論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
地緣政治風險與企業影響:以〈晶片與科學法案〉下的台灣半導體產業為例 Geopolitical Risk and Firm-Level Impacts: Evidence from Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry under the CHIPS and Science Act |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
116 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2025-05-29 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-06-22 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
晶片與科學法案、半導體產業、事件研究法、GARCH模型、橫斷面分析 CHIPS ACT, Semiconductor Industry, Event Study, GARCH Model, Cross-Sectional Analysis |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 468 次,被下載 7 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 468 times, has been downloaded 7 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究探討美國《晶片與科學法案》(CHIPS and Science Act)作為一項重大的地緣政治政策,對台灣半導體產業所產生的影響。本文採用創新性的研究方法,結合事件研究法(event study)與GARCH波動模型,分析該法案宣示與落實過程中三個關鍵事件日所引發的股市反應。此一方法能同時捕捉短期異常報酬與報酬波動的變化,從而全面呈現地緣政治不確定性下的市場動態。 此外,研究進一步進行橫斷面迴歸分析,以探討企業層級的財務特徵如何影響市場反應,分析焦點包括:研發強度(R&D intensity)、資本支出(capital expenditures)、外資持股比率(QFII holdings),以及對中國市場的盈餘曝險(China EPS contribution)。實證結果顯示,《晶片與科學法案》相關事件引發台灣半導體企業顯著的短期市場波動,且在累積異常報酬(CARs)方面呈現明顯差異。GARCH 模型估計結果指出,各事件日前後股票報酬波動顯著上升,反映整個事件投資人呈現樂觀態度,但依然會因恐慌和不確定做出不理智選擇。 進一步的橫斷面分析結果指出,研發強度較高的公司,恐在事件中期面臨負向異常報酬,顯示其資訊階層低但依然影響。外資持股比例較高的公司於事件前為正向異常報酬,但會在當天轉為負向;顯示其市場整體對事件的正向態度,卻依然會因為羊群效應而在事件當天轉變態度。整體而言,本研究結果凸顯企業特有財務特徵在調節地緣政治風險衝擊中的關鍵角色,並驗證結合事件研究法與GARCH模型之方法,在分析政策驅動型市場事件時的應用價值與有效性 |
Abstract |
This study examines the impact of the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act—a major geopolitical policy—on Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Using an innovative combination of event study and GARCH modeling, we analyze stock market reactions across three key event dates associated with the Act’s announcement and implementation. This approach captures both immediate abnormal stock returns and changes in return volatility, providing a comprehensive view of market dynamics under geopolitical uncertainty. In addition, we conduct cross-sectional regression analysis to investigate how firm-level financial characteristics shape these responses.. The empirical results reveal that the CHIPS Act events elicited significant short-term market volatility and distinct patterns in cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) for Taiwanese semiconductor firms. GARCH-based volatility estimates indicate heightened stock return fluctuations around each event date, reflecting increased investor uncertainty. Pre-event CARs are mildly negative, but event-day returns turn significantly positive, lifting the overall CAR to +4.3 % by day +15 and signaling renewed investor optimism after the Act passed. Cross-sectional analysis shows that companies with higher R&D intensity often have negative abnormal returns in the middle of the event period, even if they have less information. Firms with more foreign ownership have positive abnormal returns before the event, but these become negative on the event day, likely due to herding behavior. These results highlight the key role of firm financial characteristics in handling geopolitical risks and show that using event study and GARCH together is valuable for analyzing policy impacts. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Content 論文審定書 i 致謝 ii Acknowledgements iii 摘要 iv Abstract v List of Equation, Figures and Tables xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Global Context and Strategic Importance of Semiconductors 1 1.2 The CHIPS and Science Act as a Geopolitical Policy Tool 1 1.3 Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry: Strategic Asset or Vulnerability? 2 1.4 USA-Sino Trade War and Technological Competition 2 1.5 Problem Statement and Research Gap 3 1.6 Research Objectives and Key Questions 3 1.7 Thesis Structure 4 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 The Global Semiconductor Industry and Taiwan’s Strategic Role 5 2.1.1 Global Semiconductor Industry Overview and Value Chain Structure 5 2.1.2 Key Characteristics of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry 6 2.1.3 Industrial Clusters, Government-Industry Collaboration, and Taiwan’s Strategic Position 9 2.2 Geopolitics and Industrial Policy: Theoretical Framework 11 2.2.1 The definition of geopolitics and geo-economics 11 2.2.2 Historical Perspectives and Strategic Technology Policy Frameworks 13 2.2.3 The Geopolitical Impact of the CHIPS Act on the Semiconductor Industry 14 2.3 Political Risk and Stock Market Reactions: Empirical Evidence 17 2.3.1 Political Risk 17 2.3.2 Event Study Methodologies 20 2.3.3 Transmission Mechanisms of Political Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Market Volatility 23 2.4 Firm-Specific Financial Indicators and Their Moderating Effects 25 2.4.1 The Relationship Between Financial Ratios and Stock Abnormal Returns 25 2.4.2 The Impact of Capital Expenditure, R&D Intensity, EPS Foreign Exposure, and QFII Holdings 28 2.5. Research Gap and Contribution 30 2.5.1 Research Gap 30 2.5.2 Research Contribution 31 3. Research Method 32 3.1 Data and Sample Selection 32 3.1.1 Description of Data Sources 32 3.1.2 Justification for Using the Taiwan All-Market Semiconductor Index 33 3.1.3 Firm Selection Criteria 34 3.1.4 Data Completeness and Final Sample 34 3.2 Event Study Method 35 3.2.1 Overview of Event Study Method 35 3.2.2 Selection and Justification of Event Dates 36 3.2.3 Definition of Event Windows 37 3.2.3 Expected Returns Model and Abnormal Return Calculation 37 3.3 Volatility Modeling (GARCH Framework) 39 3.3.1 Rationale for Incorporating GARCH Models 39 3.3.2 Potential GARCH Specifications and Selection Criteria 40 3.3.3 How Volatility Modeling Complements Event Study Analysis 43 3.4 Statistical Significance Tests 44 3.4.1 Cross-sectional Test Statistic 44 3.4.2 Sign Test Statistic 45 3.4.3 Generalized Sign Test Statistic 46 3.4.4 Interpretation and Implications 47 3.5 Regression Design and Hypothesis Development 48 3.5.1 Dependent Variable 49 3.5.2 Independent Variables 49 3.5.3 Control Variables 52 3.5.4 Regression Model Specification 52 4. Result 54 4.1 Event Study Results 54 4.1.1 Descriptive Statistics and Event Window Analysis 54 4.1.2 Statistical Significance and Abnormal Returns Analysis 54 4.1.3 Summary and Selection of Key Event Date 56 4.2 Volatility Analysis from GARCH Models 57 4.2.1 GARCH Model Selection and Parameter Estimation 58 4.2.2 EGARCH(2,1) Estimation Results and Interpretation 59 4.2.3 Volatility Clustering Visualization 60 4.2.4 Model Diagnostics and Robustness 60 4.2.5 Summary of Volatility Analysis Findings 61 4.3 Regression Results and Interpretation 62 4.3.1 Operational Performance Variables (Capex, R&D Intensity, EPS China Exposure) 63 4.3.2 Financial Structure and Foreign Exposure (QFII Holdings and LTD Ratio) 64 4.3.3 Firm Size and Overall Model Evaluation 65 5. Conclusion 67 5.1 Summary of Key Findings 67 5.1.1 Event Study Results and Their Significance 67 5.1.3 Role of Firm-level Financial Indicators 71 5.2 Policy Recommendations for Taiwan and Industry Stakeholders 76 5.2.1 Recommendations for Taiwanese Policymakers 76 5.2.2 Guidance for Semiconductor Firms 77 5.3 Contributions, Limitations, and Directions for Future Research 80 5.3.1 Contributions to Literature 80 5.3.2 Limitations of the Study 81 5.3.3 Directions for Future Research 84 6. Reference 89 7. Appendix 97 Appendix A: All company samples and Dataset 97 Appendix B: The table of 06/23,07/29 and 08/09 Abnormal Return 98 Appendix C: Variable Definition and Calculation Formula 104 |
參考文獻 References |
Addison, C. (2001). Silicon Shield: Taiwan’s Protection Against Chinese Attack. iUniverse. Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3 Amir, E., Guan, Y., & Livne, G. (2007). The association of R&D and capital expenditures with subsequent earnings variability. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1-2), 222-246. Armitage, S. (1995). Event study methods and evidence on their performance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(1), 25-52. Aslan, M., Aslan, K., & Rashid, Y. (2020). Economic and socioeconomic consequences of us sanctions on Iran. Center for Iranian Studies in Ankara, 1(1), 1-32. Athari, S. A., & Bahreini, M. (2023). Does economic policy uncertainty impact firms’ capital structure policy? Evidence from Western European economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 37157-37173. Bae, K. H., Chan, K., & Ng, A. (2004). Investibility and return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), 239-263. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024 Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2000). Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00220 Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2003). Emerging markets finance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(1–2), 3–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00054-3 Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., Kiguel, A., & Wang, X. (2016). Globalization and asset returns. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 8(1), 221-288. Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. In Proceedings from the American statistical association, business and economic statistics section Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Harvard University Press. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248 Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics, 31(3), 307-327. Borusyak, K., & Jaravel, X. (2018). Revisiting event study designs. SSRN. Bown, C. P. (2020). The 2018 US-China trade conflict after forty years of special protection. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2011). Run of the red queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China. Yale University Press. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1980). Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205–258. Capri, A. (2022). CHIPS on the table: US doubles down on techno-nationalism. Hinrich Foundation, https://www.hinrichfoundation.com/research/article/tech/chips-us-techno-nationalism Castro-Iragorri, C. (2019). Does the market model provide a good counterfactual for event studies in finance? Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 33(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-019-00325-4 Chan, Y., & John Wei, K. C. (1996). Political risk and stock price volatility: The case of Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 4(2-3), 259–275. Chandran, N. (2025). Chips on the Deck: US-China Rivalry and Reorganizing the Supply Chain. In The New Geopolitics of Technology (pp. 123-145). Springer.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-8209-3_8 Chen, Z., Du, J., Li, D., & Ouyang, R. (2013). Does foreign institutional ownership increase return volatility? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 660-669. Congressional Research Service. (2023). CHIPS Act of 2022 Provisions and Implementation. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47523 Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10(2), 126-155.Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1999). Institutions, financial markets, and firm debt maturity. Journal of financial economics, 54(3), 295-336.Sorescu, A., Warren, N. L., & Ertekin, L. (2017). Event study methodology in the marketing literature: An overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 186-207. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. I., Sampson, T., & Reenen, J. V. (2016). The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. Doshi, R. (2021). The long game: China's grand strategy to displace American order. Oxford University Press.https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-long-game-9780197527917 Engle, R. (2001). GARCH 101: The use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics. Journal of economic perspectives, 15(4), 157-168. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773 European Commission. (2017). Europe’s next leaders: The start-up and scale-up initiative. European Union. European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a regulation establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem (European Chips Act). European Union. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486 Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351 Freedman, L. (2018). The future of war: A history. PublicAffairs. Gaur, V., Fisher, M. L., & Raman, A. (2005). An econometric analysis of inventory turnover performance in retail services. Management Science, 51(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0307. Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The journal of finance, 48(5), 1779-1801. Guellec, Dominique. (2003). R&D and Productivity Growth. OECD Economic Studies. 2001. 103-126. 10.1787/eco_studies-v2001-art12-en. Hah, X. B. K. (2024). Security and supremacy: An examination of the US-China technological rivalry in the semiconductor industry. Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 45–67. Retrieved from https://samudera.um.edu.my/index.php/mjir/article/view/53346 Hall, R., & Weis, R. (1967). The role of firm size in corporate performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 14(3), 45–52. Hancke, B., & Garcia Calvo, A. (2024). The paradox of semiconductors—EU governance between industrial policy and technological sovereignty. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 37(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2024.2405915 Hawkins, R. (2015). Marianna Mazzucato The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths. Hodgson, D. W., Bouteska, A., Hassan, M. K., & Sanchez, B. A. Necessary Evil: The Impact of Banking Regulations on Liquidity Risk and Financial Stability. Available at SSRN 5097938. Hufbauer, G. C., & Jung, E. (2020). What's new in economic sanctions?. European economic review, 130, 103572. Huggins, R., Johnston, A., Munday, M., & Xu, C. (2023). Competition, open innovation, and growth challenges in the semiconductor industry: the case of Europe’s clusters. Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 531–547. Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241 Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x Ji, X. (2021). Mega-regionalism and great power geo-economic competition. Routledge. Ji, X. (2021). Mega-regionalism and great power geo-economic competition. Routledge.Hassan, T. A., Hollander, S., Van Lent, L., & Tahoun, A. (2019). Firm-level political risk: Measurement and effects. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(4), 2135-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.07.001 Kania, E. B., & Laskai, L. (2025). Arms race or innovation race? Geopolitical AI development. Geopolitics, 30(2), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2025.2456019 Kim, D., & Kon, S. J. (1994). Alternative models for the conditional heteroscedasticity of stock returns. Journal of Business, 563-598. Kim, J. W., & Lee, H. K. (2004). Embodied and disembodied international spillovers of R&D in OECD manufacturing industries. Technovation, 24(4), 359-368. Kleimann, D. (2023). Normative power Europe and the emergence of a Taiwan policy in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 45(6), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2258263 Kothari, S. P., & Warner, J. B. (2007). Econometrics of event studies. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 3–36). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50015-9. Kothari, S. P., Laguerre, T. E., & Leone, A. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 613-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00069 Langlois, R., & Steinmueller, E. (1999). The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry. In Sources of industrial leadership (pp. 19–78). Cambridge University Press. Lee, S. J. (2014). Samsung Electronics and its growth strategy. In Handbook of East Asian entrepreneurship (pp. 336–345). Routledge. Leland, H. E. (1968). Saving and Uncertainty: The Precautionary Demand for Saving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879518 Lin, H.-W. (2023). The Light on the Chip Island (2nd ed.). TechView Press. Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691 Miller, C. (2023). Chip war: The fight for the world’s most critical technology (H.-F. Hung, Trans.). 天下雜誌. Ministry of Science and Technology. (2022). MOST annual report: Advancing science parks for global innovation. MOST Press. Myers, S. C. (1974). Interactions of corporate financing and investment decisions-implications for capital budgeting. The Journal of finance, 29(1), 1-25. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 347-370. Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003. Oatley, T. (2019). Toward a political economy of complex interdependence. European Journal of International Relations, 25(4), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119837806 Ota, Y. (2022). 2030半導体の地政学: 戦略物資を支配するのは誰か (T. H.-C. Chuo, Trans.). 野人文化股份有限公司 Peterson, P. P. Event Studies: A review of Issues and Methodology. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 1989, 28(3), 36-66. Piotroski, J. D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672903 Platzer, M. D., & Sargent, J. F. (2016). US semiconductor manufacturing: Industry trends, global competition, federal policy. Congressional Research Service. Reuters. (2023, September 22). U.S. finalizes rules to prevent China from benefiting from $52 billion in chips funding. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-finalizes-rules-prevent-china-benefiting-52-bln-chips-funding-2023-09-22/ Robyn, D. (1988). Trading Places: How We Allowed Japan to Take the Lead. Rodríguez, M., Bruzzone, S., & Villacorta, E. (2022). Political Risk Report: Analyzing liquidity and financial risks in volatile economies. University of Navarra. https://www.unav.edu/documents/16800098/17755721/CentralAsia_PRR_2022-Dic_SBruzzone-MRodr%C3%ADguez-EVillaCorta.pdf Rogers, J., Foxall, A., Henderson, M., & Armstrong, S. (2020). Breaking the China supply chain: How the “five eyes” can decouple from strategic dependency. Henry Jackson Society. Salisu, A. A., Cuñado, J., & Gupta, R. (2022). Geopolitical risks and historical exchange rate volatility of the BRICS. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77, 179-190. Saxenian, A. (2006). The new Argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). (2022). State of the U.S. semiconductor industry report. SIA Press. Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33-43. Shruti, R., & Thenmozhi, M. (2024). Foreign institutional ownership stability and stock price crash risk. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101937. Smith, S. A. (2024, February 28). Forwards and goalkeepers: Winning the advanced technology game or simply not losing? Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA. https://spfusa.org/publications/forwards-and-goalkeepers-winning-the-advanced-technology-game-or-simply-not-losing/ Trabelsi, E., & Mansour, M. B. (2024). Credit risk and Tunisian bank stability in the COVID-19 wave. Journal of Economic Analysis, 3(2), 45–67. https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/2/53 Truong, T. H., Lin, B. W., & Tung, C. P. (2024). Strategic legislation for the promotion of university–industry collaborations: A case study of Taiwan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-41. Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. Harvard University Press. VerWey, J. (2023). Betting the House: Leveraging the CHIPS and Science Act to Increase U.S. Microelectronics Supply Chain Resilience. Georgetown University Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). Wei, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Longman. Witt, M. A., Lewin, A. Y., Li, P. P., & Gaur, A. S. (2023). Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and implications for IB research. Journal of World Business, 58(1), 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101399 Zhu, F. (2014). Corporate governance and the cost of capital: An international study. International Review of Finance, 14(3), 393-429. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |