Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0524122-142852 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0524122-142852
論文名稱
Title
訴訟風險與自願性碳排放揭露
Litigation Risk and Voluntary Carbon Emission Disclosures
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
40
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-06-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-06-24
關鍵字
Keywords
訴訟風險、碳排放量、企業社會責任、證券集體訴訟、外部驗證
litigation risk, carbon emissions, corporate social responsibility, securities class action lawsuits, external verification
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 233 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 233 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究主旨在於檢視企業碳排放揭露以及碳排放之外部驗證對證券集體訴訟的影響,並以標普 500 指數上市公司為樣本,樣本期間為2011至2020,共計10年。研究結果證實,自願性的揭露範圍1和範圍2的碳排放量會使公司面臨高訴訟風險。 此外,取得第三方獨立碳排放驗證的公司,遭遇訴訟案件的風險更大。研究發現,無論揭露的資訊是否經過第三方驗證,只要公司自願揭露碳排放資訊皆會增加其被起訴的可能性。


Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of corporate carbon disclosure practice and external carbon verification on securities class action lawsuits based on a sample of S&P 500 listed companies for a ten-year period (2011-2020). We observe that voluntary disclosure of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions may result in litigation risk. In addition, obtaining an independent third-party verification exposes companies to higher litigation risks. These findings suggest that disclosing corporate social responsibility information increases the probability of being sued, whether the information is verified or not.


目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development 4
2.1 Litigation Risk and Voluntary Disclosure 5
2.2 Litigation Risk and Carbon Emission Disclosure 6
2.3 Litigation Risk and External Verification 8
3. Data and Empirical Models 10
3.1 Data 10
3.2 Empirical Models 11
4. Results and Discussions 14
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 14
4.2 Test of Hypothesis 16
5. Conclusion 20
Reference 22
Appendix 33
參考文獻 References
Badia, F., Bracci, E., & Tallaki, M. (2020). Quality and diffusion of social and sustainability reporting in Italian public utility companies. Sustainability, 12(11), 4525.
Bardos, K. S., Golec, J., & Harding, J. P. (2013). Litigation risk and market reaction to restatements. Journal of Financial Research, 36(1), 19-42.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 32(3), 794-816.
Barnett, M. L., Hartmann, J., & Salomon, R. (2014). Have you been served? The relationship between corporate social responsibility and lawsuits. Academy of Management Proceedings,
Barnett, M. L., Hartmann, J., & Salomon, R. M. (2018). Have you been served? Extending the relationship between corporate social responsibility and lawsuits. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(2), 109-126.
Bernard, S., Abdelgadir, S., & Belkhir, L. (2015). Does GRI reporting impact environmental sustainability? An industry-specific analysis of CO2 emissions performance between reporting and non-reporting companies. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(9), 190-205.
Boyer, M. M., & Kordonsky, K. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Litigation Risk. Available at SSRN 3704572.
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., Menichini, T., & Villazon Montalvan, R. A. (2020). Does more mean better? Exploring the relationship between report completeness and environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 12(24), 10635.
Cassell, C. A., Drake, M. S., & Dyer, T. A. (2017). Auditor Litigation Risk and the Number of Institutional Investors. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51832
Cummins, T., Hamid, R., Reeves, E., Karalis, T., & Harnett, M. (2021). ESG litigation–how companies can get ready, respond and resolve claims. Journal of Investment Compliance.
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In Search of Attention. Journal of Finance.
Du, K., & Wu, S.-J. (2019). Does external assurance enhance the credibility of CSR reports? Evidence from CSR-related misconduct events in Taiwan. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(4), 101-130.
Field, L., Lowry, M., & Shu, S. (2005). Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.004
Francis, J., Philbrick, D., & Schipper, K. (1994). Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research.
Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management.
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic management journal, 30(4), 425-445.
Gulb, A. S. F. A., & Lynn, S. G. (2001). Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics.
Hackett, D., Demas, R., Sanders, D., Wicha, J., & Fowler, A. (2020). Growing ESG Risks: The Rise of Litigation. Envtl. L. Rep., 50, 10849.
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.
Hanley, K. W., & Hoberg, G. (2012). Litigation risk, strategic disclosure and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 235-254.
Houston, J. F., Lin, C., Liu, S., & Wei, L. (2019). Litigation Risk and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Legal Changes.
Huang, A., Hui, K. W., & Li, R. Z. (2019). Federal Judge Ideology: A New Measure of Ex Ante Litigation Risk. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(2), 431-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12260
Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Climate Risk Disclosure and Institutional Investors.
Johnson, M. F., Kasznik, R., & Nelson, K. K. (2001). The impact of securities litigation reform on the disclosure of forward‐looking information by high technology firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2), 297-327.
Karpoff, J. M., & Lott Jr, J. R. (1993). The reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(2), 757-802.
Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non‐Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American countries. The accounting review, 79(2), 473-495.
Kim, I., & Skinner, D. J. (2012). Measuring securities litigation risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 290-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005
Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: convergence or divergence? MIR: Management International Review, 145-166.
Liu, Z., & Elayan, F. A. (2015). Litigation risk, information asymmetry and conditional conservatism. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 44(4), 581-608.
Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 350-359.
Mathews, M. R. (1995). Social and environmental accounting: A practical demonstration of ethical concern? Journal of business ethics, 14(8), 663-671.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78.
Murphy, D., & McGrath, D. (2013). ESG reporting–class actions, deterrence, and avoidance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
Pflugrath, G., Roebuck, P., & Simnett, R. (2011). Impact of assurance and assurer's professional affiliation on financial analysts' assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 239-254.
Pinnuck, M., Ranasinghe, A., Soderstrom, N., & Zhou, J. (2021). Restatement of CSR reports: Frequency, magnitude, and determinants. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 2376-2416.
Reverte, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: evidence from Spanish listed firms. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 411-435.
Rogers, J. L., & Van Buskirk, A. (2009). Shareholder litigation and changes in disclosure behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(1-2), 136-156.
Saad, A. I., & Strauss, D. (2020). A New" Reasonable Investor" and Changing Frontiers of Materiality: Increasing Investor Reliance on ESG Disclosures and Implications for Securities Litigation. Berkeley Bus. LJ, 17, 391.
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The accounting review, 84(3), 937-967.
Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing, 15, 119.
Skinner, D. J. (1994). Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News? Journal of Accounting Research.
Skinner, D. J. (1995). Do the SEC's Safe Harbor Provisions Encourage Forward-Looking Disclosures? Financial Analysts Journal.
Skinner, D. J. (1997). Earnings disclosures and stockholder lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 249-282.
Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Iraldo, F. (2018). Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity: can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? Journal of business ethics, 147(2), 287-307.
Unerman, J. (2010). Stakeholder engagement and dialogue. In Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 105-122). Routledge.
Waymire, G. (1985). Earnings volatility and voluntary management forecast disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 268-295.
Xia, Z.-h., Wang, Y.-y., & Zhao, Z.-w. (2014). Risk of shareholder litigation, product market competition and the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure. 2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings
Erion, G. (2009). The Stock Market to the Rescue? Carbon Disclosure and the Future of Securities‐Related Climate Change Litigation. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 18(2), 164-171.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-06-24
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-06-24

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.146.221.52
現在時間是 2024-04-30
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-06-24

Your IP address is 3.146.221.52
The current date is 2024-04-30
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-06-24.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code