論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-07-25
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-07-25
論文名稱 Title |
從故鄉到他鄉:探討離散組織在維繫香港人身份中的角色 From Homeland to Taiwan: Examining the Role of Diaspora Groups in Sustaining Hong Kong Identity |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
125 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2025-01-16 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-07-25 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
離散、身份認同、社會資本、香港、台灣 Diaspora, Identity, Social capital, Hong Kong, Taiwan |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 451 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 451 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
在2019年反對《逃犯條例修訂草案》運動(反送中運動)及後續的政治事件發生後,香港經歷了一波大規模的移民潮。隨著香港人移民至世界各地,離散團體與相關活動也逐漸增加。由於關於香港離散團體的研究相對有限,本論文探討了離散港人組織在維持在台香港移民政治認同的角色。透過兩種質性研究方法,包括深度訪談和參與觀察法,呈現離散活動參與者和非參與者的經驗。本研究發現離散團體的功能包括:建立社群、提供情感與資訊支援,以及議題倡議。研究強調香港身份中的政治層面,包括對法治、政治制度的尊重、中國影響與反威權主義,以及對民主價值的堅持。研究結果顯示,離散活動是維持在台香港人政治身份的一股推動力。 此外,研究也發現,香港離散群體的概念與2019年的反送中運動有著密切關係。反送中運動作為一個關鍵事件,讓在運動前後移民的人,產生了一種離散認同。此外,生活經驗、與香港人之間的情感與社會聯繫,以及與故鄉的關係,也對離散身份的認同產生了重要影響。 雖然研究主要聚焦於台灣,但同時為未來同類研究提供了比較視角,從而檢視香港移民在不同國家和時間的經驗。 |
Abstract |
After the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (Anti-ELAB) Movement and the subsequent political upheavals, Hong Kong experiences a massive wave of migration. Alongside this migration, the number of diaspora groups and related activities increased around the globe. With a limited number of studies about Hong Kong diaspora groups, this thesis examines the role of diaspora groups in sustaining the political identity of Hong Kong migrants in Taiwan. By employing a qualitative research approach, the study used in-depth interviews and participant observations to capture the experiences of both participants and non-participants in diasporic activities. The study identifies the functions of diaspora groups, which include community building, providing emotional and information support, and as a way of advocacy. Additionally, the research highlights the civic dimensions of Hong Kong identity. It includes the components of respect for legal-political institutions, China influence and anti-authoritarianism, and democratic values. The research finding reveals that diasporic activities acts as a driving force in sustaining the political identity of Hongkongers in Taiwan. The research further found that the concept of the Hong Kong diaspora relates to the 2019 Anti-ELAB Movement. The movement served as a pivotal event, fostering a collective diasporic identity among individuals who migrated before and after the movement. Furthermore, living experiences, emotional and social ties with people in Hong Kong, and relationships with the homeland also shape their perceptions of diasporic identity. While primarily focused on Taiwan, this research offers a comparative perspective for future studies to examine the experiences of Hong Kong migrants across nations and time. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Table of Contents 論文審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iv Abstract v Table of Contents vii Table of Figures ix Table of Tables x 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 Diaspora 4 2.2 Identity 8 2.3 Social Capital in Diaspora Community 22 3. Research Question and Design 26 3.1 Hong Kong migrants in Taiwan as a single case study 26 3.2 Methodology 28 4. Results and Discussion 39 4.1 Engagement of the diaspora groups 41 4.2 Political Identity of the Interviewees 57 4.3 Sustaining political identity through the diaspora activities 67 5. Further Discussion of Hong Kong diaspora in Taiwan 79 5.1 The formation of Hong Kong diaspora in Taiwan 79 6. Research Limitation 91 7. Conclusion 93 7.1 Research Findings 93 7.2 Future research directions 97 Reference 98 Appendix 104 Table of Figures Figure 1-1: Movements of Hong Kong residents during the period (end-2012 – end 2022) 2 Figure 2-1: Hong Kong people’s ethnic identity survey 12 Table of Tables Table 3 1: Questions for participants concerning function of diaspora groups 29 Table 3 2: Questions for non-participants concerning diaspora groups 30 Table 3 3: Questions for participants concerning identity 33 Table 3 4: Questions for non-participants concerning identity 34 Table 4 1: List of Interviewees 40 Table 4 2: Hong Kong Diaspora Groups in Taiwan 41 Table 5 1: Interviewees’ status of diaspora 80 |
參考文獻 References |
Reference Aça, M. (2023). The Role of Rituals and Ceremonies in the Identity Struggle of a Society that Has Lost Its Language: The Example of Lithuanian Tatars. Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.15388/Totoriai-Lietuvosistorijoje. 2023.8 Adinolfi, M. C. (2019). SOCIAL CAPITAL AND THE MAKING OF DIASPORA: EVIDENCE FROM THE PORTUGUESE COMMUNITY OF JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 25(2), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.25222-380 Anderson, B. R. O. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). J.G. Richardson. Westport CT: Greenwood Press. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2009). Digital diasporas: Identity and transnational engagement. Cambridge University Press. Butler, K. D. (2001). Defining Diaspora, Refining a Discourse. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10(2), 189–219. https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.2011.0014 Census and Statistics Department. (n.d.). 2021 Population Census. 2021 Population Census. Retrieved December 24, 2024, from https://idds.census2021.gov.hk/app/idds.html# CHAN, Y. W., & FUNG, H. (2018). Life ‘offshored’: New migrations to Taiwan from post-1997 Hong Kong. In New Chinese Migrations Mobility, Home, and Inspirations-Routledge (2017).epub. Routledge. Chen, A. H. Y. (2019). A Perfect Storm: Hong Kong - Mainland China Rendition of Fugitive Offenders 2019. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3469366 Cheng, J. (2009). The story of a new policy. Hong Kong Journal. http://www.hkbasiclaw.com/Hong%20Kong%20Journal/Cheng%20Jie%20articl e.htm Chow, S., Fu, K., & Ng, Y.-L. (2020). Development of the Hong Kong Identity Scale: Differentiation between Hong Kong ‘Locals’ and Mainland Chinese in Cultural and Civic Domains. Journal of Contemporary China, 29(124), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1677365 Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302–338. Cohen, R. (2008). Global diasporas: An introduction (2. ed). Routledge. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. Davis, J. B. (2014). Social Capital and Social Identity: Trust and Conflict. In Social Capital and Economics: Social Values, Power, and Identity (A. Christoforou and J. Davis). Routledge. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. W. W. Norton Company. Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates: Collective Identity in Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x Fong, B. C. H. (2017). One Country, Two Nationalisms: Center-Periphery Relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong, 1997–2016. Modern China, 43(5), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700417691470 ———. (2020). Stateless nation within a nationless state: The political past, present, and future of Hongkongers, 1949–2019. Nations and Nationalism, 26(4), 1069– 1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12556 ———. (2022). Diaspora formation and mobilisation: The emerging Hong Kong diaspora in the anti‐extradition bill movement. Nations and Nationalism, 28(3), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12804 ———. (2023). Sub-State Identity Conception: Applying ISSP Measures at Territorial Autonomy Level. Social Indicators Research, 165(3), 919–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03033-1 Foster, M. K., Meinhard, A. G., & Berger, I. (2003). The role of social capital: Bridging, bonding or both? Gober, G., & Struzik, J. (2019). Feminist transnational diaspora in the making. The case of the #BlackProtest. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 30(4), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.4.5 Gongaware, T. B. (2010). Collective Memory Anchors: Collective Identity and Continuity in Social Movements. Sociological Focus, 43(3), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2010.10571377 Government of Canada. (2022, November 29). CIMM – Hong Kong Measures – November 29, 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugeescitizenship/ corporate/transparency/committees/cimm-nov-29-2022/hong-kongmeasures. html Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties.pdf. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Hall, S. (2015). Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory (pp. 392–403). Routledge. Ho, J. C. (2022). Understanding Hong Kong nationalism: A topic network approach. Nations and Nationalism, 28(4), 1249–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12805 Hong Kong Free Press. (2022, June 29). Timeline: 58 Hong Kong civil society groups disband following the onset of the security law. Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. https://hongkongfp.com/2022/06/30/explainer-over-50-groups-gone-in-11- months-how-hong-kongs-pro-democracy-forces-crumbled/ How many people come to the UK each year (including visitors)? (2023, February 23). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-systemstatistics- year-ending-december-2022/how-many-people-come-to-the-uk-eachyear- including-visitors Johnson, G. E., & Lary, D. (2016). Hong Kong migration to Canada: The background. In Reluctant Exiles?: Migration from Hong Kong and the New Overseas Chinese (R. Skeldon&X. (Shawn) Wang, pp. 87–97). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315483139 Kleist, N. (2014). Understanding Diaspora Organisations in European Development Cooperation—Approaches, Challenges and Ways Ahead. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54544073 Kramer, R. M., Hanna, B. A., Su, S., & Wei, J. (2014). Collective Identity, Collective Trust, and Social Capital: Linking Group Identification and Group Cooperation. In Groups at Work: Theory and Research (Turner, Marlene E.). Psychology Press. Kwan, J. P. (2016). The Rise of Civic Nationalism: Shifting Identities in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2, 941–973. Lau, Sze-Ching, & Yang, William. (2023). . , 8(12), 1–29. Lee, F. L. F. (2023). Proactive internationalization and diaspora mobilization in a networked movement: The case of Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill protests. Social Movement Studies, 22(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2031957 Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., Tang, G., & Cheng, E. W. (2019). Hong Kong’s Summer of Uprising: From Anti-Extradition to Anti-Authoritarian Protests. China Review, 19(4), 1–32. Liu, N., & Chan, H. (2011). A social identity perspective on participation in virtual healthcare communities. A social identity perspective on participation in virtual healthcare communities, Shanghai. Liu, Z. (1997). Hongkongese or Chinese: The problem of identity on the eve of resumption of Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong. Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Ma, N. (2015). The Rise of "Anti-China" Sentiments in Hong Kong and the 2012 Legislative Council Elections. The China Review An Interdisciplinary Journal on Greater China, 15(1), 39–66. Mathews, G. (1997). Hèunggóngyàhn: On the past, present, and future of Hong Kong identity. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.1997.10413089 Mathews, G., Ma, E., & Lui, T.-L. (2008). Hong Kong, China: Learning to belong to a nation (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946510 Purbrick, M. (2019). A REPORT OF THE 2019 HONG KONG PROTESTS. Asian Affairs, 50(4), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1672397 Putnam, R. D. (1993). THE PROSPEROUS COMMUNITY Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 4, 35–42. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.2307/420517 Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community (1. Touchstone ed). Simon & Schuster [u.a.]. Rex, J., Joly, D., & Wilpert, C. (1987). Introduction: The scope of a comparative study. In Immigrant associations in Europe. Gower. Reynolds, T. (2006). Caribbean families, social capital and young people’s diasporic identities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(6), 1087–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600960362 Safran, W. (1991). Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.1991.0004 Sheffer, G. (2003a). Primary Questions and Hypotheses. In Diaspora Politics: At Home Abroad (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499432 Sheffer, G. (2003b). Stateless and State-Linked Diasporas. In Diaspora Politics: At Home Abroad. Cambridge University Press. Smeekes, A., & Verkuyten, M. (2014). Perceived Group Continuity, Collective Self- Continuity, and In-Group Identification. Self and Identity, 13(6), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.898685 Smeekes, A., & Verkuyten, M. (2015). The presence of the past: Identity continuity and group dynamics. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 162–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1112653 So, A. Y. (2016). The Making of Hong Kong Nationalism. In Asian Nationalisms Reconsidered (Jeff Kingston, pp. 135–146). Routledge. Sokefeld, M. (2006). Mobilizing in transnational space: A social movement approach to the formation of diaspora. Global Networks, 6(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00144.x Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relation (William G. Austin, Stephen Worchel, pp. 7– 24). Hall Publishers. Taylor, V. (1989). Social Movement Continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 761. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117752 Tsang, S. (2004). The rise of a Hong Kong identity. In China Today (pp. 236–253). Routledge. Types of British nationality. (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved November 7, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/types-of-british-nationality/british-national-overseas Ugurlu, O. (2014). Identity Formation and Community Organization among Kurdish Diaspora in London. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/12 Wear, A. (2024, November). Invisible Decline: Violations of Digital Rights in Hong Kong and their Impact. Hong Kong Watch. Winter, I. C. (with Australian Institute of Family Studies). (2000). Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Wong, K. C.-P. (2021). From helmets to face masks: How collective emotions sustain diaspora mobilization from homeland uprising to global pandemic among the Hong Kongers. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies, 17(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/STICS-10-2020-0028 Wu, R. (2016). The Lilliputian dreams: Preliminary observations of nationalism in Okinawa, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Nations and Nationalism, 22(4), 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12251 Yan, H. W. (2023). Imagining the Hong Kong Diaspora as an Imagined Community through the Lens of Relationality as a Feminist Spirituality. In S. S.-M. Kwan & W.-Y. Chow (Eds.), Asian Spiritualities and Social Transformation (pp. 27–41). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2641-1_3 Yang, S. (2024). Decoding Mixed Identities in Hong Kong: A Clustering Analysis of Multiple Identity Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 171(2), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03248-w Yew, C. P., & Kwong, K. (2014). Hong Kong Identity on the Rise. Asian Survey, 54(6), 1088–1112. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2014.54.6.1088 Yin, Francis. (2015). . , 13(9), 71–84. 中華人民共和國教育部,2021,〈粵港澳大灣區語言生活狀況報告(2021)〉, 有關情況: http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2021/53486/sfcl/202106/t20210602_534892.ht ml,檢索日期:2024 年11 月20 日。 中華民國內政部移民署,2024,〈中華民國內政部移民署-大數據分析平台〉,陸 港澳人民來臺居留定居分析: https://egate.immigration.gov.tw/biweb/cnResidence 張炳良,2011,〈香港身份:本土性、國族性與全球性的交織〉,載於《香港‧生 活‧文化》,呂大樂、吳俊雄、馬傑偉編,香港:牛津大學出版社,1-20。 彭麗君,2020,〈人民作為一種修辭?香港「反逃犯條例運動」中的民主與身分 認同〉,《文化研究》,(31),152-162。 https://doi.org/10.6752/JCS.202010_(31).0006 徐承恩,2019,香港, 鬱躁的家邦: 本土觀點的香港源流史 (增修版),台灣:左岸 文化。 政府統計處,2022,〈表E2021A : 2021 年人口普查—主要統計表(人口)〉, 政府統計處: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/tc/EIndexbySubject.html?scode=600&pcode=D52 12101#section1,檢索日期:2024 年2 月22 日。 李澄欣,2023,〈香港國安法「域外效力」引發寒蟬效應 海外港人的噤聲與堅 持〉,BBC News 中文:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news- 66107890,檢索日期:2024 年11 月20 日。 香港政治演辭優秀選,2004,〈維護香港核心價值宣言〉,Hong Kong Great Speeches 香港政治演辭優秀選: https://hkspeech.wordpress.com/2004/06/07/%e7%b6%ad%e8%ad%b7%e9%a6 %99%e6%b8%af%e6%a0%b8%e5%bf%83%e5%83%b9%e5%80%bc%e5%ae %a3%e8%a8%80/,檢索日期:2023 年12 月26 日。 華僑日報,1969,〈香港節創造香港精神〉, 香港公共圖書館多媒體資訊系統: https://mmis.hkpl.gov.hk/searchresult? p_p_id=search_WAR_mmisportalportlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=n ormal&_search_WAR_mmisportalportlet_keywords=%E8%8F%AF%E5%83% 91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201969+07&_search_WAR_mmisportalportle t_hsf=%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201969+07& p_r_p_- 1078056564_actual_q=%28%20%28%20allTermsMandatory%3A%28true%29 %20OR+all_dc.title%3A%28%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5% A0%B1%201969+07%29%20OR+all_dc.creator%3A%28%E8%8F%AF%E5% 83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201969+07%29%20OR+all_dc.contribut or%3A%28%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201969 +07%29%20OR+all_dc.subject%3A%28%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97 %A5%E5%A0%B1%201969+07%29%20OR+fulltext%3A%28%E8%8F%AF %E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201969+07%29%20OR+all_dc.de scription%3A%28%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%2 01969+07%29%20%29%20AND+%28%20dc.category.category%3A%28News paper%29%20%29%20%29&p_r_p_- 1078056564_sort_field=dc.publicationdate_bsort&_search_WAR_mmisportalp ortlet_mode=Basic&p_r_p_-1078056564_collection_type=Newspaper&p_r_p_- 1078056564_curr_page=1&p_r_p_-1078056564_new_search=true&p_r_p_- 1078056564_q=%E8%8F%AF%E5%83%91%E6%97%A5%E5%A0%B1%201 969+07&p_r_p_- 1078056564_sort_order=asc&_search_WAR_mmisportalportlet_jspPage=%2Fj sp%2Fsearch%2Fcnsc05.jsp 郭康健,1998,〈母語教學與改變中的香港語言環境〉,載於《母語教育的理論 與實踐》,郭康健、陳城禮編,香港:香港教師會,284 - 301。 鄧城鋒,2008,〈關於普教中討論的反思〉,《基礎教育學報》,17(2),1–13。 陳麗華及吳雯婷,2011,〈形塑香港特區的國家認同-中小學社會教科書之論述 分析〉,《教科書研究》,4(2),25-59。 https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201112.0025 香港民意研究所,2022,〈身分類別認同〉,HKPORI - 香港民意研究所: https://www.pori.hk/pop-poll/ethnic-identity-en/q001.html,檢索日期:2024 年10 月1 日。 馬傑偉, 2002,〈電視文化的歷史分析〉,載於《閱讀香港普及文化:1970- 2000》,吳俊雄、張志偉編,香港:牛津大學出版社,138-142。 黎逸銘, 2020,〈香港人的身份認同的演變:以2008 年到2019 年為例〉,《中 國行政評論》,26(3)。https://doi.org/10.6635/cpar.202009_26(3).0003 簡毅慧及柯皓翔,2024,〈【Data Reporter】反送中運動5 週年:從人流、經 濟、文化數據看香港的改變與走向—報導者 The Reporter〉,報導者 The Reporter:https://www.twreporter.org/a/data-reporter-hong-kong-extraditionbill- protests-fifth-anniversary,檢索日期:2024 年12 月23 日。 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-07-25 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2030-07-25 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.97.9.168 現在時間是 2026-09-15 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2030-07-25 Your IP address is 18.97.9.168 The current date is 2026-09-15 This thesis will be available to you on 2030-07-25. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2030-07-25 |
QR Code |