Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0623121-133338 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0623121-133338
論文名稱
Title
COVID-19 期間民眾對於政府提供口罩領用政策實施滿意度之研究
Research on the satisfaction of the people with the implementation of the government-provided mask acquisition policy during COVID-19
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
108
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2021-07-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2021-07-23
關鍵字
Keywords
口罩、新冠狀肺炎、COVID-19、滿意度、ACSI、口罩實名制
Face Mask, Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia, COVID-19, satisfaction, ACSI, mask-rationing plan
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 309 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 309 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
目的:
2002至2003年間發生了嚴重急性呼吸道症候群(SARS)的疫情,而在2020年又再次面對突如襲來的新冠狀肺炎(Covid-19)疫情影響,不單只是國內人民的懼怕恐慌,也考驗政府面對防疫物資的缺乏,更打亂全世界的產業鏈結構,也再次重新調整全世界面對疫情的方式。新冠狀肺炎疫情發生的前二至三個月,政府面對人民的基本防疫物資供給不足,如口罩,造成社會人心動盪,但從各項的政策一步一步的調整,從禁止防疫物資出口至全面徵收,進而成立相關產業國家隊提升口罩的產能,並透過既有的資訊網路,提供人民領用的方式及所需基本的口罩數量,使國內的人民可透過一段時間區間,購買固定價格的口罩及數量;透過政府管控價格及數量,達到全民防疫的目的,也安定民心,使人民不用處在沒有口罩的恐懼中。因此本研究應用美國顧客滿意度指數模型(American Customers Satisfaction Index, ACSI)的研究模型,針對民眾進行問卷調查,並依據政府所提供的口罩領用相關政策,探討政府在政策時效上是否能夠滿足人民的期待?所提供的口罩品質、樣式、領用方式等是否讓民眾覺得滿意?以及是否可做為政府日後再次面對疫情時之政策參考。

方法:
以自擬結構式問卷為研究工具,內容包含人口學基本資料、顧客期望、知覺品質、知覺價值、顧客滿意度、顧客忠誠、顧客抱怨等構面,針對台灣地區20歲以上之曾使用過政府口罩領用政策之民眾進行調查,取得有效問卷536份。並將人口學基本資料部分與各構面進行T檢定、單因子變異數分析,各構面之間則進行皮爾森相關及多元線性迴歸進行統計分析。


結果:
「年齡」、「職業別」、「政黨傾向」對顧客滿意度達顯著差異(p<0.05);顧客期望、知覺品質、知覺價值、顧客滿意度皆為正相關,尤其以知覺品質直接影響顧客滿意度最顯著。

結論:
透過本研究結果,建議政府適時透過政策的修正來回應民眾的需求;民眾的抱怨度對於政府來說是一種建議,民眾對於政府的政策有相對的期待及滿意度,會嫌貨才是真正的買貨人。未來政府相關單位在政策上制定或流程改進上,或民眾對於政府的政策建議上,也應依據疫情的改變而有所適時的調整。
Abstract
Purpose:
After the 2002-2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) pandemic, Taiwan was confronted by the impact of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2 or COVID-19) pandemic in 2020. Not only did this instill fear in the people, but the shortage of virus prevention supplies also challenges how the government handles the situation. It disrupted the global industry chain, and altered how the world endures the pandemic. In the first 2 to 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government was faced with shortages of basic virus prevention supplies such as the face mask, which lead to widespread societal unrest. By implementing policies from banning the export of and levying virus prevention resources, to establishing specialized industry groups to increase the domestic face mask production capacity, the government effectively controlled the price and production of face masks. By implementing an online solution for citizens to sign up for and collect the necessary amount of face masks over a set period, the government was able to achieve large-scale virus prevention while easing the fear of the general public. This research utilizes the American Customers Satisfaction Index (ACSI) research model on deploying questionnaires to the general public on aspects such as face mask quality, configuration, and method of collecting face masks to understand whether people are satisfied. The study also looks into government policies regarding face mask distribution and explores whether the findings can benefit policymaking in a future pandemic.

Method:
Using a self-developed structured questionnaire, the questions include aspects such as basic demographic information, customer expectation, perceived quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and customer complaint. The research collected 536 responses within the target demographic of people over 20 years old living in Taiwan, who have taken part in the government’s face mask distribution campaign. The demographic information is results analyzed using the t-test and the analysis of variance. Statistical analyses were done on the responses with Pearson’s correlation and multiple linear regression model.

Results:
Aspects that have the greatest effect on customer satisfaction are age, occupation, and political inclination (p<0.05). Positive correlations were observed in aspects including customer expectation, perceived quality, perceived value, and customer satisfaction. In particular, the perceived quality of the product has a direct impact on customer satisfaction.

Conclusion:
Interpreting the result of this research, the government should respond to the needs of the general public. The public’s complaints should be a clear demand of change to the government. People have certain level of expectation and satisfaction towards a public policy, and the government should include those feedback during the policymaking process, which includes making the necessary adjustments during a pandemic.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘 要 ii
Abstract iv
目 錄 vi
圖 次 viii
表 次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 1
第三節 研究範圍 2
第四節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 口罩的種類及相關法源 4
第二節 SARS疫情給予的政策經驗 5
第三節 COVID-19疫情時政策執行現況 7
第四節 顧客期望(CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS) 10
第五節 知覺品質(PERCEIVED QUALITY) 11
第六節 知覺價值(PERCEIVED VALUE) 12
第七節 顧客滿意度(CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONS) 13
第八節 顧客抱怨(CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS) 14
第九節 顧客忠誠(CUSTOMER LOYALTY) 14
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 研究流程 16
第二節 研究架構 16
第三節 研究假設 17
第四節 研究對象與研究工具 18
第五節 研究變項與定義 21
第六節 資料處理與分析方法 34
第四章 研究分析與結果 36
第一節 研究樣本之描述性統計分析 36
第二節 基本人口學與研究變項之影響 51
第三節 各構面變項對顧客滿意度之相關分析 70
第四節 各構面變項對顧客滿意度之影響程度分析 72
第五節 人口學特性變項與顧客滿意度之相關分析 78
第六節 影響滿意度之相關效果 81
第五章 討論與建議 83
第一節 研究假設驗證 83
第二節 顧客滿意度討論 87
第三節 口罩相關討論 90
第四節 研究結論與建議 91
第五節 研究限制 91
第六節 研究貢獻 92
參考文獻 93
參考文獻 References
Anderson, E. W., & Fornell, C. (2000). Foundations of the American customer satisfaction index. Total quality management, 11(7), 869-882.
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of marketing, 58(3), 53-66.
Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Marketing cues and perceived quality: Perceptions of Saudi consumers toward products of the US, Japan, Germany, Italy, UK and France. Journal of Quality management, 2(2), 217-234.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Dhruv, G. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. doi:10.2307/3172866
Edvardsson, B., Johnson, M. D., Gustafsson, A., & Strandvik, T. (2000). The effects of satisfaction and loyalty on profits and growth: products versus services. Total quality management, 11(7), 917-927.
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of marketing, 60(4), 7-18.
Garvin, D. A. (1983). Quality on the line. Harvard Business Review, 61(5).
Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention. European journal of marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.
Hoffman, K. D., & Bateson, J. E. (2001). Essentials of services marketing: Concepts, strategies and cases: South-Western Pub.
Kim, M.-K., Park, M.-C., & Jeong, D.-H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications policy, 28(2), 145-159.
Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control.
Kujala, S., Mugge, R., & Miron-Shatz, T. (2017). The role of expectations in service evaluation: A longitudinal study of a proximity mobile payment service. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 51-61.
Lovelock, C., & Wright, L. (2002). Principles of service marketing and management: Prentice Hall.
Majumdar, A. (2005). A model for customer loyalty for retail stores inside shopping malls-an Indian perspective. Journal of Services Research(Special Issue), 47-64.
Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship marketing, it’s underpinnings and aftermaths. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 70-89.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of marketing, 63(4_suppl1), 33-44.
Petrick, J. F. (2017). Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service. Journal of leisure research, 34(2), 119-134.
Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J., & Tierney, P. (1995). Going to extremes: Managing service encounters and assessing provider performance. Journal of marketing, 59(2), 83-97.
Schreyer, R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1978). The influence of experience expectations on crowding perceptions and social‐psychological carrying capacities. Leisure Sciences, 1(4), 373-394.
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
Spreng Richard, A., Mackenzie Scott, B., & Olshavasky Richard, W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of marketing, 60(3), 15-32.
Watson, D. J., Juster, R. J., & Johnson, G. W. (1991). Institutionalized use of citizen surveys in the budgetary and policy-making processes: A small city case study. Public Administration Review, 51(3), 232-239.
Woodside, A. G., Frey, L. L., & Daly, R. T. (1989). Linking sort/ice anlity, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. Journal of health care marketing, 9(4), 5-17.
Wu, P.-H., Huang, C.-Y., & Chou, C.-K. (2014). Service expectation, perceived service quality, and customer satisfaction in food and beverage industry. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 7(1), 171-180.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zheitmal, V., Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinant of customer expectation of service quality. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.
王培瑋, 璩大成, & 邱婷芳. (2020). 新冠肺炎口罩風波: 醫療資源分配倫理原則及挑戰. 北市醫學雜誌
1-12.
王婷穎. (2002). 國際觀光旅館之服務品質, 關係品質與顧客忠誠度之相關性研究─ 以台北, 台中及高雄地區為例. 南華大學論文, 94.
朱豪傑, 黃雪妍, 李良驥, 廖姿涵, & 劉淑娟. (2011). 花蓮縣原住民聯合豐年節滿意度分析-美國顧客滿意度指標(ACSI)模型之應用. Retrieved May 01, 2021, from http://docsplayer.com/docview/51/28561020/#file=/storage/51/28561020/28561020.pdf
行政院衛生署食品藥物管理局. (2011). 我國醫用口罩管理制度簡介. Retrieved March 10, 2021, from https://www.health.ntpc.gov.tw/archive/health_ntpc/6/file/%E9%86%AB%E7%94%A8%E5%8F%A3%E7%BD%A9%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6.pdf
吳宜蓁. (2004). SARS風暴的危機溝通與現階段宣導策略檢視:以臺灣政府為例. 遠景基金會季刊, 第五卷(第四期), 107-150.
呂正華. (2020). 跨域合作打造口罩國家隊. 國土及公共治理季刊, 8(4), 38-45.
李伯璋, 張禹斌, 張齡芝, 林右鈞, & 陳孜瑜. (2020). 線上線下整合與公私協力 [口罩實名制] 協助抗疫成功典範. 國土及公共治理季刊, 8(4), 30-37.
李騰翔. (2010). 全民健康保險制度與民眾滿意度之研究. 淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士班學位論文, 1-65.
林綺薇. (2020). ETtoday民調》85%民眾憂台灣疫情大爆發 近5成民眾因買不到口罩恐慌. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from https://www.storm.mg/article/2353166
高嘉宏. (2018). 以歐洲顧客滿意度模式探討百貨美食街之研究. 朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系學位論文, 1-110.
國家發展委員會. (2003). 民眾對嚴重急性呼吸道症候群(SARS)等議題的看法. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_915_4006
國家發展委員會. (2017). 「民眾對政府服務品質滿意度」民意調查加權百分比摘要表. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/5648/27196/%e5%8a%a0%e6%ac%8a%e7%99%be%e5%88%86%e6%af%94%e6%91%98%e8%a6%81%e8%a1%a8.pdf
梁世武. (2006). 從政黨認同、施政滿意度之觀點尋找獨立選民:2002高雄市長選舉個案分析: 雙葉書廊.
盛治仁, & 白瑋華. (2008). 陳水扁總統首任施政評價影響因素探討. [A Study of the Factors Influencing President Chen's Popularity in His First Term]. 東吳政治學報, 26(1), 1-50. doi:10.6418/sjps.200803.0001
陳佳音, 柯妍嬪, 薛淑青, 林宗憲, & 陳美杏. (2020). 民眾對於新型冠狀病毒肺炎防疫措施之重要性認知與滿意程度. 健康促進研究與實務, 3(2), 21-29.
陳怡靜, & 胡學誠. (2013). 以 ACSI 模式驗證國內銀行業顧客滿意度之因果關係. 臺灣銀行季刊, 64(1), 67-83.
陳威有. (2020). 服務品質與顧客滿意度. 全球科技管理與教育期刊, 9(4), 24-41.
陳博志. (2020). 政府干預口罩市場的經濟學理. 臺灣經濟研究月刊, 43(4), 8-11.
黃國敏. (2005). 政策民意與施政滿意度調查之探討:苗栗縣政府個案研究 政策研究學報, 5(1), 103-144.
經濟部工業局. (2020). 經濟部呼籲業者秉持誠信,說明混充醫用口罩真相. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=91236
經濟部國際貿易局. (2020). 公告自109年1月24日起至109年2月23日止CCC6307.90.50.10-6「紡織材料製口罩,過濾效果94%及以上者」及CCC6307.90.50.20-4「其他紡織材料製口罩」2項貨品增列輸出規定代號「111」,並列入「限制輸出貨品表」。. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=2&menu_id=41&news_id=88547
趙恩, 陳國緯, & 李思賢. (2021). 台灣公民面對新冠肺炎疫情初期之焦慮症狀與防疫作為之趨勢. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 40(1), 83-96.
劉哲綸. (2004). 中央政府危機溝通策略與經濟社會效能之研究—以 SARS 引起的口罩荒與股市震盪為例. 臺灣大學新聞研究所學位論文, 1-132.
衛生福利部. (2020). COVID-19(武漢肺炎)疫情現況及應處作為-懶人包. Retrieved Decemver 15, 2020, from https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/B62FC3962EC2DA1D?A=C
衛生福利部中央健康保險署. (2020). 口罩實名制1.0、2.0、3.0超級比一比. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/DL.aspx?sitessn=292&u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMjkyL3JlbGZpbGUvNzU5Ni8yNDE3L%2bmZhOS7tuS4gOOAgeWPo%2be9qTEuMC0zLjDotoXntJrmr5TkuIDmr5QoMTA5MDQzMCkucGRm&n=6ZmE5Lu25LiA44CB5Y%2bj572pMS4wLTMuMOi2hee0muavlOS4gOavlCgxMDkwNDMwKS5wZGY%3d
蘇彩足, 黃錦堂, 彭錦鵬, & 孫煒. (2005). 從SARS 的因應檢討台灣的行政治理模式(子計畫七). Retrieved December 12, 2020, from 行政院國家科學委員會: https://www.ea.sinica.edu.tw/file/File/[%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A]%20%E5%BE%9ESARS%E7%9A%84%E5%9B%A0%E6%87%89%E6%AA%A2%E8%A8%8E%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%9A%84%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%90%86%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F(%E5%AD%90%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E4%B8%83)%20(2003).pdf
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-23
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-23

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.222.240.21
現在時間是 2024-04-29
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2031-07-23

Your IP address is 18.222.240.21
The current date is 2024-04-29
This thesis will be available to you on 2031-07-23.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2026-07-23

QR Code