Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0618123-114654 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0618123-114654
論文名稱
Title
支付形式與知覺風險對消費行為影響之研究
The study of the effects of payment modes and perceived risk on consumer behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
96
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-18
關鍵字
Keywords
支付形式、儲值支付、點數支付、知覺風險、消費行為
Payment modes, Stored value payment, Points payment, Perceived Risk, Consumer Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 456 次,被下載 18
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 456 times, has been downloaded 18 times.
中文摘要
各項支付形式的出現帶給消費者多樣化的選擇,也改變消費者對支付的決策,進一步影響消費行為,過去在支付形式研究包含支付透明度、支付痛覺、支付便利性等支付過程的知覺研究,或是支付工具如電子支付、行動支付等實體使用影響,但是對於支付形式改變消費行為的研究卻較少。
故本研究針對支付形式的不同並受到知覺風險的影響下進行消費行為之研究,以實驗方式驗證假說,有效樣本共計280份,使用IBM SPSS 24.0進行資料分析,分別以敘述性分析、相關性分析、單因子變異數分析與迴歸分析支付形式對消費行為受知覺風險影響的效果。研究結果顯示:1. 儲值支付形式會使消費者有更高的消費行為,但知覺風險並沒有任何差異。2. 點數支付形式在提高點數額度時會使消費者有更高的消費行為,但點數增加並不會影響知覺風險。3. 知覺風險對於不同支付形式的消費行為有部分相關,僅現金與低額點數無顯著相關。最後本研究歸納支付形式的差別是會影響消費行為,但知覺風險的影響著重在支付形式之外的因素。
Abstract
The emergence of various modes of payment gives consumers a variety of payment choices, and also changes consumers' decision-making on payment, further more it affecting consumer behavior. In the past, research on payment modes included payment transparency, payment pain, and payment convenience or the effect of physical usage of payment tools such as electronic payment and mobile payment, but there are few studies on how payment modes change consumer behavior.
Therefore, this research aims at the study of consumption behavior under the influence of different payment modes and the influence of perceived risk, and verifies the hypothesis experimentally. There are total of 280 valid samples. IBM SPSS 24.0 is used to analyze the data, and the narrative analysis, correlation analysis, One-way ANOVA and regression analysis are used respectively for the effect of payment modes on consumer behavior affected by perceived risk. The research results show that: 1. The modes of stored value payment will make consumers have higher consumption behavior, but there is no difference in perceived risk. 2. When the payment modes of points is increased, consumers will have higher consumption behavior, but the increase of points will not affect the perceived risk. 3. Perceived risk is partially related to the consumption behavior of different payment modes, and only cash has no significant correlation with low value points. Finally, this study concludes that the difference in the modes of payment will affect consumer behavior, but the impact of perceived risk focuses on factors other than the modes of payment.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書 i
致謝詞 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景及動機1
第二節研究目的2
第三節研究流程2
第二章文獻回顧4
第一節支付形式4
第二節知覺風險6
第三節消費行為9
第三章研究方法10
第一節研究架構10
第二節研究假設10
第三節研究變數定義11
第四節實驗設計13
第五節分析方法21
第四章研究結果23
第一節敘述性統計23
第二節信效度分析27
第三節統計分析30
第五章結論與建議37
第一節研究結論37
第二節研究貢獻38
第三節研究限制與建議39
參考資料40
附錄:問卷44

參考文獻 References
王宜琪,(2023),影響消費者使用點數兌換之因素探討,(碩士論文。國立屏東大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
李少芬,(2018),會員儲值卡大玩點數經濟,消費者報導雜誌,(446),36-40。
李奇勳,(2007),知覺風險對消費者知覺價值之形成所扮演角色的探討,管理學報,24(2),167-190。
林靈宏、張魁峰,(2006),消費者行為學,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
邱皓政,(2010) ,量化研究與統計分析:SPSS/PASW資料分析範例解析(第五版),五南出版社。
洪玉茹、梁直青、謝政佑,(2020),付款方式對網購消費者隱私在意程度影響,東吳經濟商學學報,(100),31-59。
胡宇謙,(2020),以商業生態系統觀點探討數位點數發展-以零售產業為例,(碩士論文。國立臺灣科技大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
紀信光、賴彥廷,(2018),第三方支付真的好用嗎?-以知覺風險為干擾變數,經營管理論叢,13(1),67-79。
陳萱霖,(2022),年輕消費者使用會員點數之動機與忠誠度探討-以全聯為例,(碩士論文。國立政治大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
陳眉君,(2019),消費者風險認知對於使用行動支付意願之影響,(碩士論文。政治大學),華藝線上圖書館。
陳裕霖,(2017),支付形式與支付意願關聯之研究,(碩士論文。中央大學),中央大學博碩士論文。
張雅筑,(2015),第三方支付之信任與知覺風險相關性之研究,(碩士論文。中正大學),華藝線上圖書館。
許巍瀚,(2003),行動付款機制之分析,Doctoral dissertation,National Taiwan University Department of Information Management。
莊玉玲,(2005),數位內容之電信帳號付款機制,(碩士論文。世新大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
曾雅琪,(2021),影響消費者使用行動支付意願之研究-以電子支付為例,(碩士論文。銘傳大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
曾俞盷,(2022),以科技接受模式及知覺風險探討消費者行動支付使用意圖之研究,華藝線上圖書館。
莊雁筑,(2023),影響消費者使用行動支付系統之探討:從策略行銷觀點(碩士論文。東吳大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
廖世義、李旻哲、郭瑋朋,(2018),行動支付高知覺風險下的免費經濟模式依然有效嗎?,Marketing Review/Xing Xiao Ping Lun,15(1)。
蔡東峻、李曉青,(2005),折扣比例、品牌形象和產品種類對消費者知覺品質和知覺風險的影響,中山管理評論,13,143-176。
賴姸昕,(2022),消費者對線上美食外送平台使用偏好之探討,(碩士論文。國立屏東大學),臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
謝錦堂,(2013),消費者知覺風險與知覺價值對購買意圖之影響:社群網站服務之實證研究,Electronic Commerce Studies,11(4),431-451。
羅天一、盧希鵬、呂俊賢,(2015),網路消費內容與支付行為的關聯性研究: 以手機行動遊戲及 PC 線上遊戲為例. 科際整合管理研討會, 519-532.
英文資料
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior (pp. 11-39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior.
Conchar, M. P., Zinkhan, G. M., Peters, C., & Olavarrieta, S. (2004). An integrated framework for the conceptualization of consumers’ perceived-risk processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(4), 418-436.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology press.
Chun, S. Y., Iancu, D. A., & Trichakis, N. (2020). Loyalty program liabilities and point values. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(2), 257-272.
Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., & Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic commerce research and applications, 14(5), 265-284.
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of consumer research, 21(1), 119-134.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.
Dodds, W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. ACR North American Advances.
Danaher, P. J., Sajtos, L., & Danaher, T. S. (2016). Does the reward match the effort for loyalty program members?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 23-31.
Falk, T., Kunz, W. H., Schepers, J. J., & Mrozek, A. J. (2016). How mobile payment influences the overall store price image. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2417-2423.
Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of consumer research, 21(1), 145-153.
Iddrisu, A. M., Nooni, I. K., Fianko, K. S., & Mensah, W. (2015). Assessing the impact of service quality on customer loyalty: a case study of the cellular industry of Ghana. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(6), 15-30.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of electronic commerce, 1(2), 59-88.
Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. ACR special volumes.
Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 43(1), 111-126.
Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing places. Simon and Schuster.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). A computational starting point for Rao's canonical factor analysis: Implications for computerized procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Kollat, D. T., Blackwell, R. D., & Engel, J. F. (1972). The current status of consumer behavior research: Developments during the 1968-1972 period. ACR Special Volumes.
Kleijnen, M., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2007). An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of retailing, 83(1), 33-46.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. Journal of marketing research, 30(2), 234-245.
Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of marketing, 33(1/2), 163-195.
Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432.
Montoya, R., & Flores, C. (2019). Buying free rewards: the impact of a points-plus-cash promotion on purchase and reward redemption. Marketing Letters, 30, 107-118.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook, 97-146.
Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior: Marketing strategy perspectives. (No Title).
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing science, 17(1), 4-28.
Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 14(3), 213.
Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
Soman, D. (2003). The effect of payment transparency on consumption: Quasi-experiments from the field. Marketing Letters, 14, 173-183.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
Turban, E., Lee, J. K., King, D., & Liang, T. P. (2009). und D. Turban, Electronic Commerce 2010.
Wood, C. M., & Scheer, L. K. (1996). Incorporating perceived risk into models of consumer deal assessment and purchase intent. ACR North American Advances.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zellermayer, O. (1996). The pain of paying. Carnegie Mellon University.
網路資源
中文資源
資策會產業情報研究所(MIC) AISP情報顧問服務,(2022),【零售電商消費者調查系列二】7-11、全聯、新光三越、屈臣氏 四大零售通路App冠軍 「便利商店、超市/量販」線上購物頻率增幅最高,2023年3月01日,取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/news-content?sno=622
金融監督管理委員會,(2004),【金融小百科】,2023年4月10日,取自https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=940&parentpath=0,5&mcustomize=cyclopedia_view.jsp&dataserno=411
國家發展委員會,(2018),【行動支付與電子化支付普及之關鍵】,Taiwan Economic Forum March (vol.16,no2),2023年4月05日,取自https://reurl.cc/p6oMy4
英文資源
Niall McCarthy, (2016), Starbucks Holds More Cash Than Many Banks [Infographic]). FORBES. 2023年3月10日,取自https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2016/08/01/starbucks-holds-more-cash-than-many-banks-infographic/?sh=5485171a231a
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code