論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
公司治理對系統風險之影響 The Impact of Corporate Governance on Systematic Risk |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
69 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2022-03-21 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2022-06-23 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
公司治理、系統風險、市場風險、控制型態、金融危機 corporate governance, systematic risks, market risk, control type, financial crisis |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 322 次,被下載 1 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 322 times, has been downloaded 1 times. |
中文摘要 |
1997年亞洲爆發金融風暴後,良好的公司治理是否能降低風險已成為企業及投資人關注的重點之一。本研究將過去衡量公司治理之文獻進行彙整,建立一套衡量公司治理總體制度之評分模型,並探討台灣上市櫃公司之公司治理與系統風險間的關係。研究結果發現,良好的公司治理對於降低系統風險有顯著的效果,在五個不同的公司治理構面中,針對「股東權益及平等對待股東」、「董事會結構與運作」以及「企業社會責任」進行改善,可有效降低系統風險。而家族控股及共治型態的企業會增強公司治理與系統風險的負向關係,公股主導和專業經理人控制型態的企業則可以替代公司治理降低系統風險的效果。進一步發現金融危機時期,良好公司治理可使企業風險下降,且良好公司治理的企業系統風險顯著低於公司治理較弱之企業。企業及投資人可根據不同控制類型的企業和公司治理構面之研究結果,作為公司經營及制定投資策略參考依據之一。 |
Abstract |
After the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997, whether good corporate governance is able to reduce risks has become one of the focuses of firms and investors. This study establishes a scoring system for measuring the overall system of corporate governance by collecting several literatures, and discusses the impact of corporate governance of Taiwan listed firms on systematic risk. The results of the study found that good corporate governance has a significant effect on reducing systematic risk. In five different corporate governance dimensions, improving on "protecting the right and fair treatment of shareholders", "board structure and operation" and "corporate social responsibility" can effectively reduce systematic risk. The family holding and co-governance type of enterprises will enhance the negative relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk, while the public enterprises and professional manager-controlled enterprises can replace the effect of corporate governance to reduce systematic risk. We also found that during the financial crisis good corporate governance can reduce the risk, and the systematic risk of firms with good corporate governance is significantly lower than the firms with weak corporate governance. Enterprises and investors can operate firm and establish investment strategies based on the findings. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 ....................................................................................................................... i 中文摘要 .......................................................................................................................... ii 英文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... iii 第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 ............................................................................................. 1 第二節 研究目的 ......................................................................................................... 3 第三節 主要發現 ......................................................................................................... 4 第四節 研究流程 ......................................................................................................... 4 第二章 文獻回顧 ............................................................................................................ 6 第一節 公司治理之相關研究 ..................................................................................... 6 第二節 公司治理與風險之相關研究 ....................................................................... 11 第三節 不同控制型態下公司治理效能之相關研究 ............................................... 12 第三章 研究方法 .......................................................................................................... 15 第一節 研究架構 ....................................................................................................... 15 第二節 資料來源與樣本選取 ................................................................................... 16 第三節 變數定義與衡量 ........................................................................................... 18 第四節 實證模型 ....................................................................................................... 27 第四章 實證分析 .......................................................................................................... 30 第一節 敘述性統計 ................................................................................................... 30 第二節 多元迴歸分析 ............................................................................................... 30 第五章 結論與建議 ...................................................................................................... 36 第一節 結論 ............................................................................................................... 36 第二節 建議 ............................................................................................................... 37 參考文獻 ........................................................................................................................ 38 |
參考文獻 References |
1. 宋四君(2013)。好的公司治理品質能產生股價溢酬嗎?品質月刊,49 (5),16-21。 2. 李卉馨、詹淑婷、蘇怡方與鍾喜梅(2014)。專業經理人職位的代理意涵:台灣電子業家族企業之實證分析。臺大管理論叢,25 (1),259-285。 3. 余惠芳、陳文郎、馮惠珊與黎紅玲(2011)。外部監控、代理問題與信用風險模型之實證研究。育達科大學報,29,47-66。 4. 林公孚(2004)。認識領導與領導者。品質月刊,40 (3),67-70。 5. 洪崧洽(2012)。國內公司治理與公司價值關係之研究-金融海嘯前後之比較,國立宜蘭大學應用經濟學系碩士論文。 6. 馬永芯(2007)。公司治理、資訊透明度對信用評等影響之研究,輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。 7. 麥翊緡(2011)。公司治理、系統風險與經營績效關聯性之研究:以我國電子產業為例,國防大學財務管理學系碩士論文。 8. 黃素慧、黃劭彥、洪嘉聲與林萱霈(2011)。公司治理是否能增加我國家族企業之企業價值。經濟管理論叢,7 (2),13-37。 9. 楊麗弘(1999)。台灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效之研究,私立長庚大學管理究所碩士論文。 10. 葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩(2002)。公司治理與評等系統,商智文化出版。 11. 盧玥穎(2014)。公司治理對股票報酬及市場基礎風險影響之研究,東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士論文。 12. Addo, K. A., Hussain, N., & Iqbal, J. (2021). Corporate governance and banking systemic risk: a test of the bundling hypothesis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 115, 102327. 13. Alexander, J. A., Bloom, J. R., & Nuchols, B. A. (1994). Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: An organization‐level analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 33(4), 505-520. 14. Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2008). Do stock prices reflect the corporate governance quality of Japanese firms?. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(4), 647-662. 15. Andreou, P. C., Antoniou, C., Horton, J., & Louca, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm‐specific stock price crashes. European Financial Management, 22(5), 916-956. 16. Baek, J. S., Kang, J. K., & Park, K. S. (2004). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), 265-313. 17. Berle, A. A. and Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York. NY: MacMillan Co. 18. Berle, A., & Gardiner, M. (1932). The modern corporation and private property transaction Publishers. New Jersey, USA. 19. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257-273. 20. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The journal of Business, 76(3), 455-475. 21. Bistrova, J., & Lace, N. (2011). Evaluation of corporate governance influence on stock performance of CEE companies. WMSCI 2011 Proceedings I, United States of America, Orlando, 19(22), 59-64. 22. Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, J. M., & Zagorchev, A. (2012). Government ownership and corporate governance: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(11), 2917-2934. 23. Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333. 24. Chen, A., Kao, L., Tsao, M., & Wu, C. (2007). Building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of ownership and leadership for firms in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 251-261. 25. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424-448. 26. Chiou, J. R., Hsiung, T. C., & Kao, L. F. (2002). A study on the relationship between financial distress and collateralized shares. Taiwan Accounting Review, 3(1), 79-111. 27. Chow, C. W., & Rice, S. J. (1982). Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. Accounting Review, 326-335. 28. Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. (1999). Ownership concentration and corporate performance in the Czech Republic. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27(3), 498-513. 29. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112. 30. Clayton, M. C., Hartzell, J. C., & Rosenberg, J. (2005). The impact of CEO turnover on equity volatility. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1779-1808. 31. Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411. 32. Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401-425. 33. Ferreira, M. A., & Laux, P. A. (2007). Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 951-989. 34. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2012). The impact of the board of directors characteristics on corporate performance and risk-taking before and during the global financial crisis. Review of Managerial Science, 6(3), 207-226. 35. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156. 36. Huang, H. H., Chan, M. L., Huang, I. H., & Chang, C. H. (2011). Stock price volatility and overreaction in a political crisis: The effects of corporate governance and performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(1), 1-20. 37. Iqbal, J., Strobl, S., & Vähämaa, S. (2015). Corporate governance and the systemic risk of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 82, 42-61. 38. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. 39. Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 141-186. 40. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15-26. 41. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147-1170. 42. Lee, T. S., & Yeh, Y. H. (2004). Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 378-388. 43. Lo, A. W., Wong, R. M., & Firth, M. (2010). Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(2), 225-235. 44. Mahaney, R. C., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). Information systems project management: an agency theory interpretation. Journal of Systems and Software, 68(1), 1-9. 45. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700. 46. Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2002). Are two heads better than one? The impact of changes in management structure on performance by firm size. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(3), 213-226. 47. Ratings, F. (2004). Evaluating corporate governance: The bondholders’ perspective. Credit Policy Special Report. 48. Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867-904. 49. Schwartz, K. B., & Menon, K. (1985). Auditor switches by failing firms. Accounting Review, 248-261. 50. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569-592. 51. Sherman, H. (2004). Corporate governance assessments. Corporate governance: An International Review, 12, 5-7. 52. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488. 53. Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431-460. 54. Yeh, Y. H., & Chou, H. I. (2016). Corporate governance in Taiwan: A survey. Jing Ji Lun Wen Cong Kan, 44(1), 127-184. 55. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |