林守紀, 周麗芳, 任金剛 & 曾春榮(2017)。員工建言行為: 回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報,17(1),1-33。 https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2017.1701.01 王毓芳(2008)。主管授權賦能領導行為對部屬工作績效的影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班。 吳麗惠(2012)。主管魅力領導與賦權、員工當責與組織績效之互動關係探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺中教育大學事業經營碩士學位學程。 朱鈴瓏(2022)。授權型領導與建言行為之關聯:心理資本與組織公民行為的中介作用〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士班。 范秀芳(2022)。銀行分支機構導入賦權領導對員工忠誠度及組織效能影響之研究 -以 C銀行為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立嘉義大學管理學院碩士在職專班。 英文文獻 Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A. & Drasgow, F. (2000) The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire: The Construction and Validation of a New Scale for Measuring Leader Behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2 Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5) 945-955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945 Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in organizational behavior, 30, 91-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001 Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Romney, A. C. (2013). Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organization Science, 24(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0732 Baker, W. E. (2019). Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: Toward a multilevel model. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 373-395. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015047 Coyne, J. C. (1976). Depression and the response of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85(2), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.85.2.186 Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of management review, 33(1), 137-162. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27749365 Ergeneli, A., Arı, G. S., & Metin, S. (2007). Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.012 Frink, D. D., & Ferris, G. R. (1999). The moderating effects of accountability on the conscientiousness-performance relationship. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(4), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022918904256 Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001 Fry, L. W., & Cohen, M. P. (2009). Spiritual leadership as a paradigm for organizational transformation and recovery from extended work hours cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 265–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9695-2 Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1089-1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.408 Ford, M. T., Wang, Y., Jin, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2018). Chronic and episodic anger and gratitude toward the organization: Relationships with organizational and supervisor supportiveness and extrarole behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 175. https://doi:10.1037/ocp0000075 George, G., & Chun, H. (1996).Managing changes in globalizing business: how to manage cross-cultural business partners. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, 62-72. https://doi:10.1108/09534819610116637 George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310 Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.015 Gyu Park, J., Sik Kim, J., Yoon, S. W., & Joo, B. K. (2017). The effects of empowering leadership on psychological well-being and job engagement The mediating role of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 350-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2015-0182 Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrewe, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. (2007). Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability– job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.003 Hobfoll, S. E. (1989).Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3) , 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y.P. (2010).Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 122-143. https://doi:10.1002/job.636\ Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and reputation: Mediators in the relationships between accountability and job performance and satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809331504 Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2052 Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009).Silenced by fear:: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in organizational behavior, 29, 163-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002 Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice behavior: A two-wave longitudinal examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176 Laschinger, H. K. (1996). A theoretical approach to studying work empowerment in nursing: a review of studies testing Kanter's theory of structural power in organizations. Nursing administration quarterly, 20(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-199602020-00006 Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707697 McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0041 MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Challenge‐ oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge‐oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization's bottom line?. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 559-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045 Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020744 McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. Irvington. Madlock, P. E. (2008). The link between leadership style, communicator competence, and employee satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 45(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607309351 Owens, B. P., Baker, W. E., Sumpter, D. M., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 35. https://doi:10.1037/apl0000032 Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In Research in personnel and Human Resources Management , 331-369. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3 Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718 Thomas W. H. Ng & Daniel C. Feldman. (2012).Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(2), 216-234. https://doi:10.1002/job.754 Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902 Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.6.1195 Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384 Vecchio, R. P., Jusin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.014 Wayne E. B. (2019).Emotional Energy, Relational Energy, and Organizational Energy: Toward a Multilevel Model. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior(6) , 373-395. https://doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015047 Wang, L., Owens, B. P., Li, J. (J.), & Shi, L. (2018). Exploring the affective impact, boundary conditions, and antecedents of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000314 Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2018). How transformational leadership influences employee voice behavior: The roles of psychological capital and organizational identification. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(2), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6619 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-06-03 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.97.9.168 現在時間是 2026-09-15 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2029-06-03 Your IP address is 18.97.9.168 The current date is 2026-09-15 This thesis will be available to you on 2029-06-03. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |