Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0527124-110248 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0527124-110248
論文名稱
Title
探討品牌涉入對科技採用之影響 ─以產品涉入為中介變數
Analyzing the Impact of Brand Involvement on the Technological Adoption – The Mediating Role of Product Involvement
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
99
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-06-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-06-27
關鍵字
Keywords
產品涉入、品牌涉入、知覺價值、新興金融科技、行動支付
Product Involvement, Brand Involvement, Perceived Value, Emerging Financial Technology, Mobile Payments
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 81 次,被下載 9
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 81 times, has been downloaded 9 times.
中文摘要
隨著通訊技術的迅速發展以及網際網路的普及,社會大眾的日常生活產生了極大的改變。在傳統的金融產業,人們習慣以現金或是信用卡刷卡進行購買商品或是服務的支付工具,而由於金融科技之發展,其中行動支付已逐漸融入在社會大眾的生活中,越來越多人以行動支付作為主要的支付工具,這一趨勢也吸引了眾多業者進入行動支付的市場,競爭愈加激烈。本研究想要了解行動支付之品牌的特性與其影響消費者知覺價值的因素,即消費者對品牌的關注與投入程度是否會影響他們選擇行動支付,並探討產品涉入是否會對兩者的關係產生影響,亦即消費者對品牌之認同是否會影響其對於相關行動支付產品之理解與認識,進而影響其在使用行動支付的知覺價值。為探討此一議題,本研究先以質性訪談的方式,藉由與受訪者一對一的互動,了解消費者對於行動支付採用、相關產品與品牌特性的看法,並將前述訪談資料之結果進一步以問卷調查法的方式進行量性研究方法分析,以 Survey cake 問卷表單方式蒐集樣本資料,總共蒐集了 374 份有效樣本,並以 SPSS 28.0 統計分析軟體進行實證研究分析。本研究結果發現品牌涉入顯著正向影響產品涉入;而產品涉入與品牌涉入也會顯著正向影響消費者的知覺價值;此外,品牌涉入會經由產品涉入的中介正向影響消費者的知覺價值,亦即有間接效果。這些發現為行動支付業者提供了寶貴的見解,使他們能更深入地了解消費者對功能和品牌的偏好。業者可以利用這些資訊調整品牌和產品策略,有效提升消費者對行動支付的知覺價值,增強市場競爭力,並提升消費者的滿意程度與忠誠度。
Abstract
With the rapid development of communication technology and the widespread adoption of the Internet, everyday life for the general public has undergone significant changes. In the traditional financial industry, people were accustomed to using cash or credit cards for purchasing goods or services. However, due to technological advancements financial technology, particularly mobile payments, has been increasingly integrated into daily life. More and more people are using mobile payments as their primary tool for transactions. This trend has also attracted numerous companies into the mobile payments market, intensifying competition. This study focuses on exploring insights into the characteristics of mobile payment brands and the factors influencing consumers' perceived value. Specifically, it investigates whether consumers' brand involvement affects their choice of mobile payment methods, and examines the mediating role of product involvement in this relationship. That is, it seeks to understand whether consumers' brand recognition influences their understanding and perception of mobile payment products, thereby impacting their perceived value when using mobile payments. To explore this issue, this study initially employed qualitative interviews through one-on-one interactions with respondents to understand their views on the adoption of mobile payments, related products, and brand characteristics. Subsequently, the findings from these interviews were further analyzed using a quantitative research method, through a survey distributed via Survey Cake. A total of 374 valid samples were collected, and empirical analysis was conducted using SPSS 28.0 statistical software. The outcome of the study revealed that brand involvement significantly and positively influences product involvement. Both product involvement and brand involvement also significantly and positively affect consumers' perceived value. Additionally, brand involvement positively influences consumers' perceived value through the mediating role of product involvement, indicating an indirect effect. The research findings offer valuable insights for mobile payment providers, helping them to better understand consumer preferences for functionality and brands. Providers can utilize this information to adjust their branding and product strategies, effectively enhancing the perceived value of mobile payments, increasing market competitiveness, and improving consumer satisfaction and loyalty.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書i
誌 謝ii
摘要iii
Abstractiv
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機1
第二節 研究目的4
第三節 研究範圍5
第四節 研究流程6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 科技創新7
第二節 涉入13
第三節 消費者行為17
第四節 科技接受模型23
第五節 消費者價值理論26
第三章 研究方法29
第一節 研究方法的選擇29
第二節 資料蒐集方法31
第三節 質性訪談程序33
第四章 質性分析與假設推導37
第一節 訪談結果37
第二節 研究架構與研究假設42
第三節 量化研究工具48
第五章 量化研究結果54
第一節 樣本結構分析54
第二節 敘述性統計分析59
第三節 變數衡量的信效度分析63
第四節 假設驗證69
第六章 結論與建議73
第一節 研究結論73
第二節 研究貢獻76
第三節 研究限制與未來建議77
附錄一 訪談大綱84
附錄二 正式問卷86

參考文獻 References
Afuah, A. (2014). Business Model Innovation Concepts, Analysis, and Cases. Routledge.
Ahmad Ghazawneh, O. H. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173 - 192.
Ahtola, R. B. O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2, 159-170.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bennett, L. a. L., M. (2015). E-Books in academic libraries. Electronic Library, 23(1), 9-16.
Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8, 193-205.
Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2006). Consumer behavior (10 ed.). Thomson.
Board, F. S. (2021). 2021 FSB Annual Report.
Boonghee Yoo, N. D. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.
Caron H St. John, A. R. C., Richard W Pouder (2001). Change drivers in the new millennium: implications for manufacturing strategy research. Operations Management, 19(2), 143-160.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268 - 295.
Chiu, I. H.-Y. (2018). The Disruptive Implications of Fintech- Policy Themes for Financial Regulators. FinTech Innovation, 20-35.
Chohan, U. W. (2022). Cryptocurrencies: A Brief Thematic Review.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=hbx8NwAACAAJ
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-339.
Del I. Hawkins, R. J. B., Kenneth A. Coney. (2001). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy (8 ed.). McGraw Hil.
Delbert Hawkins, D. M., Roger Best (2009). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy (11 ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Klapper, L. (2013). Measuring Financial Inclusion: Explaining Variation in Use of Financial Services across and within Countries. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 279-321.
Dennis W. Rook, R. J. F. (1995). Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305-313.
Drucker, P. F. (2002). The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review.
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. Handbook of qualitative research, 361-376.
Fung, M. K. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Convergence or divergence? Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.08.001
Giblin, M. J. (2006). Structural elaboration and institutional isomorphism: The case ofcrime analysis units. Police Strategies and Management Information Systems, 29, 643-664.
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry Into New Markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 593-627.
Jagdish N. Sheth, B. I. N., Barbara L. Gross. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy:A Theory of Consumption Values. Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
Jillian C. Sweeneya, G. N. S. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Retailing, 77, 203-220.
Kapferer, G. L. a. J.-N. (1985). Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), 41-53.
Katherine N. Lemon, P. C. V. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6).
Keller, S. H. K. L. (2003). The marketing advantages of strong brands. Journal of Brand Management 10, 421-445.
Kevin E. Voss, E. R. S., Bianca Grohmann. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
Kim, K. (2000). On interfirm power, channel climate, and solidarity in industrial distributor-supplier dyads. Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 388–405.
KIM, Y. (2011). Understanding Green Purchase:The Influence of Collectivism, Personal Values and Environmental Attitudes, and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Business & Society, 17(1), 66-92.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/267335
Leigh, J. H., & Menon, A. (1987). Audience involvement effects on the information processing of umbrella print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 16(3), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1987.10673080
Leon Schiffman, J. W. (2018). Consumer Behavior (12 ed.). Pearson.
Li, Y., Spigt, R., & Swinkels, L. (2017). The impact of FinTech start-ups on incumbent retail banks’ share prices. Financial Innovation, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0076-7
Lin, L. Y., & Chen, C. S. (2006). The influence of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions:An empirical study of insurance and catering services in Taiwan. Consumer Marketing, 23, 248-265.
Maggie Geuens, B. W., Kristof De Wulf. (2009). A new measure of brand personality. Research in Marketing, 26, 97-107.
Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1).
Margaret A. White, G. D. B. (2006). The Management of Technology and Innovation: A Strategic Approach (2 ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Martin Fishbein, I. A. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
Michael L. Tushman, P. A. (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439-465.
Mittal, B. L., Myung-soo. (1989). A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(13), 363–389.
Mohammad Bani Younes, S. A.-Z. (2015). The Impact of Technologies on Society: A Review. Humanities And Social Science, 20(2), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-20258286
Nadim Jahangir, N. B. (2008). The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking. Business Managemen, 2(1), 32-40.
Nicoletti, B. (2017). The Future of FinTech:Integrating Finance and Technology in Financial Services (1 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
Nikunj Kumar Jain, S. K., Vinod Kumar, Zillur Rahman (2018). Examining consumer-brand relationships on social media platforms. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(1), 63-78.
Paul J. DiMaggio, W. W. P. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Paul Legris, J. I., Pierre Collerette. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
Philip Kotler, G. M. A. (2012). Principles of Marketing.
Philip Kotler, K. L. K., Mr Torben Hansen, Dr Mairead Brady, Malcolm Goodman. (2016). Marketing Management.
Rafael La Porta, F. L.-D.-S., Andrei Shleifer and Robert W., & Vishny. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. The Journal of Finance, 52, 1131-1150.
Ravi Pappu, P. G. Q., Ray W. Cooksey (2006). Consumer-based brand equity and country-of-origin relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5), 696-717.
Rowan, J. W. M. a. B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Schain, J. P., & Stiebale, J. (2020). Innovation, institutional ownership and financial constraints. Empirical Economics, 61(3), 1689-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01909-0
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5th Edition).
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations Ideas, Interests, and Identities.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots; A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. University of California Press.
Sharman Lichtenstein, C. W. (2006). Understanding consumer adoption of Internet banking: an interpretive study in the Australian banking context. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 50-66.
Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes and identifications [doi:10.1037/10840-000]. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10840-000
Solomon, M. R. (2016). Consumer Behavior:Buying, Having, and Being (12 ed.). Pearson.
Soon Ang, L. L. C. (1997). Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing. Organization Science, 8, 235-256.
Susanne Chishti, J. B. (2016). The FINTECH Book: The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaries. John Wiley & Sons.
Thompson S. H. Teo, S. C. S. a. L. J. (2008). Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study. Management Information Systems, 25, 99-131.
Trütsch, T. (2016). The impact of mobile payment on payment choice. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 30(3), 299-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-016-0272-x
Velitchka D. Kaltcheva, B. A. W. (2006). When Should a Retailer Create an Exciting Store Environment? Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 107-118.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly(157-178).
Viswanath Venkatesh, M. G. M., Gordon B. Davis, Fred D. Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
William B. Dodds, K. B. M. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Perceived Quality, 209-232.
Xin Li, T. J. H., Joseph S. Valacich. (2008). Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. Strategic Information Systems, 17(1), 39-71.
Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate Governance and Blockchains. Review of Finance, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw074
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
中央銀行. (2019). 金融科技發展與銀行經營型態的演變. 中央銀行.
池文海、唐資文、林怡安. (2010). 消費者購買涉入、品牌權益、知覺風險與顧客忠誠度之關係. 中華管理評論, 13(5), 1-22.
吳萬益. (2019). 企業研究方法 (6 ed.). 華泰文化.
吳霖姿. (2010). 家長對鍵位英語教學法的調查研究:基於創新擴散理論與體制理論-以上海舞動美語培訓校為例 國立中興大學].
李芸蕙、蔣岡霖、吳敏華. (2021). 行銷研究 (3 ed.). 普林斯頓.
李美萱. (2021). 以消費價值理論探討行動支付使用意願與黏著度之研究:以品牌形象作為調節變數 國立屏東大學]. 屏東市.
林宗漢. (2020). 台灣金融科技發展之現況與展望. 財金論文叢刊, 33, 74-80.
林健智. (2012). 何以同形?五股傢俱產業廠商間之探究 明志科技大學].
侯嘉政、傅柏霖. (2008). 產品涉入與品牌涉入對品牌忠誠度之影響-以數位相機為例. 行銷評論, 5(1), 27-56.
凃若涵. (2018). 品牌偏好、品牌涉入程度、造型視覺意象對於購買偏好之關聯性-以香水為例 國立屏東大學]. 屏東市.
胡嘉純. (2022). 產品涉入、知覺價值與購買意願關係之研究 ─以臺南市東山咖啡伴手禮為例 台灣首府大學]. 台南市.
許禮勳. (2018). 網路涉入程度、產品複雜度對網路投保意願之影響 朝陽科技大學]. 台中市.
陳志杰. (2006). 消費者涉入與供應商涉入對新產品開發績效影響之研究—以金融服務業為例 靜宜大學]. 台中市.
彭建彰、呂旺坤. (2021). 品牌行銷與管理. 華泰文化.
曾光華. (2020). 行銷管理:理論解析與實務應用 (8 ed.). 前程文化.
黃琮翔. (2019). 行動支付之認知價值對消費者使用意願研究 國立屏東大學]. 屏東市.
廖淑伶、馬友薏. (2020). 消費者行為 (3 ed.). 高立圖書.
盧鈞香. (2017). 產品涉入、消費者信任對有機產品知覺價值及購買意願影響之研究 南華大學]. 嘉義縣.
戴育嵐. (2021). 知覺風險、知覺價值對化妝保養品再購意願之影響: 以產品涉入度為干擾變項 大漢技術學院]. 花蓮縣.
羅妍昕. (2011). 銀行顧客屬性、認知風險及涉入程度對購買意願之影響-以投資型保險商品為例 世新大學]. 台北市.
關鍵議題研究中心. (2023). 六月最新調查-台灣行動支付使用習慣. 關鍵評論.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code