Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0625122-194942 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0625122-194942
論文名稱
Title
企業社會責任與避稅的關聯:汙染產業的探討
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Avoidance: Discussion of Polluting Industries
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
51
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-07-18
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-07-25
關鍵字
Keywords
避稅、企業社會責任、汙染、財稅差異、負債比
Tax avoidance, corporate social responsibility, pollution, fiscal and tax differences, debt ratio
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 290 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 290 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究係探討汙染產業中有企業社會責任績效的公司與避稅的關聯性。研究發現,有企業社會責任績效較好的公司會與財稅差異呈現正相關、與有效稅率呈現負相關,顯示企業的CSR績效愈高,也可能會進行租稅規避情事。進一步探討高汙染產業與CSR的避稅關係,實證結果,高汙染產業CSR績效分數愈佳,財稅差異呈顯著的正相關,企業避稅程度愈高。另在有CSR公司的細項分類指標中,社會責任分類指標及環境保護分類指標與財稅差異呈現正向關係,顯示企業因投入CSR活動而產生的避稅效果較大。本文也發現有企業社會責任的公司CSR活動支出金額較高且負債比較低的企業,其與有效稅率會呈現正相關,顯示企業會透過舉債的利息費用支出達到盈餘管理目的,而進行租稅規劃。
Abstract
This study examines the association of companies with CSR performance in polluting industries and tax avoidance. The study found that companies with better corporate social responsibility performance have a positive correlation with fiscal and tax differences and a negative correlation with effective tax rates, indicating that the higher the company's CSR performance, the more likely it is to avoid tax evasion. Further explore the relationship between high-polluting industries and CSR tax avoidance. The empirical results show that the higher the CSR performance score of high-polluting industries, the greater the positive correlation between fiscal and tax differences, and the higher the degree of corporate tax avoidance. In addition, in the sub-category indicators of CSR companies, the social responsibility category indicators and environmental protection category indicators have a positive relationship with the difference in fiscal and taxation, indicating that enterprises have a greater tax avoidance effect due to their investment in CSR activities. This paper also finds that companies with corporate social responsibility have higher CSR activities expenditures and lower debts, and their effective tax rates will be positively correlated , indicating that companies will achieve earnings management through the interest expenses of borrowing debt. planning.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目 錄 iv
第一章、緒論 1
第二章、文獻回顧與假說 4
2.1 企業社會責任理論與租稅管理 4
2.2 企業社會責任盈餘績效及衡量 6
2.3 CSR與租稅規避的關係 7
2.4 企業營運現金對CSR的影響 8
2.5 研究假說 10
第三章、資料敘述和研究方法 10
3.1資料來源及樣本選取 10
3.2變數定義與衡量 12
3.2.1應變數之衡量: 13
3.2.2自變數之衡量: 14
3.2.3控制變數之衡量: 15
第四章、實證結果 18
4.1各變數敘述性統計 18
4.2相關性係數檢定 19
4.3迴歸實證分析 21
4.4汙染產業對避稅影響 24
4.4.1高汙染產業對避稅迴歸 24
4.4.2低汙染產業對避稅迴歸 27
4.4.3高低汙染產業二群比較 29
第五章、額外分析 31
5.1 CSR分類指標與避稅分析 31
5.2 CSR和負債比交互作用下與避稅影響 34
第六章、結論與研究限制 35
附錄 低污染認定基準 37
參考文獻 39
一、國內部分 39
二、國外部分 40
參考文獻 References
一、國內部分
汪瑞芝、 李佳駿. (2019).企業社會責任對避稅行為之影響.證券市場發展季刊, 31(1), 47-86.
王肇蘭、蔡怡徵. (2016).企業社會責任與財稅差異之關聯.會計審計論叢, 6(1), 1-22.
侯啟娉、蔡玉琴、倪伯煌、李子文. (2017).財務績效,公司稅與企業社會責任揭露.商管科技季刊, 18(1), 75-100.
蘇迺惠、朱珮瑜.(2020).企業社會責任與租稅規避之關係:經理人持股的調節效果.會計評論, (71),133-182.
錢為家.(2009).企業社會責任實務全書:第四代企業的價值驅動優勢.商周出版.
魏妤珊、邱敬貿、黃淑惠. (2015).法人董事與企業避稅:台灣股票市場之實證研究.證券市場發展季刊,27(4), 1-42.
林嬌能.(2016).獨立董事在企業租稅規劃的監督效果.會計審計論叢,6(1),5-86.
魏妤珊.(2017).有社會責任的公司比較不會避稅嗎?-台灣上市公司實證.管理與系統,24(3),393-431.
陳育成、許峰睿、黃聖雯.(2013).企業社會責任與經營績效之關聯性研究.評價學報,(6),53-72.
黃美祝、楊佩璇.(2011).集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較.會計學報, 4(1), 1-22.
陳明進、蔡麗雯.(2006).財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究.管理學報, 23(6),739-763.
鄭明典.(2016).企業社會責任與信用評等及股權結構之關聯性研究.碩士論文/ 臺灣大學
尹立宇.( 2015) .經理人持股是否能降低代理問題.碩士論文/成功大學

簡良恩.(2017).企業社會責任對現金持有及現金價值之影響.碩士論文/臺灣大學

陳彥芳. (2018).企業社會責任與公司風險之關聯性.碩士論文/臺灣大學

蔡宗霖.(2005).違反企業道德的行為者,決策者及行為類型對道德判斷的影 響 (Doctoral dissertation).

二、國外部分
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 31(1), 86-108.


Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and strategic tax behavior. In Tax and corporate governance (pp. 183-198). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.

Cheng, C. A., Huang, H. H., Li, Y., & Stanfield, J. (2012). The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1493-1526.

Cheung, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance.

Christensen, D. M. (2016). Corporate accountability reporting and high-profile misconduct. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 377-399.

Col, B., & Patel, S. (2019). Going to haven? Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1033-1050.

Davis, R., & Weisbeck, C. (2016). Creating a supportive environment using cues for wayfinding in dementia. Journal of gerontological nursing, 42(3), 36-44.

Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179.

Desai, M. A., Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of financial economics, 84(3), 591-623.

Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The accounting review, 83(1), 61-82.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Ferreira, M. A., & Vilela, A. S. (2004). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. European financial management, 10(2), 295-319.


Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.

Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The accounting review, 84(2), 467-496.

Fassin, D. (2005). 1. L'ordre moral du monde Essai d'anthropologie de l'intolérable. In Les constructions de l'intolérable (pp. 17-50). La Découverte.

Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of management review, 30(4), 777-798.

Graham, J. R. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt?. The journal of finance, 55(5), 1901-1941.

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.

Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 50(1), 33-44.

Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The accounting review, 88(6), 2025-2059.

Hou, C. P., Tsai, Y. C., Ni, B. H., & Lee, T. W. (2017). Financial performance, corporate tax and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Commerce & Management Quarterly, 18(1), 75.

Huseynov, F., & Klamm, B. K. (2012). Tax avoidance, tax management and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 804-827.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Agency Costs and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.


Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 31(1), 86-108.

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 439-457.

McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.

McKendall, M., Sánchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.

Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?. Journal of corporate finance, 16(5), 703-718.

Nugraha,M,H,&Rohman,A.(2018).Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap tax Aggressiveness (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2013-2015) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).

Preston, L. E., & O'bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.


Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68-88.

rnell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial management, 5-14.

Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business ethics quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.

Shah, S. Z. A., & Hussain, Z. (2012). Impact of ownership structure on firm performance evidence from non-financial listed companies at Karachi Stock Exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 84(3), 6-13.

Sikka, P. (2011). Accounting for human rights: The challenge of globalization and foreign investment agreements. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(8), 811-827.

Stickney, C. P., & McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of accounting and public policy, 1(2), 125-152.

Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance.

Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of management review, 10(3), 540-557.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.

Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature.

Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The accounting review, 84(3), 969-999.

Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of corporate finance, 9(3), 295-316.

Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-07-25

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.224.95.38
現在時間是 2024-04-30
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-07-25

Your IP address is 18.224.95.38
The current date is 2024-04-30
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-07-25.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-07-25

QR Code