論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
非線性匯率轉嫁之研究
--台灣產業實證分析 Non-Linear Mechanisms of Exchange Rate Pass-Through : Evidence From Industries In Taiwan |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
47 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2013-06-11 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2013-06-19 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
遺傳演算法、非線性、匯率轉嫁、門檻共積、最大概似估計法 Genetic Algorithms, Non-Liner, Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Threshold Cointegration, Maximum Likelihood Estimate |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5917 次,被下載 814 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5917 times, has been downloaded 814 times. |
中文摘要 |
本文以Seo(2006) 具門檻共積模型基礎下的門檻共積檢定, 檢定台灣十四產業是否存 在非線性匯率轉嫁現象。以具顯著門檻共積之產業建構三區間門檻向量誤差修正模型, 利 用Seo(2003) 提出之MLE 法估計門檻參數與共積係數。傳統文獻多使用格點搜尋找最 適解, 但在多變數時, 利用格點搜尋不具效率性, 因此本文使用遺傳演算法改進多變數下 格點搜尋無效率性。 實證結果指出台灣十四產業中有六產業存在顯著門檻共積效果, 分別為動物產品產業、 礦產品產業、塑膠及其製品產業、木及木製品產業、基本金屬製品產業、運輸工具產業; 當 中有3產業可觀察到不對稱的匯率轉嫁, 其原因為出口商會在菜單成本的考量下選擇是否 調整出口報價, 若調整出口報價的利潤大過調整報價的成本, 國外出口商會選擇調整出口 報價保持市場競爭力, 此時匯率轉嫁為零, 反之, 若調整出口報價的利潤小於調整報價的 成本, 匯率轉嫁較為明顯。 |
Abstract |
This paper applies a test for the linear no cointegration null hypothesis in a threshold vector error correction model by M.Seo(2006) to investigates non-linear exchange rate pass-through (ERPT) in Taiwan. It use the MLE method to estimate threshold value and cointegrating vector. The traditional literature using the grid search to find optimal solution.But in a multi-model, the use of grid search is not efficient, and therefore we adept a genetic algorithm to improve its efficiency. Empirical results indicate that there are six industries reflect significant threshold cointegration effect among the fourteen industries. Three industries among the six industries observed asymmetric exchange rate pass through. Our reasults support that exporters consider menu costs in determining whether to adjust the export price. |
目次 Table of Contents |
1 緒論.................................................................................1 1.1 研究動機與目的. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 1 1.2 研究流程. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 3 2 文獻回顧...........................................................................4 2.1 不完全匯率轉嫁. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...4 2.2 不對稱匯率轉嫁. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .7 3 實證方法..........................................................................10 3.1 單根檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . 10 3.2 門檻自我迴歸單根檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.1 估計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ 11 3.2.2 檢定門檻效果. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . 13 3.2.3 檢定單根. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . 13 3.3 共積檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 14 3.4 門檻共積檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 15 3.5 門檻向量誤差修正模型. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.6 遺傳演算法. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 20 4 實證結果分析....................................................................24 4.1 資料來源與說明. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 24 4.2 單根檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 25 4.3 門檻共積檢定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 28 4.4 三區間門檻誤差修正模型估計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5 結論與建議........................................................................32 參考文獻..............................................................................33 A 遺傳演算法估計結果...........................................................37 B 門檻向量誤差修正模型估計結果..........................................37 |
參考文獻 References |
張瑞娟及欉清全(2009), “貨幣政策與匯率轉嫁之探討台灣之實證分析”, 《應用經濟論 叢》, 86, 37–67。 黃恩恩、藍青玉與郭炳伸(2007), “菜單成本與不對稱匯率轉嫁以台灣進口物價為例”, 《經 濟論文》, 35(4), 439–472。 劉宗欣、張銘仁(2000), “進口物價的匯率轉嫁與不對稱性: 台灣的實證研究”, 《經濟論 文》, 28(4), 369–396。 賴景昌(2006), “國際金融理論基礎篇”, 《二版》, 68–77, 台北: 華泰文化。 Al-Abri, A.S. and Goodwin, B.K. (2009), “Re-examining the exchange rate passthrough into import prices using non-linear estimation techniques : threshold cointegration”, International review of economics nance, 18, 142–161. Balke, S. Nathan and Fomby, B. Thomas (1997), “Threshold cointegration”, Inter- national Economic Review, 38, 627–645. Campa, J. M. and Goldberg, L. (2005), “Exchange rate pass-through into import prices”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 679–690. Caner, M. and Hansen, B.E. (2001), “Threshold auto-regression with a unit root”, Econometrica, 69, 1555–1596. Devereux, M.B., Engel, C., and Storgaard, P.E. (2004), “Endogenous exchange rate pass-through when nominal prices are set in advance”, Journal of International Economics, 63, 263–291. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive times series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431. Dornbusch, R. (1987), “Exchange rates and prices”, American Economic Review, 77, 93–106. Endersa, W. and Granger (1998), “Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates”, Journal of Business Eco- nomic Statistics, 16, 304–311. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987), “Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing”, Econometrica, 55, 391–407. Granger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. (1974), “Spurious regressions in econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 111–120. Hansen, B. E. (1996), “Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identi?ed under the null hypothesis”, Econometrica, 64, 413–430. Hansen, B.E. (2000), “Sample splitting and threshold estimation”, Econometrica, 68, 575–603. Hansen, B.E. and Seo, B. (2002), “Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error correction models”, Journal of Econometrics, 110, 293–318. Holland, J.H. (1992), “Genetic algorithms”, Sci. Am., 66–72. Hooper, P. and Mann, C. (1989), “Exchange rate pass-through in the 1980s: the case of u.s. imports of manufactures”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 297–337. Larue, B., Gervais, J.P., and Rancourt, Y. (2010), “Exchange rate pass-through, menu costs and threshold cointegration”, Empirical Economics, 38, 171–192. Lo, M. and Zivot, E. (2001), “Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment to the law of one price”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 5, 533–576. Menon, J. (1995), “Exchange rates and import prices for a small open economy”, Applied Economics, 27(4), 297–301. Nelson, C. R. and Plosser, C. I. (1982), “Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 129–162. Phillips, P.C.B. and Ouliaris (1990), “Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration”, Econometrica, 58(1), 165–193. Said, E. S. and Dickey, D. A. (1984), “Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models of unknown ordor”, Biometrika, 71, 599–607. Seo, B. (2003), “Nonlinear mean reversion in the term structure of interest rates”, Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 27, 2243–2265. Seo, M. (2006), “Bootstrap testing for the null of no cointegration in a threshold vector error correction model”, Journal of Econometrics, 134, 129–150. Taylor, J. (2000), “Low inflation, pass-through, and pricing power of firms”, Euro- pean Economic Review, 44, 1389–1408. Tong, H. (1978), On a Threshold Model in Pattern Recognition and Signal Process- ing, Amsterdam: Sijhoff and Noordhoff. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |