隨著全球政經情勢的不斷發展與變動，對許多產業來說尤其是台資網通製造業正面臨著供應鏈重組的壓力，其中多年以來台灣企業長期深耕大陸，讓中國這個全球製造中心地位更受到挑戰，許多企業開始尋求將生產基地移轉到成本更低，勞動力豐富且貿易環境更加友善的國家，如越南、泰國、馬來西亞、印尼等距離中國不遠的東南亞國家，以網通製造業來說，提供給客戶的服務主要包含新產品開發，整合原物料採購以及生產製造產品，由於網通產業的特殊性，從2017年中美貿易大戰以來，網通廠家為了分散生意上的風險已經開始進行跨國投資與生產分工。然而，業者在追求低廉的生產成本做為工廠選址的優先因素時，通常都優先選擇到人力成本低廉的開發中國家建立生產基地。
但是在過去建構全球供應鏈的經驗中，卻面臨到許多問題，導致整體供應鏈的效益不如預期。因建構全球供應鏈無法只看「成本」優勢，應同時綜合考量企業的內部資源/土地資源/原物料供應商的配合布局、是否符合當地法規與制度以及供貨給市場的敏捷度等條件，以利完整評估。對於供應鏈評價設計的探討，大多研究皆提出一套供應鏈績效評估與改善方法論，協助企業架構一個系統化供應鏈和選定關鍵性指標評價：針現行的供應鏈架構下研究如何改善精進並對未來績效目標建議改善作法，以成本最小化價值極大化為目標來做供應鏈設計。本研究探討網路通訊製造業的生產基地從中國移轉越南供應鏈評價，以SCOR模型內的指標為工具，來建立從供應鏈績效出發，結合客戶與公司營運目標的一個具有整合性且系統化的「移轉越南的供應鏈設計規劃與評估機制」，提供產業內公司可以採取系統的分析，以利決策達到其營運管理的效益。

As the global economy continues to develop and change, many industries, especially Taiwan-ese network communication manufacturing, are facing pressures to restructure their supply chains. The position of China as a global manufacturing hub is particularly challenged, prompting many companies to seek relocation of their production bases to countries with lower costs, abundant labor, and a more favorable trade environment, such as Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia—countries not far from China in Southeast Asia. The services provided to customers in the network communication manufacturing industry primarily include new product development, integration of raw material procurement, and the manufacturing of products for customers. Due to the characteristics of network communication manufacturing, since the China-U.S. trade war in mid-2017, there has already been a trend towards cross-border investment and division of labor in production. However, in pursuit of low production costs as a primary factor for factory location, manufacturers often choose to establish production bases in developing countries with low labor costs.
Yet, past experiences in constructing global supply chains have encountered numerous problems, leading to overall supply chain efficiencies that fall short of expectations. Constructing a global supply chain should not solely focus on the "cost" advantage but should also comprehensively consider the company's internal resources, land resources, the layout of cooperation with raw material suppliers, compliance with local laws and regulations, and the agility of supplying to the market, in order to facilitate a complete evaluation. Most research on supply chain evaluation and design proposes a set of methodologies for supply chain performance assessment and improvement, assisting companies in structuring a systematic supply chain and selecting key performance indicators: researching how to improve and refine under the current supply chain structure and suggesting improvement methods for future performance targets, with the goal of minimizing costs and maximizing value for supply chain design. This study explores the evaluation and design of network communication manufacturing supply chains from China to Vietnam, using indicators within the SCOR model as tools to establish a planning and evaluation mechanism for the "Transfer to Vietnam Supply Chain Design" that starts from supply chain performance, integrating customer and company operational goals into a systematic and integrated approach, providing network communication industry companies with a systematic analysis to facilitate decision-making for operational management effectiveness.

論文審定書i
誌 謝ii
摘 要iii
Abstractv
目錄vi
圖目錄viii
表目錄ix
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的與重要性3
第三節研究範圍與限制4
第四節研究範圍與限制4
第二章產業現況6
第一節網路通訊產業近五年狀況6
第二節供應鏈管理在網通產業的重要性10
第三節國際貿易戰與供應鏈移轉12
第三章研究方法14
第一節SC0R模式與供應鏈評價衡量14
第二節SCRE model四大觀點主要概念15
第三節跨國供應鏈關心的議題與挑戰20
第四章研究方法23
第一節研究架構與步驟23
第二節步驟一 供應鏈範圍確認24
第三節步驟二&三 供應鏈結構分析與結構確認24
第四節步驟四 供應鏈作業模式分析29
第五節步驟五 供應鏈關鍵績效指標選取與評估機制建置31
第六節步驟六 綜合評估分析34
第五章個案實務研究(以L公司為例)35
第一節供應鏈範圍確認35
第二節供應鏈架構分析與確認37
第三節供應鏈作業模式分析39
第四節跨國供應鏈關鍵指標選取與評估機制建置42
第五節綜合評估分析65
第六章結論69
第一節研究成果彙整69
第二節未來可延伸的研究主題70
參考文獻71

Bolstorff, P. and Rosenbaum, R.(2003), “Supply Chain Excellence :A Hand Book for Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR Model”, AMACOM. 卓越供應鏈：使用SCOR模型顯著提高績效的手冊，AMACOM出版。
Closs, D. J., Jacobs, M. A., Swink, M., & Webb, G. S. (2008), “Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: six case studies”, Journal of Operations Management. 走向產品複雜性管理能力理論：六個案例研究。《運營管理雜誌》。
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004)., “A framework for supply chain perfor-mance measurement”, International Journal of Production Economics. 《供應鏈績效衡量框架,國際生產經濟學雜誌》
Gunasekaran, Hong, and Fujimoto (2014), “Building Supply Chain System Capabilities in the Age of Global Complexity: Emerging Theories and Practices”, International Journal Production Economics,147.在全球複雜性時代建立供應鏈系統能力:新興理論與實踐。《國際生產經濟學雜誌》147期。
Holweg, M., & Helo, P. (2014), “Defining value chain architectures: Linking strategic value crea-tion to operational supply chain design”, International Journal of Production Economics, 147. 定義價值鏈架構:將戰略價值創造與運營供應鏈設計聯繫起來。《國際生產經濟學雜誌》，147期。
Hwang, Y. D., Lin, Y. C., & Lyu Jr, J. (2008), “ The performance evaluation of SCOR sourcing process—The case study of Taiwan's TFT-LCD industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2). SCOR採購過程的績效評估=以台灣TFT-LCD產業為例。《國際生產經濟學雜誌》，115(2)。
Lockamy, A. III , & McCormack, K. (2004), “Linking SCOR planning practices to supply. 將SCOR規劃實踐與供應鏈績效連結,《國際運營與生產管理雜誌》，24(12)。
SCOR Model Version (2017), APICS SCC.