博碩士論文 etd-0608115-152550 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 洪雋皓(Chun-hao Hung) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 企業管理學系研究所(Business Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 103學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 執行長與經營團隊之關係差異程度對組織績效的影響:檢視團隊信任的中介角色與競爭張力的調節效果
論文名稱(英) CEO-TMT Exchange Differentiation and Firm Performance: Examining the Mediating Role of TMT Trust and the Moderating Effect of Competitive Tension
檔案
  • etd-0608115-152550.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    紙本論文:5 年後公開 (2020-07-08 公開)

    電子論文:使用者自訂權限:校內 5 年後、校外 5 年後公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/60
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5602 次,被下載 15 次
    摘要(中) 本研究運用高層理論(upper-echelons perspective)及主管與部屬交換觀點(Leader-Member Exchange, LMX)探討執行長與高階經營團隊交換關係之差異程度對組織績效的影響,同時也探討團隊信任與知覺競爭張力在其間分別扮演的中介與干擾角色。本研究分析層次為組織層次,透過調查法蒐集148家台灣上市、上櫃與興櫃公司的高階主管資料進行資料分析。研究結果顯示,團隊信任對執行長與高階經營團隊交換關係差異程度與組織績效的關係具有部分中介效果,然而,競爭張力在執行長與經營團隊交換關係及團隊信任間的干擾效果並不顯著。
      本研究具有重要理論意義。首先,本研究運用LMX理論來探討高階團隊成員間的互動,並以整體公司表現做為衡量績效,補足了以往個人層次的探討;其二,以往學者大多運用人口統計變數作為高階經營團隊心理特質的代理變數,本研究將LMX及團隊信任概念運用在高階經營團隊領域中,直接檢視高階經營團隊的心理特質對組織績效的影響,補足了此領域的研究;最後,本研究嘗試運用動態競爭觀點來解釋高階經營團隊的內部動態,為後續動態競爭理論運用在高階經營團隊上提供一個方向。
    摘要(英) This study employed the upper-echelons and leader-member exchange (LMX) perspectives to examine the relationship between CEO-TMT exchange differentiation and firm performance. The study also examines the mediating role of TMT Trust and the moderating effect of perceived competitive tension. The unit of analysis is at the firm or TMT level. Based on the survey approach, data were collected from 148 firms listed on TSE, OTC and ROT in 2014. Analytical findings largely support the theoretical model. More specifically, CEO-TMT Exchange Differentiation is founded to be negatively related with TMT trust and firm performance, in which TMT trust plays a partically mediating role. Nonetheless, the moderating effect of competitive tension on the relationship between CEO-TMT exchange differentiation and TMT trust was not supported.
    This study has significant theoretical implications. First, this study first applies the leader-member exchange perspective to the TMT level and thus complements previous studies which focus mainly on the individual or dyadic level. Second, prior research tended to use demographic variables as the proxies of TMT socio- psychometric characteristics. The study address this gap by directly probing into TMT members’ interactive dynamics. Finally, the study also bridges the perspectives of the competitive dynamics, LMX and upper-echelons by examining the role of perceived competitive tension in the CEO-TMT interface. Implications for business practices are discussed as well.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 交換關係差異程度
  • 團隊信任
  • 高階經營團隊
  • 競爭張力
  • 主管與部屬交換觀點
  • 高層理論
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • TMT trust
  • Competitive Tension
  • LMX differentiation
  • Top Management Team(TMT)
  • LMX perspective
  • Upper-echelons Perspective
  • 論文目次 論文審定書……………………………………………………………………….…i
    論文授權書………………………………………………………………………....ii
    誌謝……………………………………………………………………………….…iii
    摘要……………………………………………………………………………….…iv
    Abstract …………………………………………………………………………....v
    目錄…………………………………………………………………………….……vi
    圖次…………………………………………………………………………….……vii
    表次…………………………………………………………………………….……viii
    第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………01
    第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………01
    第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………03
    第三節 預期研究貢獻………………………………………………………03
    第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………04
    第一節 理論背景……………………………………………………………04
    第二節 變數探討……………………………………………………………12
    第二節 假說推論……………………………………………………………15
    第三章 研究設計……………………………………………………………18
    第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………18
    第二節 研究變數操作定義與衡量方式……………………………………19
    第三節 研究樣本……………………………………………………………22
    第四節 統計分析方法………………………………………………………25
    第四章 實證分析……………………………………………………………27
    第一節 評估資料加總的正當性……………………………………………27
    第二節 測量模式……………………………………………………………28
    第三節 相關分析……………………………………………………………28
    第三節 層級迴歸分析………………………………………………………30
    第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………35
    第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………35
    第二節 研究意涵……………………………………………………………38
    第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向…………………………………………40
    參考文獻……………………………………………………………………..42
    附錄 執行長與經營團隊交換關係差異程度之研究………………………49
    參考文獻 一、中文部分
    沈介文、陳月娥、周毓敏、陳銘嘉,2004,以團隊歷程觀點探討團隊結構與績效之關聯─ 以團隊信任為中介變項。人力資源管理學報 2005 秋季號 第五卷第三期 PP 075-090
    楊美玉、柯旻秀、 柯佑宗,2014,團隊關係衝突對團隊信任與團隊績效之影響。致理學報,人文與生活應用特刊(民國103 年7 月)1137-1162
    李弘暉,1997,「團隊原理」,中國行政評論,6(2): 73-86
    黃敏萍,2000,跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能-任務特性與社會系絡之影響,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文
    戴良至,2014,團隊-成員間交換關係對知識分享之影響:領導者-成員交換關係之團隊平均與團隊異質性的調節效果,元智大學經營管理碩士班論文
    林欣漫,2012,領導成員間關係品質差異、團隊成員間的互動程度與團隊績效之間的關係,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    朱凱聖,2010,領導者-部屬交換關係變異對於組織公平、衝突與職場偏差行為之影響,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系碩士論文
    周毓敏,2004,團隊信任與其績效之關聯性研究-以建立虛擬社群為例,大葉大學工業關係學系碩士論文
    陳明哲、林豪傑、侯勝宗、喬友慶,2010,動態競爭。台北,智勝文化
    二、英文部分
    Bowen, D.E. & Ostroff, C. 2004. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of “Strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221
    Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. 2011. How CEO Empowering Leadership Shapes Top Management Team Processes: Implications for Firm Performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (2), 399-411.
    Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 533-543
    Carpenter, M.A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275-284.
    Chen MJ, MacMillan I. 1992. Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal 35(3): 539–70.
    Chen MJ, Miller D. 1994. Competitive Attack, Retaliation and Performance: An ExpectancyValence Framework. Strategic Management Journal 15: 85–102.
    Chen MJ, Smith KG, Grimm CM. 1992. Action Characteristics as Predictors of Competitive Responses. Management Science 38(3): 439–55.
    Chen MJ, Su K, Tsai W. 2007. Competitive Tension: The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective. Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 101–18.
    Chen, E., and G. Miller. 2012. "Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why being low in socioeconomic status isn’t always bad for health. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(2): 135–58.
    Christina Sue-Chan, Al K.C. Au, Rick D. Hackett. 2012. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality. Journal of World Business 47, 459-468.
    Dalton, Dan R. & Idalene F. Kesner, 1985. “Organizational Performance as an Antecedent of Inside/Outside Chief Executive Succession: An Empirical Assessment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, No.4, pp.749-762.
    Dansereau, F., Graen, G., and Haga, W.J. 1975. “A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 46-78
    Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. 1986. Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634
    Farh, L. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organizational Science, 9, 471-488.
    Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations.St Paul, MN: South-Western College Publisher.
    Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D.C. 1990. Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:3, 484-503
    Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. F. 1975. A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers: 143-165. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
    Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multidomain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247
    Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. 1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
    Grimm, C. M. & K. G. Smith, 1991. “Management and Organizational Change: A Note on the Railroad”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 557-563.
    Guedri, Z. and McGuire, J., 2011. Multimarket Competition, Mobility Barriers, and Firm Performance, Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 857-890
    Hambrick D. 1995, ”Fragmentation and the Other Problems CEOs have with Their Top Management Teams”, California Management Review, Vol. 37,pp.110-127
    Hambrick, D. C., & Theresa C. 1996. ”The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, December
    Hambrick, D., Mason, P. 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206
    Hambrick, D.C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Journal, 32:2, 334-343.
    Hempel, P. S., Zhang , Z.,& Tjosvold, D.2009. Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30:41—65.
    Hooper DT & Martin R. 2008. Beyond personal leader-member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19: 20-30.
    Hwang, K. K. 1990. Modernization of the Chinese family business. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 593-618. integration and communication ” , Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39,
    Johnson, R.K., Widerholm, T., Rosenberg, D.M. 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations, and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg, D.M., Resh, V.H. (Eds.), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 40-158
    Korn, H. J. & Baum, J. A. C. 1999. Chance, imitative, and strategic antecedents to multimarket contact. Academy of Management Journal: 171-193.
    Lam, T.2003. Leader-member exchange and team-member exchange: The roles of moderators in new employees’ socialization. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 27, 48-68.
    Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Wand, D. X., & Wang, L. H. 2000. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 751-765.
    Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.
    Leung, K. 1996. The role of beliefs in Chinese culture. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The hand-book of Chinese psychology (pp. 280-293). Hong Kong, P.R.C.: Oxford University Press.
    Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. 1980. Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465
    Liden, R.C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. 2006. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 723-746.
    Hao-Chieh Lin, Nayel Rababah. 2014. CEO–TMT exchange, TMT personality composition, and decision quality: Themediating role of TMT psychological empowerment, The Leadership Quarterly 25 (2014) 943–957
    March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations. Wiley: New York.
    McAllister, D. J. 1995. “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersoanl Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal (38:1), 1995, pp. 24-59.
    Michel, J. G. & Hambrick, D. C. 1992. “Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics”, Academy of Management Journal,
    Nuesch, S. 2009. Are demographic diversity effects spurious? Economic analysis and policy, 39:3, 379-388.
    Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1983. “Organizational Demography.” Pp. 299-357 in L.L. Cummings and Barry M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Volume 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.pp.412-438.
    Reger, R. and Huff, A. 1993. “Strategic Groups: A Cognitive Perspective”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 103–24.
    Scandura, T. 1995. Leader-member exchange model of leadership and fairness issues. Unpublished manuscript.
    Schoonhoven, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Lyman, K. 1990. Speeding products to markets: waiting time to first product introductions in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 177 – 207.
    Schumpeter, J. A. 1950. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. 3d ed. New York: Harper and Row
    Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. 1995. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group & Organization Management, 20, 18-38
    Sias, P. M. & Jablin, F.M. 1995. Differential Superior-Subordinate Relations, Perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Human Communication Research, 22, 5-38.
    Sins PM,Jablin FM.Differential superior-subordinate relations,perceptions of fairness,and coworker communication[J].Human Communication Research,1995,22:5—37 2
    Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M. J. 1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 60-86.
    Smith, K. G.; K, A. Smith; J. D. Olian and H. P. Sims, O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J.A.,1994, “Top management team demography and process: The role of social
    Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26: 1157-1167
    Vecchio, R. P., & Gobdel, B.C. 1984. The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 5-20.
    Warren Boeker 1997. Strategic Change: The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Growth. The Academy of Management Journal Vol. 40, No. 1 (Feb., 1997), pp. 152-170
    Wiersema, M. F., & K. A. Bantel 1992. “Top management team demography and corporate strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 91-121.
    Young G, Smith KG, Grimm CM. 1996. "Austrian" and Industrial Organization Perspectives
    Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economics structures, 1840- 1920. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 8: 53-122. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    口試委員
  • 陳世哲 - 召集委員
  • 曹瓊文 - 委員
  • 林豪傑 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2015-06-18 繳交日期 2015-07-08

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫